I am scripting for a Sharepoint application in its Production environment which uses NTLM Authorization. The recording is working fine, but I am facing 401:Unauthorized error while playback of the same script. Since this is an NTLM authorization application, the launch of the application redirects to the Homepage without asking for the login credentials. The first HTTP request of the script which is a GET Method throws 401 Unauthorized error. I've used HTTP Authorization Manager, HTTP Cookie Manager, HTTP Cache Manager. The same config elements are used in the scripts for UAT env which works fine and such issue is never experienced in the UAT environment.
Please feel free to suggest if you have any idea on this issue.
Thanks.
HTTP Authorization Manager should have "Domain" field populated and matching your environment for NTLM authentication along with username and password.
See Windows Authentication with Apache JMeter guide for more details.
Related
We have a web application (netcore) configured to use Windows authentication it was working fine, but now we dont know why iis sends basic authentication header even it is has configured windows authentication.
Any idea why?
An answer to myself, the error was related to a blocked user.
I am encountering the following issue when trying to configure an intranet ASP.NET site in IIS 8.5 for Windows authentication. I have the IIS Windows authentication provider settings set to:
Negotiate
NTLM
This works great for Windows-based browsers - users are logged in seamlessly. Mac-based browsers don't seem to support the Negotiate protocol; when accessing my site you are prompted for your domain credentials. Even when responding with correct credentials, the browser responds to the authentication challenge with "NTLM xxxxxxx...". IIS doesn't like this and always responds with a 401. This sends the browser into an authentication loop where you are prompted for your credentials endlessly. If you click "Cancel" (depending on which browser you are in), you will finally get a 401 response (not very useful).
If I modify the settings and remove the "Negotiate" provider, I am still prompted when accessing the site from a Mac browser, but this time the NTLM challenge succeeds and I can authenticate. The problem with this is I am now getting an authentication prompt from Windows browsers as well.
Is there a way to get around this (do I have Windows authentication misconfigured)? I am fine with having to answer a credential prompt from the Mac but as the vast majority of my users will be accessing from Windows, I would prefer they still get the "invisible" log on experience.
If I'm understanding your question correctly; Safari/Apple doesn't support Windows Authentication. Basic Authentication needs to be enabled within IIS in order for Safari to login.
We are deploying a NodeJS application to production via IISnode. Every time a user tries to log in, they are greeted with a additional login prompt after logging in to the app, which always lead to a nice 401 access denied error.
The response headers for this page are as follows:
Server:Microsoft-IIS/7.5
WWW-Authenticate:Negotiate
WWW-Authenticate:NTLM
X-Powered-By:ASP.NET
Clearly there's some additional windows/iis authentication mechanism, preventing our users from accessing the application. How can I disable this?
I am programming a command line tool (installedApp) that will need access to the Google Sheets of the user. For this I need to get an access token from the user.
I am following these guidelines OAuth2InstalledApp. So far I managed to get the authorization code by using the http://localhost type of redirect_uri. I specified http://localhost:7373/authorizationCode as the redirect_uri and I have a local server listening on port 7373.
But when I make the request to get the access token, I get an HTTP 400 Bad request response with a
redirect_uri_mismatch error
. When I make the request,the redirect_uri is defined as "The redirect URI you obtained from the Developers Console". Which is kind of wrong because when you create an Installed app you don't have the ability to specify a redirect uri (only with web apps). https://infinit.io/_/i48b2rM
So my question is what am I doing wrong?
When you create a client ID in the Google Developers Console, two redirect_uris are created for you: urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob and http://localhost. Also you can consider urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob:auto .The value your application uses determines how the authorization code is returned to your application. choose a redirect uri
Is browser redirection necessary to get autorization and access token ? Is there a way how to get autorization programatically ? I am a bit suprised i found this in the OAuth2 google documentation :
https://developers.google.com/accounts/docs/OAuth2#scenarios > Chapter Installed Application
sequence begins by redirecting a browser (either a browser embedded in the application or the system browser) to a Google URL with a set of query parameters that indicate the type of Google API access the application requires...
We run small java utility app which contains username and password in config file to our google account. i would expect there will be way to get autorization and access token without any browser interaction (it`s a bit hard to do when we run it as a cron job on virtual server)...
It's about trusted path between credentials holder (user), and authentication entity (it can by google app's server, or openID or facebook...). Someone who uses OAuth, provides his credentials to server he trusts, and in turn this server not revealing any secret data about him, provides identity assurance for your app.
So you have to provide trusted path to Oauth porvider. This can be done by opening a simple http server within your app, and opening user browser pointing to it, and then authentication would be done using, browser, and after auth is finished your server would recvive OAuth response and your app could authenticate user.
That's the idea, I would not input my "global" credentials to some app, and trust it that it will not, copy and use them later on. You've registered within specific OAuth provider and only he should know, and recive your credentials.