I wanted to compile botan library version Botan-1.10.1 on linux for 64-bit mode.
Please tell me steps for compiling the botan on linux in 64-bit mode.
The build instructions for botan can be found here:
http://botan.randombit.net/manual/building.html
Basically, you need to run ./configure. In theory, it should make an educated guess as to the CPU type, so if you are building on a 64bit machine, it should automagically configure itself accordingly. If not, you can help it along by specifiying the correct cpu type with
./configure --cpu
Botan automatically guesses your OS and architecture. However, you can set that manually if you want(For e.g., if you are targeting multiple platforms or using a script to run configure.py). To build for 64-bit you need to specify --cpu=x86_64:
python configure.py --cpu=x86_64
To disable certain os features use: --without-os-features=.
To specify compiler use: --cc= or --cc-bin=path/to/compiler
To get a single .h and .cpp file use: --amalgamation
To disable certain modules use: --disable-modules=aes, block
Further build instructions for botan can be found here or use --help to get more info:
http://botan.randombit.net/manual/building.html
Related
I'm cross compiling wxWidgets using that tutorial. Could anyone explain me what --host=i586-mingw32msvc does?
I know that prefix give the information where cross-compiler is. However, I compiled minGW from source manually, because then I can use the newest GCC so I can't only copy&paste.
Prefix should be prefix=/usr/local/i386-mingw32 because there is my cross-compiler. And what about host?
I use Lubuntu 14.04 LTS AMD64 .
--host is a typical ./configure option that specifies the "host" system for the program to run on, i.e. the configuration that you will be compiling for.
In other words, --host activates cross-compiling behaviour if you specify a host that is not the same as your build machine.
The format of the host spec differs occasionally between platforms, but it generally takes the form
processorfamily-osfamily[-osversion][-abi]
I want to cross compile the Qt libraries (and eventually my application) for a Windows x86_64 target using a Linux x86_64 host machine. I feel like I am close, but I may have a fundamental misunderstanding of some parts of this process.
I began by installing all the mingw packages on my Fedora machine and then modifying the win32-g++ qmake.conf file to fit my environment. However, I seem to be getting stuck with some seemingly obvious configure options for Qt: -platform and -xplatform. Qt documentation says that -platform should be the host machine architecture (where you are compiling) and -xplatform should be the target platform for which you wish to deploy. In my case, I set -platform linux-g++-64 and -xplatform linux-win32-g++ where linux-win32-g++ is my modified win32-g++ configuration.
My problem is that, after executing configure with these options, I see that it invokes my system's compiler instead of the cross compiler (x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc). If I omit the -xplatform option and set -platform to my target spec (linux-win32-g++), it invokes the cross compiler but then errors when it finds some Unix related functions aren't defined.
Here is some output from my latest attempt: http://pastebin.com/QCpKSNev.
Questions:
When cross-compiling something like Qt for Windows from a Linux host, should the native compiler ever be invoked? That is, during a cross compilation process, shouldn't we use only the cross compiler? I don't see why Qt's configure script tries to invoke my system's native compiler when I specify the -xplatform option.
If I'm using a mingw cross-compiler, when will I have to deal with a specs file? Spec files for GCC are still sort of a mystery to me, so I am wondering if some background here will help me.
In general, beyond specifying a cross compiler in my qmake.conf, what else might I need to consider?
Just use M cross environment (MXE). It takes the pain out of the whole process:
Get it:
$ git clone https://github.com/mxe/mxe.git
Install build dependencies
Build Qt for Windows, its dependencies, and the cross-build tools;
this will take about an hour on a fast machine with decent internet access;
the download is about 500MB:
$ cd mxe && make qt
Go to the directory of your app and add the cross-build tools to the PATH environment variable:
$ export PATH=<mxe root>/usr/bin:$PATH
Run the Qt Makefile generator tool then build:
$ <mxe root>/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/qt/bin/qmake && make
You should find the binary in the ./release directory:
$ wine release/foo.exe
Some notes:
Use the master branch of the MXE repository; it appears to get a lot more love from the development team.
The output is a 32-bit static binary, which will work well on 64-bit Windows.
(This is an update of #Tshepang's answer, as MXE has evolved since his answer)
Building Qt
Rather than using make qt to build Qt, you can use MXE_TARGETS to control your target machine and toolchain (32- or 64-bit). MXE started using .static and .shared as a part of the target name to show which type of lib you want to build.
# The following is the same as `make qt`, see explanation on default settings after the code block.
make qt MXE_TARGETS=i686-w64-mingw32.static # MinGW-w64, 32-bit, static libs
# Other targets you can use:
make qt MXE_TARGETS=x86_64-w64-mingw32.static # MinGW-w64, 64-bit, static libs
make qt MXE_TARGETS=i686-w64-mingw32.shared # MinGW-w64, 32-bit, shared libs
# You can even specify two targets, and they are built in one run:
# (And that's why it is MXE_TARGET**S**, not MXE_TARGET ;)
# MinGW-w64, both 32- and 64-bit, static libs
make qt MXE_TARGETS='i686-w64-mingw32.static x86_64-w64-mingw32.static'
In #Tshepang's original answer, he did not specify an MXE_TARGETS, and the default is used. At the time he wrote his answer, the default was i686-pc-mingw32, now it's i686-w64-mingw32.static. If you explicitly set MXE_TARGETS to i686-w64-mingw32, omitting .static, a warning is printed because this syntax is now deprecated. If you try to set the target to i686-pc-mingw32, it will show an error as MXE has removed support for MinGW.org (i.e. i686-pc-mingw32).
Running qmake
As we changed the MXE_TARGETS, the <mxe root>/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/qt/bin/qmake command will no longer work. Now, what you need to do is:
<mxe root>/usr/<TARGET>/qt/bin/qmake
If you didn't specify MXE_TARGETS, do this:
<mxe root>/usr/i686-w64-mingw32.static/qt/bin/qmake
Update: The new default is now i686-w64-mingw32.static
Another way to cross-compile software for Windows on Linux is the MinGW-w64 toolchain on Archlinux. It is easy to use and maintain, and it provides recent versions of the compiler and many libraries. I personally find it easier than MXE and it seems to adopt newer versions of libraries faster.
First, you will need an arch-based machine (virtual machine or docker container will suffice). It does not have to be Arch Linux, derivatives will do as well. I used Manjaro Linux.
Most of the MinGW-w64 packages are not available at the official Arch repositories, but there is plenty in AUR. The default package manager for Arch (Pacman) does not support installation directly from AUR, so you will need to install and use an AUR wrapper like yay or yaourt. Then installing MinGW-w64 version of Qt5 and Boost libraries is as easy as:
yay -Sy mingw-w64-qt5-base mingw-w64-boost
#yaourt -Sy mingw-w64-qt5-base mingw-w64-qt5-boost #if you use yaourt
This will also install the MinGW-w64 toolchain (mingw-w64-gcc) and other dependencies.
Cross-compiling a Qt project for windows (x64) is then as simple as:
x86_64-w64-mingw32-qmake-qt5
make
To deploy your program you will need to copy corresponding dlls from /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bin/. For example, you will typically need to copy /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/lib/qt/plugins/platforms/qwindows.dll to program.exe_dir/platforms/qwindows.dll.
To get a 32bit version you simply need to use i686-w64-mingw32-qmake-qt5 instead. Cmake-based projects work just as easily with x86_64-w64-mingw32-cmake.
This approach worked extremely well for me, was the easiest to set-up, maintain, and extend.
It also goes well with continuous integration services. There are docker images available too.
For example, let's say I want to build QNapi subtitle downloader GUI. I could do it in two steps:
Start the docker container:
sudo docker run -it burningdaylight/mingw-arch:qt /bin/bash
Clone and compile QNapi
git clone --recursive 'https://github.com/QNapi/qnapi.git'
cd qnapi/
x86_64-w64-mingw32-qmake-qt5
make
That's it! In many cases, it will be that easy. Adding your own libraries to the package repository (AUR) is also straightforward. You would need to write a PKBUILD file, which is as intuitive as it can get, see mingw-w64-rapidjson, for example.
Ok I think I've got it figured out.
Based in part on https://github.com/mxe/mxe/blob/master/src/qt.mk and https://www.videolan.org/developers/vlc/contrib/src/qt4/rules.mak
It appears that "initially" when you run configure (with -xtarget, etc.), it configures then runs your "hosts" gcc to build the local binary file ./bin/qmake
./configure -xplatform win32-g++ -device-option CROSS_COMPILE=$cross_prefix_here -nomake examples ...
then you run normal "make" and it builds it for mingw
make
make install
so
yes
only if you need to use something other than msvcrt.dll (its default). Though I have never used anything else so I don't know for certain.
https://stackoverflow.com/a/18792925/32453 lists some configure params.
In order to compile Qt, one must run it's configure script, specifying the host platform with -platform (e.g. -platform linux-g++-64 if you're building on a 64-bit linux with the g++ compiler) and the target platform with -xplatform (e.g. -xplatform win32-g++ if you're cross compiling to windows).
I've also added this flag:
-device-option CROSS_COMPILE=/usr/bin/x86_64-w64-mingw32-
which specifies the prefix of the toolchain I'm using, which will get prepended to 'gcc' or 'g++' in all the makefiles that are building binaries for windows.
Finally, you might get problems while building icd, which apparently is something that is used to add ActiveX support to Qt. You can avoid that by passing the flag -skip qtactiveqt to the configure script. I've got this one out of this bug report: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-38223
Here's the whole configure command I've used:
cd qt_source_directory
mkdir my_build
cd my_build
../configure \
-release \
-opensource \
-no-compile-examples \
-platform linux-g++-64 \
-xplatform win32-g++ \
-device-option CROSS_COMPILE=/usr/bin/x86_64-w64-mingw32- \
-skip qtactiveqt \
-v
As for yout questions:
1 - Yes. The native compiler will be called in order to build some tools that are needed in the build process. Maybe things like qconfig or qmake, but I'm not entirely sure which tools, exactly.
2 - Sorry. I have no idea what specs files are in the context of compilers =/ . But as far as I know, you wouldn't have to deal with that.
3 - You can specify the cross compiler prefix in the configure command line instead of doing it in the qmake.conf file, as mentioned above. And there's also that problem with idc, whose workaround I've mentioned as well.
I need to set up the Git client on a cheap shared hosting, with a no-name 32-bit Linux distribution. GCC isn't available so I can't compile it on the server. I do have at my disposal 2 other 64-bit Linux servers and an OSX laptop which I could try to cross-compile a binary on. But I can't seem to get it to compile correctly; when I push the binaries to the 32-bit server it says it can't run the executable. It looks from other sources like I need to add "-arch i386" and/or "-m32" to the ./configure or make commands to work for 32-bit, but I guess I'm not using them correctly. Anyone know how to do this, or alternately, where to find a universal 32-bit Git binary?
Thanks
Your best bet is trying to compile git as a static binary. Your binary probably have different shared libraries versions (or even, not all dependencies installed).
This link:
How to build git for a host with no compiler
Provides information on how to build git as a static binary.
This stackoverflow answer provides information on how to cross compile it from a 64 bit host.
Hope this helps.
Honestly, if it were me, I would just fire up 32-bit Linux in a VM and compile there.
OS X isn't going to work - its geared to produce Mach-O binaries with the OS X syscall interface, not Linux ELF binaries.
Using -m32 on the CLFAGS is going to help, but most importantly, use -static as well. Static binaries are much more portable.
If that fails, please provide exactly how it failed.
I've migrated an Oracle database and Oracle HTTP server install from a 32-bit machine to a 64-bit machine - both machines running Linux. Oracle Database is 64-bit, but the (Apache) HTTP server is 32-bit.
I use some non-Oracle DSOs (mod_ntlm for one) but whenever I run the standard "make install" type thing I end up with a 64-bit module.
Is there a standard way to compile 32-bit Apache modules on a 64-bit machine?
As an alternative to Andrew Medico's answer, use '-m32' for 32-bit compilations and '-m64' for 64-bit compilations on PPC or SPARC or Intel machines - since you don't actually mention which chip architecture you are using and that notation works on all of these.
I often use:
CC="gcc -m32" ./configure
to ensure a 32-bit compilation (or, more frequently, CC="gcc -m64" to ensure 64-bit compilation).
Question: "Is CC an environment variable used by make?"
Answer: Yes, though in this case, it is also recognized by configure, which is a shell script generated by autoconf. The notation I used - which is what I use at the command line - sets CC in the environment while the configure command is run. The other answer suggests using:
./configure CC="gcc -m32"
I assume that works and achieves much the same effect; I've not tried it so I don't know that it works.
If you run ./configure --help | less, you will see information (often just standard information) about how to use the script. And at the end, it will list (some of the) relevant environment variables, of which CC is one.
The advantage of setting the C compiler to "gcc -m32" is that the 32-bit flag is set every time the compiler is used - there is very little room for it to go wrong. If you set a flags variable (CFLAGS, etc), there is a chance that some command won't use it, and then things can go awry.
Also, going back to the question, make certainly uses a variable (macro) called CC. And you can set that on the make command line:
make CC="gcc -m32"
That overrides any setting in the makefile. By contrast, using an environment variable, the setting in the makefile overrides the value in the environment, so setting CC as an environment variable is less helpful. Although make -e gives the environment precedence over the makefile, it is usually a dangerous option to use - it can have unexpected side-effects.
./configure CFLAGS="-march=i686"
should do it
Along with the -m32 flag in gcc, you may need to include the -melf_i386 flag for ld to properly link the 32bit object files to the 32bit libraries if you have both the 32bit and 64bit libraries. The standard ld on 64bit linux boxes will default to the 64bit libraries and you get a compatibility error when the linking occurs.
Are there any command line interpreters or any other set of programs around for x86 linux in order to run MIPS assembly programs?
I'd like to be able to write simple MIPS assembly programs and run them from the console on my local machine.
I know of SPIM but it requires X Windows and I'm curious if there are better options out there.
Edit: Turns out it doesn't require X Windows. I still have issues with SPIM. Not the best in my humble opinion. Qemu / Cross compiled toolchain is a little more work but I have less quirks.
Incidentally, Spim does not require X Windows. It has a console interface as well. Run either spim or xspim.
You will need either a cross compilation toolchain, or to build your own cross binutils.
For a prebuilt toolchain, you can visit code sourcery. If you just want to compile assembly, then all
you need is binutils. There are some guidelines on the Linux Mips wiki
For the emulation part, QEmu would be my choice.
MARS made my assembly programming for MIPS architecture so much easier. If you would like a GUI/IDE, I would recommend MARS for sure.
I was in the same situation yesterday. I also didn't like SPIM, so this is what I did:
installed gxemul and gxemul-doc (those are the package names on debian)
installed netbsd on an emulated MIPS machine following the detailed instructions in the documentation
since netbsd already includes the standard gcc toolchain and vi, you're good to go.
Setting up networking is pretty easy and well documented, too. This has the advantage of not needing to fiddle with cross compilation.
You could use gxemul, which emulates a MIPS machine (among others, including Dreamcast), and is able to run many Operating systems (included linux, netbsd and some more).
gxemul-wikipedia
gxemul-home page
QEmu has a good MIPS emulator. Combine that with a cross-compiled GCC/binutils (technically you only need binutils to get GAS, the GNU assembler) and you're good to go.
Assuming you wish to use GCC.
Steps for compiling for MIPS on an x86-64 system, and then running the executable using an emulator:
Use a cross-compilation toolchain to produce an executable.
If you are on Debian/Ubuntu, install a cross-compilation toolchain for MIPS. For example, either of these APT packages: gcc-mips-linux-gnu (MIPS big endian) or gcc-mipsel-linux-gnu (MIPS little endian).
Compile using mips-linux-gnu-gcc (mipsel-linux-gnu-gcc for little endian MIPS); assemble using mips-linux-gnu-as; link using mips-linux-gnu-ld.
Run the executable using an emulator.
Install an emulator that can launch Linux programs compiled for one architecture (e.g. MIPS) on another architecture (e.g. x86-64): sudo apt-get install qemu-user.
Run your executable compiled for MIPS using the emulator: qemu-mips ./a.out (or qemu-mipsel ./a.out for little endian MIPS). Simply running ./a.out might also work; the emulator might be used automagically if you (or your distro's qemu package) has set up binfmt-misc to transparently run qemu-user.
Maybe you can take a look at these emulators? I'm not an expert but the list seems good.