I updated to the latest jar version and my compiler is claiming that com.google.cast.DeviceManager is no longer public?
That class is still there and public in the preview SDK, what jar file did you download?
Related
I've got an Azure Function app that creates a precompiled DLL (so it uses normal .cs files, not the older .csx method, pre-VS2017). Previously, it was targeting .Net Framework 4.5.2. I updated it to 4.7 so as to use some of the new C# 7 features. I updated my NuGet packages by doing "Update-Package -Reinstall" and verified that they all have the "net47" target set in my packages.config file.
Everything compiles fine. But when I call a function that uses either of 2 HttpRequestMessageExtensions methods, I get an exception. One example of the exception is this:
Method not found: 'System.Net.Http.HttpResponseMessage
System.Net.Http.HttpRequestMessageExtensions.CreateResponse(
System.Net.Http.HttpRequestMessage, System.Net.HttpStatusCode)'.
Here's an example of a tiny test function that will cause the error:
using System.Net;
using System.Net.Http;
public static HttpResponseMessage Run(HttpRequestMessage req)
{
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.Accepted, "");
}
Upon calling this function with say Postman, I'll receive the aforementioned exception. I also get a similar method not found exception when I call GetQueryNameValuePairs() on the HttpRequestMessage.
I've tried updating my NuGet packages to the latest, no difference. I've cleaned and rebuilt and restarted a bunch of times, making sure to nuke my bin and obj directories.
I'm not sure what could be the problem. I guess I could downgrade back to .Net 4.5.2 but I'd rather not. For one, I want to use C# 7, and for two, I want to understand what the problem is rather than avoid it.
Update: interesting. The issue seems to be with System.Net.Http. If I lower it to 4.0.0 everything works fine. If I raise it to any higher version I get the issues listed above. I tried selectively lowering each of my packages, one by one, to their previous version number to find this out. I then updated all but this one to the latest version and it fixed the issue.
I also tested it on my side. The issue is related to the latest version of System.Net.Http assembly(4.3.2). If I don't install this package manually or install the earlier versions(4.3.1/4.3.0), the application could work fine.
The CreateResponse method is a extension method which is written in System.Web.Http assembly(version 5.2.3). It seem that it is not compatible with the latest version of System.Net.Http. Please could just skip the error by using the earlier version of System.Net.Http and you can also submit this issue to Microsoft using follow channel.
https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/Feedback
Interesting. For me, if I got above version 4.0.0 (including 4.1.1 or 4.3.1) I still get the same problem of not finding those extension methods.
The assembly might not be updated during you change the package version. From the bin\Debug\net47 folder, we could check the current assembly version we used.
If the modified date of assembly is 2/9/2017, the package version is 4.3.1. If the modified date of assembly is 4/19/2017, the package version is 4.3.2. If the assembly is not the latest version, it could work fine on my side.
In addition, Microsoft.Asp.Net.WebApi.Client package is installed by default when creating an Azure function. System.Net.Http is one of its dependencies. So we don't need to install the System.Net.Http package manually. When running our application, NuGet will choose a right version of System.Net.Http for our application.
I had the same issue running my Azure Function locally and eventually tracked it down to conflicting System.Net.Http assemblies. I created my Azure function from a blank ASP.NET Web App and initially pulled down the System.Net.Http NuGet package to use within the project. I also pulled down the Microsoft.AspNet.WebApi.Client for use within the project. It did not matter which version of System.Net.Http I tried my project would compile but fail when the request was made.
Eventually, I removed packages I had downloaded, cleaned the build folder and added just the Microsoft.AspNet.WebApi.Client. I noticed that this automatically referenced the System.Net.Http on my machine for my version of the .NET Framework. (C:\Program Files (x86)\Reference Assemblies\Microsoft\Framework.NETFramework). This compiled successfully and I was able to make requests to the function without any exceptions.
Using #Aaron-Newton's insight, I identified that my issue was due to my Azure Functions project referencing a .Net Standard 2.0 class library. I switched it to .Net Framework 4.6 and it started working again. Seems like this is a bug in the Functions tooling.
I've filed a bug with the Functions team here: https://github.com/Azure/Azure-Functions/issues/477
I had the same issue. I spent quite a while to fix this problem.
The cause is that the Azure Functions project is refering to .Net Standard Library with version higher than 1.4.
Bringing down your .Net Standard version to 1.4 or lower would fix the problem.
But this is defintely a bug with Azure Functions SDK. They should fix it.
https://github.com/Azure/azure-webjobs-sdk-script/issues/980
https://github.com/Azure/Azure-Functions/issues/477
I just updated the Microsoft.Azure.Mobile.Client package in my Xamarin project and now the System.Net.Http namespace doesn't exist anymore. Here's the error message. I was using the MobileServiceClient object to pass through the URL for my Azure backend. What should I do now? I don't want to go back to the previous version if I don't have to.
The error message is pretty explicit. Do you have a System.Net.Http reference in your app? If not, add one.
What is likely to have happened is that the dependency that the package has is for a version of System.Net.Http that is not compatible with your target .net version and the upgrade has removed the old version and not been able to add the new version.
You will need to find the version of System.Net.Http which is a dependency of Microsoft.Azure.Mobile.Client and find out what version of .Net it targets (the folder is likely to be underneath your packages folder even if the reference is missing).
Then you can decide whether you can target your project at a newer version of .Net or whether you need to downgrade Microsoft.Azure.Mobile.Client.
I installed the Westwind-Globalization package 2.1 but the libraries installed are misssing the Westwind.Globalization.JavaScriptResourceHandler-class. I downloaded 2.1 from git-hub and compiled the Westwind.Globalization.Web-project anew. Now the class exists and my code works again.
Did I do something wrong or is this class deprecated/discontinued?!
You need to install the Westwind.Globalization.Web package, which includes the JavaScript resource handler. The release version of the libary rearranged the breakout of resources into separate packages. I suspect you had an older, or beta version that came from before when the change was made (a beta most likely).
How do I get the source for a specifik stable release of servicestack from Github?
I'm trying to download and build the source for version 3.9.0.0 but I am having two sorts of problems.
1) There are no labels for the main service stack project so I can't figure out at what commit the 3.9.0.0 was built from.
2) Since Service Stack main project depends on ServiceStack.Text I also need to know against what version of ServiceStack.Text the ServiceStack 3.9.0.0 was built against.
If anyone wonders. The reason I ask this is because the later ServiceStack releases are not all backward compatible and a project I recently took over is throwing exceptions down in the ServiceStack.Text. And the version of ServiceStack.Text seems important since the version of ServiceStack and ServiceStack.Text I downloade, collided on build on extension.
The state I am at is that I got souce for what seems to be 3.9.4 and I managed to get hold of a nuget packet of ServiceStack.Text with version 3.9.0.0 that I could compile against (no source) and this actuallt killed of the trubbeling exception in ServiceStack.Text so that problem seems at least temporarely solved. At the next issue I'll probably be stuck again so I'd really like the source. (It is the point with open source after all right?)
Best regards, Nick
Although older versions are not supported by ServiceStack, you could to go back through the ServiceStack commit logs until you see a message that says INCR to v3.9.x.
One way to quickly browse releases is to look at changes to the Properties/Assembly.cs file which changes when the version is incremented.
As ServiceStack is uses components from different sub projects, you will need to do the same for ServiceStack.Text, ServiceStack.OrmLite and ServiceStack.Redis as well.
ServiceStack keeps the same version in-sync with the other components, so the v3.9.4 of ServiceStack uses a v3.9.4 of ServiceStack.Text, etc.
I have added ServiceStack.Redis via Nuget to an assembly that I have. That package has a dependency on ServiceStack.Common which has a dependency on ServiceStack.Text
this project is referenced from my web project, but when I build the Website and load it in a browser I get the error
Could not load file or assembly 'ServiceStack.Text, Version=3.9.24.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified.
Sure enough, when I go to the Bin directory of my website it isn't there. Oddly enough, if I go to the Bin directory of the class library I am referencing (the one I pulled the Nuget package into) it IS there.
To recap
ClassLibrary
ServiceStack.Redis via Nuget (includes ServiceStack.Common and ServiceStack.Text)
All of these make it in the Bin dir upon build
Web Proj
Refs ClassLibrary
all dependencies are moved to Bin except ServiceStack.Text
I'm stumped. Does anyone know why?
Note: The error appears to be looking for version 3.9.24, but the version Nuget pulled is 3.9.26. If I move it to the Web/Bin manually it works though
Check the assembly reference properties in your .csproj files, perhaps they are still referencing the older version of ServiceStack.Text. Sometimes I find that NuGet will fail at some point during a package update and leave your assembly references in a bad state. For example, your packages.config file may correctly show that all ServiceStack references are at the same version number, but your .csproj file may be referencing 3.9.24 for ServiceStack.Common and 3.9.26 for ServiceStack.Text. Thus, it will copy different versions of these assemblies to your bin directory. It likely can still build successfully because you have the older copy of ServiceStack.Common cached in your NuGet packages directories.
I fix this by either manually editing the .csproj file to have the correct assembly path and version number, or by uninstalling and reinstalling the affected packages via NuGet (this would likely require reinstalling most/all of the ServiceStack packages since ServiceStack.Text is such a low level dependency.
I had this somewhat bizarre problem in several versions of Visual Studio, atm 2013. It has occurred at random.
I too have dependencies on ServiceStack.Common, which implicitly depends on ServiceStack.Text. However, I am not directly at any place referencing any class, struct or the like inside ServiceStack.Text binary.
Even having set
Copy Local = true
ServiceStack.Text.dll is not being copied to the output folder.
I have experienced this with numerous versions of ServiceStack dll's, currently v4.0.15. This could be a more general Visual Studio bug concerning dependency-chains with dead ends in not directly used libraries? Probably ServiceStack.Text is marked as a dependency in other ServiceStack dll's, but Visual Studio tries to outsmart this by seeing, the library can be excluded (I'm just speculating).
Anyway, I solved it by simply using ServiceStack.Text directly in a private method put in a random used file in my own library:
/// <summary>
/// Needed because of Visual Studio bug? Don't use this method.
/// </summary>
private JsonValue DontDoIt()
{
return new ServiceStack.Text.JsonValue();
}
I would expect the compiler to exlude an unused private method - indeed maybe it does in the IL code, but none the less this makes VS copy the dll to the output directory.
As esker says there may be some problems with Nuget when updating but there are also some problems with ServiceStack Nuget packages.
The latest package working as of today is 3.9.60. ServiceStack.Text.dll is really 3.9.60.
ServiceStack 3.9.61 and above has ServiceStack.Text.dll version 3.9.59.
The copy problem is appearing again.