i know that iBeacon use only advertising channel. which means there is no need connection.
im trying to make my own beacon module which send and receive data.
im curious about what makes the packet in iBeacon format(prefix /UUID / minor/ major/ TX) in communication ?
is it firmware?
let's assume that
when i make my iPhone act as iBeacon , it will send the advertising packet. which means it sends data in iBeacon format. but after turn off the app for iBeacon, i try to use my iphone
to send some files to laptop via Bluetooth low energy mode as usual.
then it will send data in bluetooth standard format. is this right?
given that situation, my iphone can be both iBeacon and just normal phone capable of bluetooth low energy.
i think also the beacon module can be like that. how about the product recently released? like estimote, redbearlab and so on. after connection, do they receive data?
Every iBeacon product works a little differently, but it is common for a product to be connectable for configuration purposes over Bluetooth LE.
Radius Networks' RadBeacon, for example, has firmware that sends out its advertisement as needed to be a standard iBeacon. The same firmware will allow a connection over Bluetooth LE, exchanging data with an external client (the RadBeacon app for iOS). This connectability is outside standard iBeacon functionality, using proprietary techniques that are still part of the larger Bluetooth LE standard.
Your understanding is therefore correct.
Full disclosure: I am Chief Engineer at Radius Networks.
Related
I am new to developing a mobile app with bluetooth connection to peripheral device. I searched that GATT is the relevant profile used for bluetoothLE communication but our client recommended that we use UART service. Now I am confused as to
1. how these two things are related and
2. Do we have to opt for one of these, if so, what are the pros and cons of each. Thanks
Legacy Bluetooth provides the serial port profile (SPP) - This is essentially a serial input/output stream over Bluetooth.
Bluetooth Low Energy provides a number of profiles, but the most commonly used is GATT. GATT exposes characteristics/attributes which are a little like variables that you can read from/write to. A read/write is limited to 20 bytes.
Many embedded BLE chipsets provide a "UART emulation" over BLE GATT. Here a pair of attributes are used; one for read and one for write.
The Central device writes bytes to the 'write' attribute and the embedded chip sends them out of a serial port on the chip.
Similarly, data that is written to the chip's serial port and sent to the central via a notification of new data in the 'read' attribute.
You don't say what platform your are developing on, but one important consideration is that use of SPP on iOS requires your hardware to be MFi certified by Apple, while BLE/GATT does not.
I'm not a ble guru, I worked on some modules to expose some simple service with pairing and bla bla :9
One of our customer ask me if it possible to control mcu gpio, with a beacon service running. For what I know beacon standard is only a lighthouse to check the proximity (streaming simple packet uuid, signal strength etc etc), and the only way to do something like this is to expose a new service running concurrently with beacon ( in practice send multi type of packets). I don't want pairing (beacon<->device app) and don't worry about race condition, if multi devices set/reset a gpio, it's not my business.
I found something similar https://community.estimote.com/hc/en-us/articles/217429867-What-is-GPIO-How-to-set-it-up-, what you think about?
There are libraries or eddystone's extensions to do that? Some project on github?
We prefer to work with Nordic ble module, but if you know solution based on other mcu, you are welcome.
Thanks for your help
Standard beacons (iBeacon, Eddystone, AltBeacon) are transmit only devices. They simply send out advertisements at a fixed rate with a unique identifier. Some manufacturers expose proprietary configuration interfaces as read-write Bluetooth LE GATT Services. But there is no standard GATT Service that does this, and the manufacturer-specific schemes are designed specifically to set beacon identifiers and other operating parameters.
I don't think there are beacon-specific libraries or extensions that will help with this, beyond standard Bluetooth LE SDKs for iOS and Android. In order to accomplish this goal with a Nordic BLE module you would need to build your own custom system:
Write custom Nordic firmware (that sits alongside beacon transmission firmware) that exposes a new Bluetooth LE GATT Service. The service would expose a writable GATT Attribute that would control the GPIO pin.
Write custom mobile app code that connects to this GATT Service (CoreBluetooth on iOS and android.bluetooth on Android), and writes to the GATT attribute to control the pin.
One thing you must be careful of is that connecting to to a GATT Service will typically stop a Bluetooth Peripheral from advertising (meaning it won't transmit as a beacon). So you may wish to drop the connection quickly to prevent mobile devices or other Bluetooth Centrals from stoping the beacon transmissions.
I couldn't find a clear explanation what is Bluetooth le multi advertising.
For example, in Specification of the Bluetooth System, I see only
description of BLE advertising but not multi advertising.
What the difference between BLE advertising and multi advertising?
Thanks
LE Multi advertising refers to a specific offload (non bluetooth specification) feature that has been implemented in the Android releases by Google, starting from the L release.
What multi advertising means is, that your Android phone or a device with Android stack, can enable multiple advertisement trains at the same time. For instance, one specific app can set certain advertisement data (example supported services etc.), advertisement parameters and enable advertisement, and so can N number of other apps, on the same device.
At the hardware level (or physical layer), these advertisement trains are interleaved between the three advertisement channels (37, 38, 39) and thus your phone behaves as multiple peripheral devices at the same time. All these advertisement trains also have a separate Random private address, so they are seen distinctly by the remote scanner.
Bluetooth Smart has two ways of communicating. The first one is using advertisements, where a BLE peripheral device broadcasts packets to every device around it. The receiving device can then act on this information or connect to receive more information. The second way to communicate is to receive packets using a connection, where both the peripheral and central send packets. We will focus on advertisement for several reasons:
You can’t create a connection between two devices without using advertisements. Defining the data and format of advertisement packets is usually the first thing you work on when developing a BLE device.
A large number of BLE products sleep most of the time, waking up only to advertise and connect when needed. This means advertisements have a big impact on power consumption.
Users want responsive products, and the advertising interval is critical in quick connections.
Advertising is by design unidirectional. A Central device can’t send any data to the Peripheral device without a connection. But a single peripheral can advertise to multiple masters in the area.
ref:http://www.argenox.com/bluetooth-low-energy-ble-v4-0-development/library/a-ble-advertising-primer/
I'm attempting to use a classic bluetooth chip to possibly send out signals to another device with a classic bluetooth chip.
Now would it be possible to create a beacon with classic bluetooth?
You certainly can. A Bluetooth LE beacon typically sends out regular advertisements with a unique identifier that can be picked up by a receiving device (typically a mobile phone) doing a Bluetooth LE scan. Since you can also send out advertisements and do scans with classic Bluetooth, you could build the same thing with this technology.
The main disadvantage is that classic Bluetooth uses much more power, both for transmitting the beacon signal and more importantly for doing the scans. So if you are using mobile phones to detect the beacons the battery drain will be much higher than if using Bluetooth LE.
I'm building an application where a mobile phone with an accelerometer is used to control an app on a computer in a similar way you would use a mouse. So I need to send the movement from the phone to the computer over some wireless protocol. I am thinking about using Bluetooth but I am not sure what transfer delay to expect. Another possibility is using 802.11g. What do you think? What delay could I expect given that I don’t hit the bandwidth limit?
I worked with a group at Motorola who linked up an external accelerometer pack to a mobile phone using Bluetooth. This work supported a mobile games development class at USC's GamePipe Laboratory, and the speed was sufficient to control the mobile games developed by the students. You'll need to make sure your handset's Bluetooth stack has the correct profile enabled to allow data communication.
Another advantage of Bluetooth over 802.11g is that the frequency hopping Bluetooth uses will make it less vulnerable to interference by all the other 802.11 devices in the vicinity, which sit on one frequency.
I wouldn't expect the amount of data sent by an accelerometer would give Bluetooth any problems.