when I start a webjob using the rest api :
/api/triggeredwebjobs/{job name}/run?arguments={arguments}
I need to know if the program invoked ran successfully or not and for now I request the latest result from the history using .../api/triggeredwebjobs/{job name}/history
Now, is there a way to get the {id} of the Job just after I invoke ? Because obviously there's no way to be sure that the latest history is the job I just ran. Or is there another way to get things done?
Thanks.
Yes, we added a new binder in the extensions library to allow you to get the instance ID - ExecutionContext. See an example here in the extensions repo samples. To use this binding you'll have to pull in the beta1 Microsoft.Azure.WebJobs.Extensions prerelease package, and add config.UseCore() to your startup code (as the sample app shows). This was added based on another ask similar to yours.
You can call this anywhere in your code and it works !
(Not in debug, but when published)
Console.Out.WriteLine("RUN NAME : " + Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("WEBJOBS_RUN_ID"));
We just added support for this in the WebJobs API. The way it works is that when you send the POST request to trigger the WebJob, you now get back a location attribute, with a URL to the details of the run that was started. e.g.
Location: https://mysite.scm.azurewebsites.net/api/triggeredwebjobs/SomeJob/history/201605192149381933
You can then query this URL to track the run, e.g.
{
"id": "201605192149381933",
"name": "201605192149381933",
"status": "Success",
"start_time": "2016-05-19T21:49:38.1933956Z",
"end_time": "2016-05-19T21:49:39.4826458Z",
"duration": "00:00:01.2892502",
"output_url": "https://mysite.scm.azurewebsites.net/vfs/data/jobs/triggered/SomeJob/201605192149381933/output_log.txt",
"error_url": null,
"url": "https://mysite.scm.azurewebsites.net/api/triggeredwebjobs/SomeJob/history/201605192149381933",
"job_name": "SomeJob",
"trigger": "External - ARMClient/1.1.1.0"
}
Related
When creating an Azure Media Services Job via the REST API, I cannot set a presetOverrides property on the JobOutputAsset as defined in the documentation: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/media/jobs/create#joboutputasset
My request body is:
{
"properties": {
"input": {
"#odata.type": "#Microsoft.Media.JobInputAsset",
"assetName": "inputAsset"
},
"outputs": [
{
"#odata.type": "#Microsoft.Media.JobOutputAsset",
"assetName": "outputAsset",
"label": "en-US",
"presetOverride": {
"#odata.type": "#Microsoft.Media.AudioAnalyzerPreset",
"audioLanguage": "en-US",
"mode": "Basic"
}
}
],
"priority" : "Normal"
}
}
The error message thrown is:
{
"error": {
"code": "InvalidResource",
"message": "The property 'presetOverride' does not exist on type 'Microsoft.Media.JobOutputAsset'. Make sure to only use property names that are defined by the type."
}
}
When removing the presetOverride data, everything works as expected. The official documentation clearly states that the Microsoft.Media.JobOutputAsset does have a presetOverride property though. What am I doing wrong?
It is important to select the correct API version when communicating with the Azure Media Services REST API.
In this case, api version 2020-05-01 from the Azure Media Services Postman examples was used. But the presetOverride option is only available starting with version 2021-06-01.
Setting api-version=2021-06-01 as a GET parameter enables Preset Overrides.
couple of concerns here Rene. I would not recommend using the raw REST API directly for any Azure services. Reason being is that there are a lot of built-in retry scenarios and retry policies that are already rolled into the client SDKs. We've had many customers try to roll their own REST API library but run into massive issues in production because they failed to read up on how to handle and write their own custom retry policy code.
Unless you are really familiar with rolling your own retry policies and how Azure Resource Management gateway works, try to avoid it and just use the official client SDKs - see here - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/retry-service-specific#general-rest-and-retry-guidelines
Now, to answer your specific question - try using my sample here in .NET and see if it answers your question.
https://github.com/Azure-Samples/media-services-v3-dotnet/blob/3ab85647cbadd2b868aadf175afdede67b40b2fd/AudioAnalytics/AudioAnalyzer/Program.cs#L129
I can also provide a working sample of this in Node.js/Typescript in this repo if you like. It is using the latest 10.0.0 release of our Javascript SDK.
I'm working on samples in this repo today - https://github.com/Azure-Samples/media-services-v3-node-tutorials
UPDATE: Added basic audio in Typescript sample.
https://github.com/Azure-Samples/media-services-v3-node-tutorials/blob/main/AudioAnalytics/index.ts
Shows how to use the preset override per job.
I would like to use the Microsoft Azure Cognitive Service Speech-to-text. It offers a REST API, which I succesfully have used. I can point to an Azure blob storage using a SAS URI, and the files in the container are transcribed.
My problem is, that when I try to retrieve the transcription results from the API, they are published to a public url. Since voice data can be sensitive, I would like to keep the results stored privately. Is there any way to do this?
I does not seem like it is an option in the API schema, although you can set a destinationContainerUrl. I have tried to set the destinationContainerUrl, but the result does not appear in the container.
I have only used the API reference, which is why I am not posting any code.
You've found the correct option. Using destinationContainerUrl will write the results into this container. Make sure you provide a container SAS which allows listing and writing.
When the job succeeds, the results should be there. Please check that status of your job, maybe it was set to failed.
Documentation about transcriptions:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cognitive-services/speech-service/batch-transcription
If the job succeeds and the files are not on this container, please let us know the $.self link of the job and the creation time, to help us gathering the logs.
Ok. So the solution was super simple. I just did the post request json wrong. destinationContainerUrl needs to be under properties, as shown below:
{"contentUrls": ["LINK-TO-BLOB-SAS-URI-TOKEN"],
"properties": {
"diarizationEnabled": false,
"wordLevelTimestampsEnabled": false,
"punctuationMode": "DictatedAndAutomatic",
"profanityFilterMode": "Masked",
"destinationContainerUrl": "LINK-TO-BLOB-SAS-URI-TOKEN"
},
"locale": "en-US",
"displayName": "Transcription from blob to blob"
}
I've been experimenting with the Fusion Lifecycle webhooks in Forge and have been successful using the item created/updated events but the workflow transition webhooks aren't firing.
The webhooks are created in Forge according to the Docs, as you can see below, but none of the transitions performed in the workspace will trigger the call.
They were created using a three-legged token associated with a Fusion Lifecycle user that has the proper workflow permissions on the workspace.
The following JSON excerpt is the workflow. transition webhook as returned from developer.api.autodesk.com/webhooks/v1/hooks endpoint on Forge showing it was indeed created.
{
"hookId": "909fd040-4e34-11ea-a842-651c9013b5e8",
"tenant": "TENANTNAMEREMOVED4SO",
"callbackUrl": "callbackurl removed for SO",
"createdBy": "46FGNL6DBN6D",
"event": "workflow.transition",
"createdDate": "2020-02-13T07:43:45.988+0000",
"system": "adsk.flc.production",
"creatorType": "O2User",
"status": "active",
"scope": {
"workflow.transition": "urn:adsk.plm:tenant.workspace.workflow.transition:TENANTNAMEREMOVED4SO.119.1.765"
},
"hookAttribute": {
"creator": "D3 Forge Playground",
"notification": {
"class": "alert-danger",
"system": "flc"
}
},
"urn": "urn:adsk.webhooks:events.hook:909fd040-4e34-11ea-a842-651c9013b5e8",
"__self__": "/systems/adsk.flc.production/events/workflow.transition/hooks/909fd040-4e34-11ea-a842-651c9013b5e8"
}
I've pushed the workflow through the transition events numerous times and no webhook is being fired and no failed requests on our webhook receiving server either. if I mimic the payload for the workflow. transition event and post it to our endpoint, it is received as expected.
I have yet to see a live example of the workflow. transition webhook being fired and can't find any sample code from Autodesk using them. Not sure the service is even working as expected at this point even though the item.created and item.updated webhook events seem to work fine.
Has anyone successfully received a workflow. transition webhook from Autodesk Forge? If yes, could you provide some guidance on how?
Seems to be working fine on my end in a Production tenant. This is the payload I used to create the webhook:
{
"callbackUrl": "https://webhook.site/SOME_ID",
"scope": {
"workflow.transition": "urn:adsk.plm:tenant.workspace.workflow.transition:TENANT.107.1.421"
}
}
Does it look like the payload you used when creating the hook?
Greg, any chance you can try to trigger it again, and send me the date/time stamp with tenant name via a private message? I just tried it again in my Production tenant, and it seems to be working just fine when I perform the operation from both a v3 API call, and the UI. Feel free to file a support case if you want, too, and let me know the case number. I'd like to help you out here in understanding what's going on, because overall it looks OK from your side.
i'm using the Box View API to convert a PDF file to HTML, i'm using the /documents/{id}/content.{extension} section.
The response for this GET call is a .zip file, however i don't know how to retrive it and make downloadable.
Also note that i'm using node.js.
Thanks for your help
You can set your own webhook URL that will be called by Box when your document status changes (one POST on your webhook for "document.viewable", and one for "document.done" plus one "document.error" if an transformation error occured).
Just listen to the "document.done" status and download the assets then. Format that is posted to the webhook you have set looks like :
[{
"type": "document.done",
"data": {
"id": "4cca28f1159c4f368193d5014fabc16e"
},
"triggered_at": "2014-01-30T20:33:04.798Z"
}]
Beware of the docs and check the format programatically. Their API docs are often no quite correct and they post multiple webhooks at the time i'm writing (which is a bug i've reported).
For more info and Box View API docs
Could someone walk me through setting an IAM policy in node.js using gcloud's pubsub?
I've looked through this page: https://developers.google.com/gmail/api/guides/push
And based on what I understood, I've saved this file as a .json:
POST "https://pubsub.googleapis.com/v1beta2/projects/gmail_push_project/topics/gmail_push_topic:setIamPolicy"
Content-type: application/json
{
"policy": {
"bindings": [{
"role": "roles/pubsub.publisher",
"members": ["serviceAccount:gmail-api-push#system.gserviceaccount.com"],
}],
}
}
And then, after creating a topic and subscribing to it, I've made this call in my .js script: pubsub.projects.topics.setIamPolicy('pubsub_policy.json');, however, I'm getting an error cannot read property "topics" of undefined.
Thanks for your help!
As of v0.19.0 IAM methods are supported, you can find the documentation for them on the official gcloud-node docs.
Unfortunately this is not supported yet. However, we're preparing to launch such API calls with a new set of documentation shortly (in weeks). Also all the APIs are public now so that gcloud-node developers can actually start implementing, so I filed an issue at:
https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/gcloud-node/issues/758
As a short-term workaround, you can use the API explorer, or if you need to do it dynamically, you should be able to use the following library:
https://developers.google.com/api-client-library/javascript/?hl=en