I think I'm missing something about how to search in JavaMail.
Download empty messages from a folder
Create a new SearchTerm that matches your results
Filter (yourFolder.search) the results using your search term.
This works. But - why do it this way? If I'm using javamail to connect to something like gmail, the search isn't being executed server-side, and it doesn't seem like there is any advantage to using the whole javax.mail.search.SearchTerm constructs in terms of efficiency or reducing the amount of data that needs to be sent over the network...
I don't see any way that executes a search on the server side and returns a list of matches. Any ideas?
EDIT: Including pseudocode of what I'm doing now, which doesn't execute any search on the server-side. Even if I converted this to use SearchTerm it still wouldn't be doing anything server-side, right?
Properties props = System.getProperties();
props.setProperty("mail.store.protocol", "gimaps");
final Session session = Session.getDefaultInstance(props, null);
final GmailSSLStore store = (GmailSSLStore) session.getStore("gimaps");
store.connect(ADDRESS, PASSWORD);
final GmailFolder allMailFolder = (GmailFolder) store.getFolder("[Gmail]/All Mail");
allMailFolder.open(Folder.READ_ONLY);
final Message[] allMessages = allMailFolder.getMessages();
System.out.println("Messages:" + allMessages.length);
FetchProfile fp = new FetchProfile();
fp.add(FetchProfile.Item.ENVELOPE);
allMailFolder.fetch(allMessages, fp);
for (final Message message : allMessages) {
final Address[] addrs = message.getFrom();
if (addrs != null) {
for (final Address addr : addrs) {
if (addr.toString().toLowerCase().contains("george")) {
System.out.println(addr.toString());
}
}
}
}
You're doing something wrong, but you haven't provided enough details about what you're doing for us to know what you're doing wrong.
Are you using IMAP?
Show us some code and the debug output.
If you're searching in an IMAP folder using the predefined SearchTerm implementations, it will try to perform the search on the server. Look at the implementation of SearchSequence.generateSequence. In your example you would probably want to use FromStringTerm.
If you're using the gimap provider, you can also use Google's IMAP extensions, which include the X-GM-RAW search attribute, allowing you to search exactly like in the Gmail web interface. The java implementation is in GmailRawSearchTerm and only works server-side.
Related
Following https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/application-insights/app-insights-usage-send-user-context, I thought it would be easy to get cross-schema tracking of a user. However, I'm finding the absolute opposite.
I created the telemetry initializer (which the document has bugs in it hardcore):
public void Initialize(ITelemetry telemetry)
{
if (HttpContext.Current?.Session == null)
return;
if (HttpContext.Current.Session["UserId"] == null)
{
HttpContext.Current.Session["UserId"] = Guid.NewGuid().ToString();
}
telemetry.Context.User.Id = (string)HttpContext.Current.Session["UserId"];
telemetry.Context.Session.Id = HttpContext.Current.Session.SessionID;
var authUser = _sessionManager.GetAuthenticatedUser<UserDetails>();
if (authUser != null)
{
telemetry.Context.User.AuthenticatedUserId = authUser.UserId;
}
}
Then I went and added it to App Insights
TelemetryConfiguration.Active.TelemetryInitializers.Add(new UserTrackingTelemetryInitializer());
I then played with my site, expecting this stuff to start showing up. It did not. I continued to get random strings for user_Id and session_Id (things like NVhLF and what not). So, I thought, okay, maybe it's logging before I update those values? I went and inserted my initializer first:
TelemetryConfiguration.Active.TelemetryInitializers.Insert(0, new UserTrackingTelemetryInitializer());
Same thing. So I started to look at schemas I don't usually look at. Nothing. So I pulled up traces and I found it. Finally, there is where my data is going. But the other schemas don't have the updated values, so what use is this? While traces is showing the expected values for user_Id and session_Id, the others continue to show garbage. Am I doing something wrong?
The document you followed does not work indeed, a feedback has been submitted here.
Just for your reference, the way I can find to set these values is that use such TrackEvent() / TrackRequest() or other Trackxxx() methods after implemented your own telemetry initializer
EDIT: I'm not looking for Facebook APIs! I'm simply using Facebook as an example. I intend to get my browser to perform actions on different websites that likely have no APIs.
Let's say I wish to create a program that will log into Facebook, lookup my friends list, visit each one of their profiles, extract the date + text of each post and write this to a file.
I have an idea how the algorithm should work. But I have absolutely no clue how to interface my code with the browser itself.
Now I'm a Java programmer, so I would very much imagine the pesudo code in Java would be to create a Browser Object then convert the current page's contents to HTML code so that the data can be parsed. I provided an example code below of what I think it ought to look like.
However is this the right way that I should be doing it? If it is, then where can I find a web browser object? Are there any parsers I can use to 'read' the content? How do I get it to execute javascript such as clicking on a 'Like' button?
Or are there other ways to do it? Is there a GUI version and then I can simply command the program to go to X/Y pixel position and click on something. Or is there a way to write the code directly inside my FireFox and run it from there?
I really have no clue how to go about doing this. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!
Browser browser = new Browser();
browser.goToUrl("http://facebook.com");
//Retrieve page in HTML format to parse
HtmlPage facebookCom = browser.toHtml();
//Set username & password
TextField username = facebookCom.getTextField("username");
TextField password = facebookCom.getTextField("password");
username.setText("user123");
password.setText("password123");
facebookCom.updateTextField("username", username);
facebookCom.updateTextField("password", password);
//Update HTML contents
browser.setHtml(facebookCom);
// Click the login button and wait for it to load
browser.getButton("login").click();
while (browser.isNotLoaded()) {
continue;
}
// Click the friends button and wait for it to load
browser.getButton("friends").click();
while (browser.isNotLoaded()) {
continue;
}
//Convert the current page (Friends List) into HTML code to parse
HtmlPage facebookFriends = browser.toHtml();
//Retrieve the data for each friend
ArrayList<XMLElement> friendList = facebookFriends.getXmlElementToArray("friend");
for (XMLElement friend : friendList) {
String id = friend.getId();
//Visit the friend's page
browser.goToUrl("http://facebook.com/" + id);
while (browser.isNotLoaded()) {
continue;
}
//Retrieve the data for each post
HtmlPage friendProfile = browser.toHtml();
ArrayList<XMLElement> friendPosts = friendProfile.getXmlElementToArray("post");
BufferedWriter writer = new BufferedWriter(new File("C:/Desktop/facebook/"+id));
//Write the date+text of every post to a text file
for (XMLElement post : friendPosts) {
String date = post.get("date");
String text = post.get("text");
String content = date + "\n" + text;
writer.append(content);
}
}
I think you are thinking about this the wrong way. You wouldn't really want to write a program to scrap the screen via the browser. It looks like you could take advantage of facebooks rest api and query for the data you are looking for. A link to get a users posts via rest api:
https://developers.facebook.com/docs/graph-api/reference/v2.6/user/feed
You could get their users id's from this endpoint:
https://developers.facebook.com/docs/graph-api/reference/friend-list/
Then plug the user ids into the first rest endpoint that was linked. Once you get your data coming back correctly via the rest api its fairly trivial to write that data out to a file.
Actually I have integrated CCAvenue JSP_Kit to my Lifreay portal 6.2. Till payment every thing is working properly that means after filling all the payment details and submitting no error is coming. But we are getting a response as null.
Below is the code of ReponseHandler.jsp.
encResp is coming null after payment or after cancel the request.
<%
String workingKey = "working key"; //32 Bit Alphanumeric Working Key should be entered here so that data can be decrypted.
String encResp= request.getParameter("encResp");
AesCryptUtil aesUtil=new AesCryptUtil(workingKey);
String decResp = aesUtil.decrypt(encResp);
StringTokenizer tokenizer = new StringTokenizer(decResp, "&");
Hashtable hs=new Hashtable();
String pair=null, pname=null, pvalue=null;
while (tokenizer.hasMoreTokens()) {
pair = (String)tokenizer.nextToken();
if(pair!=null) {
StringTokenizer strTok=new StringTokenizer(pair, "=");
pname=""; pvalue="";
if(strTok.hasMoreTokens()) {
pname=(String)strTok.nextToken();
if(strTok.hasMoreTokens())
pvalue=(String)strTok.nextToken();
hs.put(pname, pvalue);
}
}
}
%>
In the portal world you typically don't have access to the full and original HttpServletRequest. You can get access to it by calling
origRequest = PortalUtil.getOriginalHttpServletRequest(
PortalUtil.getHttpServletRequest());
This, of course, means that you're somewhat outside of the spec, however if you really need to communicate through servlet parameters, that might be your only option. I'd also recommend to add this code to a better testable/maintainable location - e.g. inside the Java Portlet class.
Here's the PortalUtil interface.
How do you deal with the fact, that URLs are case sensitive in xPages even for parameters? For example URL:
my_page.xsp?folderid=785478 ... is not the same as ...
my_page.xsp?FOLDERID=785478
How to make, for example, a proper check that params contain some key e.g.
param.containsKey("folderid") which desnt work when there is 'FOLDERID' in URL.
I'd suggest defining a couple convenience #Functions:
var #HasParam = function(parameter) {
var result:boolean = false;
for (var eachParam : param.keySet()) {
if (eachParam.toLowerCase() == parameter.toLowerCase()) {
result = true;
break;
}
}
return result;
};
var #GetParam = function(parameter) {
var result = "";
if (#HasParam(parameter)) {
for (var eachParam : param.keySet()) {
if (eachParam.toLowerCase() == parameter.toLowerCase()) {
result = param.get(eachParam);
break;
}
}
}
return result;
};
Then you can safely query the parameters without caring about case. For bonus points, you could add requestScope caching so that you can skip looping through the keySet if you're examining a parameter that you've previously looked at during the same request.
you may use this function:
context.getUrlParameter('param_name')
then test if it's null or not.
make sure to decide for one,so either upper or lowercase
other than that i'd suggest something like
KeyValuePair<string,string> kvp = null;
foreach(KeyValuePair<string,string> p in param)
{
if(UPPERCASE(p.Key) == UPPERCASE("folderid"))
{
kvp = p;
break;
}
}
syntax isn't correct and idk the uppercase method in c# right now,but you get the point
The easiest answer is ofcourse the obvious. Be sure that the parameters you are using througout your application are always the same on every url you are generating and know what to expect. A good approach to accomplish this is to create a ssjs function which generates url's for you according to the objects you submit.
In this function you could check which object you are receiving and with the use of keywords and so forth generate the correct url. This way generating twice a url with the same input parameters should always generate the exact same url.
another option would be just to double check with a bit of code like this
var key = "yourkey";
if(param.contains(#uppercase(key)) || param.contains(#lowercase(key)){
// do stuff
}
But should not be necesarry if the url you are parsing is generated by your own application
Edit after post of topic starter
Another option would be to grap the url directly from from the facescontext and to convert it to a string first. When it is a string you can parse the parameters yourself.
You can combine server side substitution/redirection to get around the issue that David mentioned. So a substitution rule will redirect incoming patern like this:
http://myhost/mypage/param (/mypage/* => which converts to - /dbpath/mypage.xsp?*) - substitution is tricky so please handle with care.
Also I believe I read somewhere that context.getUrlParameter is not case sensitive - can someone please confirm this.
Hope this helps.
I've created a snippet that pulls data from a databse table and displays it in tabular format. The snippet takes an id as parameter, and this is added to the sql query.
My problem is that if I've got more than 1 snippet call (sometimes need the tabular data for different id's displayed on a page) on the same page, all table data is the same as the last database call that's been made by the last snippet.
What do I need to do to kinda not cache the snippet database calls and have them all display their own content?
I've tried setting the page to no cache-able. Also used the [! !] brackets for the snippet calls, and even used the function_exists() method, but none of them helped.
Please can someone help me?
thanks
Try this at the end of the snippet:
mysql_connect('host', 'user', 'pass');
mysql_select_db('db_name');
You need to specify the connection parameters ofcourse.
It would help to answer if you can post your snippet. I do this with multiple calls on the page without issue, so there is either something wrong inside the snippet, or you need to output to unique placeholder names.
You have encountered a glitch of ModX, and it took me a long time to solve. ModX does a lot of caching by using hashing and apparently, when multiple connections are made from within one page divided over multiple snippets, this erratic behaviour can be seen. This is most likely very unwanted behaviour, it can be solved easily but gives you terrible headache otherways.
One sympton is that $modx->getObject($classname, $id)returns null (often).
The solution is very simple:
either use a static class with a single db instance, or
use $modx->setPlaceholder($instance, $tag);, or a combination.
My solution has been:
class dt__xpdo {
private function __construct() {}
public function __destruct() {
$this->close();
}
static public function db($modx = null) {
if ($modx->getPlaceholder('dt_xpdo') == '') {
$dt_user = 'xxxxxxxxx';
$dt_pw = 'xxxxxxxxx';
$dt_host = 'localhost';
$dt_dbname = 'xxxxxxxxx';
$dt_port = '3306';
$dt_dsn = "mysql:host=$dt_host;dbname=$dt_dbname;port=$dt_port;charset=utf8";
$dt_xpdo = new xPDO($dt_dsn, $dt_user, $dt_pw);
$dt_xpdo->setPackage('mymodel', MODX_CORE_PATH.'components/mymodel/'.'model/', '');
//$modx->log(modX::LOG_LEVEL_DEBUG, 'mymodel.config.php');
//$modx->log(modX::LOG_LEVEL_DEBUG, 'Could not addPackage for mymodel!');
$modx->setPlaceholder('dt_xpdo', $dt_xpdo);
}
return $modx->getPlaceholder('dt_xpdo');
}
}
Now you can use in your code:
require_once 'above.php';
and use something like
$xpdo = dt__xpdo::db($modx);
and continue flawlessly!