Is it possible to programmatically reference the extents of a text bounding box while creating a path? For example, depending on the chosen font, scale, and glyphs, a specific text might be larger or smaller. I always want, for example, a path drawn exactly under the text. Or over the text (not using the text-decoration: underline/overline attributes, but by using a path). Alternatively, if I need to guess the width of the text, is it possible to at least center a path horizontally relative to a text block without knowing its exact extents?
I played around with the "50%" attributes, but those always seem to be relative to the page, not individual SVG elements.
Example:
<svg height="200" width="300">
<text x="0" y="50" style="fill: red">Blue line on top, green line on right</text>
<path d="m 0 0 h 50" style="stroke-width: 2px; stroke: blue" />
<path d="m 50 0 v 15" style="stroke-width: 2px; stroke: green" />
</svg>
How can the path of the blue line be made to be exactly on the top boundingbox, the green line to be exactly on the righthand side of the text element?
Maybe real SVG gurus can chime in and create exactly what you want.
The JavaScript/Web Component is not required, I just did not want to copy/paste SVG code
customElements.define("svg-text-border", class extends HTMLElement{
connectedCallback(){
setTimeout(()=>{ // wait till innerHTML is parsed
this.innerHTML =
`<svg viewbox="0 0 220 30">
<path d="M10 20h200" stroke="red" pathLength="100" id="R" />
<path d="M210 20v-15" stroke="green"/>
<path d="M210 5h-200" stroke="blue"/>
<text textLength="90%">
<textPath href="#R" startoffset="100" text-anchor="end">
${this.innerHTML.trim()}
</textPath>
</text>
</svg>`;
});
}
})
<style>svg{ max-height:60px }</style>
<svg-text-border>The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog</svg-text-border>
<svg-text-border>Hello World!</svg-text-border>
<svg-text-border>Web Components are Cool!</svg-text-border>
I have two identical paths, but stroked differently: https://jsfiddle.net/vzbdcupf/
<svg version="1.2" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="300" height="300">
<style>
.s0 { fill: none; stroke: red ; stroke-width: 80 }
.s1 { fill: none; stroke: black; stroke-width: 4 }
</style>
<path class="s0" d="m100 100c20 7 33-1 36-25 2-13-71 13-36 25z"/>
<path class="s1" d="m100 100c20 7 33-1 36-25 2-13-71 13-36 25z"/>
</svg>
When I stroke the path with red, the stroke-width is huge, and there should not be any "hole" inside it. Why is there a hole?
I think it is related to the rendering algorithm (stroking is converted into filling paths, and the inner path gets "reflected"). But how do you explain it in terms of the SVG specification, to be able to say the rendering is correct?
Not an explanation why this happens but a possible workaround:
Some observations on the occurrence of this rendering:
appears on paths containing curve commands (c, s, q etc.)
won't appear on primitives like <circle>, <polygon> or paths using only line commands like l, h, v
Applying a dashed stroke seems to fix this rendering issue:
pathLength="100"
stroke-dasharray="100 0"
stroke-linecap="round"
Example:
function applyDash() {
const svg = document.querySelector('svg');
const paths = svg.querySelectorAll('path');
paths.forEach(function(path) {
path.setAttribute('pathLength', 100);
path.setAttribute('stroke-dasharray', '100 0');
path.setAttribute('stroke-linecap', 'round');
})
}
<p><button type="button" onclick="applyDash()"> Apply dash fix</button></p>
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="300px" height="300px" viewBox="0 0 300 300">
<path fill="none" stroke="#FF1746" stroke-width="80" d="M58,100c10,3.5,18.3,3.3,24.4-0.9S92.5,87,94,75 c1-6.5-16.8-3.3-30.4,3.1S40.5,94,58,100z" />
<path fill="none" stroke="#FF1746" stroke-width="80" d="M211.6,78.1l-14.5,11.1L206,100l13.6,2.4l10.7-3.3
l7.5-9.1l4.1-15l-9.7-3.3L211.6,78.1L211.6,78.1z" />
<circle fill="none" stroke="#FF1746" stroke-width="80" cx="230" cy="232.5" r="9.8" />
<path fill="none" stroke="#FF1746" stroke-width="80" d="M77.1,232.5c0,5.4-4.4,9.8-9.8,9.8
s-9.8-4.4-9.8-9.8s4.4-9.8,9.8-9.8S77.1,227.1,77.1,232.5z" />
</svg>
Your guess as to what is happening is basically correct. When 2D graphics engines "stroke" a path, what they actually do is effectively convert the stroke into a filled path of its own. When the path that is being stroked has tight corners, larger stroke widths can cause the inside borders of the stroke path to overlap each other. The result is the same as if any path intersects with itself - it can cause holes. With actual fills, you can control how those holes are rendered with the fill-rule property. Unfortunately, there is no such property for strokes.
The SVG 2 specification briefly mentions this phenomenon here, but ultimately leaves it up to implementers how they want to deal this situation.
I have been tasked to implement zooming in custom charts based on SVGs. Before i had one <svg> element. I looked into either using the transform or the viewbox approach and decided for the viewbox approach. Since i have to support zooming on just the x-axis, the charts contents will be squashed depending on the zoomFactor and need preserveAspectRatio="none". This does not look pretty for the chart labels that i used foreignObjects for. They get disorted as well and are not readable anymore. I did not find any solutions on how to apply the viewbox to just the actual chart contents, not the scales / labels.
I came up with the solution to split the chart into 3 nested svgs. The structure looks like this:
<svg> // Container SVG
<svg>...</svg> // XAxis
<svg>...</svg> // YAxis
<svg>...</svg> // ChartContent
</svg>
The viewbox will only be applied to the ChartContent svg and the svgs with the actual scales stay untouched and are just simply rerendered if needed with different labels at different positions. The desired outcome is similar to this example: https://jsfiddle.net/19h83ker/1/
Given that i have a chart to display that is as an example 4000 pixels wide and 200 pixels high, the y-axis is 40 pixels wide and 200 pixels high, the x-axis is 40 pixels high and 4000 pixels wide, how should i generally setup the viewports? If i set width="100%" and height="100%" on the ContainerSVG and ChartContent SVG, i have no scrollbar available. If i set width="4040" on the ContainerSVG and width="4000" on the ChartContent SVG, i have a scrollbar but applying the viewbox while zooming out by 100% will simply halve my svg in width and the right 50% are left blank. I dont really understand what the combination of widths / heights is in my structure, that i should be going for. Or am i making a mistake in general? Are there better ways to implement the desired outcome? I have already spent 2 days on this and dont really see any other option than these 3 nested svgs.At the end of the day panning / zooming in the 4000 pixel wide example SVG chart should be possible.
The suggestions you mentioned involve setting width and height, then using the default browser behavior for scroll and zoom. Instead, you need to intercept the appropriate events and modify the viewBox attribute.
The code below demonstrates zooming on mouse wheel events. Panning should be simpler (only the first and second parts of the viewBox need to change) but the implementation depends on what UI controls you want to use.
svg = document.getElementById("s")
var vb = [0,0,300,200]
svg.setAttribute("viewBox",vb) // vb gets converted to the string "0,0,300,40"
function zoom(wheelEvent){
let k=1.005**wheelEvent.deltaY
let ctm = svg.children[0].getScreenCTM()//If the svg is empty, this won't work
// position of the mouse in svg coords
let mx = (wheelEvent.clientX-ctm.e)/ctm.a
let my = (wheelEvent.clientY-ctm.f)/ctm.d
// To center the zoom on the mouse, we need:
// (mx - initialX)/initialWidth == (mx - finalX)/finalWidth
// finalX = mx - (mx - initalX)*(finalWidth/initialWidth)
vb[0] = mx-(mx-vb[0])*k
vb[1] = my-(my-vb[1])*k
vb[2] *= k
vb[3] *= k
svg.setAttribute("viewBox",vb)
wheelEvent.preventDefault() // prevent the page from scrolling
}
svg.addEventListener("wheel",zoom)
html,body,svg{
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
}
#s{
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background-color: red;
}
<svg id="outer" viewBox="0 0 200 100" preserveAspectRatio="xMinYMin">
<rect x="0" y="0" width="20" height="200" />
<rect x="0" y="0" width="100%" height="20" />
<svg id="s" x="20" y="20" width="180" height="180" viewBox="0,0,300,200">
<rect x="-1000" y="-1000" width="2000" height="2000" fill="lightgray"/>
<text font-size="60" x="10" y="60" fill="blue"> hello </text>
</svg>
</svg>
If you only want scaling of the x-axis, you'll need a different value for the 'preserveAspectRatio' attribute (as well as removing the code which changes vb[1] and vb[3]).
Consider following code:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/DTD/svg11.dtd">
<svg width="2000" height="2000" viewBox="-1000 -1000 2000 2000"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<defs>
<style>text { font-size: 60px; }</style>
<style>path { fill: none; stroke: black; }</style>
<style>textPath { text-anchor: middle; }</style>
<path d="M -258.8190, -965.9258 a 1000, 1000 0 0,1 517.6381, 0" id="ttO"/>
<use xlink:href="#ttO" transform="scale(.85)" id="ttI"/>
</defs>
<use xlink:href="#ttO"/>
<text dy="55"><textPath xlink:href="#ttO" startOffset="50%">Hello</textPath></text>
<use xlink:href="#ttI"/>
<text dy="25"><textPath xlink:href="#ttI" startOffset="50%">World!</textPath></text>
</svg>
... and the resulting image:
.
The explicitly defined path (ttO) and the textPath (Hello) using that path works fine. To define the smaller concentric arc (ttI), rather than calculating coordinates, I like to use transform. This works fine. However, I cannot use this second arc 'ttI' in the second textPath, at least Chrome doesn't render the second textPath. Is this because 'use' cannot be used to define new ids? What is the best way to do this?
If it was just this example, probably I can define one path halfway between two arcs and use that to draw textPaths with +/- offsets and draw the two arcs as transforms of the defied path. My goal is to extend the pattern I attempted to create more paths/textPaths at other angles / distances from the center with different languages to form a circular graphic. Without defining transformed paths, I have to explicitly specify at least one arc for each language.
This is how I would do it: I would create a text element using the same text path and I would scale the text - in this case transform="scale(.7,.7)". Also since I want the text to be the same size as the unscaled one I would use a different font size: 1em for the scaled text and .7em for the unscaled. Of coarse this is just an example. You can pick your font size making sure the font size for the scaled text is bigger than the font-size of the unscaled one by the same amount as the transformation.
Please observe that for the path I'm using vector-effect="non-scaling-stroke"so that that stroke appears the same in both the scaled and unscaled one.
svg{border:solid}
path{fill:none;stroke:black;}
<svg viewBox="-110 -110 220 220" >
<g>
<path id="path0" d="M90,0A90,90 0 0 1 -90,0A90,90 0 0 1 90,0" vector-effect="non-scaling-stroke"/>
<text font-size=".7em" >
<textPath xlink:href="#path0" startOffset="75%" text-anchor="middle">Hello World!</textPath>
</text>
</g>
<g transform="scale(.7,.7)">
<text font-size="1em" >
<textPath xlink:href="#path0" startOffset="75%" text-anchor="middle">Hello World!</textPath>
</text>
<use xlink:href="#path0"/>
</g>
</svg>
Currently building a browser-based SVG application. Within this app, various shapes can be styled and positioned by the user, including rectangles.
When I apply a stroke-width to an SVG rect element of say 1px, the stroke is applied to the rect’s offset and inset in different ways by different browsers. This is proving to be troublesome, especially when I try to calculate the outer width and visual position of a rectangle and position it next to other elements.
For example:
Firefox adds 1px inset (bottom and left), and 1px offset (top and right)
Chrome adds 1px inset (top and left), and 1px offset (bottom and right)
My only solution so far would be to draw the actual borders myself (probably with the path tool) and position the borders behind the stroked element. But this solution is an unpleasant workaround, and I’d prefer not to go down this road if possible.
So my question is, can you control how an SVG’s stroke-width is drawn on elements?
No, you cannot specify whether the stroke is drawn inside or outside an element. I made a proposal to the SVG working group for this functionality in 2003, but it received no support (or discussion).
As I noted in the proposal,
you can achieve the same visual result as "inside" by doubling your stroke width and then using a clipping path to clip the object to itself, and
you can achieve the same visual result as 'outside' by doubling the stroke width and then overlaying a no-stroke copy of the object on top of itself.
Edit: This answer may be wrong in the future. It should be possible to achieve these results using SVG Vector Effects, by combining veStrokePath with veIntersect (for 'inside') or with veExclude (for 'outside). However, Vector Effects are still a working draft module with no implementations that I can yet find.
Edit 2: The SVG 2 draft specification includes a stroke-alignment property (with center|inside|outside possible values). This property may make it into UAs eventually.
Edit 3: Amusingly and dissapointingly, the SVG working group has removed stroke-alignment from SVG 2. You can see some of the concerns described after the prose here.
UPDATE: The stroke-alignment attribute was on April 1st, 2015 moved to a completely new spec called SVG Strokes.
As of the SVG 2.0 Editor’s Draft of February 26th, 2015 (and possibly since February 13th), the stroke-alignment property is present with the values inner, center (default) and outer.
It seems to work the same way as the stroke-location property proposed by #Phrogz and the later stroke-position suggestion. This property has been planned since at least 2011, but apart from an annotation that said
SVG 2 shall include a way to specify stroke position
, it has never been detailed in the spec as it was deferred - until now, it seems.
No browser support this property, or, as far as I know, any of the new SVG 2 features, yet, but hopefully they will soon as the spec matures. This has been a property I personally have been urging to have, and I'm really happy that it's finally there in the spec.
There seems to be some issues as to how to the property should behave on open paths as well as loops. These issues will, most probably, prolong implementations across browsers. However, I will update this answer with new information as browsers begin to support this property.
I found an easy way, which has a few restrictions, but worked for me:
define the shape in defs
define a clip path referencing the shape
use it and double the stroke with as the outside is clipped
Here a working example:
<svg width="240" height="240" viewBox="0 0 1024 1024">
<defs>
<path id="ld" d="M256,0 L0,512 L384,512 L128,1024 L1024,384 L640,384 L896,0 L256,0 Z"/>
<clipPath id="clip">
<use xlink:href="#ld"/>
</clipPath>
</defs>
<g>
<use xlink:href="#ld" stroke="#0081C6" stroke-width="160" fill="#00D2B8" clip-path="url(#clip)"/>
</g>
</svg>
You can use CSS to style the order of stroke and fills. That is, stroke first and then fill second, and get the desired effect.
MDN on paint-order: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/SVG/Attribute/paint-order
CSS code:
paint-order: stroke;
Here's a function that will calculate how many pixels you need to add - using the given stroke - to the top, right, bottom and left, all based on the browser:
var getStrokeOffsets = function(stroke){
var strokeFloor = Math.floor(stroke / 2), // max offset
strokeCeil = Math.ceil(stroke / 2); // min offset
if($.browser.mozilla){ // Mozilla offsets
return {
bottom: strokeFloor,
left: strokeFloor,
top: strokeCeil,
right: strokeCeil
};
}else if($.browser.webkit){ // WebKit offsets
return {
bottom: strokeCeil,
left: strokeFloor,
top: strokeFloor,
right: strokeCeil
};
}else{ // default offsets
return {
bottom: strokeCeil,
left: strokeCeil,
top: strokeCeil,
right: strokeCeil
};
}
};
As people above have noted you'll either have to recalculate an offset to the stroke's path coordinates or double its width and then mask one side or the other, because not only does SVG not natively support Illustrator's stroke alignment, but PostScript doesn't either.
The specification for strokes in Adobe's PostScript Manual 2nd edition states:
"4.5.1 Stroking:
The stroke operator draws a line of some thickness along the current path. For each straight or curved segment in the path, stroke draws a line that is centered on the segment with sides parallel to the segment." (emphasis theirs)
The rest of the specification has no attributes for offsetting the line's position. When Illustrator lets you align inside or outside, it's recalculating the actual path's offset (because it's still computationally cheaper than overprinting then masking). The path coordinates in the .ai document are reference, not what gets rastered or exported to a final format.
Because Inkscape's native format is spec SVG, it can't offer a feature the spec lacks.
Here is a work around for inner bordered rect using symbol and use.
Example: https://jsbin.com/yopemiwame/edit?html,output
SVG:
<svg>
<symbol id="inner-border-rect">
<rect class="inner-border" width="100%" height="100%" style="fill:rgb(0,255,255);stroke-width:10;stroke:rgb(0,0,0)">
</symbol>
...
<use xlink:href="#inner-border-rect" x="?" y="?" width="?" height="?">
</svg>
Note: Make sure to replace the ? in use with real values.
Background: The reason why this works is because symbol establishes a new viewport by replacing symbol with svg and creating an element in the shadow DOM. This svg of the shadow DOM is then linked into your current SVG element. Note that svgs can be nested and every svg creates a new viewport, which clips everything that overlaps, including the overlapping border. For a much more detailed overview of whats going on read this fantastic article by Sara Soueidan.
I don’t know how helpful will that be but in my case I just created another circle with border only and placed it “inside” the other shape.
This worked for me:
.btn {
border: 1px solid black;
box-shadow: inset 0 0 0 1px black;
}
A (dirty) possible solution is by using patterns,
here is an example with an inside stroked triangle :
https://jsfiddle.net/qr3p7php/5/
<style>
#triangle1{
fill: #0F0;
fill-opacity: 0.3;
stroke: #000;
stroke-opacity: 0.5;
stroke-width: 20;
}
#triangle2{
stroke: #f00;
stroke-opacity: 1;
stroke-width: 1;
}
</style>
<svg height="210" width="400" >
<pattern id="fagl" patternUnits="objectBoundingBox" width="2" height="1" x="-50%">
<path id="triangle1" d="M150 0 L75 200 L225 200 Z">
</pattern>
<path id="triangle2" d="M150 0 L75 200 L225 200 Z" fill="url(#fagl)"/>
</svg>
The solution from Xavier Ho of doubling the width of the stroke and changing the paint-order is brilliant, although only works if the fill is a solid color, with no transparency.
I have developed other approach, more complicated but works for any fill. It also works in ellipses or paths (with the later there are some corner cases with strange behaviour, for example open paths that crosses theirselves, but not much).
The trick is to display the shape in two layers. One without stroke (only fill), and another one only with stroke at double width (transparent fill) and passed through a mask that shows the whole shape, but hides the original shape without stroke.
<svg width="240" height="240" viewBox="0 0 1024 1024">
<defs>
<path id="ld" d="M256,0 L0,512 L384,512 L128,1024 L1024,384 L640,384 L896,0 L256,0 Z"/>
<mask id="mask">
<use xlink:href="#ld" stroke="#FFFFFF" stroke-width="160" fill="#FFFFFF"/>
<use xlink:href="#ld" fill="#000000"/>
</mask>
</defs>
<g>
<use xlink:href="#ld" fill="#00D2B8"/>
<use xlink:href="#ld" stroke="#0081C6" stroke-width="160" fill="red" mask="url(#mask)"/>
</g>
</svg>
The easiest way I found is to add clip-path into circle
Add clip-path="circle()"
<circle id="circle" clip-path="circle()" cx="100" cy="100" r="100" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="5" />
Then the stroke-width="5" will magically become inner 5px stroke with absolute 100px radius.
Update 2023: The current draft renamed the attribute to stroke-align
Browser Support 2023:
See caniuse
This CSS property is not supported in any modern browser, nor are
there any known plans to support it.
Polyfill-like helper function
Based on the previous approaches to combine paint-order, mask and clip-path.
(As suggested by #Xavier Ho
#Jorg Janke)
//emulateStrokeAlign();
function emulateStrokeAlign() {
let supportsSvgStrokeAlign = CSS.supports("stroke-align", "outer") ?
true :
CSS.supports("stroke-alignment", "outer") ?
true :
false;
console.log("supportsSvgStrokeAlign", supportsSvgStrokeAlign);
if (!supportsSvgStrokeAlign) {
let ns = "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg";
let strokeAlignmentEls = document.querySelectorAll(
"*[stroke-alignment], *[stroke-align]"
);
strokeAlignmentEls.forEach((el, s) => {
let svg = el.closest("svg");
// set auto ids to prevent non-unique mask ids
let svgID = svg.id ? svg.id : "svg_" + s;
svg.id = svgID;
//create <defs> if not previously appended
let defs = svg.querySelector("defs");
if (!defs) {
defs = document.createElementNS(ns, "defs");
svg.insertBefore(defs, svg.children[0]);
}
let style = window.getComputedStyle(el);
let strokeWidth = parseFloat(style.strokeWidth);
let strokeAlignment = el.getAttribute("stroke-alignment") ?
el.getAttribute("stroke-alignment") :
el.getAttribute("stroke-align");
el.removeAttribute("stroke-align");
el.removeAttribute("stroke-alignment");
el.setAttribute("data-stroke-align", strokeAlignment);
let maskClipId = `mask-${svgID}-${s}`;
if (strokeAlignment === "outer") {
// create mask
let mask = document.createElementNS(ns, "mask");
mask.id = maskClipId;
let maskEl = el.cloneNode();
mask.appendChild(maskEl);
defs.appendChild(mask);
maskEl.setAttribute("fill", "#000");
mask.setAttribute("maskUnits", "userSpaceOnUse");
maskEl.setAttribute("stroke", "#fff");
maskEl.removeAttribute("stroke-opacity");
maskEl.removeAttribute("id");
maskEl.setAttribute("paint-order", "stroke");
maskEl.style.strokeWidth = strokeWidth * 2;
// clone stroke
let cloneStroke = el.cloneNode();
cloneStroke.style.fill = "none";
cloneStroke.style.strokeWidth = strokeWidth * 2;
cloneStroke.removeAttribute("id");
cloneStroke.removeAttribute("stroke-alignment");
cloneStroke.classList.add("cloneStrokeOuter");
cloneStroke.setAttribute("mask", `url(#${maskClipId})`);
el.parentNode.insertBefore(cloneStroke, el.nextElementSibling);
//remove stroke from original element
el.style.stroke = "none";
}
if (strokeAlignment === "inner") {
//create clipPath
let clipPathEl = el.cloneNode();
let clipPath = document.createElementNS(ns, "clipPath");
clipPath.id = maskClipId;
defs.appendChild(clipPath);
clipPathEl.removeAttribute("id");
clipPath.appendChild(clipPathEl);
el.setAttribute("clip-path", `url(#${maskClipId})`);
el.style.strokeWidth = strokeWidth * 2;
}
});
}
}
body {
margin: 2em;
}
svg {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
overflow: visible;
border: 1px solid #ccc;
}
body {
margin: 2em;
}
svg {
height: 20em;
overflow: visible;
border: 1px solid #ccc;
}
<p><button onclick="emulateStrokeAlign()">Emulate stroke align</button></p>
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 380 120">
<g id="myGroup" style="fill:rgb(45, 130, 255); stroke:#000; stroke-width:10; stroke-opacity:1;">
<rect id="el1" stroke-alignment="outer" x="10" y="10" width="100" height="100" />
<rect id="el2" x="140" y="10" width="100" height="100" />
<rect id="el3" stroke-alignment="inner" x="270" y="10" width="100" height="100" />
</g>
</svg>
<svg viewBox="0 0 12 6" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" stroke-width="0.5">
<path d="M1,5 a2,2 0,0,0 2,-3 a3,3 0 0 1 2,3.5z" fill="blue" stroke-align="outer" stroke="red" stroke-opacity="0.5" stroke-linecap="butt" />
<path d="M7,5 a2,2 0,0,0 2,-3 a3,3 0 0 1 2,3.5z" fill="blue" stroke-align="inner" stroke="red" stroke-opacity="0.5" />
</svg>
Hardcoded offset via paper.js offset glenzli's plugin
This approach will actually grow/shrink your <path> elements to get the desired stroke position (using the default middle stroke-alignment).
const canvas = document.createElement("canvas");
canvas.style.display='none';
document.body.appendChild(canvas);
//const canvas = document.querySelector("canvas");
paper.setup(canvas);
let strokeEls = document.querySelectorAll("*[stroke-alignment]");
strokeEls.forEach((el,i) => {
let type = el.nodeName;
let style = window.getComputedStyle(el);
let strokeWidth = parseFloat(style.strokeWidth);
let strokeAlignment = el.getAttribute('stroke-alignment');
let offset = strokeAlignment==='outer' ? strokeWidth/2 : (strokeAlignment==='inner' ? strokeWidth / -2 : 0);
// convert primitive
if(type!=='path'){
el = convertPrimitiveToPath(el);
}
let d = el.getAttribute("d");
let polyPath = new paper.Path(el.getAttribute("d"));
let dOffset = offset ? PaperOffset.offset(polyPath, offset)
.exportSVG()
.getAttribute("d") : d;
el.setAttribute("d", dOffset);
});
body{
margin:2em;
}
svg{
width:100%;
overflow:visible;
border:1px solid #ccc;
}
<svg viewBox="0 0 12 6" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" stroke-width="0.5">
<path d="M1,5 a2,2 0,0,0 2,-3 a3,3 0 0 1 2,3.5" stroke="black" fill="none" stroke-linejoin="miter"/>
<path d="M1,5 a2,2 0,0,0 2,-3 a3,3 0 0 1 2,3.5" fill="none" stroke-linejoin="miter" stroke-alignment="outer" stroke="red" stroke-opacity="0.5" />
<path d="M7,5 a2,2 0,0,0 2,-3 a3,3 0 0 1 2,3.5" stroke="black" fill="none" stroke-linejoin="round" />
<path d="M7,5 a2,2 0,0,0 2,-3 a3,3 0 0 1 2,3.5" fill="none" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-alignment="inner" stroke="red" stroke-opacity="0.5" />
</svg>
<script src="https://unpkg.com/paper#0.12.15/dist/paper-full.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://unpkg.com/paperjs-offset#1.0.8/dist/paperjs-offset.js"></script>
However, the library struggles with complex shapes.