I want to use CRF for sentence level sentiment classiciation (positive or negative). But, I am lost on how to create a very simple feature to detect this using either CRFsuite or CRF++. Been trying for a few days, can anyone suggest how to design a simple feature which I can use as starting point to understand how to use the tools.
Thanks.
You could start providing gazetteers containing words separated by sentiment (e.g. positive adjectives, negative nouns, etc) and so using CRF to label relevant portions of the sentences. Using gazetteers you can also provide lists of other words which won't be labeled themselves, but could help identifying sentiment terms. You could also use WordNet instead of gazetteers. Your gazetteer features could be binary, i.e. gazetteer matched or not matched. Check out http://crfpp.googlecode.com for more examples and references.
I hope this helps!
Related
I am building an NLP pipeline and I am trying to get my head around in regards to the optimal structure. My understanding at the moment is the following:
Step1 - Text Pre-processing [a. Lowercasing, b. Stopwords removal, c. stemming, d. lemmatisation,]
Step 2 - Feature extraction
Step 3 - Classification - using the different types of classifier(linearSvC etc)
From what I read online there are several approaches in regard to feature extraction but there isn't a solid example/answer.
a. Is there a solid strategy for feature extraction ?
I read online that you can do [a. Vectorising usin ScikitLearn b. TF-IDF]
but also I read that you can use Part of Speech or word2Vec or other embedding and Name entity recognition.
b. What is the optimal process/structure of using these?
c. On the text pre-processing I am ding the processing on a text column on a df and the last modified version of it is what I use as an input in my classifier. If you do feature extraction do you do that in the same column or you create a new one and you only send to the classifier the features from that column?
Thanks so much in advance
The preprocessing pipeline depends mainly upon your problem which you are trying to solve. The use of TF-IDF, word embeddings etc. have their own restrictions and advantages.
You need to understand the problem and also the data associated with it. In order to make the best use of the data, we need to implement the proper pipeline.
Specifically for text related problems, you will find word embeddings to be very useful. TF-IDF is useful when the problem needs to be solved emphasising the words with lesser frequency. Word embeddings, on the other hand, convert the text to a N-dimensional vector which may show up similarity with some other vector. This could bring a sense of association in your data and the model can learn the best features possible.
In simple cases, we can use a bag of words representation to tokenize the texts.
So, you need to discover the best approach for your problem. If you are solving a problems which closely resembles the famous NLP problems like IMDB review classification, sentiment analysis on Twitter data, then you can find a number of approaches on the internet.
A few papers on the topics of word and document embeddings (word2vec, doc2vec) mention that they used the Stanford CoreNLP framework to tokenize/lemmatize/POS-tag the input words/sentences:
The corpora were lemmatized and POS-tagged with the Stanford CoreNLP (Manning et al., 2014) and each token was replaced with its lemma and POS tag
(http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp/131/039/ecp17131039.pdf)
For pre-processing, we tokenise and lowercase the words using Stanford CoreNLP
(https://arxiv.org/pdf/1607.05368.pdf)
So my questions are:
Why does the first paper apply POS-tagging? Would each token then be replaced with something like {lemma}_{POS} and the whole thing used to train the model? Or are the tags used to filter tokens?
For example, gensims WikiCorpus applies lemmatization per default and then only keeps a few types of part of speech (verbs, nouns, etc.) and gets rid of the rest. So what is the recommended way?
The quote from the second paper seems to me like they only split up words and then lowercase them. This is also what I first tried before I used WikiCorpus. In my opinion, this should give better results for document embeddings as most of POS types contribute to the meaning of a sentence. Am I right?
In the original doc2vec paper I did not find details about their pre-processing.
For your first question, the answer is "it depends on what you are trying to accomplish!"
There isn't a recommended way per say, to pre-process text. To clean a text corpus, usually the first steps are tokenization and lemmatization. Next, to remove not important terms/tokens, you can remove stop-words or even apply POS tags, to be able to remove tokens based on their grammatical category, based on the assumption that some grammatical categories (such as adjectives), do not contain valuable information for modelling a topic for example. But this purely depends on the type of analysis you are going to follow after the pre-processing step.
For you second part of the question, as explained above, tokenisation and lower case tokens, are standard parts of the pre-processing routine. So I also suspect, that regardless of the ML algorithm used later on, your results will be better if you carefully pre-process your data. I am not sure whether POS tags contribute to the meaning of a sentence though.
Hope I provided some valuable feedback to your research. If not you could provide a code sample to further discuss this issue.
I'm making a program which provides some english sentences which user has to learn more.
For example:
First, I provide a sentence "I have to go school today" to user.
Then if the user wants to learn more sentences like that, I find some sentences which have high grammar similarity with that sentence.
I think the only way for providing sentences is to calculate similarity.
Is there a way to calculate grammar similarity between two sentences?
or is there a better way to make that algorithm?
Any advice or suggestions would be appreciated. Thank you.
My approach for solving this problem would be to do a Part Of Speech Tagging of using a tool like NLTK and compare the trees structure of your phrase with your database.
Other way, if you already have a training dataset, use the WEKA to use a machine learn approach to connect the phrases.
You can parse your sentence as either a constituent or dependency tree and use these representations to formulate some form of query that you can use to find candidate sentences with similar structures.
You can check this available tool from Stanford NLP:
Tregex is a utility for matching patterns in trees, based on tree relationships and regular expression matches on nodes (the name is short for "tree regular expressions"). Tregex comes with Tsurgeon, a tree transformation language. Also included from version 2.0 on is a similar package which operates on dependency graphs (class SemanticGraph, called semgrex.
I've successfully used OpenNLP for document categorization and also was able to extract names from trained samples and using regular expressions.
I was wondering if it is also possible to extract names (or more generally speaking, subjects) based on their position in a sentence?
E.g. instead of training with concrete names that are know a priori, like Travel to <START:location> New York </START>, I would prefer not to provide concrete examples but let OpenNLP decide that anything appearing at the specified position could be an entity. That way, I wouldn't have to provide each and every possible option (which is impossible in my case anyway) but only provide one for the possible surrounding sentence.
that is context based learning and Opennlp already does that. you've to train it with proper and more examples to get good results.
for example, when there is Professor X in our sentence, Opennlp trained model.bin gives you output X as a name whereas when X is present in the sentence without professor infront of it, it might not give output X as a name.
according to its documentation, give 15000 sentences of training data and you can expect good results.
I am trying to come up with a way to convert speech to text. I am trying to use Sphinx to attain this. What I mean by unguided speech to text is that, the speaker is not bound to speak from a definite set of sentences. Rather he might speak any sentence. So its not possible for me to have a grammar file, where each word is one of the alternative pre-written in the grammar file. I understand that I would have to train Sphinx somehow to do this.
But I am a beginner in sphinx. How to start training Sphinx to convert unguided speech? Is it possible to attain unguided conversion with Sphinx?
The task you are up to is, as of right now, is not yet possible to complete, at least not with satisfying accuracy.
As for the Sphinx-based solution: you will have to create dictionary with all the words to be recognized. There is no other way.
Once you have the dictionary, you can generate a simple n-gram model based on it, with ony unigrams - each unigram will be one word. The probability of each may be the same, or you may attempt to do some statistical analysis of the words that will be used.