Rust borrow mutable self inside match expression - rust

I have a problem with self borrowing in a match expression:
fn add_once(&'t mut self, p_name: &'t str) -> Box<Element> {
match self.get(p_name) {
Some(x) => Box::new(*x),
None => self.add(p_name),
}
}
The signature of the get() and add() functions are:
fn get(&self, p_name: &str) -> Option<&Element>
fn add(&'t mut self, p_name: &'t str) -> Box<Element>
The compiler refuses this code:
error[E0502]: cannot borrow `*self` as mutable because it is also borrowed as immutable
--> src/main.rs:38:21
|
36 | match self.get(p_name) {
| ---- immutable borrow occurs here
37 | Some(x) => Box::new(*x),
38 | None => self.add(p_name),
| ^^^^ mutable borrow occurs here
39 | }
40 | }
| - immutable borrow ends here
I get that, but I don't see how I can rewrite the match expression.
In a related question, it was solved by having the match return a value and then calling the function. However, that doesn't work here because the meaning of the conditional is not to choose a value but selectively execute an action.
The full code sample is below:
struct Element<'e> {
name: &'e str,
}
impl<'e> Element<'e> {
fn new(p_name: &str) -> Element {
Element { name: p_name }
}
}
struct Top<'t> {
list: Vec<Element<'t>>,
}
impl<'t> Top<'t> {
fn new() -> Top<'t> {
Top { list: vec![] }
}
fn get(&self, p_name: &str) -> Option<&Element> {
for element in self.list.iter() {
if element.name == p_name {
return Some(element);
}
}
None
}
fn add(&'t mut self, p_name: &'t str) -> Box<Element> {
let new_element = Box::new(Element::new(p_name));
self.list.push(*new_element);
return new_element;
}
fn add_once(&'t mut self, p_name: &'t str) -> Box<Element> {
match self.get(p_name) {
Some(x) => Box::new(*x),
None => self.add(p_name),
}
}
}
fn main() {
let mut t = Top::new();
let plop1 = t.add_once("plop1");
let plop2 = t.add_once("plop1");
}

Let's fix the design issues first. The main issue is lifetime conflation:
struct Top<'t> {
list: Vec<Element<'t>>,
}
impl<'t> Top<'t> {
fn add(&'t mut self, p_name: &'t str) -> Box<Element>;
fn add_once(&'t mut self, p_name: &'t str) -> Box<Element>;
}
You assert that self should live at least as long as 't, which is itself the lifetime bound of the references it will contain. It is not actually what you need, self should live less than 't to guarantee that any &'t is still alive and kicking until self dies.
If we change this, we can painlessly return references to Element:
impl<'t> Top<'t> {
fn add<'a>(&'a mut self, p_name: &'t str) -> &'a Element<'t>;
fn add_once<'a>(&'a mut self, p_name: &'t str) -> &'a Element<'t>;
}
Note that the lifetime 'a of the reference to Element is different (and actually will be shorter) than the lifetime 't of its contained reference.
With that out of the way, this should fix the functions:
fn position(&self, p_name: &str) -> Option<usize> {
self.list.iter().position(|e| e.name == p_name)
}
fn add<'a>(&'a mut self, p_name: &'t str) -> &'a Element<'t> {
self.list.push(Element::new(p_name));
&self.list[self.list.len() - 1]
}
fn add_once<'a>(&'a mut self, p_name: &'t str) -> &'a Element<'t> {
if let Some(p) = self.position(p_name) {
return &self.list[p];
}
self.add(p_name)
}
And position can be reused for get:
fn get<'a>(&'a self, p_name: &str) -> Option<&'a Element<'t>> {
self.position(p_name).map(|pos| &self.list[pos])
}
I would expect the following to work in a perfect world:
fn add_once<'a>(&'a mut self, p_name: &'t str) -> &'a Element<'t> {
match self.get(p_name) {
Some(x) => x,
None => self.add(p_name)
}
}
However, I recall a discussion in which it was determined that the borrow-checker was not lax enough: the scope of the borrow induced by self.get is computed to be the entire match expression even though in the None branch the temporary cannot be accessed.
This should be fixed once "Non-Lexical Lifetimes" are incorporated in Rust, which is a work in progress.

Related

Trouble with digraphs: cannot borrow as mutable

I created a library to deal with digraphs: nodes that link (reference counted) to zero or one other nodes (as in linked lists, but in a digraph a node can be linked to by more than one node).
I am trying to use my library to create a list with a current node:
struct ListWithPointer<'a> {
pub nodes: DigraphNodeRef<String>,
pub current_node: Option<&'a mut DigraphNodeRef<String>>,
}
current_node points to a link in the list.
Now I am trying to move current node to the next element of the list (or to the beginning if the list ended):
fn next_node<'a>(this: &'a mut ListWithPointer<'a>) {
if this.current_node.is_some() {
this.current_node.iter_mut().for_each(|a| {
(*a).as_rc_mut().iter_mut()
.for_each(|rc| this.current_node = Some(&mut Arc::get_mut(rc).unwrap().next));
});
} else {
this.current_node = Some(&mut this.nodes);
}
}
but whatever I do, it fails with an error like:
error[E0500]: closure requires unique access to `this.current_node` but it is already borrowed
--> src/lib.rs:150:51
|
148 | fn next_node<'a>(this: &'a mut ListWithPointer<'a>) {
| -- lifetime `'a` defined here
149 | if this.current_node.is_some() {
150 | this.current_node.iter_mut().for_each(|a| {
| ---------------------------- ^^^ closure construction occurs here
| |
| borrow occurs here
| argument requires that `this.current_node` is borrowed for `'a`
151 | (*a).as_rc_mut().iter_mut()
152 | .for_each(|rc| this.current_node = Some(&mut Arc::get_mut(rc).unwrap().next));
| ----------------- second borrow occurs due to use of `this.current_node` in closure
Help to rewrite without errors.
Here is the library code:
use std::sync::Arc;
#[derive(Clone)]
pub struct DigraphNode<T> {
pub next: DigraphNodeRef<T>, // I made it `pub` to be able `item.next.next()` to remove an item from the middle.
data: T,
}
impl<T> DigraphNode<T> {
fn new(next: DigraphNodeRef<T>, data: T) -> Self {
Self { next, data }
}
}
pub struct DigraphNodeRef<T> {
rc: Option<Arc<DigraphNode<T>>>,
}
impl<T> DigraphNodeRef<T> {
pub fn new() -> Self {
Self {
rc: None
}
}
pub fn from_node(value: DigraphNode<T>) -> Self {
Self::from(Some(Arc::new(value)))
}
pub fn from(rc: Option<Arc<DigraphNode<T>>>) -> Self {
Self {
rc
}
}
pub fn as_rc(&self) -> &Option<Arc<DigraphNode<T>>> {
&self.rc
}
pub fn as_rc_mut(&mut self) -> &mut Option<Arc<DigraphNode<T>>> {
&mut self.rc
}
pub fn is_none(&self) -> bool {
self.rc.is_none()
}
pub fn remove(&mut self) -> bool {
if let Some(rc) = self.rc.clone() {
self.rc = rc.next.rc.clone();
true
} else {
false
}
}
pub fn prepend(&mut self, value: T) -> Self {
let new_node = DigraphNode::new(self.clone(), value);
let new_node_ref = DigraphNodeRef::from_node(new_node);
*self = new_node_ref.clone();
new_node_ref
}
pub fn node(&self) -> Option<DigraphNode<T>>
where T: Clone
{
self.rc.clone().map(|node| (*node).clone())
}
/// TODO: Should return a reference.
pub fn data(&self) -> Option<T>
where T: Clone
{
self.rc.clone().map(|node| (*node).data.clone())
}
pub fn values(self) -> DigraphNodeValuesIterator<T> {
DigraphNodeValuesIterator {
underlying: self.clone()
}
}
}
impl<T> Clone for DigraphNodeRef<T> {
fn clone(&self) -> Self {
Self { rc: self.rc.clone() }
}
}
impl<T> Iterator for DigraphNodeRef<T> {
type Item = Arc<DigraphNode<T>>;
fn next(&mut self) -> Option<Self::Item> {
if let Some(rc) = self.rc.clone() {
self.rc = rc.next.rc.clone();
Some(rc.clone())
} else {
None
}
}
}
pub struct DigraphNodeValuesIterator<T> {
underlying: DigraphNodeRef<T>,
}
impl<T: Clone> Iterator for DigraphNodeValuesIterator<T> {
type Item = T;
fn next(&mut self) -> Option<Self::Item> {
self.underlying.next().map(|node| node.data.clone())
}
}
In Rust the mutable access is ensured to be exclusive, i.e. if you hold a reference, some other code can't grab a mutable reference.
Problem is this line:
this.current_node.iter_mut().for_each(...)
It grabs a mutable access to current_node, so it can't regain it again down the line.
Not to mention that iterating over Option is a strange decision.
If you want to move current_node to a different place, I'd try to reorganize your code such that reads are separate from writes, and they are performed in a sequence, instead of trying to do it in one go:
// detach the current_node for moving
if let Some(current_node_to_move) = this.current_node.take() {
let new_current_node_ref: &mut ... = ... // find new location logic
new_current_node_ref.replace(current_node_to_move);
} else {
...
}
Here in line 1 it does a write None update to current_node via this, but immediately relinquishes the mutable reference. Line 2 does a read (search), but also grabs a mutable reference to a new location. Line 3 writes to this location.
To get the linked list implementation right, I recommend https://rust-unofficial.github.io/too-many-lists/

How do I mutate in a match which borrows an immutable value?

I can understand borrowing/ownership concepts in Rust, but I have no idea how to work around this case:
use std::collections::{HashMap, HashSet};
struct Val {
t: HashMap<u16, u16>,
l: HashSet<u16>,
}
impl Val {
fn new() -> Val {
Val {
t: HashMap::new(),
l: HashSet::new(),
}
}
fn set(&mut self, k: u16, v: u16) {
self.t.insert(k, v);
self.l.insert(v);
}
fn remove(&mut self, v: &u16) -> bool {
self.l.remove(v)
}
fn do_work(&mut self, v: u16) -> bool {
match self.t.get(&v) {
None => false,
Some(r) => self.remove(r),
}
}
}
fn main() {
let mut v = Val::new();
v.set(123, 100);
v.set(100, 1234);
println!("Size before: {}", v.l.len());
println!("Work: {}", v.do_work(123));
println!("Size after: {}", v.l.len());
}
playground
The compiler has the error:
error[E0502]: cannot borrow `*self` as mutable because it is also borrowed as immutable
--> src/main.rs:28:24
|
26 | match self.t.get(&v) {
| ------ immutable borrow occurs here
27 | None => false,
28 | Some(r) => self.remove(r),
| ^^^^^------^^^
| | |
| | immutable borrow later used by call
| mutable borrow occurs here
I don't understand why I can't mutate in the match arm when I did a get (read value) before; the self.t.get is finished when the mutation via remove begins.
Is this due to scope of the result (Option<&u16>) returned by the get? It's true that the lifetime of the result has a scope inside the match expression, but this design-pattern is used very often (mutate in a match expression).
How do I work around the error?
The declaration of function HashMap::<K,V>::get() is, a bit simplified:
pub fn get<'s>(&'s self, k: &K) -> Option<&'s V>
This means that it returns an optional reference to the contained value, not the value itself. Since the returned reference points to a value inside the map, it actually borrows the map, that is, you cannot mutate the map while this reference exists. This restriction is there to protect you, what would happen if you remove this value while the reference is still alive?
So when you write:
match self.t.get(&v) {
None => false,
//r: &u16
Some(r) => self.remove(r)
}
the captured r is of type &u16 and its lifetime is that of self.t, that is, it is borrowing it. Thus you cannot get a mutable reference to self, that is needed to call remove.
The simplest solution for your problem is the clone() solves every lifetime issue pattern. Since your values are of type u16, that is Copy, it is actually trivial:
match self.t.get(&v) {
None => false,
//r: u16
Some(&r) => self.remove(&r)
}
Now r is actually of type u16 so it borrows nothing and you can mutate self at will.
If your key/value types weren't Copy you could try and clone them, if you are willing to pay for that. If not, there is still another option as your remove() function does not modify the HashMap but an unrelated HashSet. You can still mutate that set if you take care not to reborrow self:
fn remove2(v: &u16, l: &mut HashSet<u16>) -> bool {
l.remove(v)
}
fn do_work(&mut self, v: u16) -> bool {
match self.t.get(&v) {
None => false,
//selt.t is borrowed, now we mut-borrow self.l, no problem
Some(r) => Self::remove2(r, &mut self.l)
}
}
You are trying to remove value from HashMap by using value you get, not key.
Only line 26 is changed Some(_) => self.remove(&v)
This will work:
use std::collections::HashMap;
struct Val {
t: HashMap<u16, u16>
}
impl Val {
fn new() -> Val {
Val { t: HashMap::new() }
}
fn set(&mut self, k: u16, v: u16) {
self.t.insert(k, v);
}
fn remove(&mut self, v: &u16) -> bool {
match self.t.remove(v) {
None => false,
_ => true,
}
}
fn do_work(&mut self, v: u16) -> bool {
match self.t.get(&v) {
None => false,
Some(_) => self.remove(&v)
}
}
}
fn main() {
let mut v = Val::new();
v.set(123, 100);
v.set(1100, 1234);
println!("Size before: {}", v.t.len());
println!("Work: {}", v.do_work(123));
println!("Size after: {}", v.t.len());
}
play.rust
It seems that the following solution is good for primitive types like here u16. For other types, the ownership is moved.
use std::collections::HashMap;
struct Val {
t: HashMap<u16, u16>,
}
impl Val {
fn new() -> Val {
Val { t: HashMap::new() }
}
fn set(&mut self, k: u16, v: u16) {
self.t.insert(k, v);
}
fn remove(&mut self, v: &u16) -> bool {
match self.t.remove(v) {
None => false,
_ => true,
}
}
fn do_work(&mut self, v: u16) -> bool {
match self.t.get(&v) {
None => false,
Some(&v) => self.remove(&v)
}
}
}
fn main() {
let mut v = Val::new();
v.set(123, 100);
v.set(100, 1234);
println!("Size before: {}", v.t.len());
println!("Work: {}", v.do_work(123));
println!("Size after: {}", v.t.len());
}
For other types, we must clone the value:
use std::collections::{HashMap, HashSet};
#[derive(Debug)]
struct Val {
t: HashMap<String, String>,
l: HashSet<String>
}
impl Val {
fn new() -> Val {
Val { t: HashMap::new(), l: HashSet::new() }
}
fn set(&mut self, k: String, v: String) {
self.l.insert(v.clone());
self.t.insert(k, v);
}
fn remove(&mut self, v: &String) -> bool {
self.l.remove(v)
}
fn do_work(&mut self, i: &String) -> bool {
match self.t.get(i) {
None => false,
Some(v) => {
let x = v.clone();
self.remove(&x)
}
}
}
fn do_task(&mut self, i: &String) -> bool {
match self.t.get(i) {
None => false,
Some(v) => self.l.insert(v.clone())
}
}
}
fn main() {
let mut v = Val::new();
v.set("AA".to_string(), "BB".to_string());
v.set("BB".to_string(), "CC".to_string());
println!("Start: {:#?}", v);
println!("Size before: {}", v.l.len());
println!("Work: {}", v.do_work(&"AA".to_string()));
println!("Size after: {}", v.l.len());
println!("After: {:#?}", v);
println!("Task [Exist]: {}", v.do_task(&"BB".to_string()));
println!("Task [New]: {}", v.do_task(&"AA".to_string()));
println!("End: {:#?}", v);
}
But i'd like a solution that has no allocation

Struggling with interior mutability

I have a data structure like this:
struct R {
hmhs: HashMap<i64, HashSet<i64>>,
}
impl R {
fn hs_for_hmhs(&mut self) -> &mut HashSet<i64> {
if let None = self.hmhs.get(&0) {
self.hmhs.insert(0, HashSet::new());
}
self.hmhs.get_mut(&0).unwrap()
}
fn iter_for_hmhs<'a>(&'a mut self) -> impl Iterator<Item = &'a i64> {
self.hs_for_hmhs().iter()
}
fn insert_for_hmhs(&mut self, i: i64) -> bool {
self.hs_for_hmhs().insert(i)
}
}
This seems to work, but all the methods require a mutable
reference to self which is unfortunate. I tried to give
interior mutability a go:
struct S {
hmhs: RefCell<HashMap<i64, HashSet<i64>>>,
}
impl S {
fn hs_for_hmhs(&self) -> &HashSet<i64> {
if let None = self.hmhs.borrow().get(&0) {
self.hmhs.borrow_mut().insert(0, HashSet::new());
}
self.hmhs.borrow_mut().get_mut(&0).unwrap()
}
fn iter_for_hmhs(&mut self) -> impl Iterator<Item = &i64> {
self.hs_for_hmhs().iter()
}
fn insert_for_hmhs(&mut self, i: i64) -> bool {
self.hs_for_hmhs().insert(i)
}
}
However, I constantly seem to hit problems. Mostly some variety of How do I return a reference to something inside a RefCell without breaking encapsulation?
I have tried lots of variants here, but I am missing something
fundamental in my understanding. Is there a way of achieving what I
want?
Complete Code:
use std::cell::RefCell;
use std::collections::{HashMap, HashSet};
struct R {
hmhs: HashMap<i64, HashSet<i64>>,
}
impl R {
fn hs_for_hmhs(&mut self) -> &mut HashSet<i64> {
if let None = self.hmhs.get(&0) {
self.hmhs.insert(0, HashSet::new());
}
self.hmhs.get_mut(&0).unwrap()
}
fn iter_for_hmhs<'a>(&'a mut self) -> impl Iterator<Item = &'a i64> {
self.hs_for_hmhs().iter()
}
fn insert_for_hmhs(&mut self, i: i64) -> bool {
self.hs_for_hmhs().insert(i)
}
}
struct S {
hmhs: RefCell<HashMap<i64, HashSet<i64>>>,
}
impl S {
fn hs_for_hmhs(&self) -> &mut HashSet<i64> {
if let None = self.hmhs.borrow().get(&0) {
self.hmhs.borrow_mut().insert(0, HashSet::new());
}
self.hmhs.borrow_mut().get_mut(&0).unwrap()
}
fn iter_for_hmhs(&self) -> impl Iterator<Item = &i64> {
self.hs_for_hmhs().iter()
}
fn insert_for_hmhs(&self, i: i64) -> bool {
self.hs_for_hmhs().insert(i)
}
}
fn main() {}
Compiler Message:
error[E0597]: borrowed value does not live long enough
--> src/main.rs:36:9
|
36 | self.hmhs.borrow_mut().get_mut(&0).unwrap()
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ temporary value does not live long enough
37 | }
| - temporary value only lives until here
|
note: borrowed value must be valid for the anonymous lifetime #1 defined on the method body at 31:5...
--> src/main.rs:31:5
|
31 | / fn hs_for_hmhs(&self) -> &mut HashSet<i64> {
32 | | if let None = self.hmhs.borrow().get(&0) {
33 | | self.hmhs.borrow_mut().insert(0, HashSet::new());
34 | | }
35 | |
36 | | self.hmhs.borrow_mut().get_mut(&0).unwrap()
37 | | }
| |_____^
I found a solution -- extract the HashMap as a raw pointer. This in turn means that I can get to the HashSet without shenanigans including returning a iterator.
I'm happy enough with this as a solution. The unsafe code is small and contained and if I understand the reason why the compiler is complaining without unsafe, it cannot occur in this code, since neither the HashMap nor the HashSet are ever removed or replaced after construction.
That was a lot of effort.
use std::cell::RefCell;
use std::collections::{HashMap, HashSet};
struct R {
hmhs: HashMap<i64, HashSet<i64>>,
}
impl R {
fn hs_for_hmhs(&mut self) -> &mut HashSet<i64> {
if let None = self.hmhs.get(&0) {
self.hmhs.insert(0, HashSet::new());
}
self.hmhs.get_mut(&0).unwrap()
}
fn iter_for_hmhs<'a>(&'a mut self) -> impl Iterator<Item = &'a i64> {
self.hs_for_hmhs().iter()
}
fn insert_for_hmhs(&mut self, i: i64) -> bool {
self.hs_for_hmhs().insert(i)
}
}
struct S {
hmhs: RefCell<HashMap<i64, HashSet<i64>>>,
}
impl S {
fn hs_as_ptr(&self) -> *mut HashMap<i64, HashSet<i64>> {
self.hmhs.borrow_mut().entry(0).or_insert(HashSet::new());
self.hmhs.as_ptr()
}
fn mut_hs_for_hmhs(&mut self) -> &mut HashSet<i64> {
unsafe { (*self.hs_as_ptr()).get_mut(&0).unwrap() }
}
fn hs_for_hmhs(&self) -> &HashSet<i64> {
unsafe { (*self.hs_as_ptr()).get(&0).unwrap() }
}
fn iter_for_hmhs<'a>(&'a self) -> impl Iterator<Item = &'a i64> + 'a {
self.hs_for_hmhs().iter()
}
fn insert_for_hmhs(&mut self, i: i64) -> bool {
self.mut_hs_for_hmhs().insert(i)
}
}
fn main() {
let mut r = R {
hmhs: HashMap::new(),
};
let mut s = S {
hmhs: RefCell::new(HashMap::new()),
};
r.insert_for_hmhs(10);
s.insert_for_hmhs(20);
println!("r next: {:?}", r.iter_for_hmhs().next());
println!("s next: {:?}", s.iter_for_hmhs().next());
}
https://play.rust-lang.org/?gist=3ed1977bdd5f9f82d144fe128f618979&version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2015

Why does a call to `fn pop(&mut self) -> Result<T, &str>` continue to borrow my data structure?

I am developing some basic data structures to learn the syntax and Rust in general. Here is what I came up with for a stack:
#[allow(dead_code)]
mod stack {
pub struct Stack<T> {
data: Vec<T>,
}
impl<T> Stack<T> {
pub fn new() -> Stack<T> {
return Stack { data: Vec::new() };
}
pub fn pop(&mut self) -> Result<T, &str> {
let len: usize = self.data.len();
if len > 0 {
let idx_to_rmv: usize = len - 1;
let last: T = self.data.remove(idx_to_rmv);
return Result::Ok(last);
} else {
return Result::Err("Empty stack");
}
}
pub fn push(&mut self, elem: T) {
self.data.push(elem);
}
pub fn is_empty(&self) -> bool {
return self.data.len() == 0;
}
}
}
mod stack_tests {
use super::stack::Stack;
#[test]
fn basics() {
let mut s: Stack<i16> = Stack::new();
s.push(16);
s.push(27);
let pop_result = s.pop().expect("");
assert_eq!(s.pop().expect("Empty stack"), 27);
assert_eq!(s.pop().expect("Empty stack"), 16);
let pop_empty_result = s.pop();
match pop_empty_result {
Ok(_) => panic!("Should have had no result"),
Err(_) => {
println!("Empty stack");
}
}
if s.is_empty() {
println!("O");
}
}
}
I get this interesting error:
error[E0502]: cannot borrow `s` as immutable because it is also borrowed as mutable
--> src/main.rs:58:12
|
49 | let pop_empty_result = s.pop();
| - mutable borrow occurs here
...
58 | if s.is_empty() {
| ^ immutable borrow occurs here
...
61 | }
| - mutable borrow ends here
Why can't I just call pop on my mutable struct?
Why does pop borrow the value? If I add a .expect() after it, it is ok, it doesn't trigger that error. I know that is_empty takes an immutable reference, if I switch it to mutable I just get a second mutable borrow.
Your pop function is declared as:
pub fn pop(&mut self) -> Result<T, &str>
Due to lifetime elision, this expands to
pub fn pop<'a>(&'a mut self) -> Result<T, &'a str>
This says that the Result::Err variant is a string that lives as long as the stack you are calling it on. Since the input and output lifetimes are the same, the returned value might be pointing somewhere into the Stack data structure so the returned value must continue to hold the borrow.
If I add a .expect() after it, it is ok, it doesn't trigger that error.
That's because expect consumes the Result, discarding the Err variant without ever putting it into a variable binding. Since that's never stored, the borrow cannot be saved anywhere and it is released.
To solve the problem, you need to have distinct lifetimes between the input reference and output reference. Since you are using a string literal, the easiest solution is to denote that using the 'static lifetime:
pub fn pop(&mut self) -> Result<T, &'static str>
Extra notes:
Don't call return explicitly at the end of the block / method: return Result::Ok(last) => Result::Ok(last).
Result, Result::Ok, and Result::Err are all imported via the prelude, so you don't need to qualify them: Result::Ok(last) => Ok(last).
There's no need to specify types in many cases let len: usize = self.data.len() => let len = self.data.len().
This happens because of lifetimes. When you construct a method which takes a reference the compiler detects that and if no lifetimes are specified it "generates" them:
pub fn pop<'a>(&'a mut self) -> Result<T, &'a str> {
let len: usize = self.data.len();
if len > 0 {
let idx_to_rmv: usize = len - 1;
let last: T = self.data.remove(idx_to_rmv);
return Result::Ok(last);
} else {
return Result::Err("Empty stack");
}
}
This is what compiler sees actually. So, you want to return a static string, then you have to specify the lifetime for a &str explicitly and let the lifetime for the reference to mut self be inferred automatically:
pub fn pop(&mut self) -> Result<T, &'static str> {

How to implement Index over a wrapped HashMap?

I would like to implement the Index trait for a wrapper type over the HashMap type:
use std::collections::HashMap;
use std::option::Option;
#[cfg(test)]
use std::ops::Index;
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
struct Value {
val: i32,
}
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
pub struct HMShadow {
hashmap: HashMap<String, Value>,
}
impl HMShadow {
fn new() -> HMShadow {
HMShadow {
hashmap: {
HashMap::<String, Value>::new()
},
}
}
fn insert<S>(&mut self, key: S, element: Value) -> Option<Value>
where S: Into<String>
{
self.hashmap.insert(key.into(), element)
}
fn get(&mut self, key: &str) -> &mut Value {
self.hashmap.get_mut(key).expect("no entry found for key")
}
}
fn main()
{
let mut s: HMShadow = HMShadow::new();
let v: Value = Value { val : 5 };
let _ = s.insert("test", v);
println!("{:?}", s);
println!("Get: {}", s.get("test").val);
}
#[cfg(test)]
impl<'a> Index<&'a str> for HMShadow {
type Output = &'a mut Value;
fn index(&self, key: &'a str) -> &&'a mut Value {
match self.hashmap.get_mut(key) {
Some(val) => &mut val,
_ => panic!("no entry found for key"),
}
}
}
#[cfg(test)]
#[test]
fn test_index() {
let mut s: HMShadow = HMShadow::new();
let v: Value = Value { val : 5 };
let _ = s.insert("test", v);
println!("{:?}", s);
println!("Index: {}", s["test"].val);
}
Doing rustc --test tt.rs the compiler says:
error[E0495]: cannot infer an appropriate lifetime for autoref due to conflicting requirements
--> tt.rs:51:28
|
51 | match self.hashmap.get_mut(key) {
| ^^^^^^^
|
help: consider using an explicit lifetime parameter as shown: fn index(&'a self, key: &'a str) -> &&'a mut Value
--> tt.rs:50:5
|
50 | fn index(&self, key: &'a str) -> &&'a mut Value {
| ^
But I cannot do fn index(&'a self, key: &'a str) -> &&'a mut Value because the Index trait does not allow &'a self and the compiler errors:
error[E0308]: method not compatible with trait
Since your question is pretty unclear, I will reinterpret it as follows:
I am trying to implement Index for my struct, but somehow it doesn't work.
The errors
After looking at the compiler errors, it became clear that your implementation of Index is wrong for many reasons:
The Index trait defines a function called index, which returns an immutable reference to the value. However, you are trying to return a mutable reference. Of course, Rust complains that the method you are implementing is incompatible with the trait.
The Output associated type of your Index implementation should not be wrapped in a reference. Therefore, instead of type Output = &'a mut Value; you need type Output = Value;
The lifetimes of key and the output in the index function are unrelated, but you use 'a for both.
You need to make the Value type public in order to use it in a trait implementation.
The code
A correct and simple implementation of Index would be:
impl<'a> Index<&'a str> for HMShadow {
type Output = Value;
fn index(&self, key: &'a str) -> &Value {
&self.hashmap[key]
}
}
I guess, I was looking for
#[cfg(test)]
impl<'a> IndexMut<&'a str> for HMShadow {
fn index_mut<'b>(&'b mut self, key: &'a str) -> &'b mut Value {
self.hashmap.get_mut(key).expect("no entry found for key")
}
}

Resources