Actually I have integrated CCAvenue JSP_Kit to my Lifreay portal 6.2. Till payment every thing is working properly that means after filling all the payment details and submitting no error is coming. But we are getting a response as null.
Below is the code of ReponseHandler.jsp.
encResp is coming null after payment or after cancel the request.
<%
String workingKey = "working key"; //32 Bit Alphanumeric Working Key should be entered here so that data can be decrypted.
String encResp= request.getParameter("encResp");
AesCryptUtil aesUtil=new AesCryptUtil(workingKey);
String decResp = aesUtil.decrypt(encResp);
StringTokenizer tokenizer = new StringTokenizer(decResp, "&");
Hashtable hs=new Hashtable();
String pair=null, pname=null, pvalue=null;
while (tokenizer.hasMoreTokens()) {
pair = (String)tokenizer.nextToken();
if(pair!=null) {
StringTokenizer strTok=new StringTokenizer(pair, "=");
pname=""; pvalue="";
if(strTok.hasMoreTokens()) {
pname=(String)strTok.nextToken();
if(strTok.hasMoreTokens())
pvalue=(String)strTok.nextToken();
hs.put(pname, pvalue);
}
}
}
%>
In the portal world you typically don't have access to the full and original HttpServletRequest. You can get access to it by calling
origRequest = PortalUtil.getOriginalHttpServletRequest(
PortalUtil.getHttpServletRequest());
This, of course, means that you're somewhat outside of the spec, however if you really need to communicate through servlet parameters, that might be your only option. I'd also recommend to add this code to a better testable/maintainable location - e.g. inside the Java Portlet class.
Here's the PortalUtil interface.
Related
Good day!
In my Orchard, I have several content types all with my custom part attached. This part defines to what users this content is available. For each logged user there is external service, which defines what content user can or cannot access. Now I need access restriction to apply everywhere where orchard display content lists, this includes results by specific tag from a tag cloud, or results listed from Taxonomy term. I seems can’t find any good way to do it except modifying TaxonomyServices code as well as TagCloud services, to join also my part and filter by it. Is this indeed the only way to do it or there are other solutions? I would like to avoid doing changes to built-in modules if possible but cannot find other way.
Thanks in advance.
I'm currently bumbling around with the same issue. One way I'm currently looking at is to hook into the content manager.
[OrchardSuppressDependency("Orchard.ContentManagement.DefaultContentManager")]
public class ModContentManager : DefaultContentManager, IContentManager
{
//private readonly Lazy<IShapeFactory> _shapeFactory;
private readonly IModAuthContext _modAuthContext;
public ModContentManager(IComponentContext context,
IRepository<ContentTypeRecord> contentTypeRepository,
IRepository<ContentItemRecord> contentItemRepository,
IRepository<ContentItemVersionRecord> contentItemVersionRepository,
IContentDefinitionManager contentDefinitionManager,
ICacheManager cacheManager,
Func<IContentManagerSession> contentManagerSession,
Lazy<IContentDisplay> contentDisplay,
Lazy<ISessionLocator> sessionLocator,
Lazy<IEnumerable<IContentHandler>> handlers,
Lazy<IEnumerable<IIdentityResolverSelector>> identityResolverSelectors,
Lazy<IEnumerable<ISqlStatementProvider>> sqlStatementProviders,
ShellSettings shellSettings,
ISignals signals,
//Lazy<IShapeFactory> shapeFactory,
IModAuthContext modAuthContext)
: base(context,
contentTypeRepository,
contentItemRepository,
contentItemVersionRepository,
contentDefinitionManager,
cacheManager,
contentManagerSession,
contentDisplay,
sessionLocator,
handlers,
identityResolverSelectors,
sqlStatementProviders,
shellSettings,
signals) {
//_shapeFactory = shapeFactory;
_modAuthContext = modAuthContext;
}
public new dynamic BuildDisplay(IContent content, string displayType = "", string groupId = "") {
// So you could do something like...
// var myPart = content.As<MyAuthoPart>();
// if(!myPart.IsUserAuthorized)...
// then display something else or display nothing (I think returning null works for this but
//don't quote me on that. Can always return a random empty shape)
// else return base.BuildDisplay(content, displayType, groupId);
// ever want to display a shape based on the name...
//dynamic shapes = _shapeFactory.Value;
}
}
}
Could also hook into the IAuthorizationServiceEventHandler, which is activated before in the main ItemController and do a check to see if you are rendering a projection or taxonomy list set a value to tell your content manager to perform checks else just let them through. Might help :)
I just upgrade MvcSiteMapProvider from v3 to v4.6.3.
I see the upgrade note indicate:
In general, any reference to System.Web.SiteMap.Provider will need to be updated to MvcSiteMapProvider.SiteMaps.Current
I am trying to get the sitemap node by using:
SiteMaps.Current.FindSiteMapNode(rawUrl)
But it always return null
I looked into the code. In the sitemap it's actually calling the function:
protected virtual ISiteMapNode FindSiteMapNodeFromUrlMatch(IUrlKey urlToMatch)
{
if (this.urlTable.ContainsKey(urlToMatch))
{
return this.urlTable[urlToMatch];
}
return null;
}
It's trying to find a match in the urlTable.
I am using Default implementation of XmlSiteMapProvider .
It define var url = node.GetAttributeValue("url");
siteMapNode.Url = url;
siteMapNode.UrlResolver = node.GetAttributeValue("urlResolver");
So if I did not define url or urlResolver attribute in the .sitemap file. These variables a set to empty string, when generate the node.
And when this nodes are passed to AddNode function in SiteMap.
When adding the node
bool isMvcUrl = string.IsNullOrEmpty(node.UnresolvedUrl) && this.UsesDefaultUrlResolver(node);
this code will check if there is url or urlResolver
// Only store URLs if they are clickable and are configured using the Url
// property or provided by a custom URL resolver.
if (!isMvcUrl && node.Clickable)
{
url = this.siteMapChildStateFactory.CreateUrlKey(node);
// Check for duplicates (including matching or empty host names).
if (this.urlTable
.Where(k => string.Equals(k.Key.RootRelativeUrl, url.RootRelativeUrl, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase))
.Where(k => string.IsNullOrEmpty(k.Key.HostName) || string.IsNullOrEmpty(url.HostName) || string.Equals(k.Key.HostName, url.HostName, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase))
.Count() > 0)
{
var absoluteUrl = this.urlPath.ResolveUrl(node.UnresolvedUrl, string.IsNullOrEmpty(node.Protocol) ? Uri.UriSchemeHttp : node.Protocol, node.HostName);
throw new InvalidOperationException(string.Format(Resources.Messages.MultipleNodesWithIdenticalUrl, absoluteUrl));
}
}
// Add the URL
if (url != null)
{
this.urlTable[url] = node;
}
Finally no url is add to the urlTable, which result in FindSiteMapNode cannot find anything.
I am not sure if there needs to be specific configuration. Or should I implement custom XmlSiteMapProvider just add the url.
ISiteMapNodeProvider instances cannot use the FindSiteMapNode function for 2 reasons. The first you have already discovered is that finding by URL can only be done if you set the url attribute explicitly in the node configuration. The second reason is that the SiteMapBuilder doesn't add any of the nodes to the SiteMap until all of the ISiteMapNodeProvider instances have completed running, so it would be moot to add the URL to the URL table anyway.
It might help if you explain what you are trying to accomplish.
The ISiteMapNodeProvider classes have complete control over the data that is added to the SiteMapNode instances and they also have access to their parent SiteMapNode instance. This is generally all that is needed in order to populate the data. Looking up another SiteMapNode from the SiteMap object while populating the data is not supported. But as long as the node you are interested in is populated in the same ISiteMapNodeProvider instance, you can just get a reference to it later by storing it in a variable.
Update
Okay, I reread your question and your comment and it now just seems like you are looking in the wrong place. MvcSiteMapProvider v4 is no longer based on Microsoft's SiteMap provider model, so using XmlSiteMapProvider doesn't make sense, as it would sidestep the entire implementation. The only case where this might make sense is if you have a hybrid ASP.NET and ASP.NET MVC application that you want to keep a consitant menu structure between. See Upgrading from v3 to v4.
There are 2 stages to working with the data. The first stage (the ISiteMapBuilder and ISiteMapNodeProvider) loads the data from various sources (XML, .NET attributes, DynamicNodeProviders, and custom implementations of ISiteMapNodeProvider) and adds it to an object graph that starts at the SiteMap object. Much like Microsoft's model, this data is stored in a shared cache and only loaded when the cache expires. This is the stage you have been focusing on and it definitely doesn't make sense to lookup nodes here.
The second stage is when an individual request is made to access the data. This is where looking up data based on a URL might make sense, but there is already a built-in CurrentNode property that finds the node matching the current URL (or more likely the current route since we are dealing with MVC) which in most cases is the best approach to finding a node. Each node has a ParentNode and ChildNodes properties that can be used to walk up or down the tree from there.
In this second stage, you can access the SiteMap data at any point after the Application_Start event such as within a controller action, in one of the built in HTML helpers, an HTML helper template in the /Views/Shared/DisplayTemplates/ directory, or a custom HTML helper. This is the point in the application life cycle which you might call the lines SiteMaps.Current.FindSiteMapNode(rawUrl) or (more likely) SiteMaps.Current.CurrentNode to get an instance of the node so you can inspect its Attributes property (the custom attributes).
public ActionResult About()
{
ViewBag.Message = "Your app description page.";
var currentNode = MvcSiteMapProvider.SiteMaps.Current.CurrentNode;
string permission = currentNode.Attributes.ContainsKey("permission") ? currentNode.Attributes["permission"].ToString() : string.Empty;
string programs = currentNode.Attributes.ContainsKey("programs") ? currentNode.Attributes["programs"].ToString() : string.Empty;
string agencies = currentNode.Attributes.ContainsKey("agencies") ? currentNode.Attributes["agencies"].ToString() : string.Empty;
// Do something with the custom attributes of the About page here
return View();
}
The most common usage of custom attributes is to use them from within a custom HTML helper template. Here is a custom version of the /Views/Shared/DisplayTemplates/SiteMapNodeModel.cshtml template that displays the custom attributes. Note that this template is called recursively by the Menu, SiteMapPath, and SiteMap HTML helpers. Have a look at this answer for more help if HTML helper customization is what you intend to do.
#model MvcSiteMapProvider.Web.Html.Models.SiteMapNodeModel
#using System.Web.Mvc.Html
#using MvcSiteMapProvider.Web.Html.Models
#if (Model.IsCurrentNode && Model.SourceMetadata["HtmlHelper"].ToString() != "MvcSiteMapProvider.Web.Html.MenuHelper") {
<text>#Model.Title</text>
} else if (Model.IsClickable) {
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(Model.Description))
{
#Model.Title
}
else
{
#Model.Title
}
} else {
<text>#Model.Title</text>
}
#string permission = Model.Attributes.ContainsKey("permission") ? Model.Attributes["permission"].ToString() : string.Empty
#string programs = Model.Attributes.ContainsKey("programs") ? Model.Attributes["programs"].ToString() : string.Empty
#string agencies = Model.Attributes.ContainsKey("agencies") ? Model.Attributes["agencies"].ToString() : string.Empty
<div>#permission</div>
<div>#programs</div>
<div>#agencies</div>
I think I'm missing something about how to search in JavaMail.
Download empty messages from a folder
Create a new SearchTerm that matches your results
Filter (yourFolder.search) the results using your search term.
This works. But - why do it this way? If I'm using javamail to connect to something like gmail, the search isn't being executed server-side, and it doesn't seem like there is any advantage to using the whole javax.mail.search.SearchTerm constructs in terms of efficiency or reducing the amount of data that needs to be sent over the network...
I don't see any way that executes a search on the server side and returns a list of matches. Any ideas?
EDIT: Including pseudocode of what I'm doing now, which doesn't execute any search on the server-side. Even if I converted this to use SearchTerm it still wouldn't be doing anything server-side, right?
Properties props = System.getProperties();
props.setProperty("mail.store.protocol", "gimaps");
final Session session = Session.getDefaultInstance(props, null);
final GmailSSLStore store = (GmailSSLStore) session.getStore("gimaps");
store.connect(ADDRESS, PASSWORD);
final GmailFolder allMailFolder = (GmailFolder) store.getFolder("[Gmail]/All Mail");
allMailFolder.open(Folder.READ_ONLY);
final Message[] allMessages = allMailFolder.getMessages();
System.out.println("Messages:" + allMessages.length);
FetchProfile fp = new FetchProfile();
fp.add(FetchProfile.Item.ENVELOPE);
allMailFolder.fetch(allMessages, fp);
for (final Message message : allMessages) {
final Address[] addrs = message.getFrom();
if (addrs != null) {
for (final Address addr : addrs) {
if (addr.toString().toLowerCase().contains("george")) {
System.out.println(addr.toString());
}
}
}
}
You're doing something wrong, but you haven't provided enough details about what you're doing for us to know what you're doing wrong.
Are you using IMAP?
Show us some code and the debug output.
If you're searching in an IMAP folder using the predefined SearchTerm implementations, it will try to perform the search on the server. Look at the implementation of SearchSequence.generateSequence. In your example you would probably want to use FromStringTerm.
If you're using the gimap provider, you can also use Google's IMAP extensions, which include the X-GM-RAW search attribute, allowing you to search exactly like in the Gmail web interface. The java implementation is in GmailRawSearchTerm and only works server-side.
I need to write a service that connects to CRM, and returns with a list of all of the entity available on the server (custom or otherwise).
How can I do this? To be clear, I am not looking to return all data for all entities. Just a list of every type, regardless of whether any actually exist.
You need to use RetrieveAllEntitiesRequest
RetrieveAllEntitiesRequest request = new RetrieveAllEntitiesRequest()
{
EntityFilters = EntityFilters.Entity,
RetrieveAsIfPublished = true
};
// service is the IOrganizationService
RetrieveAllEntitiesResponse response = (RetrieveAllEntitiesResponse)service.Execute(request);
foreach (EntityMetadata currentEntity in response.EntityMetadata)
{
string logicalName = currentEntity.LogicalName;
// your logic here
}
note that you will get also system or hidden entities, like wizardpage or recordcountsnapshot
You will probably find these sections of the MSDN useful:
Customize Entity Metadata (lookout for the samples linked on that page).
Retrieve and Detect Changes to Metadata.
Is there a way to programmatically determine if a SharePoint 2007 web application is using Forms authentication? I guess one way might be to read it from the web.config but I was wondering if there is some property exposed in the API.
Take a look at how /_admin/Authentication.aspx does it in Central Admin:
protected override void OnLoad(EventArgs e)
{
base.OnLoad(e);
string g = base.Request.QueryString["WebAppId"];
this.webApp = (SPWebApplication) SPConfigurationDatabase.Local.GetObject(new Guid(g));
this.zone = (SPUrlZone) Enum.Parse(typeof(SPUrlZone), base.Request.QueryString["Zone"]);
this.lb_Zone.Text = SPHttpUtility.HtmlEncode(SPAlternateUrl.GetZoneName(this.zone));
SPIisSettings iisSettings = this.webApp.IisSettings[this.zone];
// CODE ELIDED
if (AuthenticationMode.Windows != iisSettings.AuthenticationMode)
{
if (AuthenticationMode.Forms != iisSettings.AuthenticationMode)
{
// CODE ELIDED
}
else
{
this.rdo_authForms.Checked = true;
}
// CODE ELIDED
}
}
The part you are interested in is where it uses iisSettings.AuthenticationMode to determine if it is Forms Auth or not. So the trick is to correctly obtain a reference to SPIisSettings that is relevant to your webapp and zone. Getting to that point is where all the work needs to be done.
You'll need to parameterize parts of this code so that information to identify and obtain references to the webApp and Zone are passed in.
See where it assigns his.rdo_authForms.Checked? that's how you know if it's using forms auth.
Also, this implies that you need to know which Zone of the web application you are looking at to see if Forms Authentication is enabled
Using Jon Schoning's answer, I came up with the following code to determine if the current authentication mode is forms:
if (SPContext.Current.Site.WebApplication.IisSettings[SPContext.Current.Site.Zone].AuthenticationMode == System.Web.Configuration.AuthenticationMode.Forms) { ... }