Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I read that the convention of node js of spaces is double spaces, but by default it is 4 spaces, how to configure it?
It is:
if ('development' == app.get('env')) {
app.use(express.errorHandler());
}
should be this way:
if ('development' == app.get('env')) {
app.use(express.errorHandler());
}
That's not a "convention" - that's called code style; and more specifically, it looks like it's the NPM Coding Style, as it's followed by lots of Node developers out there.
You can customize this easily by going to Settings -> Code Style -> JavaScript in WebStorm.
P.S.: I personally like a lot the jQuery Code Style - it's more readable than any other.
Related
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 5 days ago.
Improve this question
I have a Animal entity and i want to reference Cat entity from Animal.
import { CosmosPartitionKey, CosmosUniqueKey } from '#nestjs/azure-database';
#CosmosPartitionKey('name')
export class Animal {
#CosmosUniqueKey() country: string;
climate: string;
}
#CosmosPartitionKey('name')
export class Cat {
#CosmosUniqueKey() name: string;
age: string;
}
how can i create foreign key to Cat entity from Animal,can someone please help?
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 1 year ago.
Improve this question
Addition: Why Python3 choose to design new features at cost of compatibility? Is there anything to do with the nature of language?
Why ES6 (7/8…) is able to be compatible with ES5(3) since there is so much difference in grammar?
There aren't differences so much as additions. When new grammar/syntax is added in JavaScript, it's defined carefully so that it would have been a syntax error in earlier versions. That's important, because maintaining backward compatibility with the mind-bogglingly huge amount of JavaScript code out in the wild is an important goal for the committee that moves JavaScript forward (ECMA's TC39). (Backward compatibility isn't 100%, but it's about 99.9999%.) But if something new would have been a syntax error before, then there isn't any working code out there that has the new thing.
For example: Adding async functions. In JavaScript from the beginning, a function declaration looks like this:
function example() {
// ...
}
To create async functions, it became possible to put async in front of function:
async function example() {
// ...
}
That's new grammar. It only works because before it was added, that would have been a syntax error, the same one you get if you do this today:
blah function example() {]
// ...
}
Similarly, with parameter default values, you specify the default value with an = and an expression in the parameter list:
function example(param = "default") {
// ...
}
That was a syntax error until it was added. So were arrow functions, generator functions, class syntax, nullish coalescing, optional chaining, destructuring, and other new grammar/syntax.
So since these would have been syntax errors, they don't exist in working code out in the wild.
Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
I have the following logic implemented:
let assigned_courses: Option<Vec<String>> =
schools.courses.iter().map(|c| c.to_string()).collect();
Since this is an optional variable, I get the error:
value of type `std::option::Option<Vec<std::string::String>>` cannot
be built from `std::iter::Iterator<Item=std::string::String>`
How do I handle this issue? If it is not optional, it does not throw this error.
Why not?
let assigned_courses: Vec<String> =
schools.courses.iter().map(ToString::to_string).collect();
Or if you really need an Option for later usage within your context
let assigned_courses: Option<Vec<String>> =
Some(schools.courses.iter().map(ToString::to_string).collect());
This question already has answers here:
Is it possible to conditionally enable an attribute like `derive`?
(1 answer)
Can I conditionally compile my Rust program for a Windows subsystem?
(1 answer)
Closed 4 years ago.
I have a particular function that is unused on one platform, but I would still like it to be compiled. Is there any way to #[allow(dead_code)] for only a particular configuration?
Here's some example code:
#[ (what do I put here?) ]
fn cross_platform() {
}
#[cfg(windows)]
pub fn windows_only() {
// Do a cross-platform thing
cross_platform();
}
Is there any way to suppress the dead code warning on non-Windows platforms only?
Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I implemented a Http filter using Filter interface and it works fine in localhost.
The problem is that in a testing environment when two users want to access to the application this filter does not work like always. It mixes the data between two users. I know it because I have lots of logs reporting me the steps every moment. I don't know if there is any problem with the simultaneous access.
Like servlets, filters are application scoped. There's only one instance of a filter class being created during application startup and the very same instance is being reused across all HTTP requests throughout the application's lifetime. Your problem symptoms indicate that you're for some reason assigning request or session scoped variables as an instance variable of the filter instance, such as request parameters or session attributes, or perhaps even the whole request or session object itself.
For example,
public class MyFilter implements Filter {
private String someParam;
public void doFilter(... ...) {
someParam = request.getParameter("someParam");
// ...
}
}
This is not threadsafe! You should be declaring them in the method local scope:
public class MyFilter implements Filter {
public void doFilter(... ...) {
String someParam = request.getParameter("someParam");
// ...
}
}
See also:
How do servlets work? Instantiation, sessions, shared variables and multithreading