Yesod: -dump-splices reliability - haskell

I'm using ghc parameter -dump-splices to see the static file names generated by Yesod while debugging.
But I have found that sometimes it displays the static files name ( eg: css_bootstrap_css) but most of the times it doesn't show any of the static files.
Am I doing something wrong here?
I'm attaching the dump file here.

Doing this should solve the issue:
touch Settings/StaticFiles.hs
Or even a cabal configure and build seems to work.

Related

Configure haskell-language-server to see generated proto-lens modules

I've got a fairly stock stack based project that uses proto-lens-setup to generate some Haskell code from some .proto files. I'm using haskell-language-server with wonderful success in emacs for everything except when my code imports any of the Proto.Myproto modules. It can't find them and thusly can't properly check the files I'm editing.
The project builds perfectly, but I'd like to have the lsp working. It's very helpful!
I get errors highlighted anytime my code uses an identifier from the proto-lens-generated code. I've tried looking into hie-bios configurations but didn't see anything obvious to put in a manual config to make it work. I don't normally have a manual hie-bios config.

How to get object file to link first?

I'm trying to compile a Windows DLL for code originally intended for a Unix platform. One problem I have is that Windows fopen() defaults to O_TEXT, but Unix defaults to O_BINARY.
Windows recommends two ways to solve this:
Use _set_fmode() function, didn't work for me probably because I could not call it from correct context.
Link with binmode.obj object file. This file is included with the compiler, and the compiler knows where to look for it.
The latter worked for my own code, but it does not seem to work for third party static libraries. Looking at the linker output, I can see that static libraries are included before binmode.obj, but binmode.obj was included before my own object files.
The real solution should be to persuade all external libraries to include binmode.obj, but this is somewhat non-trivial and might incur significant maintenance overhead in the future.
So I'd like to try to move the binmode.obj to the beginning of the linker command line, but this proved to be surprisingly difficult. I've tried:
target_link_libraries( mylib PRIVATE binmode.obj ) - Got correct position, but got renamed to binmode.obj.lib casuing linker error.
Tried making a static library with binmode.obj as a pre-compiled object, but got an error that the file has a relative path. I have no idea how to make it a full path.
Tried adding it as a linker flag in different ways, even including using toolchain file, but it all ended up with binmode.obj being placed after libraries.
I'm now out of ideas and feel I need help with this. Any suggestions how to fix this?
#fabian's comment made me read the right part of CMake documentation, which made me realize that UNKNOWN library type could be used. Using the following code in CMake I could make binmode.obj appear before all libraries:
add_library( binmode_obj UNKNOWN IMPORTED GLOBAL )
set_target_properties( binmode_obj PROPERTIES IMPORTED_LOCATION binmode.obj )
target_link_libraries( mylib PUBLIC binmode_obj )
This solved my problem of trying out if link binmode.obj before libraries might fix my original problem. It didn't, unfortunately. But that is another problem...

Why Is Doppl Trying To Pull in ReactiveStreams?

I am attempting to convert parts of an Android app to iOS using Doppl, and I am getting a strange result: Doppl keeps trying to pull in android.arch.lifecycle:reactivestreams, even though I don't want it to.
Specifically, in app/build/j2objcSrcGenMain/android/arch/lifecycle/, there is a reactivestrams/ subdirectory with R.h and R.m files in it. This seems to make Xcode cranky and may explain why I had some oddities with pod install.
My app/build.gradle has compile "android.arch.lifecycle:reactivestreams:$archVer", because my activity is using LiveDataReactiveStreams.fromPublisher(). However:
The activity is not in the translatePattern (and since its code is not showing up in app/build/j2objcSrcGenMain/, I have to assume that the translatePattern is fine)
I do not have a doppl statement related to reactivestreams, because there does not appear to be a Doppl conversion of this library (nor should it be needed here)
AFAIK, nowhere else in this app am I referring to LiveDataReactiveStreams, which AFAIK is the one-and-only public class from the reactivestreams library
So, the questions:
What determines whether Doppl creates R.h and R.m files for some dependency? It's not the existence of a doppl statement, as I have doppl statements for a lot of other dependencies (RxJava, RxAndroid, Retrofit) and those do not get R.h and R.m files. It's not whether the dependency is referenced from generated code, as my repository definitely uses RxJava and Retrofit, yet there are no R files for those.
How can I figure out why Doppl generates R.h and R.m for reactivestreams?
Once I get this cleared up... do I re-run pod install, or is there some other pod command to refresh an existing pod with a new implementation?
Look into 'app/build/generated/source/r/debug' and confirm there's an R.java being created for the architecture component. It'll be under 'android/arch/lifecycle/reactivestrams'.
I think there are 2 problems here.
Problem 1
Somehow Doppl/J2objc is of the opinion that this file should be transpiled. It could be either that 'translatePattern' matches with it, or that something in the shared code is referencing it. If you can't figure out which, please post a comment and I'll try to help (or post in slack group).
Problem 2
Regardless of why that 'R.java' is being sucked into the translate step, because of how stock J2objc is configured, the code is being generated with package folders instead of creating One Big Name. That generated file should be called 'AndroidArchLifecycleReactivestramsR.h' (and AndroidArchLifecycleReactivestramsR.m). Xcode really doesn't like package folders. That's why there's a slightly custom J2ojbc being used with Doppl, so we can have files with big names instead of folders.
In cases where you intentionally use package names that match with what J2objc considers to be "system" classes, you need to provide a header mapping file to force long names. The 'androidbase' doppl library needs to add a lot of files that are in the 'android' package, which J2objc considers "system". We override those names in the mapping file.
build.gradle
https://github.com/doppllib/core-doppl/blob/master/androidbase/build.gradle#L19
mapping file
https://github.com/doppllib/core-doppl/blob/master/androidbase/src/main/java/androidbase.mappings
I screwed up.
In my dopplConfig, I have:
translatePattern {
include '**/api/**'
include '**/arch/**'
include '**/RepositoryTest.java'
}
In this case, **/arch/** not only matches my arch package, but also the arch package from the Architecture Components.
Ordinarily, this would not matter, because the Architecture Components source code is not in my project. But, R.java gets generated, due to resources, and the translatePattern includes generated source code in addition to lovingly hand-crafted source code. So, that's where my extraneous Objective-C was coming from.
Many thanks to Kevin Galligan for his assistance with this, out on the #newbiehelp Doppl Slack channel!

How to use ReaderWriterOBJ in OpenSeneGraph

Can anyone explain to me how to use ReaderWriterOBJ in OpenSceneGraph? I want to load an obj file along with the mtl file. I have already built the solution for readerWriterObj code and created a dll file.
The ReaderWriter's are just file loaders. You have to use them in context of an application, like osgviewer, one of the examples included in OSG. If you've gone through the process of building OSG, you might have already built osgviewer, which will use the appropriate DLL's to load files.
eg
osgviewer FILE.obj
will open FILE.obj, with its associated material file[s].

how to distribute a Flash component for use with MTASC?

I have a Flash component that's just a library of compiled code with some exposed API calls. Normally we distribute this as a SWC or MXP, and it works just fine. Recently I had a client express interest in using my component, but they do all their development in MTASC only. MTASC doesn't support SWC files, so ss there a good way to send precompiled code that would work in MTASC? I'm not able to send them the original source code, but if there's some other method I'd appreciate it. I do have access to the source, so I can recompile it however necessary. Thanks!
I did find an answer, and I'm not 100% sure if this is exactly the process since I'm no longer at that job and don't have the computer/process in front of me anymore. It was a bit of a hack.
What it involved basically was unzipping the SWC file and getting a .swf and a bunch of .asi files out.
The .asi files are really just ActionScript files, but they contain intrinsic definitions, or just prototypes or footprints of whats actually there. The real meat of it is still in the .swf.
So you rename all those .asi files to .as and then put them into your MTASC classpath. Since they contain definitions, you shouldn't be getting any more "undefined variable" or "undefined function" errors at compile time. Now you just need to pull in the SWF, where the actual function bodies are defined, using loadMovie. once the loadMovie is complete, you should be able to use all of the functions.
The only caveat of course is that you have to wait for that SWF to load before calling of any of the functions from the SWC.
so step-by-step, it looks like this:
1.) unzip the SWC file. this can be done using WinZip or OS X terminal unzip command
2.) Rename .asi files to .as
3.) add new .as files to MTASC classpath
4.) add AS code to load the .swf in and make sure none of the SWC functions are called before the SWF is loaded
5.) compile
I'm pretty sure this is what we did, but i'm not in a spot to try it out right now.,
Hope this helps, let me know if you have any other questions and I'll see if I can help figure it out any more.

Resources