I have code like the following:
Microsoft.AnalysisServices.AdomdClient.Dimension dimension = cubeDef.Dimensions[dimensionName];
string hierarchyName = matches[1].Value.Replace("[", "").Replace("]", "");
Microsoft.AnalysisServices.AdomdClient.Hierarchy hierarchy = dimension.Hierarchies[hierarchyName];
Microsoft.AnalysisServices.AdomdClient.Level adomdLevel = hierarchy.Levels[levelNumber];
MemberCollection levelMembers = adomdLevel.GetMembers();
Which is good to get all the members at a level.
However what I want is to narrow the members to just the ones at have a certain parent.
So that the members are the children from a chosen parent drilled down on.
There are overloads for GetMembers, but I was not able to work out how I could use them to filter in only the parent dimensions children.
Is there a way to do this?
The code I have gets the full level and then filters in code:
foreach (Microsoft.AnalysisServices.AdomdClient.Member memberData in levelMembers)
{
if (memberData.Parent.UniqueName != parentMemberUniqueName)
{ continue; }
// code using child of parent here
}
This is proving slower as I drill down deeper.
Thanks,
Jasonlan
Related
When I was using gtk3 I was able to access a ListBox's children this way:
let list_box = ListBox::new();
let label = Label::new(Some("Label 1"));
list_box.append(&label);
for row in list_box.children() {
list_box.remove(&row);
}
In gtk4, it seems like children() doesn't exist anymore: "no method named `children` found for struct `gtk4::ListBox`".
I checked ListBox in the gtk4 docs, but I couldn't find anything related to accessing a ListBox's children.
How to access a ListBox's children in gtk4?
There is observe_children, but like it's name suggests you should not modify the container while using it. Or more specifically you can't keep using it's iterator once you modify the underlying container.
For your usecase you can iterate and remove children using first_child/last_child like this:
while let Some(row) = list_box.last_child() {
list_box.remove(&row);
}
I am iterating over a collection of data, in my case, an array of objects. Here is a sample of 2 data points from it:
{
violation_id: '211315',
inspection_id: '268804',
violation_category: 'Garbage and Refuse',
violation_date: '2012-03-22 0:00',
violation_date_closed: '',
violation_type: 'Refuse Accumulation' },
{
violation_id: '214351',
inspection_id: '273183',
violation_category: 'Building Conditions',
violation_date: '2012-05-01 0:00',
violation_date_closed: '2012-04-17 0:00',
violation_type: 'Mold or Mildew' }
I need to create a new array of objects from this, one for each "violation_category" property. If Violation category already exists in the new array I am creating, i simply add the information to that existing category object (instead of having two "building conditions" objects for example, I would just add to an existing one).
However, I am having trouble assigning to the existing object if the current one exists (it's easy to check if it does not, but not the other way around). This is what am attempting to do currently:
if (violationCategory.uniqueCategoryName) {
violationCategory.uniqueCategoryName.violations = results[i].violation_id;
violationCategory.uniqueCategoryName.date = results[i].violation_date;
violationCategory.uniqueCategoryName.closed =
results[i].violation_date_closed;
} else {
category.violations = results[i].violation_id;
category.date = results[i].violation_date;
category.closed = results[i].violation_date_closed;
violationCategory.push(category);
}
In first condition, if this category (key) exists, I simply add to it, and in the second condition, this is where I am struggling. Any help appreciated. Thanks guys.
Just add an empty object to the key if there no object there :
violationCategory.uniqueCategoryName = violationCategory.uniqueCategoryName || {};
And only then, add the data you want to the object.
violationCategory.uniqueCategoryName.violations = results[i].violation_id;
violationCategory.uniqueCategoryName.date = results[i].violation_date;
violationCategory.uniqueCategoryName.closed =
results[i].violation_date_closed;
No condition needed.
Good luck!
Assuming that you have an input variable which is an array of objects, where the objects are looking like the objects of the question, you can generate your output like this:
var output = {};
for (var item of input) {
if (!output[item.violation_category]) output[item.violation_category] = [];
output[item.violation_category].push(item);
}
Of course you might customize it like you want.
I have a Document based Core Data app with an NSTreeController supplying the content to a view based NSOutlineView. I am "styling" (setting text colour, background colour etc.) the rows based on persistent "transformable" NSColor and NSFont attributes in my data model which the end use can modify. When a new row is popped up, it displays things with the colours/fonts set in the data model. Here is the delegate/datasource code that sets the row background colour:
- (void) outlineView:(NSOutlineView *)outlineView
didAddRowView:(NSTableRowView *)rowView
forRow:(NSInteger)row
{
// Get the relevant nodeType which contains the attributes
QVItem *aNode = [[outlineView itemAtRow:row] representedObject];
if (aNode.backColor)
{
rowView.backgroundColor = aNode.backColor;
}
}
However when the style attributes change I want the associated visible rows to be redrawn with the new style values. Each time a "style" attribute is changed, I am using NSNotificationCenter to send a notification to the Outline view delegate, with the model object whose row needs to be redrawn with the changed style. This is the code in the delegate that receives the notification.
-(void) styleHasChanged: (NSNotification *)aNotification
{
NSTreeNode *aTreeNode = [myTreeController treeNodeForModelObject:aNotification.object];
[myOutlineView reloadItem:aTreeNode];
}
My assumption here is that I can navigate the tree controller to find the tree node which is representing my model object and then ask the outline view to redraw the row for that tree node. This is the "additions" code in the tree controller which walks the tree to find the object - not super efficient, but I don't think there is another way.
#implementation NSTreeController (QVAdditions)
- (NSTreeNode *)treeNodeForModelObject:(id)aModelObject
{
return [self treeNodeForModelObject:aModelObject inNodes:[[self arrangedObjects] childNodes]];
}
- (NSTreeNode *)treeNodeForModelObject:(id)aModelObject inNodes:(NSArray*)nodes
{
for(NSTreeNode* node in nodes)
{
if([node representedObject] == aModelObject)
return node;
if([[node childNodes] count])
{
NSTreeNode * treeNode = [self treeNodeForModelObject:aModelObject inNodes:[node childNodes]];
return treeNode;
}
}
return nil;
}
So sometimes this works and the row redraws, and sometimes it doesn't. The delegate method "styleHasChanged:" is always called, and the tree controller always returns a corresponding tree node (Actually of a subclass of NSTreeNode). But more often than not the outline view does not recognise the tree node, and the row is not redrawn. Its like the tree controller has given back a different tree node object to the one it gave the outline view in the past. But weirdly sometimes it does work and the right row is redrawn with the new background colour. If I collapse the row out of view and pop it open again, it is redrawn correctly.
Anyone any idea why it works sometimes and not other times?
It would be nice to be able to bind the colour/font attributes to the row and columns in some way, so that the outline view did this styling automatically with KVO, but I don't think that is possible - is it?
You spend hours/days trying to work out what you've done wrong; You write the question out; Post it; Sleep on it; and think how stupid can you be.
So I asked the NSTableRowView to redraw itself, but I had not set the new background colour. So here is the new improved (and works) version of styleHasChanged:
-(void) styleHasChanged: (NSNotification *)aNotification
{
QVItem *modelItem = aNotification.object;
NSTreeNode *aTreeNode = [myTreeController treeNodeForModelObject:modelItem];
NSInteger rowIndex = [myOutlineView rowForItem:aTreeNode];
if !(rowIndex == -1)
{
NSTableRowView *rowViewToBeUpdated = [myOutlineView rowViewAtRow:rowIndex makeIfNecessary:YES];
rowViewToBeUpdated.backgroundColor = modelItem.backColor;
}
}
Duh!
I have records that have an index attribute to maintain their position in relation to each other.
I have a plugin that performs a renumbering operation on these records when the index is changed or new one created. There are specific rules that apply to items that are at the first and last position in the list.
If a new (or existing changed) item is inserted into the middle (not technically the middle...just somewhere between start and end) of the list a renumbering kicks off to make room for the record.
This renumbering process fires in a new execution pipeline...We are updating record D. When I tell record E to change (to make room for D) that of course fires the plugin on update message.
This renumbering is fine until we reach the end of the list where the plugin then gets into a loop with the first business rule that maintains the first and last record differently.
So I am trying to think of ways to pass a flag to the execution context spawned by the renumbering process so the recursion skips the boundary edge business rules if IsRenumbering == true.
My thoughts / ideas:
I have thought of using the Depth check > 1 but that isn't a reliable value as I can't explicitly turn it on or off....it may happen to work but that is not engineering a solid solution that is hoping nothing goes bump. Further a colleague far more knowledgeable than I said that when a workflow calls a plugin the depth value is off and can't be trusted.
All my variables are scoped at the execute level so as to avoid variable pollution at the class level....However if I had a dictionary object, tuple, something at the class level and one value would be the thread id and the other the flag value then perhaps my subsequent execution context could check if the same owning thread id had any values entered.
Any thoughts or other ideas on how to pass context information to a new pipeline would be greatly appreciated.
Per Nicknow sugestion I tried sharedvariables but they seem to be going out of scope...:
First time firing post op:
if (base.Stage == EXrmPluginStepStage.PostOperation)
{
...snip...
foreach (var item in RenumberSet)
{
Context.ParentContext.SharedVariables[recordrenumbering] = "googly";
Entity renumrec = new Entity("abcd") { Id = item.Id };
#region We either add or subtract indexes based upon sortdir
...snip...
renumrec["abc_indexfield"] = TmpIdx + 1;
break;
.....snip.....
#endregion
OrganizationService.Update(renumrec);
}
}
Now we come into Pre-Op of the recursion process kicked off by the above post-op OrganizationService.Update(renumrec); and it seems based upon this check the sharedvariable didn't carry over...???
if (!Context.SharedVariables.Contains(recordrenumbering))
{
//Trace.Trace("Null Set");
//Context.SharedVariables[recordrenumbering] = IsRenumbering;
Context.SharedVariables[recordrenumbering] = "Null Set";
}
throw invalidpluginexception reveals:
Sanity Checks:
Depth : 2
Entity: ...
Message: Update
Stage: PreOperation [20]
User: 065507fe-86df-e311-95fe-00155d050605
Initiating User: 065507fe-86df-e311-95fe-00155d050605
ContextEntityName: ....
ContextParentEntityName: ....
....
IsRenumbering: Null Set
What are you looking for is IExecutionContext.SharedVariables. Whatever you add here is available throughout the entire transaction. Since you'll have child pipelines you'll want to look at the ParentContext for the value. This can all get a little tricky, so be sure to do a lot of testing - I've run into many issues with SharedVariables and looping operations in Dynamics CRM.
Here is some sample (very untested) code to get you started.
public static bool GetIsRenumbering(IPluginExecutionContext pluginContext)
{
var keyName = "IsRenumbering";
var ctx = pluginContext;
while (ctx != null)
{
if (ctx.SharedVariables.Contains(keyName))
{
return (bool)ctx.SharedVariables[keyName];
}
else ctx = ctx.ParentContext;
}
return false;
}
public static void SetIsRenumbering(IPluginExecutionContext pluginContext)
{
var keyName = "IsRenumbering";
var ctx = pluginContext;
ctx.SharedVariables.Add(keyName, true);
}
A very simple solution: add a bit field to the entity called "DisableIndexRecalculation." When your first plugin runs, make sure to set that field to true for all of your updates. In the same plugin, check to see if "DisableIndexRecalculation" is set to true: if so, set it to null (by removing it from the TargetEntity entirely) and stop executing the plugin. If it is null, do your index recalculation.
Because you are immediately removing the field from the TargetEntity if it is true the value will never be persisted to the database so there will be no performance penalty.
I try to get the Subgroup of a Group in the standard Cognos Namespace.
Quering the Contentstore to get ALL groups works fine.
The standard methodes to get "members" of objects return the users or only the "root" group (the group I want the subgroups of). Nothing else....
Am I doing something wrong or is it just "not to be done" ?
I found a way of doing it:
Assuming you have the searchpath for the group you want the subgroups of.
Query the contentstore for it with following PropEnum:
PropEnum[] props = {
PropEnum.defaultName,
PropEnum.searchPath,
PropEnum.members };
As result you get a BaseClass[] object (with only one element though...).
Import com.cognos.developer.schemas.bibus._3.Group <--- this is part of the Cognos SDK libraries and
now you can cast the object[0] to Group.
object.getMembers().getValue()[] is an array of all members INCLUDING groups, roles, accounts.
In java it looks like this (query for the object already done):
Group group = (Group)object[0];
BaseClass obj = null;
for (int i = 0; i < group.getMembers().getValue().length; i++){
obj = group.getMembers().getValue();
System.out.println(obj.getSearchPath().getValue());
}