While working in XPages many a times I have encountered error messages beginning with CLFAD####E and sometimes CLFAD####W. In my development the error messages that I have encountered look something like this:
SEVERE: CLFAD####E: Exception processing XPage request.
WARNING: CLFAD####W: <SOME ERROR MESSAGE>
I have seen specific error messages on web like in this question with a number replacing #, to be precise CLFAD0111W. Another example I was able to find was this article with CFLAD0246 and CFLAD0134E.
But I haven't been able to find what they indicate? Is there a list of CLFADs which can be looked up to see what exactly the error indicates?
The first part is an internal identifier CLFAD, followed by 4 numbers to identify the error. The last character identifies the type of the message:
I for "Information"
E for "Error"
W for "Warning"
When looking in the XPages source code you will find some property files which let you identifiy a Java property containing the error code. If you search for the property, you can find the element which throws the error message.
F.e.
CLFAD0111W can be found in the path
com/ibm/xsp/core/core.properties
and is contained by the property
warn.PropertyMap.ThePropertyMapwasinaninvalidstate
Searching for this property will lead you to com.ibm.xsp.binding.PropertyMap and the method saveRoot.
Hope this helps you a little bit.
Related
I'm trying to use Apple's CoreDataCloudkitDemo app. I've only changed the app settings per their README document. On running the demo, I'm getting the error: "CloudKit integration requires does not support ordered relationships."
(The weird grammar in the title is included in the app)
The console log shows:
Fatal error: ###persistentContainer: Failed to load persistent stores:Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=134060 "A Core Data error occurred." UserInfo={NSLocalizedFailureReason=CloudKit integration requires does not support ordered relationships. The following relationships are marked ordered:
Post: attachments
There is the same error for the "Tags" entity.
I'm using Xcode 11.0 beta 4 (11M374r).
I've only changed the bundle identifier, and set my Team Id.
I removed the original entitlements file - no errors in resulting build.
I've not changed any code from the original.
Does anyone have a workaround, or preferably, a fix? Or did I do something wrong?
Thanks
Firstly, select CoreDataCloudKitDemo.xcdatamodeld -> Post -> RelationShips, select attachments relationship, on the Inspect panel, deselect Ordered, then do the same thing on the tags relationship.
Secondly, there will be some errors in the code now, because we unchecked the Ordered option, the property of attachments and tags in the generated NSManagedObject may changed from NSOrderedSet? to NSSet?. So we could change these error lines of code like below:
Origin:
guard let tag = post?.tags?.object(at: indexPath.row) as? Tag else { return cell }
Changed:
guard let tag = post?.tags?.allObjects[indexPath.row] as? Tag else { return cell }
Finally, you can run the code now. ;-)
Further more, on WWDC19 Session 202, the demo shows they set both attachments and tags relationships as Unordered, so I think there's something wrong in the given demo project.
I am sure I am not the first to encounter this, but I was unable to find a solution while Googling.
I am trying to add a drop-down list to my document. At the top of my model I am adding these namespaces:
use \DocuSign\eSign\Model\List;
use \DocuSign\eSign\Model\ListItem;
When doing so I get this error because "List" is a reserved word in PHP.
A PHP Error was encountered
Severity: Parsing Error
Message: syntax error, unexpected List (T_LIST), expecting identifier (T_STRING)
Filename: models/Docusign_model.php
Line Number: 19
I tried changing the name of the class from List to Elist but then I got errors from ObjectSerializer that it could not find Elist:swaggerType.
What am I missing on how to add a list to my document?
Thom
#thom I think this is really a "PHP" parsing question as is answered here for you Parse error: syntax error, unexpected (T_STRING), expecting variable (T_VARIABLE)
So I think the $ missing is your real issue as discussed in the referenced article above and below from PHP Manual.
http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.basic.php
Recommend you look at GIT example from SDK using CustomFieldList at https://github.com/docusign/docusign-php-client/blob/ccc86ac37334f34728361d73b2f8c4592225b8d2/src/Model/CustomFieldsEnvelope.php
excerpt
protected static $swaggerTypes = [
'list_custom_fields' => '\DocuSign\eSign\Model\ListCustomField[]',
'text_custom_fields' => '\DocuSign\eSign\Model\TextCustomField[]'
];
http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.basic.php
Also, maybe the first place to validate if you even need a specific "use" is by reviewing this PHP sample code from a good friend Ergin https://gist.github.com/Ergin008/d4a8b9210fbea41414b0
As I see it with most of the DocuSign SDK's, you have the client and specific services you want to use per excerpt below:
// Download PHP client: https://github.com/docusign/DocuSign-PHP-Client
require_once './DocuSign-PHP-Client/src/DocuSign_Client.php';
require_once './DocuSign-PHP-Client/src/service/DocuSign_RequestSignatureService.php';
require_once './DocuSign-PHP-Client/src/service/DocuSign_ViewsService.php';
Regardless if I am right or wrong, let us know if this helped you go in the right direction :-)
I'm migrating from Loopback 2 tot 3.
I currently have an issue with validation errors and strong-error-handler
When I post a bulk create which results in multiple validation errors, those get returned as an array of ValidationErrors.
Those errors get grouped by strong-error handler in a 500 internal server error, which is how it was before, but the details of the errors get discarded, when debug is set to false.
In my example I upload an array of tags, but for each tag, a uniqueness validation is executed. When 2 or more tags are already in the database, I have an array of errors, instead of a single validation error
I need a way to determine why the validation failed on the client side, but the details of the errors are discarded now.
Am I doing something wrong here, or should this be considered as a bug?
From the strongloop error handler documentation in loopback,
In production mode, strong-error-handler omits details from error responses to prevent leaking sensitive information:
More information
For 5xx errors, the output contains only the status code and the status name from the HTTP specification.
For 4xx errors, the output contains the full error message (error.message) and the contents of the details property (error.details) that ValidationError typically uses to provide machine-readable details about validation problems. It also includes error.code to allow a machine-readable error code to be passed through which could be used, for example, for translation.
Am I doing something wrong here, or should this be considered as a bug?
No this is the intended behaviour
Safe error fields
You can set the stack trace as "safe-error-field" so that it will be displayed in production.
For example, the stack field is not displayed by default if you run the loopback in production mode.
If you still want to display the stack field, then change the config json in the server/middleware.json
"final:after": {
"strong-error-handler": {
"params": {
"safeFields": ["stack"]
}
}
}
This is a multi faceted question, but any help is appreciated
Background:
I have a Application Definition with 6 entities using SSO
The database back end is Firebird through ODBC
All the data is coming from stored procedures
Questions:
1 While trying to implement one or any of the entities from the BDC in a Business Data List web part I get the following error: "An error occurred while retrieving data from . Administrators, see the server log for more information." It only happens when I have fields that are null, in this instance a field that was declared as a string.
2.When I check the logs, it's a System.OverFlowException.
3.If I change it so the output from the procedure is a blank string, I suddenly get "The title property of entity is set to an invalid value"
4.The error from the logs after changing to a blank string is "Exception handed to HandleXslException.HandleException System.ArgumentException: '.', hexadecimal value 0x00, is an invalid character"
What gives? It worked last night without issue until a record appeared that had a null value in one of the string field. Now, even replacing the null value with something generic is still giving me the title property invalid error.
Most puzzling: If I change the query so that the rows with what would be a null or blank string aren't in the query, the error goes away. But, if I add them back and replace the null string with anything, the error comes back. What the !##$? How does it know I've replaced a null value with something else before the records are returned to the XmlReader?
I've run into this exact scenario and it brought back some angry/confused moments. As you said in your comment:
I set the encoding to be unicode on all varchar and char outputs and it fixed it. The lack of encoding caused there to be null characters (not a null record, but one null character) for that column and Sharepoint could not parse the field. Changed the encoding, and everything works.
It took me a couple days of swearing at the computer before we took it down to the metal and discovered the unicode issue. I don't even know when it changed but we realized the same thing and all was right with the world again.
DataServiceRequestException was unhandled by user code. An error occurred while processing this request.
This is in relation to the previous post I added
public void AddEmailAddress(EmailAddressEntity emailAddressTobeAdded)
{
AddObject("EmailAddress", emailAddressTobeAdded);
SaveChanges();
}
Again the code breaks and gives a new exception this time. Last time it was Storage Client Exception, now it is DataServiceRequestException. Code breaks at SaveChanges.
Surprisingly, solution is same. CamelCasing is not supported. So the code works if "EmailAddress" is changed to "Emailaddress" or "emailaddress"
More details
http://weblogs.asp.net/chanderdhall/archive/2010/07/10/dataservicerequestexception-was-unhandled-by-user-code-an-error-occurred-while-processing-this-request.aspx
Because you've tagged this with "azure" and "table," I'm going to assume this code results in a call to Windows Azure tables. If so, I can assure you that camel casing table names is indeed supported. However, the string you pass to AddObject has to match a table that you've created, so make sure the code where you create the table is using the same casing.