I'm trying to have my bot keep track of items that are being spawned by another bot (Mee6).
The following code gives me a None output.
#client.event
async def on_message(message:discord.Message):
if message.author.bot:
print(message.content)
The command the other bot is responding to is:
/spawn-item member={member} item={item} amount={amount}
I would like to retrieve these values.
Any help would be welcome!
Your code doesn't work, because you want to get an interaction, not a message.
Unfortunately, there is no way to get the interaction of another client. At most you can have a MessageInteraction, which gives you the name of the command used.
But in your case you can make it work since MEE6 still accepts the old command format. If you use the prefix of MEE6 instead of the / command, your code should work (with a bit of reworking: you would need to look at the message right before MEE6's response, or look if a message starts with the MEE6's prefix)
I want to clear all pending_update_count in my bot!
The output of below command :
https://api.telegram.org/botxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/getWebhookInfo
Obviously I replaced the real API token with xxx
is this :
{
"ok":true,"result":
{
"url":"",
"has_custom_certificate":false,
"pending_update_count":5154
}
}
As you can see, I have 5154 unread updates til now!! ( I'm pretty sure this pending updates are errors! Because no one uses this Bot! It's just a test Bot)
By the way, this pending_update_count number are increasing so fast!
Now that I'm writing this post the number increased 51 and reached to 5205 !
I just want to clear this pending updates.
I'm pretty sure this Bot have been stuck in an infinite loop!
Is there any way to get rid of it?
P.S:
I also cleared the webhook url. But nothing changed!
UPDATE:
The output of getWebhookInfo is this :
{
"ok":true,
"result":{
"url":"https://somewhere.com/telegram/webhook",
"has_custom_certificate":false,
"pending_update_count":23,
"last_error_date":1482910173,
"last_error_message":"Wrong response from the webhook: 500 Internal Server Error",
"max_connections":40
}
}
Why I get Wrong response from the webhook: 500 Internal Server Error ?
I think you have two options:
set webhook that do nothing, just say 200 OK to telegram's servers. Telegram wiil send all updates to this url and the queque will be cleared.
disable webhook and after it get updates by using getUpdates method, after it, turn on webhook again
Update:
Problem with webhook on your side. You can try to emulate telegram's POST query on your URL.
It can be something like this:
{"message_id":1,"from":{"id":1,"first_name":"FirstName","last_name":"LastName","username":"username"},"chat":{"id":1,"first_name":"FirstName","last_name":"LastName","username":"username","type":"private"},"date":1460957457,"text":"test message"}
You can send this text as a POST query body with PostMan for example, and after it try to debug your backend.
For anyone looking at this in 2020 and beyond, the Telegram API now supports clearing the pending messages via a drop_pending_updates parameter in both setWebhook and deleteWebhook, as per the API documentation.
Just add return 1; at the end of your hook method.
Update:
Commonly this happens because of queries delay with the database.
I solved is like this
POST tg.api/bottoken/setWebhook to emtpy "url"
POST tg.api/bottoken/getUpdates
POST tg.api/bottoken/getUpdates with "offset" last update_id appeared before
doing this serveral times
POST tg.api/bottoken/getWebhookInfo
had a look if all away.
POST tg.api/bottoken/setWebhook with filled "url"
If you are using webhook, you can follow these steps
On your web browser, enter the following url with your right value of bot
https://api.telegram.org/bot/getWebhookInf
You will get a result like this on your screen
{"ok":true,"result":{"url":"url_value",...}}
On the displayed result, copy the entire url_value without quotes and replace it on this second url
https://api.telegram.org/bot/setWebhook?url=url_value&drop_pending_updates=True
Enter the second url with right bot and url_value in your web browser then press ENTER
Done!
i solve it by Change file access permissions file - set permissions file to 755
and second increase memory limit in php.ini file
A quick&dirty way is to get a temporary webhook here: https://webhook.site/ and
set your webhook to that (it will answer with a HTTP/200 code everytime, reseting your pending messages to zero)
I faced the same issue for my tele bot after user edited existing message. My bot receives update with editedMessage continuously, but update.hasMessage() was empty. As a result number of updates rocketly increased and my bot stack.
I solved this issue by adding handling for use case when message is missing - send 200 code:
public APIGatewayProxyResponseEvent handleRequest(APIGatewayProxyRequestEvent event, Context context) {
update = MAPPER.readValue(event.getBody(), Update.class);
if (!update.hasMessage()) {
return new APIGatewayProxyResponseEvent()
.withStatusCode(200) // -> !!!!!! return code 200
.withBody("message is missing")
.withIsBase64Encoded(false);
}
... ... ...
L20N is setup in my ReactJS project and I am calling getSync on the context after its ready event has fired (so things should be good to go). However, rather than my expected string including other Entity values and variable expansion, I get the raw Entity string.
The string I get looks like this:
{{$user.name}} - {{appName}}
But of course, I'm expecting something like this:
Ben Taylor - My Cool App
I have tried to recreate the problem in this plunker. Unfortunately, it works fine! When you run it, the alert box shows the expected L20N expanded string.
What could cause the Entity value to be returned raw? I have a valid context and there are no errors in inspector, so it appears all is configured fine. I'm wondering if there is some interaction with something else I'm doing that is breaking L20N. Any ideas appreciated!
I am unable to include the app I'm working on, but needless to say it has more moving parts. It is a React app based on this template.
If there is some sort of error in your .l20n file (the extension formerly known as .lol) then the getSync call will return the raw string value. In my case the error was to quote the keys in an L20n dictionary.
If you have context data like { user: { type: "Awesome" } } then the following does not work and calling getSync for useTheShout will return the unprocessed string value (including the text {{shout}}):
<shout[$user.type] {
"Awesome": "HEY AWESOME USER!",
"Loser": "i can't be bothered to shout at you loser..."
}>
<useTheShout "I'm gonna shout the following: {{shout}}">
Removing the quote marks from the dictionary key names will make this work, as follows:
<shout[$user.type] {
Awesome: "HEY AWESOME USER!",
Loser: "i can't be bothered to shout at you loser..."
}>
<useTheShout "I'm gonna shout the following: {{shout}}">
Update: You can avoid the pain by logging using the error and warning event emitters.
Using MVC5 with ninject 3.2 version I noticed ninject is throwing this error
Sequence contains more than one element
when resolving/injecting dependency
I have an email service that uses sendgrid to send emails from an MVC 5 application running in Azure WebSites
if I register the service like following in ninjectwebcommon, it works
var sgUserName = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["SG_UserName"];
var sgPassword = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["SG_Password"];
//Register email service
kernel.Bind<IEmailService>()
.To<EmailService>()
.WithConstructorArgument("userName", sgUserName)
.WithConstructorArgument("password", sgPassword);
Below code gives the
Sequence contains more than one element
error when resolving/injecting dependency. Not sure if this is a known issue or not
var sgUserName = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["SG_UserName"];
var sgPassword = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["SG_Password"];
//Register email service
kernel.Bind<IEmailService>()
.To<EmailService>()
.WithConstructorArgument(sgUserName)
.WithConstructorArgument(sgPassword);
I know this is old, but want to answer for anyone that happens upon this error.
It might be OK to leave out the ArgumentName when there is only one.
I wouldn't and haven't.
ArgumentName is required for each when there is more than one argument.
It is not really an issue, .WithConstructorsArgument simply requires and argument name.
I am working on an AS3 project in FDT6. I am using the lastest FLEX 4.6 and AIR 3.7.
I have a worker.swf file that is embedded into the main application to do threading work with.
I am using the MessageChannel class to pass information between the two.
In my main class I have defined
private var mainToWorker:MessageChannel;
private var workerToMain:MessageChannel;
mainToWorker = Worker.current.createMessageChannel(worker);
workerToMain = worker.createMessageChannel(Worker.current);
on the mainToWorker I only ever send messages. In these messages I send a byte array of information. The information is an object that contains a 'command' property and a 'props' property. Basically acting like a function call. The command is a function name and the props is an object that contains data for that function.
mainToWorkerMutex.lock();
mainToWorker.send(ByteArrayUtils.ObjectToByteArray({command:"DoSomething", props:{propA:1,propB:7}}));
mainToWorkerMutex.unlock();
The same occurs for the workerToMain var except I only send byte data that contains the 'message' and 'props' parameters.
workerToMainMutex.lock();
workerToMain.send(ByteArrayUtils.ObjectToByteArray({command:"complete", props:{return:"result"}}));
workerToMainMutex.unlock();
As a sanity check I make sure that the message channels are getting what they should.
It is working fine when I build it in FDT, however when it is built using an ANT script through flash builder I am sometimes getting the 'command' events coming back through in the workerToMain channel.
I am sending quite a lot of data through the message channel. Is it possible that I am overloading it and causing a buffer overflow into the other message channel somehow? How could that only be happening in FB?
I have checked my code many times and I am sure there is nothing in my own code that is sending that message back.
I had similar issue. When sending many bytearrays using channels sometimes things i received was not things i've actually sended. I had 4 channels (message channel to worker, message channel to main, data channel to worker, data channel to main).
I've noticed that data channel to main was affecting message channel to worker. When i turned off data channel to main - message channel to worker stared working just fine :D...
They have a big issue there with sending byte arrays it seems.
But what helped me was using shareable (at first it was not shareable) bytearray for communication via channels, but only for communication, as soon as i am receiving such bytearray i'm copying it to another byte array and parsing a copy.
This removed the problem (made quite hard stress tests there)...
Cheers
P.S. I'm also using static functions (like your ByteArrayUtils) to create bytearray's used for communication, but it seems fine, even made tests using non static functions.
So, it looks like I have found the issue. Looks like it's the ByteArray that is doing it.
ByteArray.toString() is basically sometimes mangles your data meaning you can't really trust it.
http://www.actionscript.org/forums/showthread.php3?t=155067
If you read the comment by "Jim Freer" he mentions how strings sometimes do this.
My solution was to switch to using a JSON encoded string instead of ByteArray data in the message channel. The reason I was using bytearray data to begin with is because I wanted to preserve class definition information, which JSON doesn't do.