I seem to be stuck on a classic ORM issue and don't know really how to handle it, so at this point any help is welcome.
Is there a way to get the pivot table on a hasManyThrough query? Better yet, apply some filter or sort to it. A typical example
Table products
id,title
Table categories
id,title
table products_categories
productsId, categoriesId, orderBy, main
So, in the above scenario, say you want to get all categories of product X that are (main = true) or you want to sort the the product categories by orderBy.
What happens now is a first SELECT on products to get the product data, a second SELECT on products_categories to get the categoriesId and a final SELECT on categories to get the actual categories. Ideally, filters and sort should be applied to the 2nd SELECT like
SELECT `id`,`productsId`,`categoriesId`,`orderBy`,`main` FROM `products_categories` WHERE `productsId` IN (180) WHERE main = 1 ORDER BY `orderBy` DESC
Another typical example would be wanting to order the product images based on the order the user wants them to
so you would have a products_images table
id,image,productsID,orderBy
and you would want to
SELECT from products_images WHERE productsId In (180) ORDER BY orderBy ASC
Is that even possible?
EDIT : Here is the relationship needed for an intermediate table to get what I need based on my schema.
Products.hasMany(Images,
{
as: "Images",
"foreignKey": "productsId",
"through": ProductsImagesItems,
scope: function (inst, filter) {
return {active: 1};
}
});
Thing is the scope function is giving me access to the final result and not to the intermediate table.
I am not sure to fully understand your problem(s), but for sure you need to move away from the table concept and express your problem in terms of Models and Relations.
The way I see it, you have two models Product(properties: title) and Category (properties: main).
Then, you can have relations between the two, potentially
Product belongsTo Category
Category hasMany Product
This means a product will belong to a single category, while a category may contain many products. There are other relations available
Then, using the generated REST API, you can filter GET requests to get items in function of their properties (like main in your case), or use custom GET requests (automatically generated when you add relations) to get for instance all products belonging to a specific category.
Does this helps ?
Based on what you have here I'd probably recommend using the scope option when defining the relationship. The LoopBack docs show a very similar example of the "product - category" scenario:
Product.hasMany(Category, {
as: 'categories',
scope: function(instance, filter) {
return { type: instance.type };
}
});
In the example above, instance is a category that is being matched, and each product would have a new categories property that would contain the matching Category entities for that Product. Note that this does not follow your exact data scheme, so you may need to play around with it. Also, I think your API query would have to specify that you want the categories related data loaded (those are not included by default):
/api/Products/13?filter{"include":["categories"]}
I suggest you define a custom / remote method in Product.js that does the work for you.
Product.getCategories(_productId){
// if you are taking product title as param instead of _productId,
// you will first need to find product ID
// then execute a find query on products_categories with
// 1. where filter to get only main categoris and productId = _productId
// 2. include filter to include product and category objects
// 3. orderBy filter to sort items based on orderBy column
// now you will get an array of products_categories.
// Each item / object in the array will have nested objects of Product and Category.
}
Related
I am building an iOS app in SwiftUI for which I have a Core Data model with two entities:
CategoryEntity with attribute: name (String)
ExpenseEntity with attributes: name (String) and amount (Double)
There is a To-many relationship between CategoryEntity and ExpenseEntity (A category can have many expenses).
I’m fetching the categories and showing them in a list together with the sum of the expenses for each category as follows: Link to app screenshot
I would like to add a sort to the fetch request so the categories appear in order depending on the total amount of their expenses. In the example of the previous picture, the order of appearance that I would like to get would be: Tech, Clothes, Food and Transport. I don’t know how to approach this problem. Any suggestions?
In my current implementation of the request, the sorted is done alphabetically:
// My current implementation for fetching the categories
func fetchCategories() {
let request = NSFetchRequest<CategoryEntity>(entityName: "CategoryEntity")
let sort = NSSortDescriptor(keyPath: \CategoryEntity.name, ascending: true)
request.sortDescriptors = [sort]
do {
fetchedCategories = try manager.context.fetch(request)
} catch let error {
print("Error fetching. \(error.localizedDescription)")
}
}
You don't have to make another FetchRequest, you can just sort in a computed property like this:
(I assume your fetched results come into a var called fetchedCategories.)
var sortedCategories: [CategoryEntity] {
return fetchedCategories.sorted(by: { cat1, cat2 in
cat1.expensesArray.reduce(0, { $0 + $1.amount }) >
cat2.expensesArray.reduce(0, { $0 + $1.amount })
})
}
So this sorts the fetchedCategories array by a comparing rule, that looks at the sum of all cat1.expenses and compares it with the sum of cat2.expenses. The >says we want the large sums first.
You put the computed var directly in the View where you use it!
And where you used fetchedCategories before in your view (e.g. a ForEach), you now use sortedCategories.
This will update in the same way as the fetched results do.
One approach would be to include a derived attribute in your CategoryEntity model description which keeps the totals for you. For example, to sum the relevant values from the amount column within an expenses relation:
That attribute should be updated whenever you save your managed object context. You'll then be able to sort it just as you would any other attribute, without the performance cost of calculating the expense sum for each category whenever you sort.
Note that this option only really works if you don't have to do any filtering on expenses; for example, if you're looking at sorting based on expenses just in 2022, but your core data store also has seconds in 2021, the derived attribute might not give you the sort order you want.
I'm trying to get some information about an item, including the item's subsidiary's logo, which naturally requires joining the item to the subsidiary.
The documentation for search.lookupFields says:
You can use joined-field lookups with this method, with the following syntax:
join_id.field_name
So, I duly request the fields I want, including a join on subsidiary:
require(['N/search'], function(search) {
var item = search.lookupFields({
type: search.Type.ITEM,
id: 2086,
columns: ['itemid', 'displayname', 'subsidiary.logo'],
});
log.debug(item);
});
itemid and displayname are fine, but when I try to join another record I get this error:
{
"type":"error.SuiteScriptError",
"name":"SSS_INVALID_SRCH_COLUMN_JOIN",
"message":"An nlobjSearchColumn contains an invalid column join ID, or is not in proper syntax: logo.",
"stack":["doLookupFields(N/search/searchUtil.js)","<anonymous>(adhoc$-1$debugger.user:2)","<anonymous>(adhoc$-1$debugger.user:1)"],
"cause":{
"type":"internal error",
"code":"SSS_INVALID_SRCH_COLUMN_JOIN",
"details":"An nlobjSearchColumn contains an invalid column join ID, or is not in proper syntax: logo.",
"userEvent":null,
"stackTrace":["doLookupFields(N/search/searchUtil.js)","<anonymous>(adhoc$-1$debugger.user:2)","<anonymous>(adhoc$-1$debugger.user:1)"],
"notifyOff":false
},
"id":"",
"notifyOff":false,
"userFacing":false
}
This seems to happen no matter which record and field I try to join. What am I missing?
Although you can return results from multi-select fields, you cannot join to fields on records referenced by multi-select fields (which the subsidiary field on the item record is). Also, you cannot search the logo field on the subsidiary record (not listed in Search Columns under Subsidiary in the NetSuite Records Browser).
This means you have to load the Subsidiary record to get the logo field. In other words:
require(['N/record', 'N/search'], function(record, search) {
var item = search.lookupFields({
type: search.Type.ITEM,
id: 2086,
columns: ['itemid', 'displayname', 'subsidiary'],
});
var subID = item.subsidiary[0].value; //internal id of *first* subsidiary
var subRec = record.load({
type: record.Type.SUBSIDIARY,
id: subID
});
var logo = subRec.getText('logo'); //gets the file name - use getValue to get its ID instead
});
Note that if multiple subsidiaries are set on the item, this only gets the values for the first one. You could iterate through the item.subsidiary result to handle values for multiple subsidiaries if required.
I believe you can't access to the subsidiary record from a lookupfield, you should do a proper search.
https://system.netsuite.com/help/helpcenter/en_US/srbrowser/Browser2018_2/script/record/item.html
You can only join to tables allowed in the Item search object. Try looking for "Subsidiary..." in the Search Results tab within the UI. It's not there. Use the Schema Browser to determine what fields and joins are available.
You cannot think of a NetSuite search as you would any regular SQL search. You have to be cognizant of which fields and which joins can be utilized via the search object.
As people have mentioned, the subsidiary is not a join field available from the item record, one way to achieve what you are trying to do is:
Make a lookup to get the internal id of the subsidiary belonging to the desired item.
Then make a lookup to get the internal id of the logo image (file cabinet image) belonging to the previous subsidiary.
Make another lookup/load the image file to get the URL of the image/logo
You can try to combine the above steps in a single saved search but I think you might need to load the image file to get the URL.
This won't answer your question, but this may help out in the future. The records browser shows everything that you can search and join on, columns and filters, and field IDs. Very useful when building out searches.
NetSuite Records Browser - 2018.2
Im trying to get a random entry from a table and its associations.
Recipe.findAll({
order: [
[sequelize.fn('RANDOM')]
],
where: {
'$RecipeCategory.name$': category
},
include:[
{
model: models.Category,
as: 'RecipeCategory',
},{
model: models.Product,
}],
subQuery:false,
limit:1})
With the above code I'm getting a random entry of Recipe and its associations with limit 1. For example , it returns only 1 product and I need all products. I need to get one recipe with all products.
Any suggestions?
If I remove the subQuery option , I receive this:
SequelizeDatabaseError: missing FROM-clause entry for table "RecipeCategory"
Im searching 5 days for the solution and I think that I have check all related answers in this.'
edit: generated query
SELECT "Recipe"."id", "Recipe"."name", "Recipe"."description", "Recipe"."pic", "Recipe"."createdAt", "Recipe"."updatedAt", "RecipeCategory"."id" AS "RecipeCategory.id", "RecipeCategory"."name" AS "RecipeCategory.name", "RecipeCategory"."description" AS "RecipeCategory.description", "RecipeCategory"."createdAt" AS "RecipeCategory.createdAt", "RecipeCategory"."updatedAt" AS "RecipeCategory.updatedAt", "RecipeCategory.Recipes_Categories"."createdAt" AS "RecipeCategory.Recipes_Categories.createdAt", "RecipeCategory.Recipes_Categories"."updatedAt" AS "RecipeCategory.Recipes_Categories.updatedAt", "RecipeCategory.Recipes_Categories"."CategoryId" AS "RecipeCategory.Recipes_Categories.CategoryId", "RecipeCategory.Recipes_Categories"."RecipeId" AS "RecipeCategory.Recipes_Categories.RecipeId", "Products"."id" AS "Products.id", "Products"."name" AS "Products.name", "Products"."protein" AS "Products.protein", "Products"."fat" AS "Products.fat", "Products"."carbohydrates" AS "Products.carbohydrates", "Products"."salt" AS "Products.salt", "Products"."min" AS "Products.min", "Products"."max" AS "Products.max", "Products"."vegan" AS "Products.vegan", "Products"."piece" AS "Products.piece", "Products"."createdAt" AS "Products.createdAt", "Products"."updatedAt" AS "Products.updatedAt", "Products.Product_Recipe"."position" AS "Products.Product_Recipe.position", "Products.Product_Recipe"."createdAt" AS "Products.Product_Recipe.createdAt", "Products.Product_Recipe"."updatedAt" AS "Products.Product_Recipe.updatedAt", "Products.Product_Recipe"."ProductId" AS "Products.Product_Recipe.ProductId", "Products.Product_Recipe"."RecipeId" AS "Products.Product_Recipe.RecipeId"
FROM
"Recipes" AS "Recipe"
LEFT OUTER JOIN (
"Recipes_Categories" AS "RecipeCategory.Recipes_Categories"
INNER JOIN
"Categories" AS "RecipeCategory" ON "RecipeCategory"."id" = "RecipeCategory.Recipes_Categories"."CategoryId"
) ON "Recipe"."id" = "RecipeCategory.Recipes_Categories"."RecipeId"
LEFT OUTER JOIN (
"Product_Recipes" AS "Products.Product_Recipe"
INNER JOIN "Products" AS "Products" ON "Products"."id" = "Products.Product_Recipe"."ProductId"
) ON "Recipe"."id" = "Products.Product_Recipe"."RecipeId"
WHERE "RecipeCategory"."name" = 'meal-3'
ORDER BY RANDOM()
LIMIT 1;
It looks like using an include on the same level as where is not supported as of this thread in 2015. It's not clear what the solution would be in your case.
A relavant quote from the above thread by a sequelize contributor:
include.where won't since you need a negative query.
You could probably try a raw where. .and({filter_level: ...}, ['RAW QUERY']})
On a side note.. On the off chance that you aren't fully commited to using sequelize, I personally recommend using knex.js. I use it in production code. It's a good balanced library. You get a lot of the flexibility/ease of use of an ORM like sequelize, without losing too much sight/control of the query itself. It's very easy to add/run raw queries if the library doesn't support what you do.
This is pretty rough because I'm pretty sure that either sequelize
is overcomplicating this or your database structure is over complicated. This
shouldn't require 4 joins! Here's the general idea:
assume your db auto incrememts the recipes id
get number of recipes from recipes table, using COUNT()
generate a random number between 0 and COUNT(), this is the id of your random recipe
query the recipe table for for the recipe, left join on the products table to get, join on recipe id. This is a simple query that can be written easily in knex.
Profit! you now have a random recipe and all products required for the recipe.
I’ve just started to use Cloudant and I just can’t get my head around the map functions. I’ve been fiddling with the data below but it isn’t working out as I expected.
The relationship is, a user can have many vehicles. A vehicle belongs to 1 user. The vehicle ‘userId’ is the key of the user. There is a bit of redundancy as in user the _id and userId is the same, guess later is not required.
Anyhow, how can I find for a/every user, the vehicles which belong to it? The closest I’ve come through trial and error is a result which displays the owner of every vehicle, but I would like it the other way round, the user and the vehicles belonging to it. All the examples I’ve found use another document which ‘joins’ two or more documents, but I don’t need to do that?
Any point in the right direction appreciated - I really have no idea.
function (doc) {
if (doc.$doctype == "vehicle")
{
emit(doc.userId, {_id: doc.userId});
}
}
EDIT: Getting closer. I'm not sure exactly what I was expecting, but the result seems a bit 'messy'. Row[0] is the user document, row[n > 0] are the vehicle documents. I guess it's fine when a startkey/endkey is used, but without the results are a bit jumbled up.
function (doc) {
if (doc.$doctype == 'user') {
emit([doc._id, 0], doc);
} else if (doc.$doctype == 'vehicle') {
emit([doc.userId, 1, doc._id], doc);
}
}
A user is described as,
{
"_id": "user:10",
"firstname": “firstnamehere",
"secondname": “secondnamehere",
"userId": "user:10",
"$doctype": "user"
}
a vehicle is described as,
{
"_id": "vehicle:4002”,
“name”: “avehicle”,
"userId": "user:10",
"$doctype": "vehicle",
}
You're getting in the right direction! You already got that right with the global IDs. Having the type of the document as part of the ID in some form is a very good idea, so that you don't get confused later (all documents are in the same "pot").
Here are some minor problems with your current solution (before getting to your actual question):
Don't emit the doc as value in emit(key, value). You can always ask for the document that belongs to a view row by querying with include_docs=true. Having the doc as view value increases the view indexes a lot. When you don't need a specific value, use emit(key, null).
You also don't need the ID in the emit value. You'll get the ID of the document that belongs to a view row as part of the row anyway.
View Collation
Now to your problem of aggregating the vehicles with their user. You got the basic pattern right. This pattern is called view collation, you can read more about it in the CouchDB docs (ignore that it is in the "Couchapp" section).
The trick with view collation is that you return two or more types of documents, but make sure that they are sorted in a way that allows for direct grouping. Thus it is important to understand how CouchDB sorts the view result. See the collation specification for more information on that one. An important key to understanding view collation is that rows with array keys are sorted by key elements. So when two rows have the same key[0], they sort by key[1]. If that's equal as well, key[2] is considered, and so on.
Your map function frist groups users and vehicles by user ID (key[0]). Your map function then uses the fact that 0 sorts before 1 in the second element of the key, so your view will contain the following:
user 1
vehicle of user 1
vehicle of user 1
vehicle of user 1
user 2
user 3
vehicle of user 3
user 4
etc.
As you can see, the vehicles of a user immediately follow their user. Thus you can group this result into aggregates without performing expensive sort or lookup operations.
Note that users are sorted according to their ID, and vehicles within users also according to their ID. This is because you use the IDs in the key array.
Creating Queries
Now that view isn't worth much if you can't query according to your needs. A view as you have it supports the following queries:
Get all users with their vehicles
Get a range of users with their vehicles
Get a single user with its vehicles
Get a single user without vehicles (you could also use the _all_docs view for that though)
Example query for "all users between user 1 and user 3 (inclusive) with their vehicles"
We want to query for a range, so we use startkey and endkey in the query:
startkey=["user:1", 0]
endkey=["user:3", 1, {}]
Note the use of {} as sentinel value, which is required so that the end key is larger than any row that has a key of ["user:3", 1, (anyConceivableVehicleId)]
I have a custom post type called "coupons". These coupons can then be drilled down by "city". City is a custom field that is defined for each individual "coupon". I am then trying to modify a sidebar widget so it will only show the distinct categories related to the specific queried cities result set, as opposed to all coupon categories. I would then need to display a count that would show how many of the returned coupons belong to the specific category.
So far the query returns all coupon categories (and the coupon count), not just the ones that belong to the specific coupon category.
SELECT t.*, tt.*, tr.object_id FROM wp_terms AS t INNER JOIN wp_term_taxonomy AS tt ON tt.term_id = t.term_id INNER JOIN wp_term_relationships AS tr ON tr.term_taxonomy_id = tt.term_taxonomy_id WHERE tt.taxonomy IN ('coupon_category', 'coupon_tag', 'stores', 'coupon_type') AND tr.object_id IN (430, 618) ORDER BY t.name ASC
Any help would be greatly appreciated.