Im trying to implement windows phone 8.1 notification background task.
it is implemented with one bug!
the toast notification message will appear in the action center more than once. sometimes 9times.
here is my code:
public sealed class my_bg_notifier: IBackgroundTask
{
public async void Run(IBackgroundTaskInstance taskInstance)
{
var deferral = taskInstance.GetDeferral();
bool status = await notificationChecker.check();
if (status)
{
populateNotification(notificationChecker.count);
}
deferral.Complete();
}
}
I tried to debug so I put a breakpoint over the line status.
and I was surprised that it is called more than once and that is why my notification will pop-up more than one time.
and the message that is showed from the debugger breakpoint clearly states that there are multiple threads doing the same job simultaneously.
so i thought to prevent running the method by more than one thread by using a boolean flag as follow:
public sealed class my_bg_notifier: IBackgroundTask
{
private static bool isNotBusy = true;
public async void Run(IBackgroundTaskInstance taskInstance)
{
if (isNotBusy)
{
isNotBusy = false;
var deferral = taskInstance.GetDeferral();
bool status = await notificationChecker.check();
if (status)
{
populateNotification(notificationChecker.count);
}
deferral.Complete();
}
isNotBusy = true;
}
}
but again that didn't work.
my question is :
why would a background task run more than once by multiple thread simultanously.
and How can I block this behavioud? should I use lock keyword?
Okkkkk!!! It was my fault. In my code i registered the background task on each app launch without checking if it is already registered.
So i used code as below to check if my task is registered then no need to register it again.
var taskRegistered = false;
var exampleTaskName = "ExampleBackgroundTask";
foreach (var task in Background.BackgroundTaskRegistration.AllTasks)
{
if (task.Value.Name == exampleTaskName)
{
taskRegistered = true;
break;
}
}
Source: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/apps/xaml/hh977055.aspx
Related
I could just write a long-running CLI app and run it, but I'm assuming it wouldn't comply to all the expectations one would have of a standards-compliant linux daemon (responding to SIGTERM, Started by System V init process, Ignore terminal I/O signals, etc.)
Most ecosystems have some best-practice way of doing this, for example, in python, you can use https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-daemon/
Is there some documentation about how to do this with .Net Core?
I toyed with an idea similar to how .net core web host waits for shutdown in console applications. I was reviewing it on GitHub and was able to extract the gist of how they performed the Run
https://github.com/aspnet/Hosting/blob/15008b0b7fcb54235a9de3ab844c066aaf42ea44/src/Microsoft.AspNetCore.Hosting/WebHostExtensions.cs#L86
public static class ConsoleHost {
/// <summary>
/// Block the calling thread until shutdown is triggered via Ctrl+C or SIGTERM.
/// </summary>
public static void WaitForShutdown() {
WaitForShutdownAsync().GetAwaiter().GetResult();
}
/// <summary>
/// Runs an application and block the calling thread until host shutdown.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="host">The <see cref="IWebHost"/> to run.</param>
public static void Wait() {
WaitAsync().GetAwaiter().GetResult();
}
/// <summary>
/// Runs an application and returns a Task that only completes when the token is triggered or shutdown is triggered.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="host">The <see cref="IConsoleHost"/> to run.</param>
/// <param name="token">The token to trigger shutdown.</param>
public static async Task WaitAsync(CancellationToken token = default(CancellationToken)) {
//Wait for the token shutdown if it can be cancelled
if (token.CanBeCanceled) {
await WaitAsync(token, shutdownMessage: null);
return;
}
//If token cannot be cancelled, attach Ctrl+C and SIGTERN shutdown
var done = new ManualResetEventSlim(false);
using (var cts = new CancellationTokenSource()) {
AttachCtrlcSigtermShutdown(cts, done, shutdownMessage: "Application is shutting down...");
await WaitAsync(cts.Token, "Application running. Press Ctrl+C to shut down.");
done.Set();
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Returns a Task that completes when shutdown is triggered via the given token, Ctrl+C or SIGTERM.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="token">The token to trigger shutdown.</param>
public static async Task WaitForShutdownAsync(CancellationToken token = default (CancellationToken)) {
var done = new ManualResetEventSlim(false);
using (var cts = CancellationTokenSource.CreateLinkedTokenSource(token)) {
AttachCtrlcSigtermShutdown(cts, done, shutdownMessage: string.Empty);
await WaitForTokenShutdownAsync(cts.Token);
done.Set();
}
}
private static async Task WaitAsync(CancellationToken token, string shutdownMessage) {
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(shutdownMessage)) {
Console.WriteLine(shutdownMessage);
}
await WaitForTokenShutdownAsync(token);
}
private static void AttachCtrlcSigtermShutdown(CancellationTokenSource cts, ManualResetEventSlim resetEvent, string shutdownMessage) {
Action ShutDown = () => {
if (!cts.IsCancellationRequested) {
if (!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(shutdownMessage)) {
Console.WriteLine(shutdownMessage);
}
try {
cts.Cancel();
} catch (ObjectDisposedException) { }
}
//Wait on the given reset event
resetEvent.Wait();
};
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.ProcessExit += delegate { ShutDown(); };
Console.CancelKeyPress += (sender, eventArgs) => {
ShutDown();
//Don't terminate the process immediately, wait for the Main thread to exit gracefully.
eventArgs.Cancel = true;
};
}
private static async Task WaitForTokenShutdownAsync(CancellationToken token) {
var waitForStop = new TaskCompletionSource<object>();
token.Register(obj => {
var tcs = (TaskCompletionSource<object>)obj;
tcs.TrySetResult(null);
}, waitForStop);
await waitForStop.Task;
}
}
I tried adapting something like a IConsoleHost but quickly realized I was over-engineering it. Extracted the main parts into something like await ConsoleUtil.WaitForShutdownAsync(); that operated like Console.ReadLine
This then allowed the utility to be used like this
public class Program {
public static async Task Main(string[] args) {
//relevant code goes here
//...
//wait for application shutdown
await ConsoleUtil.WaitForShutdownAsync();
}
}
from there creating a systemd as in the following link should get you the rest of the way
Writing a Linux daemon in C#
The best I could come up with is based on the answer to two other questions: Killing gracefully a .NET Core daemon running on Linux and Is it possible to await an event instead of another async method?
using System;
using System.Runtime.Loader;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace ConsoleApp1
{
public class Program
{
private static TaskCompletionSource<object> taskToWait;
public static void Main(string[] args)
{
taskToWait = new TaskCompletionSource<object>();
AssemblyLoadContext.Default.Unloading += SigTermEventHandler;
Console.CancelKeyPress += new ConsoleCancelEventHandler(CancelHandler);
//eventSource.Subscribe(eventSink) or something...
taskToWait.Task.Wait();
AssemblyLoadContext.Default.Unloading -= SigTermEventHandler;
Console.CancelKeyPress -= new ConsoleCancelEventHandler(CancelHandler);
}
private static void SigTermEventHandler(AssemblyLoadContext obj)
{
System.Console.WriteLine("Unloading...");
taskToWait.TrySetResult(null);
}
private static void CancelHandler(object sender, ConsoleCancelEventArgs e)
{
System.Console.WriteLine("Exiting...");
taskToWait.TrySetResult(null);
}
}
}
Implementing Linux Daemon or service for windows quite easy with single codebase using Visual Studio 2019. Just create project using WorkerService template. In my case I have
Coraval library to schedule the tasks.
Program.cs class
public class Program
{
public static void Main(string[] args)
{
Log.Logger = new LoggerConfiguration()
.MinimumLevel.Debug()
.MinimumLevel.Override("Microsoft", LogEventLevel.Warning)
.Enrich.FromLogContext()
.WriteTo.File(#"C:\temp\Workerservice\logfile.txt").CreateLogger();
IHost host = CreateHostBuilder(args).Build();
host.Services.UseScheduler(scheduler =>
{
scheduler
.Schedule<ReprocessInvocable>()
.EveryThirtySeconds();
});
host.Run();
}
public static IHostBuilder CreateHostBuilder(string[] args) =>
Host.CreateDefaultBuilder(args).UseSystemd() //.UseWindowsService()
.ConfigureServices(services =>
{
services.AddScheduler();
services.AddTransient<ReprocessInvocable>();
});
}
ReprocessInvocable.cs class
public class ReprocessInvocable : IInvocable
{
private readonly ILogger<ReprocessInvocable> _logger;
public ReprocessInvocable(ILogger<ReprocessInvocable> logger)
{
_logger = logger;
}
public async Task Invoke()
{
//your code goes here
_logger.LogInformation("Information - Worker running at: {time}", DateTimeOffset.Now);
_logger.LogWarning("Warning - Worker running at: {time}", DateTimeOffset.Now);
_logger.LogCritical("Critical - Worker running at: {time}", DateTimeOffset.Now);
Log.Information("Invoke has called at: {time}", DateTimeOffset.Now);
}
}
For linux daemon use UseSystemd and for windows service use UseWindowsService as per the above code.
If you're trying to find something more robust, I found an implementation on Github that looks promising: .NET Core Application blocks for message-based communication. It uses Host, HostBuilder, ApplicationServices, ApplicationEnvironment, etc classes to implement a messaging service.
It doesn't quite look ready for black box reuse, but it seems like it could be a good starting point.
var host = new HostBuilder()
.ConfigureServices(services =>
{
var settings = new RabbitMQSettings { ServerName = "192.168.80.129", UserName = "admin", Password = "Pass#word1" };
})
.Build();
Console.WriteLine("Starting...");
await host.StartAsync();
var messenger = host.Services.GetRequiredService<IRabbitMQMessenger>();
Console.WriteLine("Running. Type text and press ENTER to send a message.");
Console.CancelKeyPress += async (sender, e) =>
{
Console.WriteLine("Shutting down...");
await host.StopAsync(new CancellationTokenSource(3000).Token);
Environment.Exit(0);
};
...
Have you tried Thread.Sleep (Timeout.Infinite) ?
using System;
using System.IO;
using System.Threading;
namespace Daemon {
class Program {
static int Main(string[] args) {
if (Environment.OSVersion.Platform == PlatformID.Win32NT) {
Log.Critical("Windows is not supported!");
return 1;
}
Agent.Init();
Agent.Start();
if (Agent.Settings.DaemonMode || args.FirstOrDefault() == "daemon") {
Log.Info("Daemon started.");
Thread.Sleep(Timeout.Infinite);
}
Agent.Stop();
}
}
}
I'm not sure it is production grade, but for a quick and dirty console app this works well:
await Task.Delay(-1); //-1 indicates infinite timeout
I want to perform some long running operation (e.g. listening to some event raised by OS) on the background thread. Most of the times, operation will run continuously without any problem. But in certain rare conditions, OS level API sends some error code and I need to raise exception from background thread which has to be propagated to the main thread to show it to the user of my WinFrom application.
I had decided to use BackgroundWorker for this. But .NET 4.0 provides Task class of the Task Parallel Library which is a better option as per various blogs on the TPL.
In my application, I have to kick off the background task before actual form is shown. Since actual code is quite complex, I have written some sample code simulating real time problem:
public static Task task;
/// <summary>
/// The main entry point for the application.
/// </summary>
[STAThread]
static void Main()
{
Application.EnableVisualStyles();
Application.SetCompatibleTextRenderingDefault(false);
ThreadTest tt = new ThreadTest();
task = new Task(() => tt.PerformTask("hi"));
task.Start();
try
{
task.Wait();
}
catch (AggregateException aggregateException)
{
// Handle exception here.
}
Application.Run(new Form1());
}
In this code, I never see the main form simply because background task keeps running without exception and task.Wait() call makes the current thread waiting until background task finishes!
Can I use TPL's Task for such scenarios where main thread should not wait until background task is finished but at the same time, it should get exception details whenever exception is raised from the background task?
In above code, one of the solutions could be to move the task creation code at some later stage. But my question is more academic in this case.
Yes you can. Please see the code below.
The program code is:
/// <summary>
/// The main entry point for the application.
/// </summary>
[STAThread]
static void Main()
{
Application.EnableVisualStyles();
Application.SetCompatibleTextRenderingDefault(false);
CancellationTokenSource cancellationTokenSource = new CancellationTokenSource();
Task longRunningTask = new Task((state) =>
{
LongRunningWork.DoWork( cancellationTokenSource.Token);
},cancellationTokenSource.Token,TaskCreationOptions.LongRunning);
var newForm = new Form1(cancellationTokenSource);
new Thread((state) =>
{
longRunningTask.Start();
try
{
longRunningTask.Wait();
}
catch (AggregateException exception)
{
Action<Exception> showError = (ex) => MessageBox.Show(state as Form, ex.Message);
var mainForm = state as Form;
if (mainForm != null)
{
mainForm.BeginInvoke(showError, exception.InnerException);
}
}
}).Start(newForm);
Application.Run(newForm);
And the code for the long running task is:
public class LongRunningWork
{
public static void DoWork( CancellationToken cancellationToken)
{
int iterationCount = 0;
//While the
while (!cancellationToken.IsCancellationRequested &&iterationCount <5)
{
//Mimic that we do some long jobs here
Thread.Sleep(1000);
iterationCount++;
//The jobs may throw the exception on the specific condition
if (iterationCount ==5)
{
throw new InvalidOperationException("Invalid action");
}
}
//cancel the task
cancellationToken.ThrowIfCancellationRequested();
}
}
Finally, the code for the Form1 which includes a exit button, whose function is to terminate the program on clicking.
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
private CancellationTokenSource _cancellationTokenSource;
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
public Form1(CancellationTokenSource cancellationTokenSource):this()
{
_cancellationTokenSource = cancellationTokenSource;
}
private void exitBtn_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
//Cancel out the task
if (_cancellationTokenSource != null)
{
_cancellationTokenSource.Cancel();
}
//Exit the program
Application.Exit();
}
}
Start your long running operation from the form itself rather than before the form is created. Remember that Application.Run() starts a message loop on the current thread, but that means you can use that message loop to poll your task from the Timer class.
class Form1 : Form
{
private Timer PollingTimer;
private Task BackgroundTask;
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
// Begin the background task.
ThreadTest tt = new ThreadTest();
this.BackgroundTask = new Task(() => tt.PerformTask("hi"));
this.BackgroundTask.Start();
// Monitor the task's status by polling it regularly.
this.PollingTimer = new Timer();
this.PollingTimer.Interval = 1000; // In milliseconds.
this.PollingTimer.Tick += timerCallback;
this.PollingTimer.Start();
}
private timerCallback(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
if (this.BackgroundTask.IsFaulted)
{
// Exception information is in BackgroundTask.Exception.
}
}
}
If you dislike polling (which I do), you'll need to catch the exception from your task and marshall it back to your UI thread. The best way to do that is simply not catch the exception in the task itself and provide a continuation method which will only execute on error.
class Form1 : Form
{
private Task BackgroundTask;
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
// Capture the UI thread context.
// (Note, it may be safer to run this in the Form.Load event than the constructor.
var uiContext = TaskScheduler.FromCurrentSynchronizationContext();
// Begin the background task.
ThreadTest tt = new ThreadTest();
this.BackgroundTask = new Task(() => tt.PerformTask("hi"))
// Schedule a continuation to be executed after the task is completed.
.ContinueWith((t,arg) =>
{
// Exception information is in t.Exception
},null, null,
// Only execute the continuation if the task throws an exception.
TaskContinuationOptions.OnlyOnFaulted,
// Execute the continuation on the UI thread we captured above.
uiContext);
this.BackgroundTask.Start();
}
}
MSDN references for Task.ContinueWith() and TaskScheduler.FromCurrentSynchronizationContext().
And, if you have the luxury of .NET 4.5 with async and await:
class Form1 : Form
{
private Task BackgroundTask;
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private async void Form1_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
ThreadTest tt = new ThreadTest();
try
{
// Move your Task creation and start logic into a method.
await tt.RunAsync();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
// Really smart compiler writers make sure you're on the right thread
// and everything Just Works(tm).
}
}
}
I am using threads in blackberry to perform web service calls. I want to get notified as soon as the call gets a response back. I was using
Handlers
in android. I didnt find anything similar in blackberry.
Here is the code I am using to run the thread
class PrimeRun implements Runnable {
long minPrime;
PrimeRun(long minPrime) {
this.minPrime = minPrime;
}
public void run() {
// compute primes larger than minPrime
. . .
}
}
How can I get a notification after the thread finished running?
How can I do this in blackberry?
Thanks
Added more Information : Thanks for your reply. Its really
informative. Let me explain a bit more on my issue. I have a
webservice call which is running on a thread. As soon as I get the
reply back from server I want to execute the next function(next call
to server) which is based on the response from the previous call.So I need to wait until I get a response back. Also
at them same time I need to show a activity indicator on screen. I was
using handler for this in android. I am looking for something similar
on blackberry.
So your question essentially is this
One thread does the job while the other thread waits for completion
The first thread completes the job and "notifies" the second thread.
This is a simple producer consumer problem. Here is the code how you can solve this.
class JobResult
{
boolean done = false;
}
JobResult result = new JobResult();
class Worker extends Thread
{
JobResult _result;
public Worker( JobResult result )
{
_result = result
}
public void run()
{
// Do some very long job
synchronized( _result )
{
// modify result
_result.done = true;
_result.notify();
}
}
}
public class Waiter extends Thread
{
JobResult _result;
public Waiter( JobResult result )
{
_result = result;
}
public void run()
{
synchroinzed( _result ){
while(! _result.done)
{
this.wait();
}
}
// Wait is over. You can do something now.
}
}
As I got the Zach's question - he asks how to execute some code that involves UI changes (something like showing an info popup or closing the progress popup) upon a background thread completion. On Android a Handler created on the UI thread is often used for that purpose.
In BB you can use another way which is similar to Swing on desktop Java. When you need some code to be executed on the UI thread you wrap it in a Runnable and pass to one of the following methods:
// Puts runnable object into this application's event queue,
// and waits until it is processed.
Application.invokeAndWait(Runnable runnable)
// Puts runnable object into this application's event queue.
Application.invokeLater(Runnable runnable)
// Puts runnable object into this application's event queue
// for repeated execution.
Application.invokeLater(Runnable runnable, long time, boolean repeat)
So the behaviour of the above calls is similar to what Handler.post(Runnable r) (and the like) does.
Note, you can always get a handle to your Application instance by a static call Application.getApplication().
So in the end of a background thread it is safe to do something like this:
Application.getApplication().invokeLater(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
progressScreen.close();
Dialog.alert("I am finished!");
}
});
It is similar to Android's:
handler.post(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
progressScreen.dismiss();
showDialog(DIALOG_TASK_FINISHED_ID);
}
});
Android has a much rich multi threading primitives. But you can achieve the same even in Blackberry with equal elegance. The solution I provide below is essentially the same as previous, but with a minor change. Waiter thread can be replaced with built-in utility to perform painting on UI thread using UiApplicaiton's invokeLater method. You don't actually need to "notify" anyone but just update the UI once a particular task is completed. Check the docs for more info.
Anyway, you can model your code along the lines:
class ProgressScreen extends FullScreen
{
LabelField _label;
public void start()
{
}
public void setMessage( final String message )
{
UiApplication.getApplication(
UiApplication.invokeLater(
new Runnable() {
_label.setText( message );
}
)
);
}
public void dismiss()
{
this.close();
}
}
interface WebserviceTask
{
int STATUS_CONDITIONS_NOT_SATISFIED = -3;
int STATUS_NET_ERR = -2;
int STATUS_FAILURE = -1;
int STATUS_SUCCESS = 0;
public int invoke();
}
public class Updater extends Thread
{
final int NUM_TASKS = 10;
WebServiceTask tasks[] = new WebServiceTask[ NUM_TASKS ];
WebServiceTask tasks[0] = new WebServiceTask(){
public int invoke()
{
int retCode = 0;
// invoke a particular web service
return STATUS_SUCCESS;
}
}
public void run()
{
ProgressScreen progress = new ProgressScreen();
progress.start();
for( int i=0; i < NUM_TASKS; i++ )
{
int retcode;
WebServiceTask t = tasks[i];
retcode = t.invoke();
String mesg;
switch( retcode )
{
case STATUS_SUCCESS: { mesg ="Task successfully completed!";} break;
case STATUS_NET_ERR: { mesg ="Could not connect to network";} break;
}
progress.setMessage(message);
}
progress.dismiss();
}
}
Note that I have provided only the stubs to give you an idea how you may accomplish. Let us know how it goes.
Silverlight can only send a certain number of simultaneous WCF requests at a time. I am trying to serialize the requests that a particular section of my application is performing because I don't need them to run concurrently.
The problem is as follows (summary below):
"WCF proxies in Silverlight applications use the SynchronizationContext of the thread from which the web service call is initiated to schedule the invocation of the async event handler when the response is received. When the web service call is initiated from the UI thread of a Silverlight application, the async event handler code will also execute on the UI thread."
http://tomasz.janczuk.org/2009/08/improving-performance-of-concurrent-wcf.html
summary: basically, if you block the thread that is calling the async method, it will never get called.
I can't figure out the right model of threading this such which would give me what I want in a reasonable way.
My only other requirement is that I don't want the UI thread to block.
As far as I can see, what should work is if the UI thread has a worker thread which queues up the calls as Action delegates, then uses an AutoResetEvent to execute a task one at a time in yet another worker thread. There are two problems:
1) The thread that calls async can't block, because then async will never get called. In fact, if you put that thread into a wait loop, I've noticed it doesn't get called either
2) You need a way to signal from the completed method of the async call that it is done.
Sorry that was so long, thanks for reading. Any ideas?
I have used a class that i build on my own to execute load operations synchronous. With the class you can register multiple load operations of diffrent domaincontexts and then execute them one by one. You can provide an Action to the constructor of the class that gets called, when all operations are finished (successful or failed).
Here´s the code of the class. I think it´s not complete and you have to change it to match your expectations. Maybe it can help you in your situation.
public class DomainContextQueryLoader {
private List<LoadOperation> _failedOperations;
private Action<DomainContextQueryLoader> _completeAction;
private List<QueuedQuery> _pendingQueries = new List<QueuedQuery>();
public DomainContextQueryLoader(Action<DomainContextQueryLoader> completeAction) {
if (completeAction == null) {
throw new ArgumentNullException("completeAction", "completeAction is null.");
}
this._completeAction = completeAction;
}
/// <summary>
/// Expose the count of failed operations
/// </summary>
public int FailedOperationCount {
get {
if (_failedOperations == null) {
return 0;
}
return _failedOperations.Count;
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Expose an enumerator for all of the failed operations
/// </summary>
public IList<LoadOperation> FailedOperations {
get {
if (_failedOperations == null) {
_failedOperations = new List<LoadOperation>();
}
return _failedOperations;
}
}
public IEnumerable<QueuedQuery> QueuedQueries {
get {
return _pendingQueries;
}
}
public bool IsExecuting {
get;
private set;
}
public void EnqueueQuery<T>(DomainContext context, EntityQuery<T> query) where T : Entity {
if (IsExecuting) {
throw new InvalidOperationException("Query cannot be queued, cause execution of queries is in progress");
}
var loadBatch = new QueuedQuery() {
Callback = null,
Context = context,
Query = query,
LoadOption = LoadBehavior.KeepCurrent,
UserState = null
};
_pendingQueries.Add(loadBatch);
}
public void ExecuteQueries() {
if (IsExecuting) {
throw new InvalidOperationException("Executing of queries is in progress");
}
if (_pendingQueries.Count == 0) {
throw new InvalidOperationException("No queries are queued to execute");
}
IsExecuting = true;
var query = DequeueQuery();
ExecuteQuery(query);
}
private void ExecuteQuery(QueuedQuery query) {
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("Load data {0}", query.Query.EntityType);
var loadOperation = query.Load();
loadOperation.Completed += new EventHandler(OnOperationCompleted);
}
private QueuedQuery DequeueQuery() {
var query = _pendingQueries[0];
_pendingQueries.RemoveAt(0);
return query;
}
private void OnOperationCompleted(object sender, EventArgs e) {
LoadOperation loadOperation = sender as LoadOperation;
loadOperation.Completed -= new EventHandler(OnOperationCompleted);
if (loadOperation.HasError) {
FailedOperations.Add(loadOperation);
}
if (_pendingQueries.Count > 0) {
var query = DequeueQuery();
ExecuteQuery(query);
}
else {
IsExecuting = false;
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("All data loaded");
if (_completeAction != null) {
_completeAction(this);
_completeAction = null;
}
}
}
}
Update:
I´ve just noticed that you are not using WCF RIA Services, so maybe this class will not help your.
There are some options:
- You can take a look at the Agatha-rrsl either by inspecting the implementation of it or by just using it instead of pure wcf. The framework allows you to queue requests. You can read more here.
- Another option is to use the Reactive extension. There is a SO example here and more info here and here.
- You can try the Power Thread library from Jeffrey Richter. He describes it on his book CLR via C#. You can find the library here. This webcast gives you some info about it.
- You can always roll your own implementation. The yield statement is a good help here. Error handling makes it very difficult to get the solution right.
Part of my Silverlight application requires data from three service requests. Up until now I've been chaining the requests so as one completes the other starts... until the end of the chain where I do what I need to do with the data.
Now, I know thats not the best method(!). I've been looking at AutoResetEvent (link to MSDN example) to thread and then synchronize the results but cannot seem to get this to work with async service calls.
Does anyone have any reason to doubt this method or should this work? Code samples gratefully received!
Take a look at this example:
Will fire Completed event and print 'done' to Debug Output once both services returned.
Key thing is that waiting for AutoResetEvents happens in background thread.
public partial class MainPage : UserControl
{
public MainPage()
{
InitializeComponent();
Completed += (s, a) => { Debug.WriteLine("done"); };
wrk.DoWork += (s, a) =>
{
Start();
};
wrk.RunWorkerAsync();
}
public event EventHandler Completed;
private void Start()
{
auto1.WaitOne();
auto2.WaitOne();
Completed(this, EventArgs.Empty);
}
public AutoResetEvent auto1 = new AutoResetEvent(false);
public AutoResetEvent auto2 = new AutoResetEvent(false);
BackgroundWorker wrk = new BackgroundWorker();
private void Button_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
ServiceReference1.Service1Client clien = new SilverlightAsyncTest.ServiceReference1.Service1Client();
clien.DoWorkCompleted += new EventHandler<SilverlightAsyncTest.ServiceReference1.DoWorkCompletedEventArgs>(clien_DoWorkCompleted);
clien.DoWork2Completed += new EventHandler<SilverlightAsyncTest.ServiceReference1.DoWork2CompletedEventArgs>(clien_DoWork2Completed);
clien.DoWorkAsync();
clien.DoWork2Async();
}
void clien_DoWork2Completed(object sender, SilverlightAsyncTest.ServiceReference1.DoWork2CompletedEventArgs e)
{
Debug.WriteLine("2");
auto1.Set();
}
void clien_DoWorkCompleted(object sender, SilverlightAsyncTest.ServiceReference1.DoWorkCompletedEventArgs e)
{
Debug.WriteLine("1");
auto2.Set();
}
}
It could be done using the WaitHandle in the IAsyncResult returned by each async method.
The code is simple. In Silverlight I just do 10 service calls that will add an item to a ListBox. I'll wait until all the service calls end to add another message to the list (this has to run in a different thread to avoid blocking the UI). Also note that adding items to the list have to be done through the Dispatcher since they will modify the UI. There're a bunch of lamdas, but it's easy to follow.
public MainPage()
{
InitializeComponent();
var results = new ObservableCollection<string>();
var asyncResults = new List<IAsyncResult>();
resultsList.ItemsSource = results;
var service = new Service1Client() as Service1;
1.To(10).Do(i=>
asyncResults.Add(service.BeginDoWork(ar =>
Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(() => results.Add(String.Format("Call {0} finished: {1}", i, service.EndDoWork(ar)))),
null))
);
new Thread(()=>
{
asyncResults.ForEach(a => a.AsyncWaitHandle.WaitOne());
Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(() => results.Add("Everything finished"));
}).Start();
}
Just to help with the testing, this is the service
public class Service1
{
private const int maxMilliSecs = 500;
private const int minMillisSecs = 100;
[OperationContract]
public int DoWork()
{
int millisSecsToWait = new Random().Next(maxMilliSecs - minMillisSecs) + minMillisSecs;
Thread.Sleep(millisSecsToWait);
return millisSecsToWait;
}
}