I am just following the code examples of a Beginning SilverLight book and here is part of the code about user controls and Dependeny Property that I have typed from the book into my IDE:
public class CoolDownButtonControl: Control
{
public static readonly DependencyProperty CoolDownSecondsProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register(
"CoolDownSeconds",
typeof(int),
typeof(CoolDownButtonControl),
new PropertyMetadata(
new PropertyChangedCallback(
CoolDownButtonControl.OnCoolDownSecondsPropertyChanged
)
)
);
public int CoolDownSeconds
{
get
{
return (int)GetValue(CoolDownSecondsProperty);
}
set
{
SetValue(CoolDownSecondsProperty, value);
}
}
private static void OnCoolDownSecondsPropertyChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
CoolDownButtonControl cdBuutton = d as CoolDownButtonControl;
cdBuutton.OnCoolDownButtonChange(null);
}
}
The problem is that IDE highlights the line of cdBuutton.OnCoolDownButtonChange(null); complaining about
CoolDownButtonControl does not contain a definition for
OnCoolDownButtonChange
As I am new to this and hoping to learn it from this example I couldn't figure out what is wrong and how to fix it?
You should add that method too, something like this:
protected virtual void OnCoolDownButtonChange(RoutedEventArgs e)
{
}
Related
I have a Trade class which contains a property currentPrice, which downloads price data from a website using getPricedata() method. The Trade object will show up as a table row in TableView. Now, my task: is to
use the getPricedata() method to grab data from internet, populate the currentPrice cell, whenever the object is created.
relaunch the getPricedata() method to every 1 minute after the object has been created and update table cell.
Below is the basic structure of my code. But I have no idea how to implement this ?
Which package do I need ? Task ? Service ? ScheduledService ?
public class Trade{
private DoubleProperty currentPrice;
// need thread here
public double getPricedata(){
.......
}
}
Use a ScheduledService<Number>, whose Task<Number>'s call() method retrieves and returns the value. Then you can either register an onSucceeded handler with the service, or just bind the Trade's currentPrice to service.lastValue(). Call setPeriod(..) on the service (once) to configure it to run every minute.
Since the currentPrice is being set from the service, you should only expose a ReadOnlyDoubleProperty from your Trade class (otherwise you might try to call currentPriceProperty().set(...) or setCurrentPrice(...), which would fail as it's bound).
I would do something like
public class Trade {
private final ReadOnlyDoubleWrapper currentPrice ;
private final ScheduledService<Number> priceService = new ScheduledService<Number>() {
#Override
public Task<Number> createTask() {
return new Task<Number>() {
#Override
public Number call() {
return getPriceData();
}
};
}
};
public Trade() {
priceService.setPeriod(Duration.minutes(1));
// in case of errors running service:
priceService.setOnFailed(e -> priceService.getException().printStackTrace());
currentPrice = new ReadOnlyDoubleWrapper(0);
currentPrice.bind(priceService.lastValueProperty());
startMonitoring();
}
public final void startMonitoring() {
priceService.restart();
}
public final void stopMonitoring() {
priceService.cancel();
}
public ReadOnlyDoubleProperty currentPriceProperty() {
return currentPrice.getReadOnlyProperty();
}
public final double getCurrentPrice() {
return currentPriceProperty().get();
}
private double getPriceData() {
// do actual retrieval work here...
}
}
(Code just typed in here without testing, but it should give you the idea.)
I want to use RazorEngine to generate some html files. It's easy to generate strings first, then write them to files. But if the generated strings are too large, that will cause memory issues.
So I wonder is there a non-cached way to use RazorEngine, like using StreamWriter as its output rather than a string.
I google this for a while, but with no luck.
I think use a custom base template should be the right way, but the documents are so few(even out of date) on the offcial homepage of RazorEngine.
Any hint will be helpful!
OK. I figured it out.
Create a class that inherits TemplateBase<T>, and take a TextWrite parameter in the constructor.
public class TextWriterTemplate<T> : TemplateBase<T>
{
private readonly TextWriter _tw;
public TextWriterTemplate(TextWriter tw)
{
_tw = tw;
}
// override Write and WriteLiteral methods, write text using the TextWriter.
public override void Write(object value)
{
_tw.Write(value);
}
public override void WriteLiteral(string literal)
{
_tw.Write(literal);
}
}
Then use the template as this:
private static void Main(string[] args)
{
using (var sw = new StreamWriter(#"output.txt"))
{
var config = new FluentTemplateServiceConfiguration(c =>
c.WithBaseTemplateType(typeof(TextWriterTemplate<>))
.ActivateUsing(context => (ITemplate)Activator.CreateInstance(context.TemplateType, sw))
);
using (var service = new TemplateService(config))
{
service.Parse("Hello #Model.Name", new {Name = "Waku"}, null, null);
}
}
}
The content of output.txt should be Hello WAKU.
I have this field in which I insert port number. I would like to convert the string automatically into number:
fieldNport = new TextField();
fieldNport.setPrefSize(180, 24);
fieldNport.setFont(Font.font("Tahoma", 11));
grid.add(fieldNport, 1, 1);
Can you tell how I can do this? I cannot find suitable example in stack overflow.
EDIT:
Maybe this:
fieldNport.textProperty().addListener(new ChangeListener()
{
#Override
public void changed(ObservableValue o, Object oldVal, Object newVal)
{
try
{
int Nport = Integer.parseInt((String) oldVal);
}
catch (NumberFormatException e)
{
}
}
});
Starting with JavaFX 8u40, you can set a TextFormatter object on a text field:
UnaryOperator<Change> filter = change -> {
String text = change.getText();
if (text.matches("[0-9]*")) {
return change;
}
return null;
};
TextFormatter<String> textFormatter = new TextFormatter<>(filter);
fieldNport = new TextField();
fieldNport.setTextFormatter(textFormatter);
This avoids both subclassing and duplicate change events that you will get when you add a change listener to the text property and modify the text in that listener.
You can write something like this :
fieldNPort.text.addListener(new ChangeListener(){
#Override public void changed(ObservableValue o,Object oldVal, Object newVal){
//Some Code
//Here you can use Integer.parseInt methods inside a try/catch
//because parseInt throws Exceptions
}
});
Here are all the things you'd need about properties and Listeners in JavaFX:
http://docs.oracle.com/javafx/2/binding/jfxpub-binding.htm
If you have any question, I'll be glad to help.
Maybe this is what you need:
fieldNPort= new TextField()
{
#Override
public void replaceText(int start, int end, String text)
{
if (text.matches("[0-9]*"))
{
super.replaceText(start, end, text);
}
}
#Override
public void replaceSelection(String text)
{
if (text.matches("[0-9]*"))
{
super.replaceSelection(text);
}
}
};
This will restrict the users from entering anything but numbers(you can modify the regex expression to your needs) and then you do not have to worry about Integer.parseInt throwing any exception.
I wanted to debug the Seed() method in my Entity Framework database configuration class when I run Update-Database from the Package Manager Console but didn't know how to do it. I wanted to share the solution with others in case they have the same issue.
Here is similar question with a solution that works really well.
It does NOT require Thread.Sleep.
Just Launches the debugger using this code.
Clipped from the answer
if (!System.Diagnostics.Debugger.IsAttached)
System.Diagnostics.Debugger.Launch();
The way I solved this was to open a new instance of Visual Studio and then open the same solution in this new instance of Visual Studio. I then attached the debugger in this new instance to the old instance (devenv.exe) while running the update-database command. This allowed me to debug the Seed method.
Just to make sure I didn't miss the breakpoint by not attaching in time I added a Thread.Sleep before the breakpoint.
I hope this helps someone.
If you need to get a specific variable's value, a quick hack is to throw an exception:
throw new Exception(variable);
A cleaner solution (I guess this requires EF 6) would IMHO be to call update-database from code:
var configuration = new DbMigrationsConfiguration<TContext>();
var databaseMigrator = new DbMigrator(configuration);
databaseMigrator.Update();
This allows you to debug the Seed method.
You may take this one step further and construct a unit test (or, more precisely, an integration test) that creates an empty test database, applies all EF migrations, runs the Seed method, and drops the test database again:
var configuration = new DbMigrationsConfiguration<TContext>();
Database.Delete("TestDatabaseNameOrConnectionString");
var databaseMigrator = new DbMigrator(configuration);
databaseMigrator.Update();
Database.Delete("TestDatabaseNameOrConnectionString");
But be careful not to run this against your development database!
I know this is an old question, but if all you want is messages, and you don't care to include references to WinForms in your project, I made some simple debug window where I can send Trace events.
For more serious and step-by-step debugging, I'll open another Visual Studio instance, but it's not necessary for simple stuff.
This is the whole code:
SeedApplicationContext.cs
using System;
using System.Data.Entity;
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.Drawing;
using System.Windows.Forms;
namespace Data.Persistence.Migrations.SeedDebug
{
public class SeedApplicationContext<T> : ApplicationContext
where T : DbContext
{
private class SeedTraceListener : TraceListener
{
private readonly SeedApplicationContext<T> _appContext;
public SeedTraceListener(SeedApplicationContext<T> appContext)
{
_appContext = appContext;
}
public override void Write(string message)
{
_appContext.WriteDebugText(message);
}
public override void WriteLine(string message)
{
_appContext.WriteDebugLine(message);
}
}
private Form _debugForm;
private TextBox _debugTextBox;
private TraceListener _traceListener;
private readonly Action<T> _seedAction;
private readonly T _dbcontext;
public Exception Exception { get; private set; }
public bool WaitBeforeExit { get; private set; }
public SeedApplicationContext(Action<T> seedAction, T dbcontext, bool waitBeforeExit = false)
{
_dbcontext = dbcontext;
_seedAction = seedAction;
WaitBeforeExit = waitBeforeExit;
_traceListener = new SeedTraceListener(this);
CreateDebugForm();
MainForm = _debugForm;
Trace.Listeners.Add(_traceListener);
}
private void CreateDebugForm()
{
var textbox = new TextBox {Multiline = true, Dock = DockStyle.Fill, ScrollBars = ScrollBars.Both, WordWrap = false};
var form = new Form {Font = new Font(#"Lucida Console", 8), Text = "Seed Trace"};
form.Controls.Add(tb);
form.Shown += OnFormShown;
_debugForm = form;
_debugTextBox = textbox;
}
private void OnFormShown(object sender, EventArgs eventArgs)
{
WriteDebugLine("Initializing seed...");
try
{
_seedAction(_dbcontext);
if(!WaitBeforeExit)
_debugForm.Close();
else
WriteDebugLine("Finished seed. Close this window to continue");
}
catch (Exception e)
{
Exception = e;
var einner = e;
while (einner != null)
{
WriteDebugLine(string.Format("[Exception {0}] {1}", einner.GetType(), einner.Message));
WriteDebugLine(einner.StackTrace);
einner = einner.InnerException;
if (einner != null)
WriteDebugLine("------- Inner Exception -------");
}
}
}
protected override void Dispose(bool disposing)
{
if (disposing && _traceListener != null)
{
Trace.Listeners.Remove(_traceListener);
_traceListener.Dispose();
_traceListener = null;
}
base.Dispose(disposing);
}
private void WriteDebugText(string message)
{
_debugTextBox.Text += message;
Application.DoEvents();
}
private void WriteDebugLine(string message)
{
WriteDebugText(message + Environment.NewLine);
}
}
}
And on your standard Configuration.cs
// ...
using System.Windows.Forms;
using Data.Persistence.Migrations.SeedDebug;
// ...
namespace Data.Persistence.Migrations
{
internal sealed class Configuration : DbMigrationsConfiguration<MyContext>
{
public Configuration()
{
// Migrations configuration here
}
protected override void Seed(MyContext context)
{
// Create our application context which will host our debug window and message loop
var appContext = new SeedApplicationContext<MyContext>(SeedInternal, context, false);
Application.Run(appContext);
var e = appContext.Exception;
Application.Exit();
// Rethrow the exception to the package manager console
if (e != null)
throw e;
}
// Our original Seed method, now with Trace support!
private void SeedInternal(MyContext context)
{
// ...
Trace.WriteLine("I'm seeding!")
// ...
}
}
}
Uh Debugging is one thing but don't forget to call:
context.Update()
Also don't wrap in try catch without a good inner exceptions spill to the console.
https://coderwall.com/p/fbcyaw/debug-into-entity-framework-code-first
with catch (DbEntityValidationException ex)
I have 2 workarounds (without Debugger.Launch() since it doesn't work for me):
To print message in Package Manager Console use exception:
throw new Exception("Your message");
Another way is to print message in file by creating a cmd process:
// Logs to file {solution folder}\seed.log data from Seed method (for DEBUG only)
private void Log(string msg)
{
string echoCmd = $"/C echo {DateTime.Now} - {msg} >> seed.log";
System.Diagnostics.Process.Start("cmd.exe", echoCmd);
}
I'm trying to get windows workflows working, and I've become a little stumped.
I've gotten a single workflow working, but now I am trying to do something a little more complex: start a workflow, where each activity itself contains a workflow. (Picture something like the main program starts the activities "Input, logic, and output", and then each of those have additional activities like "prompt user, get input, etc.")
I've had it working fine, with the example from here (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/gg535667.aspx), when I am not passing any parameters from the main program to the activites. My question is, how exactly does the 'Variables' and 'metadata.SetVariablesCollection' work in the NativeActivity, and how to I get the parameters to the low level activities?
This is what I am currently trying:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Activities;
using System.Collections.ObjectModel;
using System.Activities.Statements;
namespace Project1
{
internal class MainProgram
{
internal static void Main(string[] args)
{
try
{
var act = new SimpleSequence();
act.Activities.Add((Activity)(new WriteSomeText()));
act.Activities.Add((Activity)(new WriteSomeText()));
act.Activities.Add((Activity)(new WriteSomeText()));
act.Variables.Add(new Variable<string> ("stringArg", "TEXT"));
WorkflowInvoker.Invoke(act);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
System.Console.WriteLine("EXCEPTION: {0}", ex);
}
}
public class WriteSomeText : CodeActivity
{
[RequiredArgument]
public InArgument<string> stringArg { get; set; }
protected override void Execute(CodeActivityContext context)
{
string output = context.GetValue(stringArg);
System.Console.WriteLine(output);
}
}
public class SimpleSequence : NativeActivity
{
Collection<Activity> activities;
Collection<Variable> variables;
Variable<int> current = new Variable<int> { Default = 0 };
public Collection<Activity> Activities
{
get
{
if (this.activities == null)
this.activities = new Collection<Activity>();
return this.activities;
}
set
{
this.activities = value;
}
}
public Collection<Variable> Variables
{
get
{
if (this.variables == null)
this.variables = new Collection<Variable>();
return this.variables;
}
set
{
this.variables = value;
}
}
protected override void CacheMetadata(NativeActivityMetadata metadata)
{
metadata.SetChildrenCollection(this.activities);
metadata.SetVariablesCollection(this.variables);
metadata.AddImplementationVariable(this.current);
}
protected override void Execute(NativeActivityContext context)
{
if (this.Activities.Count > 0)
context.ScheduleActivity(this.Activities[0], onChildComplete);
}
void onChildComplete(NativeActivityContext context, ActivityInstance completed)
{
int currentExecutingActivity = this.current.Get(context);
int next = currentExecutingActivity + 1;
if (next < this.Activities.Count)
{
context.ScheduleActivity(this.Activities[next], this.onChildComplete);
this.current.Set(context, next);
}
}
}
}
}
This ends up throwing the following exception:
EXCEPTION: System.Activities.InvalidWorkflowException: The following errors were encountered while processing the workflow tree:
'WriteSomeText': Value for a required activity argument 'stringArg' was not supplied.
'WriteSomeText': Value for a required activity argument 'stringArg' was not supplied.
'WriteSomeText': Value for a required activity argument 'stringArg' was not supplied.
at System.Activities.Validation.ActivityValidationServices.ThrowIfViolationsExist(IList`1 validationErrors)
at System.Activities.Hosting.WorkflowInstance.ValidateWorkflow(WorkflowInstanceExtensionManager extensionManager)
at System.Activities.Hosting.WorkflowInstance.RegisterExtensionManager(WorkflowInstanceExtensionManager extensionManager)
at System.Activities.WorkflowApplication.EnsureInitialized()
at System.Activities.WorkflowApplication.RunInstance(WorkflowApplication instance)
at System.Activities.WorkflowApplication.Invoke(Activity activity, IDictionary`2 inputs, WorkflowInstanceExtensionManager extensions, TimeSpan timeout)
at System.Activities.WorkflowInvoker.Invoke(Activity workflow, TimeSpan timeout, WorkflowInstanceExtensionManager extensions)
at System.Activities.WorkflowInvoker.Invoke(Activity workflow)
at Project1.MainProgram.Main(String[] args) in c:\users\user\documents\visual studio 2010\Projects\ModelingProject1\Project1\MainProgram.cs:line 25
I know, I only pass 1 parameter, but the exception still says that I am missing 3 parameters. I am missing something as to how to do this properly.
You're correctly declaring stringArg as an InArgument but you're not passing any value to it when calling it inside SimpleSequence.
You can pass something using the constructor, while constructing the all activity itself, like this:
public class WriteSomeText : CodeActivity
{
[RequiredArgument]
public InArgument<string> stringArg { get; set; }
public WriteSomeText(string stringArg)
{
this.stringArg = stringArg;
}
protected override void Execute(CodeActivityContext context
{
string output = context.GetValue(stringArg);
System.Console.WriteLine(output);
}
}
// Calling the activity like this:
internal static void Main(string[] args)
{
var act = new SimpleSequence()
{
Activities =
{
new WriteSomeText("hello"),
new WriteSomeText("world"),
new WriteSomeText("!")
}
};
WorkflowInvoker.Invoke(act);
Console.WriteLine("Press any key to exit");
Console.ReadKey();
}
Also notice that is a best practice to use the constructor to initialize collections:
public SimpleSequence()
{
activities = new Collection<Activity>();
variables = new Collection<Variable>();
}
This way is even more intuitive to initialize the activity:
var act = new SimpleSequence()
{
Activities =
{
new WriteSomeText("hello"),
new WriteSomeText("world"),
new WriteSomeText("!")
},
Variables =
{
new Variable<int>("myNewIntVar", 10),
// ....
}
};
EDIT:
There are a couple of other ways to approach the problem. This is your best friend while starting in the WF4 world.
Check WF\Basic\CustomActivities\Code-Bodied for a little push with this particular case.