Can any body explain to me what does the whole sentence mean?
I know this is to set Macro BLAS_LIBS as another string.
But I'm not sure what's the "-lblas" mean and I don't know how to use it.
Similar as the following code. "-llapack"
export LAPACK_LIBS="-L$LAPACKHOME/lib -llapack"
How can the program find out the BLAS and LAPACK libraries just by "-lblas" and "-llapack" ?
Thanks for advance.
I'm not sure why you say "just by -llapack" because that's not what is happening here. Specifically, the -L option just before it specifies a directory path to add to the library resolution path. This works roughly like PATH in the shell.
For example, with the command line fragment gcc -Lfoodir -Lbardir -lfoo -lbar, you basically instruct the linker to search the directories foodir and bardir for the library files libfoo.a and libbar.a.
The -l option is described in GCC: Options for Linking and -L and friends in the following section GCC: Options for Directory Search.
This build arrangement -- configure the build to show where the required files are before compiling -- is common for libraries, where if a user has already downloaded and compiled a required library for some other project, they don't need to rebuild it; they can just point the compiler to wherever they already have the stuff needed for this project.
Building your own libraries is becoming increasingly unnecessary anyway, as prepackaged binaries of most common libraries are available for most systems these days. But of course, if you are on an unusual platform, or have specialized needs which dictate recompilation with different options than any available prebuilt binary, you will still need to understand how to do this.
Related
I'm working in a project that uses a number of external libraries. These libraries are included using Conan. The project is primarily written for Unix, but it also need to compile and run on Windows.
My current problem is that Windows defaults fopen() to be O_TEXT, while Unix expects this to be O_BINARY. I have a fix that works for my own code, simply include binmode.obj when linking to change this default to O_BINARY.
The problem is that this does not affect my third party libraries. Googling for this didn't turn up much, most suggestions seems to be based on where you are creating your own package and want flags added, rather than how to add flags when using other's packages.
What I have tried so far:
Make binmode.obj come before libraries, in case the linking order matters. Made no difference.
Added --env 'CL=link binmode.obj' to conan install, but this flag did not end up as part of the compile flags nor link flags.
Any suggestions for what I could try?
EDIT: I was wrong about "CL" taking no effect. This was caused by confusing output. But I did observe that CL seems to be applied for both compiler and linker, which makes it somewhat challenging what flags to give. Using "/link" prefix makes it work with compiler, but does not work with linker.
EDIT 2: More confusions... I didn't realize that the syntax of the CL value was: "<compile flags> /link <link flags>". It affected compile, but not link, however. So this environment variable apparently can't be used to make Conan add a linker flag for autotools based packages.
Hi Mats L welcome to our community!
I once had a similar problem and what I end up doing was quite hacky but quite simple also:
On my conan profile located at ~/.conan/profiles/default or any other profile actually I added an enviromental variable as such:
CXX=/usr/bin/clang++ -fms-compatibility. This one made me compile all the c++ sources with this flag (that can understand windows specific code).
So in your case you can run which c++ to find the location of your compiler
and edit the CXX environmental variable in the conan profile you use your final file will probably look like :
[settings]
os=Macos
os_build=Macos
arch=x86_64
arch_build=x86_64
compiler=clang
compiler.version=11
compiler.libcxx=libc++
build_type=Release
[options]
[build_requires]
[env]
CXX=c++ --required_flag
Some additional notes: You might also want this flag set on your CC enviromental variable .
It's preferable to not change the default profile but copy it (lets say on a file named default_edited_copy) and then invoke the other profile with conan ... --profile default_edited_copy
I want to build an executable foobar on Linux, that depends on shared libraries such as libfoobar.so. So I do
gcc foobar.o -Xlinker -rpath relative path from executable to library-lfoobar -o foobar
I have to provide the path to the library so that the linker does not complain, even though the library is not needed at link time.
Then the executable and libraries get installed to system directories (which are unrelated to the initial locations and to each other).
After that, I can't run it, because the path to the library, used to build is no longer valid, and the library is not found.
What is the best way to setup linker options so that they work both at link time and at runtime?
I cannot use absolute paths, they are a bad idea in general to use during build, and also not possible during runtime, as different users will have different installation roots. Only the relative paths at build time and runtime, are guaranteed to be always the same.
I have a certain shared object library in a special directory which I
make sure special directory is in $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
make sure this directory has read and execute permisions for all
make sure appropriate library directory is in ld.so.conf and that root has done a ldconfig
(verify by checking for library using ldconfig -p as normaluser.
make sure it is has no soname problems (i.e. create a few symlinks if necessary)
Now, say I compile a program that needs that special library, a program packaged in a typical Open Source manner which ./configure && make, etc) and it says -lspecialibrary cannot be found, an error which a lack of any of the above checks would also probably throw.
A workaround I have done is to symlink the library to /usr/local/lib64 and suddenly the library has ben found. Also when compiling a relatively simple package, I manually add -L/path/to/spec/lib and that also has worked. But I regard those two methods as hacks, so I was looking for any clues as to why my list of checks aren't good enough to find a library.
(I particularly find the $LD_LIBRARY_PATH of shallow use. In fact I can exclude certain libraries from it, and they will still be found in a compilation process).
$LD_LIBRARY_PATH and ldconfig are only used to locate libraries when running programs that need libraries, i.e. they are used by the loader not the compiler. Your program depends on libspeciallibrary.so. When running your program $LD_LIBRARY_PATH and ldconfig are consulted to find libspeciallibary.so.
These methods are not used by your compiler to find libraries. For your compiler, the -L option is the right way to go. Since your package uses the autotools, you should set the $LDFLAGS environment variable:
LDFLAGS=-L/path/to/lib ./configure && make
This is also documented in the configure help:
./configure --help
I have a c++ project (g++/raw Makefile) designed for linux, I used to statically link everything which worked fine for ages. Now I want to build binaries both statically and dynamically linked. The following command is used in my Makefile to build the dynamic library (say libtest):
$(CXX) -shared -Wl,-soname,libtest.so.1 -o libtest.so.1.0.0 $(LIBTEST_OBJS)
The output is libtest.so.1.0.0 which has the so name libtest.so.1
I found at least a symbolic link libtest.so --> libtest.so.1.0.0 is required to link my client program that actually use the above generated libtest.so.1.0.0 library.
Here my question is if I want to build my software, what is the standard way of managing the above symbolic link? Clearly I don't want this extra stuff in my source directory, but it is required to build my client binary, shall I create it as a temp link for building the client then just remove it when done? or shall I create a directory to host the generate .so library and its links and leave everything there until I do "make install" to install them into other specified directories? Will be cool to now what is the standard way of doing this.
Or maybe the way how I generate libraries is incorrect? shall I just generate libtest.so (as actual library, not a link) to link my executable, then rename the library and create those links when doing ``make install''?
any input will be appreciated. :)
Certainly don't generate libtest.so as an actual link. Typically installing the shared library development files installs the .h files and creates a symbolic link libtest.so as part of some install script you have to write.
If you're not installing the development files, but only using the library in your build process of your binary, you just create the symbolik link from your makefile.
There's not that much of a standard here, some prefer to build artifacts to a separate build directory,
some don't care if it's built in the source directory. I'd build to a separate directory though, and keep the source directory clean of any .o/.so/executable files.
You might find useful information here
My suggestion is to use libtool which handles situations like this.
I'm trying to compile/link a very old piece of software on a linux system and I can't for some reason link with a shared library that's installed on my system.
I get the following error from the linker:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXaw
However, the lib itself is installed. If I run
ldconfig -v | grep libXaw
I get (among other things) this hit:
libXaw.so.7 -> libXaw7.so.7.0.0
The library and the links to it are in /usr/lib btw. So nothing special.
So the library is there and ldconfig finds it. What could ld cause ld from not finding the library during link-time? As you may have already guessed I'm quite new to the shared library stuff.
Any ideas?
The linker may be looking, literally, for "libXaw.so". Is that in /usr/lib? If not, you could try adding it as another soft link from libXaw7.so.7.0.0.
The reason for the symlink btw is to select the default version to link against in the case of multiple versions, keep in mind the name of the library is integrated into the binary. (which you can see with ldd).
Are the -L library directories being overridden, and it's not looking in /usr/lib?
To link it, you need the .a file, NOT the .so file, which is the runtime library. The shared object is only useful to a program already linked against the non-shared parts of a library. This is typically distributed in a ".a" file.