google trusted stores on single app application - store

Has anyone tried to implement google trusted store badges on single app pages?
My badge appears on the first time that I access the page but when I go another page, like product detail page, the badge disappears.
I couldn't find any reference on google about it.

Same problem here. I read through the script that is inserted by Google Trusted Stores, and they don't provide any public method to re-initialize the script, or a destroy method to revert the changes they've already made to your document.
As a dirty last resort, you can manually remove the badge and previous script, then include the script again to have it re-run. There is a small caveat here... the first time the script runs it creates a read-only property on the window object, window.GoogleTrustedStore. The script won't run a second time if that property is defined.
You can prevent this property from being configured as readonly if you define it before Google's script does. Here's an example of all of this:
// Define object as configurable before Google Trusted Stores locks it.
// Need to be able to overwrite this property later to re-initiliaze the script.
Object.defineProperty(window, 'GoogleTrustedStore', {configurable: true});
var gts = window.gts || [];
gts.push(["locale", "en_US"]);
// ... finish defining your gts options
// Insert the GTS script to run it:
(function() {
const script = document.createElement("script");
script.src = "//www.googlecommerce.com/trustedstores/api/js";
const s = document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(script, s);
})();
// Using timeout for demonstration purposes
setTimeout(function(){
// Dirty example of destroying the existing badge
var dirtyDestroy = document.querySelectorAll('#gts-comm, #gts-c, script[src^="http://www.googlecommerce.com"], script[src^="https://www.googlecommerce.com"], script[src^="http://www.gstatic.com/trustedstores"], script[src^="https://www.gstatic.com/trustedstores"]');
[].slice.call(dirtyDestroy,0).forEach(function(el){el.parentNode.removeChild(el)});
// Reset window.GoogleTrustedStore
Object.defineProperty(window, 'GoogleTrustedStore', {value: undefined});
// Insert the script again to re-run it:
(function() {
const script = document.createElement("script");
script.src = "//www.googlecommerce.com/trustedstores/api/js";
const s = document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(script, s);
})();
}, 5000);

Related

galen: how to wait dynamic new page with same url

I started working with Galen and I had this test that was working perfectly:
this.HomePage = $page('Welcome Page', {
aboutButton: 'nav.navbar .about'
});
this.AboutPage = $page('About page', {
modalContent: 'div.modal-content',
supportLink: '.support-link',
dismissButton: '.dismiss'
});
var homePage = new HomePage(driver);
homePage.waitForIt();
homePage.aboutButton.click();
var aboutPage = new AboutPage(driver);
aboutPage.waitForIt();
I understand that the waitForIt method waits for all the attributes defined by page so the framework knows when to execute the next statement.
Now, I want to run this as a grunt task and I've been using grunt-galenframework, and I configured it correctly, everything is working, but I can't make the previous test pass, the task code is as follows:
load('../gl.js');
forAll(config.getDevices(), function (device) {
test('simple test on ' + device.deviceName, function () {
gl.openPage(device, config.getProjectPage(), "Welcome Page", {
aboutButton: 'nav.navbar .about'
});
elements.aboutButton.click();
// MISSING WAIT FOR ABOUT_PAGE
gl.runSpecFile(device, './test/responsive/galen/about.gspec');
});
});
As you can see, I get into the Welcome Page and then I need to click a button, wait for a dialog to appear, and then check the about.gspec specs (they verify elements inside the dialog).
So how can I add a wait for new elements to appear on the same URL? it feels like grunt-galenframework only offers wait when entering a new url, with the openPage method.
you could try
elements.newElement.waitToBeShown()
The methods from here should be available.
PS: I'm the author of the grunt plugin for Galen and also involved in the development of the Galen Framework itself

Why doesn't Meteor.user() work inside publish functions?

Mainly out of curiosity, but also for a better understanding of Meteor security, what is the reason(ing) behind Meteor.user() not working inside publish functions?
The reason is in this piece of code (from meteor source code)
Meteor.user = function () {
var userId = Meteor.userId();
if (!userId)
return null;
return Meteor.users.findOne(userId);
};
Meteor.userId = function () {
// This function only works if called inside a method. In theory, it
// could also be called from publish statements, since they also
// have a userId associated with them. However, given that publish
// functions aren't reactive, using any of the infomation from
// Meteor.user() in a publish function will always use the value
// from when the function first runs. This is likely not what the
// user expects. The way to make this work in a publish is to do
// Meteor.find(this.userId()).observe and recompute when the user
// record changes.
var currentInvocation = DDP._CurrentInvocation.get();
if (!currentInvocation)
throw new Error("Meteor.userId can only be invoked in method calls. Use this.userId in publish functions.");
return currentInvocation.userId;
};

Chrome Extenion - chrome.tabs.executescript - how to pass a variable in the code parameter [duplicate]

How can I pass a parameter to the JavaScript in a content script file which is injected using:
chrome.tabs.executeScript(tab.id, {file: "content.js"});
There's not such a thing as "pass a parameter to a file".
What you can do is to either insert a content script before executing the file, or sending a message after inserting the file. I will show an example for these distinct methods below.
Set parameters before execution of the JS file
If you want to define some variables before inserting the file, just nest chrome.tabs.executeScript calls:
chrome.tabs.executeScript(tab.id, {
code: 'var config = 1;'
}, function() {
chrome.tabs.executeScript(tab.id, {file: 'content.js'});
});
If your variable is not as simple, then I recommend to use JSON.stringify to turn an object in a string:
var config = {somebigobject: 'complicated value'};
chrome.tabs.executeScript(tab.id, {
code: 'var config = ' + JSON.stringify(config)
}, function() {
chrome.tabs.executeScript(tab.id, {file: 'content.js'});
});
With the previous method, the variables can be used in content.js in the following way:
// content.js
alert('Example:' + config);
Set parameters after execution of the JS file
The previous method can be used to set parameters after the JS file. Instead of defining variables directly in the global scope, you can use the message passing API to pass parameters:
chrome.tabs.executeScript(tab.id, {file: 'content.js'}, function() {
chrome.tabs.sendMessage(tab.id, 'whatever value; String, object, whatever');
});
In the content script (content.js), you can listen for these messages using the chrome.runtime.onMessage event, and handle the message:
chrome.runtime.onMessage.addListener(function(message, sender, sendResponse) {
// Handle message.
// In this example, message === 'whatever value; String, object, whatever'
});
There are five general ways to pass data to a content script injected with tabs.executeScript()(MDN):
Set the data prior to injecting the script
Use chrome.storage.local(MDN) to pass the data (set prior to injecting your script).
Inject code prior to your script which sets a variable with the data (see detailed discussion for possible security issue).
Set a cookie for the domain in which the content script is being injected. This method can also be used to pass data to manifest.json content scripts which are injected at document_start, without the need for the content script to perform an asynchronous request.
Send/set the data after injecting the script
Use message passing(MDN) to pass the data after your script is injected.
Use chrome.storage.onChanged(MDN) in your content script to listen for the background script to set a value using chrome.storage.local.set()(MDN).
Use chrome.storage.local (set prior to executing your script)
Using this method maintains the execution paradigm you are using of injecting a script that performs a function and then exits. It also does not have the potential security issue of using a dynamic value to build executing code, which is done in the second option below.
From your popup script:
Store the data using chrome.storage.local.set()(MDN).
In the callback for chrome.storage.local.set(), call tabs.executeScript()(MDN).
var updateTextTo = document.getElementById('comments').value;
chrome.storage.local.set({
updateTextTo: updateTextTo
}, function () {
chrome.tabs.executeScript({
file: "content_script3.js"
});
});
From your content script:
Read the data from chrome.storage.local.get()(MDN).
Make the changes to the DOM.
Invalidate the data in storage.local (e.g. remove the key with: chrome.storage.local.remove() (MDN)).
chrome.storage.local.get('updateTextTo', function (items) {
assignTextToTextareas(items.updateTextTo);
chrome.storage.local.remove('updateTextTo');
});
function assignTextToTextareas(newText){
if (typeof newText === 'string') {
Array.from(document.querySelectorAll('textarea.comments')).forEach(el => {
el.value = newText;
});
}
}
See: Notes 1 & 2.
Inject code prior to your script to set a variable
Prior to executing your script, you can inject some code that sets a variable in the content script context which your primary script can then use:
Security issue:
The following uses "'" + JSON.stringify().replace(/\\/g,'\\\\').replace(/'/g,"\\'") + "'" to encode the data into text which will be proper JSON when interpreted as code, prior to putting it in the code string. The .replace() methods are needed to A) have the text correctly interpreted as a string when used as code, and B) quote any ' which exist in the data. It then uses JSON.parse() to return the data to a string in your content script. While this encoding is not strictly required, it is a good idea as you don't know the content of the value which you are going to send to the content script. This value could easily be something that would corrupt the code you are injecting (i.e. The user may be using ' and/or " in the text they entered). If you do not, in some way, escape the value, there is a security hole which could result in arbitrary code being executed.
From your popup script:
Inject a simple piece of code that sets a variable to contain the data.
In the callback for chrome.tabs.executeScript()(MDN), call tabs.executeScript() to inject your script (Note: tabs.executeScript() will execute scripts in the order in which you call tabs.executeScript(), as long as they have the same value for runAt. Thus, waiting for the callback of the small code is not strictly required).
var updateTextTo = document.getElementById('comments').value;
chrome.tabs.executeScript({
code: "var newText = JSON.parse('" + encodeToPassToContentScript(updateTextTo) + "');"
}, function () {
chrome.tabs.executeScript({
file: "content_script3.js"
});
});
function encodeToPassToContentScript(obj){
//Encodes into JSON and quotes \ characters so they will not break
// when re-interpreted as a string literal. Failing to do so could
// result in the injection of arbitrary code and/or JSON.parse() failing.
return JSON.stringify(obj).replace(/\\/g,'\\\\').replace(/'/g,"\\'")
}
From your content script:
Make the changes to the DOM using the data stored in the variable
if (typeof newText === 'string') {
Array.from(document.querySelectorAll('textarea.comments')).forEach(el => {
el.value = newText;
});
}
See: Notes 1, 2, & 3.
Use message passing(MDN)(send data after content script is injected)
This requires your content script code to install a listener for a message sent by the popup, or perhaps the background script (if the interaction with the UI causes the popup to close). It is a bit more complex.
From your popup script:
Determine the active tab using tabs.query()(MDN).
Call tabs.executeScript()(MDN)
In the callback for tabs.executeScript(), use tabs.sendMessage()(MDN)(which requires knowing the tabId), to send the data as a message.
var updateTextTo = document.getElementById('comments').value;
chrome.tabs.query({active: true, currentWindow: true}, function(tabs) {
chrome.tabs.executeScript(tabs[0].id, {
file: "content_script3.js"
}, function(){
chrome.tabs.sendMessage(tabs[0].id,{
updateTextTo: updateTextTo
});
});
});
From your content script:
Add a listener using chrome.runtime.onMessage.addListener()(MDN).
Exit your primary code, leaving the listener active. You could return a success indicator, if you choose.
Upon receiving a message with the data:
Make the changes to the DOM.
Remove your runtime.onMessage listener
#3.2 is optional. You could keep your code active waiting for another message, but that would change the paradigm you are using to one where you load your code and it stays resident waiting for messages to initiate actions.
chrome.runtime.onMessage.addListener(assignTextToTextareas);
function assignTextToTextareas(message){
newText = message.updateTextTo;
if (typeof newText === 'string') {
Array.from(document.querySelectorAll('textarea.comments')).forEach(el => {
el.value = newText;
});
}
chrome.runtime.onMessage.removeListener(assignTextToTextareas); //optional
}
See: Notes 1 & 2.
Note 1: Using Array.from() is fine if you are not doing it many times and are using a browser version which has it (Chrome >= version 45, Firefox >= 32). In Chrome and Firefox, Array.from() is slow compared to other methods of getting an array from a NodeList. For a faster, more compatible conversion to an Array, you could use the asArray() code in this answer. The second version of asArray() provided in that answer is also more robust.
Note 2: If you are willing to limit your code to Chrome version >= 51 or Firefox version >= 50, Chrome has a forEach() method for NodeLists as of v51. Thus, you don't need to convert to an array. Obviously, you don't need to convert to an Array if you use a different type of loop.
Note 3: While I have previously used this method (injecting a script with the variable value) in my own code, I was reminded that I should have included it here when reading this answer.
You can use the args property, see this documentation
const color = '#00ff00';
function changeBackgroundColor(backgroundColor) {
document.body.style.backgroundColor = backgroundColor;
}
chrome.scripting.executeScript(
{
target: {tabId},
func: changeBackgroundColor,
args: [color],
},
() => { ... });
Edit: My mistake - This only applies to injected functions, not files as the question specifies.
#RobW's answer is the perfect answer for this. But for you to implement this you need to initiate global variables.
I suggest an alternative for this, which is similar to #RobW's answer. Instead of passing the variable to the file, you load a function from the content.js file and then initiate the function in your current context using the code: and pass variables from current context.
var argString = "abc";
var argInt = 123;
chrome.tabs.executeScript(tabId, { file: "/content.js" }).then(() => {
chrome.tabs.executeScript(tabId, {
allFrames: false,
code: "myFunction('" + argString + "', " + argInt + "); ",
});
});
This is inspired from #wOxxOm's answer here. This method is really going to be helpful to write a common source code for Manifest v2 & v3

Dynamically update stored chrome extension config/global data, not in prefs?

I'd like my extension to have stored "config" or "meta/global" Constant data, and have the extension update this config data daily from my web server. Things like class names, patterns to match, identifiers, etc.
I can store this data in prefs, but they are async and won't be available when the extension starts up. I need them to be available immediately so the extension can act on them.
Right now I store this data in my extension source itself, so it cannot be updated. But it is available immediately, not async.
Is there a better fix that would allow my extension to update its internal data?
In extensions, you can still have localStorage access in non-content scripts, which is synchonous.
However, what's wrong with async chrome.storage? It's not going to take a long time to read, you just need to restructure your program to wait for this quite fast initialization.
If you do not want massive restructuring, you could make a synchronous "cache" for it in the script.
// Old:
var settings = { /* hard-coded values*/ }
doSomething(settings[key]);
settings[key] = value;
// New:
function updateCache(changes, area){
if(area != "local") return;
for(key in changes){
settings[key] = changes[key].newValue;
}
}
function setOption(key, value){
settings[key] = value; // Synchronous cache update
var update = {};
update[key] = value;
chrome.storage.local.set(update);
}
var settings = { /* set defaults here */ };
chrome.storage.local.get(settings, function(data){
for(key in data) settings[key] = data[key];
chrome.storage.onChanged(updateCache);
/* Old top level code here */
});
doSomething(settings[key]); // Still synchronous
setOption(key, value);

Get all defined variables in scope in node.js

I am trying to get all the variables that have been defined, i tried using the global object
but it seems to be missing the ones defined as var token='44'; and only includes the ones defined as token='44';. What i am looking for idealy is something like the get_defined_vars() function of php. I need to access the variables because i need to stop the node process and then restart at the same point without having to recalculate all the variables, so i want to dump them somewhere and access them later.
It's impossible within the language itself.
However:
1. If you have an access to the entire source code, you can use some library to get a list of global variables like this:
var ast = require('uglify-js').parse(source)
ast.figure_out_scope()
console.log(ast.globals).map(function (node, name) {
return name
})
2. If you can connect to node.js/v8 debugger, you can get a list of local variables as well, see _debugger.js source code in node.js project.
As you stated
I want to dump them somewhere and access them later.
It seems like you should work towards a database (as Jonathan mentioned in the comments), but if this is a one off thing you can use JSON files to store values. You can then require the JSON file back into your script and Node will handle the rest.
I wouldn't recommend this, but basically create a variable that will hold all the data / variables that you define. Some might call this a God Object. Just make sure that before you exit the script, export the values to a JSON file. If you're worried about your application crashing, perform backups to that file more frequently.
Here is a demo you can play around with:
var fs = require('fs');
var globalData = loadData();
function loadData() {
try { return require('./globals.json'); } catch(e) {}
return {};
}
function dumpGlobalData(callback) {
fs.writeFile(
__dirname + '/globals.json', JSON.stringify(globalData), callback);
}
function randomToken() {
globalData.token = parseInt(Math.random() * 1000, 10);
}
console.log('token was', globalData.token)
randomToken();
console.log('token is now', globalData.token)
dumpGlobalData(function(error) {
process.exit(error ? 1 : 0);
});

Resources