what does anon-rss and total-vm mean - linux

Recently, tomcat process on my Linux machine was killed abruptly. After investigation I found below error message in /var/log/messages file:
kernel: [1799319.246494] Out of memory: Kill process 28536 (java) score 673 or sacrifice childSep
kernel: [1799319.246506] Killed process 28536 (java) total-vm:1271568kB, anon-rss:426528kB, file-rss:0kB
Now, can someone please tell me that what all is included in total-vm and how is anon-rss different from rss?

As I understand, the size of the virtual memory that a process uses is listed as "total-vm". Part of it is really mapped into the RAM itself (allocated and used). This is "RSS".
Part of the RSS is allocated in real memory blocks (other than mapped into a file or device). This is anonymous memory ("anon-rss") and there is also RSS memory blocks that are mapped into devices and files ("file-rss").
So, if you open a huge file in vim, the file-rss would be high, on the other side, if you malloc() a lot of memory and really use it, your anon-rss would be high also.
On the other side, if you allocate a lot of space (with malloc()), but nevers use it, the total-vm would be higher, but no real memory would be used (due to the memory overcommit), so, the rss values would be low.

Related

Allocate memory to a process that other process can not use in linux

To limit memory resource for particular process we can use ulimit as well as cgroup.
I want to understand that if using cgroup, I have allocated say ~700 MB of memory to process A, on system having 1 GB of RAM, and some other process say B, requires ~400 MB of memory. What will happen in this case?
If process A is allocated ~750 MB of memory but using only 200 MB of memory, will process B can use memory that allocated to A?
If no then how to achieve the scenario when "fix amount of memory is assigned to a process that other process can not use"?
EDIT
Is it possible to lock physical memory for process? Or only VM can be locked so that no other process can access it?
There is one multimedia application that must remain alive and can use maximum system resource in terms of memory, I need to achieve this.
Thanks.
Processes are using virtual memory (not RAM) so they have a virtual address space. See also setrlimit(2) (called by ulimit shell builtin). Perhaps RLIMIT_RSS & RLIMIT_MEMLOCK are relevant. Of course, you could limit some other process e.g. using RLIMIT_AS or RLIMIT_DATA, perhaps thru pam_limits(8) & limits.conf(5)
You could lock some virtual memory into RAM using mlock(2), this ensures that the RAM is kept for the calling process.
If you want to improve performance, you might also use madvise(2) & posix_fadvise(2).
See also ionice(1) & renice(1)
BTW, you might consider using hypervisors like Xen, they are able to reserve RAM.
At last, you might be wrong in believing that your manual tuning could do better than a carefully configured kernel scheduler.
What other processes will run on the same system, and what kind of thing do you want to happen if the other multimedia program needs memory that other processes are using?
You could weight the multimedia process so the OOM killer only picks it as a last choice after every other non-essential process. You might see a dropped frame if the kernel takes some time killing something to free up memory.
According to this article, adjust the oom-killer weight of a process by writing to /proc/pid/oom_adj. e.g. with
echo -17 > /proc/2592/oom_adj

When would a process cause paging in linux

Today, i received few alerts about swapping activity of 3000KB/sec. This linux box have very few process running and has total 32GB of RAM. When i logged and did execute free, i did not see any thing suspicious. The ratio of free memory to used in (buffers/cache) row, was high enough(25GB in free, to 5GB in usage).
So i am wondering what are main causes of paging on linux system
How does swappiness impact paging
How long does a page stay in Physical RAM before it is swapped out. What controls this behavior on linux?
Is it possible that even if there is adequate free physical RAM, but a process's memory access pattern is such that data is spread over multiple pages. Would this cause paging?
For example consider a 5GB array, such that the program access 5GB in a loop, although slowly, such that pages which are not used , are swapped out. Again, keep in mind, that even if buffer is 5GB, there could be 20GB of physical RAM available.
UPDATE:
The linux vendor is RHEL 6.3, kernel version 2.6.32-279.el6.x86_64

Nginx killed for “Out of memory”?

My nginx has 8 process, each of them take about 150M memory.
From time to time,my nginx get killed for this(dmesg)
21228 total pagecache pages 50 pages in swap cache Swap cache stats:
add 85, delete 35, find 63/64 Free swap = 2031300kB Total swap =
2031608kB 3407856 pages RAM 3180034 pages HighMem 290515 pages
reserved 36448 pages shared 491788 pages non-shared
Out of memory:kill process 16373 (nginx) score 5013 or a child
I googled it, turns out the Low Memory is run out, so the oom-killer begin doing its job...
Here is my questions:
I get 16GB memory, but the Low Memory is just 800M (free -lm), how can i use the rest of them? google tell me i can use a patch kernel-hugemem , but it only for centos4, Mine is centos5.2, so...
Is it too much for a nginx process use 150MB memory? You guys never meet such a problem?
The Low memory confused me, 32-bit system can use more than 3GB memory without PAE, so why the Low/Hign memory for? Is not a kernel bug?
I notice you have a lot of free swap, which should prevent the OOM killer from activating but for some reason isn't. This question from serverfault indicates that OOM with unused swap means the failed allocation was in kernel mode, caused by a driver that wanted a lot of memory. That might also explain why the free HighMem wasn't good enough to satisfy the request (kernel mode things can request memory from specific regions). You should look a bit farther back in the dmesg to see if there are any clues, like a backtrace.
As for the 3rd part of your question, there is a distinction between HighMen and LowMem when using PAE because it extends the physical address space to 36 bits while the virtual address space is still 32 bits. Access to the full potential 64G of physical addresses can't be done as quickly as access to a fixed 4G subset, so the kernel divides the memory up and tries to keep the most performance-critical things in the "low" area.

Different between memory usage in WHM/Cpanel and Linux

If I go to WHM and see my server's memory usage, it says that only 16% of memory is in use.
But when I connect to server using SSH and run command "free -m" then it shows that 80% is in use. Why is that? I want to know exact memory usage of all applications running like MySQL, Apache e.t.c.
How do I view that?
Thanks
As they say, "It's Complicated".
Linux uses unused memory for disk buffering and caching. It speeds things up. But you may need to look at the -/+ buffers/cache line of free.
'ps' can show you, for any given process, or for all processes, the %cpu, %mem, cumulative cpu-time, rss (resident set size, the non-swapped physical memory that a process is using), size (very approximate amount of swap space that would be required if the process were to dirty all writable pages and then be swapped out), vsize (virtual memory usage of entire process (vm_lib + vm_exe + vm_data + vm_stack)), and much much more.
For any given process, you can cat /proc/$PID/status -- it's human readable -- and check out the VmSize, VmLck, VmRSS, VmData, VmStk, VmExe, VmLib, and VmPTE values, along with others...
But that's just for starters... Processes can allocate memory but not use it. (Memory can be allocated, but the memory pages are not created/issued until they're actually used. That whole on-demand thing.)
Processes can map in hardware space, showing up as using a large quantity of memory that's not actually coming from system RAM. (X-servers are known to sometimes do this. It's some wonky stuff involved kernel drivers...)
There's the executable, which is usually a memory-mapped file. Meaning that parts that are swapped-in are taking up RAM, but when swapped out it never takes up swapfile space.
Processes can have other memory-mapped files...
There's shared-memory libraries, where the same RAM pages are used by multiple programs concurrently.
So we have to ask, as far as memory goes, what exactly counts and what doesn't?

Allocating memory for process in linux

Dear all, I am using Redhat linux ,How to set maximum memory for particular process. For eg i have to allocate maximum memory usage to eclipse alone .Is it possible to allocate like this.Give me some solutions.
ulimit -v 102400
eclipse
...gives eclipse 100MiB of memory.
You can't control memory usage; you can only control virtual memory size, not the amount of actual memory used, as that is extremely complicated (perhaps impossible) to know for a single process on an operating system which supports virtual memory.
Not all memory used appears in the process's virtual address space at a given instant, for example kernel usage, and disc caching. A process can change which pages it has mapped in as often as it likes (e.g. via mmap() ). Some of a process's address space is also mapped in, but not actually used, or is shared with one or more other processes. This makes measuring per-process memory usage a fairly unachievable goal in practice.
And putting a cap on the VM size is not a good idea either, as that will result in the process being killed if it attempts to use more.
The right way of doing this in this case (for a Java process) is to set the heap maximum size (via various well-documented JVM startup options). However, experience suggests that you should not set it less than 1Gb.

Resources