build: source1.c source2.c header.h lib.so
gcc source1.c source2.c -shared lib.so -o exec.bin
exec.bin: source1.o source.o
source1.o: source1.c
gcc source1.c -c -o source1.o
source2.o: source2.c
gcc source2.c -c -o source2.o
clean:
rm exec.bin source1.o source2.o
I have some instructions to make this Makefile which depends on those 4 source files to compile a program(the program context is irrelevant).
It also has to create the object files and compile only if modifications were made.
The code above is what I managed to write. I'm new at this and I can't seem to find out the problem is.
Generally, your prerequisites are messed up. You want to declare the prerequisites for the targets that need them. You also want each recipe to build exactly the target that you wrote in the makefile.
For example, you have a rule with a target build, but it creates an output file named exec.bin. That's not right: if the recipe creates a file named exec.bin then the target should be named exec.bin. If you want to have a pretend rule like build then you should declare it to be phony.
Also, you have header.h as a prerequisite of build. Even leaving aside the target name, do you re-link the objects when a header file changes? Not directly. You recompile source files when a header file changes. So the header file should be a prerequisite of the object file, not the executable.
Lastly, your life is much simpler if you leverage the built-in rules. You can rewrite your makefile like this:
CC = gcc
SRC = source1.c source2.c
LIB = lib.so
OBJ = $(SRC:%.c=%.o)
.PHONY: build
build: exec.bin
exec.bin: $(OBJ)
$(CC) $(OBJ) $(LIB) -o $#
$(OBJ): header.h
clean:
rm -f exec.bin $(OBJ)
We aren't defining rules on how to build object files from source files, because make already has built-in rules that will do that for us.
ETA:
If you can't use the built-in rules, then create your own pattern rule. For example:
XOBJ = $(SRC:%.c=%.xo)
%.xo : %.c
<whatever command>
$(XOBJ): header.h
Here's a tip for writing new Makefiles: don't do it. There are better tools available. For example, CMake is a very usable tool which generates Makefiles from a more legible language (unfortunately not a standard language like Python, but otherwise it's pretty nice).
CMake will automatically generate "clean" and "help" and other targets, plus more features you don't yet know you need (like optimized builds).
Here's something to get you started (name this file CMakeLists.txt):
add_library(foo SHARED source1.c source2.c)
add_executable(exec source3.c)
target_link_libraries(exec foo)
Related
I am wondering why gcc/g++ doesn't have an option to place the generated object files into a specified directory.
For example:
mkdir builddir
mkdir builddir/objdir
cd srcdir
gcc -c file1.c file2.c file3.c **--outdir=**../builddir/objdir
I know that it's possible to achive this with separate -o options given to the compiler, e.g.:
gcc -c file1.c -o ../builddir/objdir/file1.o
gcc -c file2.c -o ../builddir/objdir/file2.o
gcc -c file3.c -o ../builddir/objdir/file3.o
... and I know that I can write Makefiles via VPATH and vpath directives to simplify this.
But that's a lot of work in a complex build environment.
I could also use
gcc -c file1.c file2.c file3.c
But when I use this approach my srcdir is full of .o garbage afterwards.
So I think that an option with the semantics of --outdir would be very useful.
What is your opinion?
EDIT: our Makefiles are written in such a way that .o files actually placed into builddir/obj. But I am simply wondering if there might be a better approach.
EDIT: There are several approaches which place the burden to achieve the desired behavior to the build system (aka Make, CMake etc.). But I consider them all as being workarounds for a weakness of gcc (and other compilers too).
This is the chopped down makefile for one of my projects, which compiles the sources in 'src' and places the .o files in the directory "obj". The key bit is the the use of the patsubst() function - see the GNU make manual (which is actually a pretty good read) for details:
OUT = lib/alib.a
CC = g++
ODIR = obj
SDIR = src
INC = -Iinc
_OBJS = a_chsrc.o a_csv.o a_enc.o a_env.o a_except.o \
a_date.o a_range.o a_opsys.o
OBJS = $(patsubst %,$(ODIR)/%,$(_OBJS))
$(ODIR)/%.o: $(SDIR)/%.cpp
$(CC) -c $(INC) -o $# $< $(CFLAGS)
$(OUT): $(OBJS)
ar rvs $(OUT) $^
.PHONY: clean
clean:
rm -f $(ODIR)/*.o $(OUT)
How about changing to the directory and running the compile from there:
cd builddir/objdir
gcc ../../srcdir/file1.c ../../srcdir/file2.c ../../srcdir/file3.c
That's it. gcc will interpret includes of the form #include "path/to/header.h" as starting in the directory the file exists so you don't need to modify anything.
A trivial but effective workaround is to add the following right after the gcc call in your Makefile:
mv *.o ../builddir/objdir
or even a soft-clean (possibly recursive) after the compilation is done, like
rm -f *.o
or
find . -name \*.o -exec rm {} \;
You can use a simple wrapper around gcc that will generate the necessary -o options and call gcc:
$ ./gcc-wrap -c file1.c file2.c file3.c --outdir=obj
gcc -o obj/file1.o -c file1.c
gcc -o obj/file2.o -c file2.c
gcc -o obj/file3.o -c file3.c
Here is such a gcc_wrap script in its simplest form:
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use File::Spec;
use File::Basename;
use Getopt::Long;
Getopt::Long::Configure(pass_through);
my $GCC = "gcc";
my $outdir = ".";
GetOptions("outdir=s" => \$outdir)
or die("Options error");
my #c_files;
while(-f $ARGV[-1]){
push #c_files, pop #ARGV;
}
die("No input files") if(scalar #c_files == 0);
foreach my $c_file (reverse #c_files){
my($filename, $c_path, $suffix) = fileparse($c_file, ".c");
my $o_file = File::Spec->catfile($outdir, "$filename.o");
my $cmd = "$GCC -o $o_file #ARGV $c_file";
print STDERR "$cmd\n";
system($cmd) == 0 or die("Could not execute $cmd: $!");
}
Of course, the standard way is to solve the problem with Makefiles, or simpler, with CMake or bakefile, but you specifically asked for a solution that adds the functionality to gcc, and I think the only way is to write such a wrapper. Of course, you could also patch the gcc sources to include the new option, but that might be hard.
I believe you got the concept backwards...?!
The idea behind Makefiles is that they only process the files that have been updated since the last build, to cut down on (re-)compilation times. If you bunch multiple files together in one compiler run, you basically defeat that purpose.
Your example:
gcc -c file1.c file2.c file3.c **--outdir=**../builddir/objdir
You didn't give the 'make' rule that goes with this command line; but if any of the three files has been updated, you have to run this line, and recompile all three files, which might not be necessary at all. It also keeps 'make' from spawning a seperate compilation process for each source file, as it would do for seperate compilation (when using the '-j' option, as I would strongly suggest).
I wrote a Makefile tutorial elsewhere, which goes into some extra detail (such as auto-detecting your source files instead of having them hard-coded in the Makefile, auto-determining include dependencies, and inline testing).
All you would have to do to get your seperate object directory would be to add the appropriate directory information to the OBJFILES := line and the %.o: %.c Makefile rule from that tutorial. Neil Butterworth's answer has a nice example of how to add the directory information.
(If you want to use DEPFILES or TESTFILES as described in the tutorial, you'd have to adapt the DEPFILES := and TSTFILES := lines plus the %.t: %.c Makefile pdclib.a
rule, too.)
Meanwhile I found a "half-way" solution by using the -combine option.
Example:
mkdir builddir
mkdir builddir/objdir
cd srcdir
gcc -combine -c file1.c file2.c file3.c -o ../builddir/objdir/all-in-one.o
this "combines" all source files into one single object file.
However, this is still "half-way" because it needs to recompile everything when only one source file changes.
I think that telling pass gcc doesn't have an separate option to say where to put object file, since it already has it. It's "-c" - it says in what directory to put object.
Having additional flag for directory only must change meening of "-c".
For example:
gcc -c file.c -o /a/b/c/file.o --put-object-in-dir-non-existing-option /a1/a2/a3
You can not put /a/b/c/file.o under /a1/a2/a3, since both paths are absolute. Thus "-c" should be changed to name object file only.
I advise you to consider a replacement of makefile, like cmake, scons and other.
This will enable to implement build system as for for simple project as well as for bigger one too.
See for example how it's easy to compile using cmake your example.
Just create file CMakeList.txt in srcdir/:
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.6)
project(test)
add_library(test file1.c file2c file3.c)
And now type:
mkdir -p builddir/objdir
cd builddir/objdir
cmake ../../srcdir
make
That's all, object files will reside somewhere under builddir/objdir.
I personaly use cmake and find it very convinient. It automatically generates dependencies and has other goodies.
I am trying to figure out the same thing. For me this worked
CC = g++
CFLAGS = -g -Wall -Iinclude
CV4LIBS = `pkg-config --libs opencv4`
CV4FLAGS = `pkg-config --cflags opencv4`
default: track
track: main.o
$(CC) -o track $(CV4LIBS) ./obj/main.o
ALLFLAGS = $(CFLAGS) $(CV4FLAGS)
main.o: ./src/main.cpp ./include/main.hpp
$(CC) $(ALLFLAGS) -c ./src/main.cpp $(CV4LIBS) -o ./obj/main.o
``
This is among the problems autoconf solves.
If you've ever done ./configure && make you know what autoconf is: it's the tool that generates those nice configure scripts. What not everyone knows is that you can instead do mkdir mybuild && cd mybuild && ../configure && make and that will magically work, because autoconf is awesome that way.
The configure script generates Makefiles in the build directory. Then the entire build process happens there. So all the build files naturally appear there, not in the source tree.
If you have source files doing #include "../banana/peel.h" and you can't change them, then it's a pain to make this work right (you have to copy or symlink all the header files into the build directory). If you can change the source files to say #include "libfood/comedy/banana/peel.h" instead, then you're all set.
autoconf is not exactly easy, especially for a large existing project. But it has its advantages.
Personally for single files I do this,
rm -rf temps; mkdir temps; cd temps/ ; gcc -Wall -v --save-temps ../thisfile.c ; cd ../ ; geany thisfile.c temps/thisfile.s temps/thisfile.i
temps folder will keep all the object, preprocessed and assembly files.
This is a crude way of doing things and I would prefer above answers using Makefiles.
My program comprises sharedmemory.c sharedmemory.h semaphore.c semaphore.h sumprime.c, now I want to compile in Linux an executable file named sumprime
sumprime.c code calls some methods that are declared in sharedmemory.h semaphore.h and implemented in sharedmemory.c semaphore.c
My makefile is like this:
HEADERFILES = semaphore.h sharedmemory.h
SOURCEFILES = sumprime.c semaphore.c sharedmemory.c
OBJFILES = sumprime.o semaphore.o sharedmemory.o
DISTFILES = $(HEADERFILES) $(SOURCEFILES) Makefile
DISTFOLDER = lab5
HANDIN = ${DISTFOLDER}.tar.bz2
DEST=sumprime
CCFLAG=
.PHONY: all clean pack
all: $(DEST)
$(DEST): sumprime.o
gcc sumprime.o -o $(DEST)
sumprime.o: $(HEADERFILES) $(SOURCEFILES)
gcc -c $(HEADERFILES) $(SOURCEFILES) -o sumprime.o
clean:
pack:
#echo [PACK] Preparing for packaging...
#rm -fr ${DISTFOLDER} ${HANDIN}
#mkdir ${DISTFOLDER}
#echo [PACK] Copying solution files
#for file in ${DISTFILES}; do\
cp -f $$file ${DISTFOLDER};\
echo \>\>\> $$file;\
done;
#echo [PACK] Creating ${HANDIN}...
#tar cjf ${HANDIN} ${DISTFOLDER}
#rm -fr ${DISTFOLDER}
#echo [PACK] Done!
I tried multiple ways in vain after searching. Please help me with this
As gcc should tell you, you cannot use -c with multiple input files, so
gcc -c $(HEADERFILES) $(SOURCEFILES) -o sumprime.o
does not work.
Fortunately, it also isn't necessary; in fact, you don't need special rules for the .o files because the built-in rules work quite well. This is particularly the case because the name of the output binary corresponds with one of the object files (sumprime.o; see "Linking a single object file" behind the link).
I would use something like
#!/usr/bin/make -f
CC = gcc
CPPFLAGS = -MD
CFLAGS = -O2 -g
LDFLAGS =
LDLIBS =
TARGET = sumprime
HEADERFILES = semaphore.h sharedmemory.h
SOURCEFILES = sumprime.c semaphore.c sharedmemory.c
DISTFOLDER = lab5
DISTFILES = $(HEADERFILES) $(SOURCEFILES) Makefile
HANDIN = $(DISTFOLDER).tar.bz2
OBJFILES = $(SOURCEFILES:.c=.o)
DEPFILES = $(OBJFILES:.o=.d)
all: $(TARGET)
$(TARGET): $(OBJFILES)
clean:
rm -f $(TARGET) $(OBJFILES)
distclean: clean
rm -f $(DEPFILES) $(HANDIN)
pack: dist
dist: $(HANDIN)
$(HANDIN): $(DISTFILES)
#echo [DIST] Preparing for packaging...
#rm -f $#
#tar cjf $# --transform 's,^,$(DISTFOLDER)/,' $+
#echo [DIST] Done!
.PHONY: all clean distclean dist pack
-include $(DEPFILES)
Obviously, this requires some explanation.
Explanation
Implicit rules
I mentioned these above: make predefines a number of rules that often just Do The Right Thing™; we can make them do most of our work. In fact, the shortest Makefile you could use to build your program is
sumprime: sumprime.o semaphore.o sharedmemory.o
This uses an implicit rule to build the .o files and an implicit recipe to build sumprime. Note that there are variables that influence the behavior of implicit rules; behind the link above is a list of such rules that includes their recipes, and in them the names of the variables they use. Since we're compiling C code, the ones we're interested in are:
CPPFLAGS = -MD # C preprocessor flags, such as -Ipath -DMACRO=definition
CFLAGS = -O2 -g # C compiler flags
LDFLAGS = # linker flags, such as -Lpath
LDLIBS = # linked libraries, such as -lpthread (Alternatively:
# LOADLIBES, but this is less usual)
Pattern substitution
The lines
OBJFILES = $(SOURCEFILES:.c=.o)
DEPFILES = $(OBJFILES:.o=.d)
use pattern substitution to generate a list of .o files from a list of .c files, and .d from .o. We'll use .d files for dependency tracking.
Dependency tracking
This is perhaps the most complex part, but it's not that bad.
One of the practical problems with the minimal Makefile is that it doesn't know about #includes. If sumprime.c includes semaphore.h and semaphore.h is changed, we would really like sumprime.c to be rebuilt. Fortunately, gcc has a mechanism to facilitate this that we invoke with
CPPFLAGS = -MD
When given this option, the preprocessor generates a .d file corresponding to the input .c it was given (i.e., if sumprime.c is compiled, sumprime.d is generated) that contains a make-compatible list of dependencies of the source file. For example, I expect a sumprime.d that looks something like
sumprime.c: semaphore.h sharedmemory.h
Then, with
-include $(DEPFILES)
make is instructed to include these files into its code if they exist. This means that make always knows the dependencies of source files as they were during the last build (!). That it lags one behind is not a problem because a change in the dependencies requires a change in one of the files that a target depended on last time, and that no dependencies are pulled in the first time is not a problem because the first time everything has to be built anyway.
And so we get dependency tracking with a minimum of fuss.
Packing with GNU tar
The
pack: dist
dist: $(HANDIN)
$(HANDIN): $(DISTFILES)
#echo [DIST] Preparing for distaging...
#rm -f $#
#tar cjf $# --transform 's,^,$(DISTFOLDER)/,' $+
#echo [DIST] Done!
rule requires GNU tar, but if it is available, its --transform option makes for a much nicer dist rule, as you can see. I took the liberty of changing it to that. Of course, if you prefer, you can still use your old way.
Side note: It is more usual to call what you called the pack rule dist. There is no technical reason for this, it's just a convention; people expect make dist. With this code, both names work.
Following is my directory structure
calculator
|
|---src
(multiply.cpp sum.cpp)
|---lib
I am building a static library calc.a using following
ar -rcs calc.a multiply.o sum.o
calc.a is builded in current directory.
I trying calc.a to be put into lib folder not in current directory (i.e. src)
I searched in internet and man page but couldn't find anything.
Any idea?
Since you are using the command line, the easiest way to write the library into the lib directory is to do it explicitly:
ar -rcs lib/libcalc.a multiply.o sum.o
Using a Makefile you can do more sophisticated things, but even then, it boils down to the same thing, e.g. adding the path to the front of the library name.
Since you asked for additional info on your comment, I add here a simple Makefile, which may be helpful to get you started:
CC=g++
CFLAGS=-c -Wall
LDFLAGS=
SOURCES=src/main.cpp src/sum.cpp src/multiply.cpp
OBJECTS=$(SOURCES:.cpp=.o)
LIBRARY=lib/libcalc.a
EXECUTABLE=main
all: $(SOURCES) $(LIBRARY) $(EXECUTABLE)
$(LIBRARY): $(OBJECTS)
<tab>mkdir -p lib
<tab>ar -rcs $# $<
$(EXECUTABLE): $(OBJECTS)
<tab>$(CC) $(LDFLAGS) $(OBJECTS) -o $#
.cpp.o:
<tab>$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $< -o $#
clean:
<tab>rm -rf main lib/ src/*.o
Important: All <tab>s must be replaced with real tabs, as required by the Makefile syntax!
Makefiles are very very flexible, so they can be very simple and specific to your problem, or as general and/or complex to build many libraries and binaries, based on millions and millions of source code. I suggest you to search for Makefile documentation for more information.
As a final note, I also suggest you to rename your library as 'libcalc.a', since the 'lib' prefix is standard in Unix. Other similar standards apply for other environments.
i am new to makefiles and have just rescently created a makefile that works for a c++ project. it has two cpp files and one h file. i am trying to convert my file to work in linux but cant seem to figure out how. any ideas?
EXE = NumberGuessingGame.exe
CC = cl
LD = cl
OBJ = game.obj userInterface.obj
STD_HEADERS = header.h
CFLAGS = /c
LDFLAGS = /Fe
$(EXE): $(OBJ)
$(LD) $(OBJ) $(LDFLAGS)$(EXE)
game.obj: game.cpp $(STD_HEADERS)
$(CC) game.cpp $(CFLAGS)
userInterface.obj: userInterface.cpp $(STD_HEADERS)
$(CC) userInterface.cpp $(CFLAGS)
#prepare for complete rebuild
clean:
del /q *.obj
del /q *.exe
For in depth treatment of make on Linux, see GNU make.
There are a few differences. Binaries have no extension
EXE = NumberGuessingGame
The compiler is gcc, but need not be named, because CC is built in, same goes for LD. But since your files are named .cpp, the appropriate compiler is g++, which is CXX in make.
Object files have extension .o
OBJ = game.o userInterface.o
STD_HEADERS = header.h
Compiler flags
CXXFLAGS = -c
The equivalent for /Fe is just -o, which is not specified as LDFLAGS, but spelled out on the linker command line.
Usually, you use the compiler for linking
$(EXE): $(OBJ)
$(CXX) $(LDFLAGS) $(OBJ) -o $(EXE)
You don't need to specify the rules for object creation, they are built in. Just specify the dependencies
game.o: $(STD_HEADERS)
userInterface.o: $(STD_HEADERS)
del is called rm
clean:
rm -f $(OBJ)
rm -f $(EXE)
One important point is, indentation is one tab character, no spaces. If you have spaces instead, make will complain about
*** missing separator. Stop.
or some other strange error.
You can also use CMake to accomplish your task:
Put following into CMakeLists.txt file in the root directory of your project (<project-dir>):
cmake_minimum_required (VERSION 2.6)
project (NumberGuessingGame)
add_executable(NumberGuessingGame game.cpp serInterface.cpp)
Then on the console do
"in-source" build
$ cd <project-dir>
$ cmake .
$ make
or "out-source" build
$ mkdir <build-dir>
$ cd <build-dir>
$ cmake <project-dir>
$ make
You can adjust build setting using nice GUI tool. Just go to the build directory and run cmake-gui.
You don't need to include headers in the dependency list. The compiler will fail on its own, stopping make from continuing. However, if you're including them in the dependency list to force make to rebuild files in case the header changes, nobody will stop you.
CFLAGS never needs to contain -c, nor does LDFLAGS need -o. Below is a revamped makefile. Note that you can always override a macro explicitly defined in a makefile or implicitly defined using something like make CFLAGS=-Wall for example. I used the de facto standard CXX macro name in the event that you have C source files, which must be compiled using a C compiler (the value of the CC macro) instead of a C++ compiler.
.POSIX:
#CC is already implicitly defined.
CXX = g++
OBJ = game.o userInterface.o
STD_HEADERS = header.h
.SUFFIXES:
.SUFFIXES: .o .cpp .c
NumberGuessingGame: $(OBJ) $(STD_HEADERS)
$(CXX) $(CFLAGS) -o $# $(OBJ) $(LDFLAGS)
.cpp.o: $(STD_HEADERS)
$(CXX) $(CFLAGS) -c $<
#There is already an implicit .c.o rule, thus there is no need for it here.
#prepare for complete rebuild
clean:
-rm -f NumberGuessingGame *.o
As yegorich answered, you can use a build system like Cmake. It is much more flexible, cross-platform, and can generate Unix Makefiles as well as Nmake Makefiles and Visual Studio solutions on Windows.
I have the same problem as others have:
I have a *.la file generated by libtool in an Automake project (e.g. module.la),
but I need the *.so of it to use it for dlopen() (eg. module.so).
But: project is configured and built with --disable-shared to make sure the created main binary is one big statically linked program, e.g. main.x (easier for deployment and debugging). Thus *.so files are not created.
The program main.x is a huge framework-like application which is capable of loading extensions (modules) via dlopen() -- despite it being linked statically.
This works fine when I build module.so by hand. But putting this to work in Makefile.am seems impossible to me. Yes, I can write lib_LTLIBRARIES, but with my standard --disable-shared I do not get a *.so file.
lib_LTLIBRARIES = module.la
module_so_SOURCES = module.cpp
The file module.la is created, which dlopen() refuses to load (of course).
I tried to put rules into Makefile.am building it manually and that works:
# Makefile.am (yes, .am)
all: mm_cpp_logger.so
SUFFIXES = .so
%.so: %.cpp
$(CXX) $(CXXFLAGS) -fPIC -fpic -c -I $(top_srcdir)/include -o $# $<
%.so: %.o
$(CXX) $(LDFLAGS) -shared -fPIC -fpic -o $# $<
But this can only be a workaround. I do not get all the nice auto-features like dependency-checking and installation.
How can I build module.so with still building the main program with --disable-shared (or with the same effect) in the Makefile.am-way?
can I postprocess *.la files to *.so files with a special automake rule?
can I tweak the lib_LTLIBRARIES process to create *.so files in any case?
What you are looking for is called a module. You can tell Autotools to create a static binary (executable) by adding -all-static to the LDFLAGS of the application. I think this is the preferred way over using --disable-shared configure flag (which really is aimed at the libraries rather than the executable)
Something like this should do the trick:
AM_CPPFLAGS=-I$(top_srcdir)/include
lib_LTLIBRARIES = module.la
module_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -shared
module_la_SOURCES = mm_cpp_logger.cpp
bin_PROGRAMS = application
application_LDFLAGS = -all-static
application_SOURCES = main.cpp
The .so file will (as usual) end up in the .libs/ subdirectory (unless you install it, of course).
And you can build both your application and plugins in one go (even with a single Makefile.am), so there is no need to call configure multiple times.
The use of -fPIC (and friends) should be auto-detected by Autotools.
Update: here's a little trick to make the shared-libraries available where you expect them. Since all shlibs end up in .libs/, it is sometimes nice to have them in a non-hidden directory.
The following makefile snippet creates convenience links (on platforms that support symlinks; otherwise they are copied). Simply adding the snippet to your makefile (i usually use an -include convenience-link.mk) should be enough (you might need an AC_PROG_LN_S in your configure.ac)
.PHONY: convenience-link clean-convenience-link
convenience-link: $(lib_LTLIBRARIES)
#for soname in `echo | $(EGREP) "^dlname=" $^ | $(SED) -e "s|^dlname='\(.*\)'|\1|"`; do \
echo "$$soname: creating convenience link from $(abs_builddir)/.libs to $(top_builddir)"; \
rm -f $(top_builddir)/$$soname ; \
test -e $(abs_builddir)/.libs/$$soname && \
cd $(top_builddir) && \
$(LN_S) $(abs_builddir)/.libs/$$soname $$soname || true;\
done
clean-convenience-link:
#for soname in `echo | $(EGREP) "^dlname=" $(lib_LTLIBRARIES) | $(SED) -e "s|^dlname='\(.*\)'|\1|"`; do \
echo "$$soname: cleaning convenience links"; \
test -L $(top_builddir)/$$soname && rm -f $(top_builddir)/$$soname || true; \
done
all-local:: convenience-link
clean-local:: clean-convenience-link
I've solved a similar problem using the noinst_LTLIBRARIES macro.
The noinst_LTLIBRARIES macro creates static, non installable libraries to be only used internally. all noinst_LTLIBRARIES static libraries are created also if you specify the --disable-static configure option.
lib_LTLIBRARIES = libtokenclient.la
noinst_LTLIBRARIES = libtokenclient_static.la
libtokenclient_la_SOURCES = $(TOKEN_SERVER_CLIENT_SOURCES) cDynlib.c cDynlib.h token_mod.h
libtokenclient_la_CFLAGS = #BASE_CFLAGS#
libtokenclient_la_CXXFLAGS = $(libtokenclient_la_CFLAGS)
libtokenclient_la_LIBADD = #B_BASE_OS_LIBS#
libtokenclient_la_LDFLAGS = #LT_PLUGIN_LIBS_FLAGS# #LIBS_FLAGS# $(TOKEN_SERVER_CLIENT_EXPORT_SYMBOLS)
libtokenclient_static_la_SOURCES = $(libtokenclient_la_SOURCES)
libtokenclient_static_la_CFLAGS = $(libtokenclient_la_CFLAGS)
libtokenclient_static_la_CXXFLAGS = $(libtokenclient_static_la_CFLAGS)
token_test_SOURCES = $(TEST_SOURCES)
token_test_LDADD = #B_BASE_OS_LIBS# libtokenclient_static.la
token_test_CFLAGS = #BASE_CFLAGS#
token_test_CXXFLAGS = $(token_test_CFLAGS)
I use noinst_LTLIBRARIES static libraries for 2 reasons:
to speed up compile time I create static libraries to be used as intermediate containers for code that shall be linked against more than once: the code is compiled just once, otherwise automake would compile same source files once for each target
to statically link the code to some executable
One thing that could work according to the libtool documentation for LT_INIT is to partition your build into two packages: the main application and the plugins. That way you could (in theory) invoke:
./configure --enable-shared=plugins
and things would work the way you would expect.