Why do some emulators need a BIOS dump?
For example Playstation emulators do, but Gameboy and SNES emulators don't.
Most Gameboy and SNES emulators include the BIOS file in their implementations so you don't need to add BIOS dump files as external sources.
BIOS dumps contain intellectual property therefore it is illegal to distribute them without consent from the manufacturer. My guess is that most developers do not want to include any intellectual property in their emulators. It is the same reason why you won't find emulators being distributed with game ROMs.
EDIT
Taking Gameboy Advance as an example, according to "GBA BIOS FAQ":
The original BIOS code is copyrighted by Nintendo, and, for that reason, not included in the no$gba package.
No$gba includes some sort of a BIOS 'clone'. These 'simulated' functions are providing exactly the same return values as the real BIOS, including for undocumented and 'undefined' return values, and are fully compatible with most or all existing GBA software.
Taking Gameboy Classic and Color as an example, according to "Pan Docs" the gameboy BIOS provides the following functionalities:
displays Nintendo logo on the screen at the top and scrolls until it to the middle of the screen
plays two musical notes on the internal speaker
compares internal nintendo logo with cartridge nintendo logo, if they do not match gameboy halts.
performs cartridge header checksum
So, without the BIOS file, gameboy emulators won't perform these functions unless they are programmed in the emulator itself.
Basically if the programmer decides not to add the BIOS file to its emulator, he has two options: either he can allow users to add the BIOS file manually or he can add BIOS behaviour to his emulator.
Related
I was searching for a syscall that would draw a pixel on a given coordinate on the screen on something similar. But I couldn't find any such syscalls in this site.
I came to know that OS interacts with monitors using graphic drivers. But these drivers may be different on different machines. So is there a common native API provided by linux for handling these?
Much like how there are syscalls for opening, closing, reading, writing to files. Even though underlying file systems maybe different, these syscalls provide an abstract API for user programs to simplify things. I was searching something similar for drawing onto the screen.
Typically a user is running a display server and window system which organizes the screen into windows which applications draw to individually using the API provided by that system. The details will depend on the architecture of this system.
The traditional window system on Linux is the X window system and the more modern Wayland display server/protocol is also in common use. For example X has commands to instruct the X server to draw primitives to the screen.
If no such system is in use, you can directly draw to a display either via a framebuffer device or using the DRM API. Both are not accessed by special syscalls, but instead by using normal file syscalls like open, read, write, etc., but also ioctl, on special device files in /dev, e.g. /dev/dri/card0 for DRM to the first graphics card or /dev/fb0 for the first framebuffer device. DRM is also used for applications to render directly to the screen or a buffer when under a display server or window system as above.
In any case DRM is usually not used directly to draw e.g. pixels to the screen. It still is specific to the graphics card. Typically a library like Mesa3D is used to translate the specific details into a common API like OpenGL or Vulkan for applications to use.
I have a rooted Sony prs900, running a linux 2.6.23 #2 PREEMPT kernel, for ARMv6. (Montavista linux kernel). I'm having problems with figuring out how power management works, both for running the system and for powering up and down the audio port.
I can neither figure out how to read the battery/powerline status information, nor get the audio chip to play sound, etc ... although I have been studying the kernel modules for a while...
It's worth a little money for help, say $100 paypal donation to an email account, (or more if this takes a long time...) for the first person able to explain to me how to do them in a way that works.
Eg: read battery status, and change some power modes like getting the audio amplifiers to power up/down so that the audio played to /dev/dsp (oss emulation) actually comes out as sound rather than just being consumed by the chip and ignored...
The actual sony kernel, and binary packages of cross compiler tools are located on the main page. Actual kernel sourcecode is also available.
What I have learned so far myself :
The sony is using a wolfson micro WM8350 audio driver and battery charger/power management chip for all the system's power; eg: it can power down/up the SD memory cards, send more power to the cpu, power up audio amplifiers, etc. See: WM8350 Datasheet.
Pretty much, the whole problem revolves around getting the WM8350 kernel drivers to work...
Although the company brags quite a bit about it's support under linux, they don't have any application notes or examples that are actually helpful that I can find, other than the datasheet. I suspect the kernel drivers I have are beta code, because they don't seem to be behaving well (several error messages in the kernel log about wm8350 registers not being readable happen at every boot even when running only the sony's native software...).
The kernel driver's source-code of most interest are in: linux-2.6.23_091126/drivers/mxc/pmic/{core,wm8350}
Notice, the wm8350 is a competitor to the MC14783, but the linux kernel drivers use the same {core} driver source code for both chips; The sony ONLY has the wm8350 on it -- there is no MC14783 present.
The code that I most want most desperately to understand how to make operate is found in the subdirectory {wm8350}, eg: wm8350/wm8350pm/power_supply_sysfs.c.
I want the audio to fire up too, but 'm not quite sure where the pertinent audio amplifier code is yet...
Very clearly the wm8350pm code is designed to export a /sys directory interface; right now /sys is mounted and operational on the system; but I'm not very familiar with the semantics of these newer style interfaces... they aren't quite like the old APM power interfaces for Linux laptops...
First I checked the obvious:
If I do a "cat /sys/power/state" it returns the word "mem" and nothing else.
The file has permissions -rw-r--r--, so potentially it could be written -- but I don't know with what. The string "mem" does not exist anywhere in the source code for the wm8350pm drivers, so I don't even know if /sys/power/state is part of the source code.
Doing a find /sys -iname "wm8350" reveals a handful of directories with the patterns:
wm8350-rtc , wm8350-pmic , wm8350-bl , wm8350-power , wm8350-led
wm8350-hifi-dai , wm8350-codec
wm8350-imx32ads.0
So, I do an ls-l on each directory, and look for actual files rather than symbolic links or subdirectories, and what I find are stock useless writable files: bind, unbind, uevent,
and a very few read only files: pmic_reg, dapm_widget, modalias, codec_reg which aren't very helpful.
It's no surprise that:
Doing: cat /sys/devices/platform/wm8350-ebx5016-audi/modalias gives "wm8350-ebx5016-audio"
Doing: cat /sys/devices/platform/wm8350-imx32ads.0/modalias gives "wm8350-imx32ads"
and since audio is off... Doing: cat /sys/devices/platform/wm8350-ebx5016-audi/dapm_widget reveals the audio state:
Headphone Jack: Off
Line In Jack: On
Mic Bias: Off
Left DAC: Off
Right DAC: Off
... (all else off and omitted except )...
EBX5016-hifi: PM State: D3hot
The last two files, I expect should do wm8350 chip register dumps... and one did.
Doing: cat /sys/devices/wm8350-pmic/pmic-reg causes a long pause, then nothing is printed.
but:
Doing: cat /sys/devices/wm8350/platform/wm8350-ebx5016-audi/wm8350-codec/codec_reg does prints a list of registers up to e8 which is just a few bytes larger than the datasheet says the chip should be (0x00 to 0xe6).
I tried using a python program to play wav files, (works on my desktop computer), and I noticed that /dev/dsp does open, the mixers DO set volume levels, and nothing comes out. So -- the audio driver is not able to enable the sound amplifiers on it's own automatically.
There are no alsa sound files in /dev, nor are any alsa tools found on the embedded machine... so I assume Sony is strictly using OSS /dev/dsp and /dev/mixer.
There is only one other access point I can find to the ws8350:
There IS a device driver /dev/wm8350.
That driver created by the source code in subdirectory wm8350/wm8350_reg.c ; in theory it should be able to read and write to all registers using ioctls() calls from a user space. However, something appears grossly wrong with it, for I wrote a test program to read the wm8350 registers... and most of the registers return error messages rather than allowing to be read, including the most pulic ID registers (0x00, 0x01) etc.
So, I'm quite stuck. Pointers, thoughts, hints, are quite desired.
I would like to change your question a little bit.
How does Linux ASOC (alsa system on chip) power management work?
I will answer this and then give some hints on using this specific chip.
.. If I do a cat /sys/power/state it returns the word "mem" and nothing else. The file has permissions -rw-r--r--, so potentially it could be written -- but I don't know with what. The string "mem" does not exist anywhere in the source code for the wm8350pm drivers, so I don't even know if /sys/power/state is part of the source code.
You need to get an understanding of the Linux driver model. Hardware in Linux is structured like a tree. The rational is that things must be powered up/down in specific sequences. For instance, you should not power down the PCI bus controller before powering down the PCI peripherals. Linux builds a tree of hardware and each driver (code) and device (data/actual hardware) has specific call backs/function pointers which handle some specific tasks.
probe - Are you there? Determines actual hardware/device is present.
remove - Shuts down device. Module removal, power off, etc.
suspend - going to sleep.
resume - waking up.
Three and four may look interesting to you. Now, to read about what /sys/power/state is about. The text mem, means that suspend to memory is supported by your system. In this mode, Linux does these steps,
Find first lowest level active bus.
suspend devices on that bus.
suspend bus and de-activate.
If a bus is active go to step 1.
Set CPU to low power state (suspend to RAM).
This is not quite the full story. A few devices may support a wake-up. They will have extra call-backs to enable waking the system from sleep modes. Read the documentation to find out about this.
That is general power management and driver/device structure. Now, how is the ASOC (alsa system on chip) structured?
There are typically three drivers/devices that get stitched together.
Codec - The wm8350 in your case. This includes audio amplifier drive circuitry and can include sound mixing and source controls. Supports digital to analog and analog to digital, typically through an i2s interface. The i2s is not the only interface. Usually a register bank is controlled through a secondary interface; i2c in the wm8350 case.
DAI - Refer to chapter 1.2.18.1 of the iMx31 reference manual; the hardware is called the SSI by Freescale. The next chapter on the AUDMUX is also useful to understand audio support on the iMx31/32.
Machine file - this is the board specific routing. It hooks the DAI to the codec and is the parent of both. It provides board clocking information and other specific configuration. For instance, it may use the AUDMUX to route the physical pins to the SSI block.
An i2c (or SPI) interface from the codec driver to send control commands to the coded chip. Some chips might uses a wacky i2s interface or something else for control (but not in your case).
Now if you understood this, you will see that some features of the wm8350 seem to break the Linux model. The DAI interface can be stopped (digital audio), but the i2c interface must remain alive to program the registers related to the power functionality in the codec/PMIC (power management IC).
The latest WM8350 calls the IC a multi-function device and support was introduced in 2.6.35. The initial support may not have included the WM8350 features. Unfortunately, without some details on the layout of the Sony prs900 board, it would be difficult to know how to use the WM8350 PMIC functionality. The code will involve the iMx31 CPU, the WM8350, the i2c connection, and possibly some power supply circuitry.
For certain, you can just try echo mem > /sys/power/state and see what happens. If it works, you are lucky. The power/current consumption in sleep might not be optimal, but it will probably be hard to fix with the 2.6.23 kernel. You will want to look through the /sys directories for wake-up sources and possibly register these before issuing the suspend to memory command.
I can neither figure out how to read the battery/powerline status information, nor get the audio chip to play sound, etc ... although I have been studying the kernel modules for a while...
From the above discussions, the battery and powerline status will probably be found through another device. However, the pmic_reg file may actually give the status if things are connected properly on the board.
The audio chip will use ALSA. You need to use either alsamixer or the command line amixer to set up audio routes through the codec, so the DAI channel (PCM from iMx32) is routed and sent to the speaker. To minimize power consumption, things are usually turned off by default. The /dev/dsp files are just OSS compatibility. This configuration will support ALSA natively. You are better off to use ALSA if possible.
Donate to the OSF and get a tax receipt, if this was helpful enough.
This is a fairly broad question, so I will try to keep it as focused as I can.
I currently own a Lenovo laptop with Ubuntu installed and touchscreen functionality and own a pressure-sensitive Bluetooth pen, and been trying to make the two work together as a cheap Cintiq-like tablet.
The pen has, unfortunately, support for only specific apps for iOS phones and tablets.
So after lots of research, I've managed to interface with the pen and create a uinput device for it, so I can register button clicks and pressure changes on the pen and even see them routed to GIMP when configuring the device through the Input Controllers menu.
The code I have so far for that interface is available here.
The trouble starts when trying to test it out with GIMP.
From what I gather, this is because GIMP assumes Wacom devices report their own position, treats touchscreen touches as mouse movements and only allows input from a single device at a time.
My question is, how can I work around this?
More specifically, how can I create a uinput device that would behave as a Wacom tablet and supersede/block the behavior I described?
Or if there's a different solution, such as patching GIMP or writing a plugin for it.
Update (2014-06-07)
The code mentioned above now works.
I have written a blog post on the process of getting this to work: http://gerev.github.io/laptop-cintiq
As you said, Gimp expects you to provide ABS_X and ABS_Y along with ABS_PRESSURE in your driver - which is not strange, because you are using you virtual device as input, so it wouldn't make much sense to pick ABS_X and ABS_Y coordinates from one device and ABS_PRESSURE from another (although they will always be the same in this case). Maybe you can just read the current coordinates of the mouse and copy them as your own device coordinates.
As an example, the project GfxTablet does something similar to what you are trying, they have an Android application for tablets with pen and use uinput to create virtual device that works like pressure-sensitive pen on Linux. I have used it and it worked like a charm in Gimp and mypaint on my laptop, and I had no problem with having a mouse (or the touchpad) active at the same time as the uinput device (I think that Krita added support for generic pressure-sensitive devices recently). You can take a look at the source code of the driver here (surprinsingly simple, to be fair).
Note that this is not a faulty behavior of Gimp, because this is what is expected from a tablet-like device. Take a look at the event codes kernel documentation page, in the last section (Guidelines), it is said that tablets must report ABS_X and ABS_Y. Moreover, they should use BTN_STYLUS and BTN_STYLUS2 to report the tool buttons and some BTN_TOOL_* (e.g. BTN_TOOL_PEN) to report activity (you can find all the available codes in input.h); however, these last does not seem that important, as GfxTablet does not implement them and worked without problem.
I am planning to make a small OS and run a Tetris clone on it using an ARM Cortex-M3. Unfortunately, I am not able to buy any development boards as of now, so I will have to use simulators.
I have actually looked into QEMU which has LM3S6965EVB support, which contains an ARM Cortex-M3 processor. But apparently newer revisions of the board are not compatible with the model in QEMU as none of the examples I have downloaded from TI seem to work. Even the OLED display is different.
Another problem is to do graphics development as the OLED display for LM3S6965EVB has a really low resolution. I was able to get it up to 640x480 by editing the QEMU source but as I could not get any examples to work, so I don't know if it works either. Using the debug parameters for SSD0323, all I can see is that it accepts some of the data that is sent to initialize the device, then hangs...
I have considered choosing another board in QEMU but that would mean redoing many things from scratch when I get my hands on a real device, as the other ones are too powerful for something as simple as this.
What should I do? Are there any other simulators out there that can help me accomplish what I am trying to do? I want to develop a small OS and some small games.
Thanks in advance. I have been searching for a solution for days and I am really stuck.
How much you have to redo, in part, has to do with your software/system engineering, you can abstract where needed and only have to re-write the abstraction layer not the entire package. Actually you can do much of your software design/testing on your host system and never cross compile, only later cross compile to a simulator or real hardware.
For example, I assume you would construct the next video screen somewhere in ram then depending on the hardware change some bits in a register and page flip or have to do a copy from this frame buffer to the video/lcd in whatever form it wants. Using thumbulator you could build your screen in ram somewhere (in the simulated memory space) then add to the simulator when the simulation writes to such and such register take these bytes from ram and display them on the host computer (running the simulation) basically simulate some hardware. use sdl or basic X calls or whatever you prefer. I normally take snapshots to .bmp files (very easy to write) then look at them later.
Later, on hardware your abstracted update_screen() function would have hardware specific code to display that screen.
thumbulator only runs thumb instructions not ARM and not Thumb2, thumb being the common denominator between the arm processors (ARMv4T and newer except for cortex-m) and those that support thumb2 extensions (cortex-m). other than startup code the compiling and programming experience is the same across the arm family. the code (other than startup code and of course hardware specific accesses) will run across the arm family as well as the simulator. If you go to a cortex-m then adding an architecture specification to the command line will change the build from thumb only to thumb+thumb2 instructions giving you some performance boost. if you surf around my other projects on github you will find this idea reapeated over and over again, I have many simple cortex-m examples where I use gcc and llvm and build the same .C code with thumb instructions and thumb+thumb2.
Another completely different answer is get a GBA (Nintendo Game Boy Advance). You can get a GBA SP (has a backlit display, makes the whole experience better) for about $30 or so on ebay. You can buy flash cartridges that take sd cards for about the same amount. It has an ARM7TDMI, it runs thumb code much faster than ARM code, giving you that thumb experience in preparation for other/newer cores like the cortex-m. For another $30 you can get a game link cable, chop it up, attach a rs232 level shifter (I can talk you through all of this), and make a gba serial cable. My preferred setup is to have a flash cartridge that I have pre-programmed with a serial bootloader, I download the program over serial into ram then run from ram. This avoids having to yank the flash cartridge and/or sd card every time you re-compile the program. doable, and a cheaper solution but gets tiring fast.
If you have a Nintendo DS for $12 to $15 you can get an sd based flash cartridge that you can likewise use for development. I recommend learning the gba first, which you can do on the NDS if you buy a gba side memory cartridge (need a ds lite not an ndsi nor 3d) supported by the software on the cartridge. (the ez flash 3 in 1 gba size for example is a good one, as well as memory you can flash that one with the nds and carry it over to the gba (this is how I put my serial bootloader on it)). these loaders will let you put your .gba file on the nds cartridge sd card then load it into the gba cartridge and it switches the nds into gba mode and runs as a gba.
there are lots of other solutions, sparkfun.com likely has a number of arm based boards that can drive lcds and/or come with lcds. You can go to earthlcd and get one of the serial based lcd panels that make for rapid development, later of course a cheaper solution is desired. Along the same lines you could instead simulate an earthlcd like thing using your host computer have the embedded microcontroller send screen updates over serial to the host and the host displays the graphics. Later replace that screen update with something else.
This latter solution, for about $20 you can get a stm32f4 discovery board, has a cortex-m4, runs up to 168MHz, has a number of serial ports of which at least two have pins not being used by something else you could easily have one port for debug messages and the other for this virtual serial screen. In the stm32f4 directory in my stm32vld repo on github I have a number of getting started examples for using that board (as well as the stm32vld which is a few bucks cheaper but not as powerful as this stm32f4). Likewise your host application can take keystrokes and turn them into user control/game control commands back into the game software on the microcontroller.
There is of course the beagleboard or hawkboard or raspberri pi when it comes out, or open-rd (I dont like the plug computer but do like the open rd) which have video processing and video output direct to a monitor and/or tv using composite or whatever. About $150 to $200 and it just works run with it. You definitely dont need to run linux on these platforms, you can make your own os or whatever you like and run that, very simple.
There are more solutions than you probably have time and/or money to pursue you need to find one that fits within your comfort or happyness zone for how you like to do development and try that path.
I'm working on embedded device with screen rotated 90 degrees clockwise: screen controller reports 800x600 screen, while device's screen is 600x800 portrait.
What do you think, whose responsibility it is to compensate for this: should kernel rotate framebuffer to provide 800x600 screen as expected by upper-level software or applications (X server, bootsplash) should adapt and draw to rotated screen?
Every part of stack is free software, so there are no non-technical problems for modification, the question is more about logical soundness.
It makes most sense for the screen driver to do it - the kernel after all is supposed to provide an abstraction of the device for the userspace applications to work with. If the screen is a 600x800 portrait oriented device, then that's what applications should see from the kernel.
yes,I agree, The display driver should update the display accordingly and keep the control
Not sure exactly how standard your embedded device is, if it is running a regular linux kernel, you might check in the kernel configurator (make xconfig, when compiling a new kernel) , one of the options for kernel 2.6.37.6 in the device, video card section, is to enable rotation of the kernel messages display so it scrolls 90 degrees left or right while booting up.
I think it also makes your consoles be rotated correctly after login too.
This was not available in kernels even 6-8 months ago, at least not available in kernel that slackware64 13.37 came with about that time.
Note that the bios messages are still rotated on a PC motherboard,
but that is hard-coded in the bios, which may not apply to the embedded system you are working with.
If this kernel feature is not useful to you for whatever reason, how they did it in the linux kernel might be good example of where and how to go about it. Once you get the exact name of the option from "make xconfig", it should be pretty easy to search where ever they log the kernel traffic for that name and dig up some info about it.
Hmmm. I just recompiled my kernel today, and I may have been wrong about how new this option is. Looks like it was available with some kernel versions before the included-with-Slackware64 versions that I referenced. Sorry!