I come upon one scenario when editing a file in vim and I still haven't found a way to do it quickly in vim way. When editing a call of a function, I offently put my arguments in a wrong order.
anyFunction(arg2, arg1)
When arriving on this situation, I have to find arg2 / delete it / append it before the ')' / deal with the ', ' / etc.
Isn't it a better way to this task quickly ? I am open to any idea (macro/ shortcut / plugin) even if I'd rather have a 'vim only' way of doing this
You need two things:
A text object to quickly select an argument (as they aren't always that simple like in your example). argtextobj plugin (my improved fork here) does this.
Though you can use delete + visual mode + paste + go back + paste, a plugin to swap text makes this much easier. My SwapText plugin or the already mentioned exchange plugin both do that job.
put this mapping in your _vimrc.
" gw : Swap word with next word
nmap <silent> gw :s/\(\%#\w\+\)\(\_W\+\)\(\w\+\)/\3\2\1/<cr><c-o><c-l>
then in normal mode with the cursor anywhere in arg1 type gw to swap parameters
anyFunction(arg1, arg2)
Explanation:-
arg1 the separator (here a comma) and arg2 are put into regexp memories 1 2 3
the substitute reverses them to 3 2 1
Control-O return to last position
Control-L redraw the screen
Note that the separator is any non-alphanumeric character or string e,g whitespace
I actually made a plugin to deal with a exact situation called argumentative.vim. (Sorry for the plug.)
Argumentative.vim provides the following mappings:
[, and ], motions which will go to the previous or next argument
<, and >, to shift an argument left or right
i, and a, argument text objects. e.g. da,, ci, or yi,
So with this plugin you move to the argument in question and then do a <, or >, as many times as needed. It can also take a count e.g. 2>,.
If you have Tim Pope's excellent repeat.vim plugin installed <, and >, become repeatable with the . command.
I would recommend a plugin: vim-exchange for that:
https://github.com/tommcdo/vim-exchange
This is a perfect use for a regular expression search and replace.
You want to find "anyFunction(", then swap anything up to the ',' with anything from the ',' to the ')'. This is fairly straightforward, using [^,]* for "anything up to the ','" and [^)]* for "anything up to the ')'". Use \(...\) to capture each thing, and \1, \2 to refer to those things in the replacement:
:s#anyFunction(\s*\([^,]*\),\s*\([^)]*\)#anyFunction(\2, \1#g
Note how I use \s* to allow any whitespace between the "anyFunction(" and the first thing, and also between the ',' and the second thing.
If you want this to be able to span multiple lines, you can use \_s instead of \s, and capture the whitespace if you want to maintain the multi-line format:
:s#anyFunction(\(\_s*\)\([^,]*\),\(\_s*\)\([^)]*\)#anyFunction(\1\4,\3\2#g
There is also a multi-line variant of [...] collections, for example \_[^,] meaning "anything (even a new line) except for a ',' " which you could use in the pattern if your use case demands it.
For details, consult the help topics for: /\s, /\_s, /\1, /\(, and /[.
If you want a more general-purpose mapping to use at every location, you can use the cursor position in your regular expression, rather than keying off the function name. The cursor position in a regular expression is matched using \%# as demonstrated here: http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Exchanging_adjacent_words
Similar to what Peter Rincker suggested (Argumentative), sideways also does what you describe.
Related
I've been using the answer to Using visual selection or register for search and replace as follows:
v visually select
y yank
:%s/
Ctrl+r
"
This works fine in most cases. However, if newline characters are part of the visual selection I have to manually replace ^M with \n, first. What am I doing wrong?
What am I doing wrong?
Nothing. It's just Vim being well optimised for some workflows and not for others.
The linked thread actually contains some of the ingredients of the solution to the problem, namely that, after yanking, multiline text needs a bit of massaging if we want to use it for something else than p or P. The massaging is needed because newlines are stored as control characters in the buffer and that's what you get when you yank. But regular expressions don't really like control characters so literal ^#s must be changed into \ns and other characters must be escaped, too, like . or [, because they have a special meaning.
The solution to this problem is thus to write a function that:
escapes what needs to be escaped,
transforms newlines into \ns.
Here is one way to do it (with more intermediary steps than I would do in real life but that's better for demonstration):
function! EscapeRegister(reg)
let raw_text = getreg(a:reg)
let escaped_text = escape(raw_text, '\/.*$^~[]')
return substitute(escaped_text, "\n", '\\n', "g")
endfunction
which you would use like so:
v<motion>
y
:%s/
<C-r>=EscapeRegister(e)<CR>
/foo/g
<CR>
Feel free to call your function ER() or whatever for saving typing.
See :help getreg(), :help escape(), :help substiute(), :help #=.
The function above is fairly low-level and could be composed with other things to make higher-level tools that, for example, could handle everything in the macro above in a couple of keystrokes.
I used this map:
map ,w v/\([^ a-z0-9]\|[^ A-Z0-9]\)*<cr>h
the idea is to select
in the words
mysuperTest
MYSUPER_TEST
mysuper_test
to always select the part that says mysuper
but it doesnt work, not sure why
I would use something like the below:
nnoremap ,w v/\C\%#.\([a-z]\+\<bar>[A-Z]\+\)\zs<cr>h
One point to notice is that in a mapping you need to use <bar> (or escape | with an extra backslash) since otherwise | is recognized as a command separator (see :help map-bar.)
Another one to notice is that you want the match to start at the first character outside the word (so you'll land at the end of the word with the h). The visual selection will expand to the start of the match in a search. I suggest using \zs to set the start of the match explicitly (see :help /\zs.)
Finally, beware of 'ignorecase' or 'smartcase' settings. Use \C to explicitly request a case-sensitive match (see :help /\C.)
I also like the idea of using a stronger anchor for the start of the match, so I'm using \%# to match the current cursor position (see :help /\%#), so you're always sure to match the current word only and not end up wandering through the buffer.
Putting it all together:
\C Case-sensitive search
\%# From cursor position
. Skip first character
\( Either one of:
[a-z]\+ One or more lowercase letters
\| (\<bar>) Or:
[A-Z]\+ One or more uppercase letters
\) End group
\zs Set match position here
I'm skipping the first character under the cursor, since in a CamelCase word, the first character won't match capitalization of the remainder of the word.
I kept your original idea of finding the first character after the word then using h to go back one to the left. But that might be a problem if, for example, the word is at the end of the line.
You can actually match the last character of the word instead with something like [a-z]\+\zs[a-z], which will set the start of the match on the last lowercase character. You can do this for both sides of the group (you can have more than one \zs in your pattern, last wins.) If you structure your match that way, you won't need the final h to go back.
I didn't handle numbers, I'll leave those as an exercise to the reader.
Finally, consider there are quite a few corner cases that can make such a mapping quite tricky to get right. Rather than coming up with your own, why not look at plug-ins which add support for handling CamelCase words that have been battle-tested and will cover use cases a lot more advanced than the simple expression you're using here?
There's the excellent vim-scripts/camelcasemotion by Ingo Karkat which sets up a ,w mapping to move to the start of the next CamelCase word, but also i,w to select the current one. You can use powerful combinations such as v3i,w to visually select the current and next two CamelCase words.
You might also check Tim Pope's tpope/vim-abolish which, among other features, defines a set of cr mappings to do coercion from camelCase to MixedCase, snake_case, UPPER_CASE, etc. (Not directly about selecting them, but still related and you might find it useful.)
I would like to use tabs in a code that doesn’t use them. What I did until now to implement tabs was pretty handcrafty:
:%s/^ /\t/g
:%s/^\t /\t\t/g
. . .
Question: Is there a way to replace two spaces ( ) by tab (\t) the number of times it was found at the beginning of a line?
There are (at least) three substitution techniques relevant to this case.
1. The first one takes advantage of the preceding-atom matching
syntax to naturally define a step of indentation. According to the
question statement, an indent step is a pair of adjacent space
characters preceded with nothing but spaces from the beginning
of line. Following this definition, one can construct the actual
substitution pattern, right to left:
:%s/\%(^ *\)\#<= /\t/g
Indeed, the pattern designates an occurrence of two literal space
characters, but only when they are preceded by a zero-width match
of the atom just before \#<=, which is the pattern ^ * wrapped in
grouping parentheses \%(, \). These non-capturing parentheses are
used instead of the usual capturing ones, \(, \), since there is no
need in further referring to the matched string of leading spaces. Due
to the g flag, the above :substitute command runs through the
leading spaces pair by pair, and replaces each of them by single tab
character.
2. The second technique takes a different approach. Instead of
matching separate indent levels, one can break each of the lines
starting with space characters down into two lines: one containing
the indenting spaces of the original line, and another holding the
rest of it. After that, it is straightforward to replace all of the pairs
of spaces on the first line, and concatenate the lines back together:
:g/^ /s/^ \+/&\r/|-s/ /\t/g|j!
3. The third idea is to process leading spaces by means of Vim
scripting language. A convenient way of doing that is to use the
substitute with an expression feature of the :substitute command
(see :help sub-replace-\=). When started with \=, the substitute
string of the command enables to substitute the matches of a pattern
with results of evaluation of the expression specified after \=:
:%s#^ \+#\=repeat("\t",len(submatch(0))/2)
If you specifically want to convert spaces into tabs (or vice-versa) at the start of a line, there's the useful :retab command which takes care of that. For example:
:retab! 2 will convert spaces in groups of two to tabs
:set expandtab and then :retab! 2 will convert tabstops (of width 2) back to spaces
See :h :retab (and :h 'ts') for the details.
This is not a general solution for the original problem, but I think it covers the most common use case.
There is no general way of doing this using :s regex's. You can't make the /g modifier look backwards otherwise it'd be unusable, and you can't reliably check that you're at the beginning of the line without looking backwards.
The only way of doing it generally is to loop, like so:
:for i in range(100)
: %s/^\t*\zs /\t/e
:endfor
Which is ugly, slow and highly unrecommended. Use :retab
I am trying to use vim properly - to aid me I've mapped my arrow keys to "" so that I am forced to use {hjlk} to move around.
This is causing me a problem when I want to just surround a character with spaces, eg:
"2+3" is better formatted "2 + 3"
Previously I would have put my cursor over the + and typed:
i[space][arrow-right][space][Esc]
That's 5 presses.
To do this without the arrow I seem to need to put the cursor over the + and go:
i[space][Esc]lli[space][Esc]
That's 8 presses.
I can convert the "li" into an "a" which reduces it to 7 presses:
i[space][Esc]la[space][Esc]
Short of writing this into a macro is there a better way of doing it? Is there some magic vim command which will allow me to do it in less than even 5 presses - and some way to generalise it so that I can do it to entire words or symbols, eg if I want to convert 3==4 to 3 == 4?
Personally, I think it makes most sense to destroy what you want to surround, and then repaste it.
c w "" ESC P
Obviously, you can replace both the object and the quotes with whatever you like. To change just one character + to be [space]+[space], you would do
s [space] [space] ESC P
on the +
The first thing that jumps to mind after reading just the title is surround.vim which is an excellent script to do all kinds of useful things along the lines of what you've described.
To solve your specific problem, I would probably position the cursor on the + and:
s[space]+[space][esc]
To change 3==4 into 3 == 4, I might position the cursor on the first =, and:
i[space][esc]ww.
i have been wondering about this as well. i tried with surround.vim, but the naive approach
S<space>
(after making a visual selection) does not work since the space is already taken up as a modifier for adding space to other surrounding character pairs. S<space><cr> adds a ^M in the output. Ss almost works but inserts a space only before.
after asking at tpope/surround.vim on github:
S<space><space>
in visual mode works. alternatively, from normal mode, ysl<space><space> works for a single character
Hah! I've been trying to figure out how to surround a block in spaces for quite a while and I finally found the right combination.
Using surround.vim you say surround selector space space.
So for this specific case I would use visual mode (a good trick for operating on single characters under the cursor BTW) thus: "vs " <- four key presses!
I also have a habit of typing things like argument lists without spaces. With this technique you can just navigate to the second argument using w and say "vws " to visually select a word and surround with spaces.
I prefer visual select mode generally. Also the alternate surround syntax "ysw " excludes the word final comma that is caught by "vw".
You could create a macro with one of the described actions and call it everytime you need it (Like amphetamachine proposed while I was writing) or you could simply search & replace:
:%s/\(\d\)\(+\|-\)\(\d\)/\1 \2 \3/g
You probably have to execute this command two times because it will only find every second occurence of +/-.
EDIT:
This will replace everything without the need to be called twice:
:%s/\d\#<=+\|-\d\#=/ \0 /g
Try positioning your cursor over the '+' and typing this:
q1i[space][right arrow][space][left arrow][esc]q
This will record a quick macro in slot 1 that you can re-use whenever you feel like it, that will surround the character under the cursor with spaces. You can re-call it with #1.
There is also the more versatile one:
q1ea[space][esc]bi[space][right arrow][esc]q
Which will surround the word under the cursor ("==" counts as a word) with spaces when you hit #1.
You could set up a mapping like this (press enter in visual mode to wrap spaces):
:vnoremap <CR> <ESC>`<i<SPACE><ESC>`>la<SPACE><ESC>h
This method allows you to use . to repeat the command at the next +.
Put your cursor over the + and type:
s[SPACE][CTRL-R]"[SPACE][ESC]
I know this is and old thread, but this might be useful to someone. I've found that the map (map it to anything else you want!)
noremap <leader>ss diwi<SPACE><C-R>"<SPACE><ESC>B
works ok both for turning 'a+b' into 'a + b' (when used over the '+' char) and for turning 'a==b' into 'a == b' (when used over either the first or the second '=' sign).
I hope it's useful to someone.
I am using Vim to read through a lot of C and Perl code containing many single letter variable names.
It would be nice to have some command to change the name of a variable to something more meaningful while I’m in the process of reading the code, so that I could read the rest of it faster.
Is there some command in Vim which could let me do this quickly?
I don’t think regexes would work because:
the same single letter name might have different purposes in different scoping blocks; and
the same combination of letters could be part of another longer variable name, a string literal, or a comment.
Are there any known solutions?
The following is how to rename a variable which is defined in the current scope {}.
Move your cursor to the variable usage. Press gd. Which means - move cursor to the definition.
Now Press [{ - this will bring you to the scope begin.
Press V - will turn on Visual Line selection.
Press % - will jump to the opposite } thus will select the whole scope.
Press :s/ - start of the substitute command.
<C-R>/ - will insert pattern that match variable name (that name you were on before pressing gd).
/newname/gc<CR> - will initiate search and replace with confirmation on every match.
Now you have to record a macros or even better - map a key.
Here are the final mappings:
" For local replace
nnoremap gr gd[{V%::s/<C-R>///gc<left><left><left>
" For global replace
nnoremap gR gD:%s/<C-R>///gc<left><left><left>
Put this to your .vimrc or just execute.
After this pressing gr on the local variable will bring you to :s command where you simply should enter new_variable_name and press Enter.
I know it's an old question, and #mykola-golubyev's way obviously IS the best answer for the particular case in the OP question (which, I assume is going through obfuscated code where you're likely to have multiple blocks with same var names); but with the question name like that many people coming here from google searches probably look for less situation-specific ways to rename variables in VIM -- and those can be more concise
I'm surprised no one suggested this way:
* :s// NEWNAME /gc
The * is the same as gn - search the next occurrence of the word under the cursor AND make it the last searched pattern; you can then omit the search pattern in the substitute command and VIM will assume that last one is the pattern to search for.
For small amounts of var copies, here's an even quicker one:
* cw NEWNAME <esc> then repeat n. for other occurrences
* is search for occurrences, cw is change word, n goes to the next occurrence of the last searched term and . repeats the last command (which is now change word to NEWNAME)
(Credits for me knowing all this go to #doomedbunnies on Reddit)
Another cool trick: (credits to #nobe4)
* cgn NEWNAME <esc> then repeat . for other occurrences
cgn is "change whatever is the result of (find next occurrence)". Now that this is the last command, you don't need the n to go to the next occurrence, so fewer strokes again, and, more importantly, no need to alternate n and .. But, obviously, this one has the drawback of not having a way to skip an occurrence.
Here are some benefits of these over other similar approaches, or language-specific plugins with refactoring support:
no command mapping, no fiddling with .vimrc(or init.vim), so you can use it in any VIM copy you come across (e.g. a quick task on some VPS or your friend's machine where configuring VIM your way would defeat the purpose of 'quick')
using * or gn for word selection is very quick -- just one keystroke (well, let's say 1.5)
using * or gn makes sure you don't get any matches inside other words, just as :%s/<C-R>//gc does. Beats typing the :%s/\<OLDNAME\>/NEWNAME/gc by hand: I personally tend to forget to use the \< things to limit matches to whole words only.
Not using a scope will only result in a few extra strokes of n to skip unwanted matches -- probably even fewer than the extra strokes needed to limit the scope to a certain code block. Under normal circumstances, your variables are most likely somewhat localised to a certain code block anyway.
AFAIK, there is no actual refactoring support in VIM. When doing a rename with the intent of a refactor I usually take the following precautions:
Limit the scope of the change my using marks.
When entering the regex, bracket the name with \< and >. This will make it match an entire word which reduces the types of incorrect renames that will occur.
Don't do a multiline replace to reduce chances of a bad replace
Look through the code diff carefully if it's anything other than a small change.
My end change looks something like this
:'a,'bs/\<foo\>/bar
I would love to be wrong about there not being a refactoring tool for VIM but I haven't seen it.
Put this in your .vimrc
" Function to rename the variable under the cursor
function! Rnvar()
let word_to_replace = expand("<cword>")
let replacement = input("new name: ")
execute '%s/\(\W\)' . word_to_replace . '\(\W\)/\1' . replacement . '\2/gc'
endfunction
Call it with :call Rnvar()
expand("<cword>") gets the word under the cursor. The search string uses % for file-scope, and the \(\W\) patterns look for non-word characters at the boundary of the word to replace, and save them in variables \1 and \2 so as to be re-inserted in the replacement pattern.
You could use the 'c' modifier in the global search and replace that would ask you for confirmation for each replace. It would take longer but it might work for a non-humongous code file:
%s/\$var/\$foo/gc
The c stands for confirm.
In c, you may be able to make some progress using cscope. It makes an attempt at understanding syntax, so would have a chance of knowing when the letter was a variable.
If this is across multiple files, you may consider taking a look at sed. Use find to grab your files and xargs plus sed for a replace. Say you want to replace a with a_better_name in all files matching *.c, you could do
find . -name "*.c" | xargs sed -i -e 's/a/a_better_name/g'
Bear in mind that this will replace ALL occurrences of a, so you may want a more robust regex.