fortran 77 and 90 mpi libraries - openmpi

I compiled openmpi-1.8 using,
shell$ ./configure --prefix=$(pwd) CC=gcc CXX=g++ F77=gfortran FC=gfortran
shell$ make all install
However, I did not see libmpi_f77.so and libmpi_f90.so library files in lib directory. Any ways to obtain these library files.
Appreciate your help.
-Raj

The Fortran routines of Open MPI 1.8 are contained in libmpi_mpifh.so.2 and libmpi_usempi*.so.0.

Related

How to link mach-o format object files on linux?

I have been attempting to link a MACHO formatted object file on Linux, but I have failed miserably. So far, I have created the object file by running:
nasm -fmacho -o machoh.o hello.o
I have tried linking using:
clang --target=x86_64-apple-darwin machoh.o
but that failed. I have attempted using GCC, LD, and other linkers but I have still failed miserably. Are there any ideas on how I could solve my problem?
Thank you very much.
The most accessible solution would be lld, the LLVM linker.
lld does not ship with clang, but is a separate package.
sudo apt install lld
If you installed a version of clang that isn't the default (e.g. clang-12 explicitly), then you should use the same version for lld (i.e. lld-12).
Get a MacOS SDK from somewhere. This GitHub repo archives them.
If you're uncomfortable using the above, the "legitimate" way of obtaining it without a Mac would be:
Create an Apple ID
Go to https://developer.apple.com/download/all/
Download the "Command Line Tools for Xcode <version>"
Mount or extract the dmg
Extract the XAR package
For each ".pkg" folder inside, run pbzx <Payload | cpio -i
Find the Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk inside.
Feed both of the above to clang:
clang --target=x86_64-apple-darwin -fuse-ld=lld --sysroot=path/to/MacOSX.sdk machoh.o
I have tried linking using: clang --target=x86_64-apple-darwin machoh.o
but that failed.
Failed how? Details matter.
Anyway, there are 3 commonly used linkers on Linux: BFD-ld, Gold, and (newest) LLD.
Of these, Gold is an ELF-only linker, and will not work for Mach-O.
BFD-ld is only configured to support a few emulations (use ld --help to see which ones) in my distribution. BFD does appear to support Mach-O, so it's probably possible to build a Linux BFD-ld cross-linker with such support.
LLD should support Mach-O out of the box, but you are probably not using LLD.
So your first step should be to figure out which linker clang --target=x86_64-apple-darwin ... uses, and then make it use the one which does support Mach-O.

Compile Swift code to native executable for Linux

I've installed Swift lang for Linux (Ubuntu) and it works fine. For example:
print("Hello World")
To run it:
./swift hi.swift
My question is, is it possible to generate a native executable code for it? How?
Listing the executable files in the Swift directory, it has swiftc. It generates a native executable binary by command:
swiftc hi.swift -o hi
./hi
In addition to swiftc, one can also generate native executables by using the Swift build system, which is described at
https://swift.org/getting-started/#using-the-build-system
Using the build system, one can easily build native executables from multiple source files, while swiftc is a convenient way to build an executable from a single source file.
Please note that you also need to install Clang if you want to create native executables with Swift. Clang is not needed to run the swift command interactively or to run a .swift file. Interestingly, installing GCC (including g++) and creating symlink clang++ to g++ does allow swiftrc to build an executable. This also enables swift build to work. At least it is true for very simple programs. However, this is not a "blessed" way. Apple docs at swift.org say that Clang is needed.

Compiling my C program with my customized library (.h) using Linux

Hi team,
I have three files which I need to compile for testing, btw im using CentOS linux.
source_code.c
library.h
library.c
how do I put the library.h in the gcc library, so I can use it?
how do I compile the source_code.c to use that library?
Thank you very much.
This is basic knowledge of your tools, but you can do this:
#include "library.h" in the include section of the library.c code (at top of the file).
gcc source_code.c library.c in the linux terminal will link and compile both source_code.c and library.c. This will generate an executable named "a.out" (if there were no compilation problems). You can change its name, by adding the option -o name to the gcc command (gcc source_code.c library.c -o mycode will generate an executable named "mycode").
If you really need a library that will be used by a lot of other programs, you can look for "shared libraries", but I think that you are asking for a basic thing.
You dont need this library.h while building and executable (with gcc) as you should have specified the exact location of the library in the source file. All you need to do is gcc sourcefile1.c sourcefile2.c -o exename

Setting up G++ or ICC for mpi.h on Ubuntu

I have never done any major programing outside of VS08.
I am trying to compile a program called LAMMPS with either of the two relevant make files. One calls g++ and the other calls icc (Intel's compiler).
icc produces this error:
icc -O -DLAMMPS_GZIP -DMPICH_SKIP_MPICXX -DFFT_FFTW -M write_restart.cpp > write_restart.d
write_restart.cpp(15): catastrophic error: cannot open source file "mpi.h"
#include "mpi.h"
and g++ throws this error
g++ -g -O -DLAMMPS_GZIP -DMPICH_SKIP_MPICXX -DFFT_FFTW -M verlet.cpp > verlet.d
pointers.h:25: fatal error: mpi.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
The mpi.h file is located in /usr/lib/openmpi/include
It is my understanding that I need to set that $PATH variable which reads
bash: /usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/opt/intel/bin:/usr/lib/openmpi/include:
and $LD_LIBRARY_PATH which currently reads
/usr/lib/openmpi/lib:
SO, how does one include the mpi.h file? So that either icc or g++ find it?
mpi.h is a header for MPI library. That would be included if you use mpic++ MPI compiler wrapper instead of g++ in your makefile. mpic++ will call the appropriate compiler. From what you describe you have openmpi package installed on your ubuntu machine.
For more info, you need to consult the manual, e.g.
http://lammps.sandia.gov/doc/Section_start.html#2_2 (for LAMMPS)
and perhaps you need to see openmpi manual as to how to set up additional compiler. Not sure if this can be done after openmpi itself has been built. By default I think in Ubuntu openmpi compiler wrappers would only call g++. CMIIW.
Okay, so I got it to work with g++ when setting up cc as "mpic++.mpich2" instead of "mpic++"
you can try compile using openmpi make file in /src/MAKE
make openmpi
in my case, this option was successful

Any way to tell g++ to use another binary for compiling?

This question may sound a little absurd. Facts:
I have a program written in C++.
It uses lot of in-house libs.
I don't have read permission to the libs.
So I have to build with a given tool which does have access to the lib headers and archives.
Stuck on gcc 4.3
I have a local build of gcc 4.5
I want g++ to use my local g++ instead of the old version.
Is there any way to get this done?
Use the full path of the compiler instead of invoking it without specifying the path.
Many configure scripts accept the CC environment variable:
export CC=/usr/bin/gcc44 for example. If you have a configure script, try ./configure --help to see if it's supported.
Assuming you have g++ in your ~/bin folder, could you add
export PATH=~/bin:$PATH
to your shell's .profile file (.bash_profile for bash). Then when you log in again and do which g++ it should show your local version of g++.

Resources