The following query works perfectly fine and populates its dropdown list. The data in the data base is stored in all uppercase, ie PALM BEACH. I want to convert it to Proper case, which obviously i can do after the fact by iterating through the returned list and reformatting BUT I should be able to do it with in the query itself. The following query works fine.
Dim citylist As List(Of String) = (From c In ctx.ziptaxes
Where c.StateID = ddlStates.SelectedIndex
Order By c.City Ascending
Select c.City).ToList()
But if i try to convert it to some thing like this, it fails
Dim citylist As List(Of String) = (From c In ctx.ziptaxes
Where c.StateID = ddlStates.SelectedIndex
Let cityname = StrConv(c.City, VbStrConv.ProperCase)
Order By cityname Ascending
Select cityname).ToList()
I've tried using culture info and String.Format(c.City, vbProperCase) too and nothing other than the original query works. Any help appreciated.
ADDENDUM:
Well some further research is telling me that .Net objects like string conversion and cultureinfo cannot be used prior to the query being run. If that's the case it explains why it isn't working. The following solves my problem BUT I would still like to know if there is way to do it within the LINQ to EF.
Dim citylist As List(Of String) = (From c In ctx.ziptaxes
Where c.StateID = ddlStates.SelectedIndex
Order By c.City Ascending
Select c.City).ToList()
If citylist.Count > 0 Then
For i As Integer = 0 To citylist.Count - 1
citylist(i) = StrConv(citylist(i).ToLower(), vbProperCase)
Next
With ddlCity
.Items.Clear()
.DataSource = citylist.Distinct()
.DataBind()
.Items.Insert(0, "Select a city")
.SelectedIndex = 0
End With
End If
You can do the conversion in your SELECT. Here's an example (with an over-simplified City name converter):
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using NUnit.Framework;
namespace LinqQuestion
{
[TestFixture]
public class StackOverflowTests
{
private IEnumerable<City> _cities;
[TestFixtureSetUp]
public void Arrange()
{
_cities = new List<City>
{
new City { Id = 1, Name = "FLINT", StateId = 1 },
new City { Id = 2, Name = "SAGINAW", StateId = 1 },
new City { Id = 3, Name = "DETROIT", StateId = 1 },
new City { Id = 4, Name = "FLint", StateId = 1 }
};
}
[Test]
public void TestCountryQuery()
{
var data = _cities
.Where(c => c.StateId == 1)
.OrderBy(c => c.Name)
.Select(c => StrConv(c.Name))
.Distinct().ToList();
Assert.That(data.Count == 3);
}
private static string StrConv(string original)
{
var firstLetter = original.Substring(0, 1).ToUpper();
var theRest = original.Substring(1, original.Length - 1).ToLower();
return firstLetter + theRest;
}
}
public class City
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int StateId { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
}
Related
Given a simple poco
public class Model
{
[PrimaryKey]
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
}
this works fine ...
var connectionString = #"Data Source=WIN8PC\SQLEXPRESS;Initial Catalog=Test;Integrated Security=True;";
connectionFactory = new OrmLiteConnectionFactory(connectionString, SqlServerDialect.Provider);
using (var db = connectionFactory.OpenDbConnection())
{ db.DropAndCreateTable<Model>(); }
var model0 = new Model { ID = 0, Description = "Item Zero" };
var model1 = new Model { ID = 1, Description = "Item One" };
using (var db = connectionFactory.OpenDbConnection())
{ db.Save(model0, model1); }
as does this ...
model0.Description += " updated";
model1.Description += " updated";
using (var db = connectionFactory.OpenDbConnection())
{
db.Save(model0);
db.Save(model1);
}
however, this crashes with a primary key violation exception ...
model0.Description += " updated again";
model1.Description += " updated again";
using (var db = connectionFactory.OpenDbConnection())
{ db.Save(model0, model1); }
The record with ID zero is required, as this is a lookup table to replace an existing C# enum type. This is a local copy of distributed data (that I don't control), so there's no reason to have an auto-increment key.
The issue appears to be in OrmLiteWriteCommandExtensions.SaveAll() - any row with id == defaultValue is assumed to be a new item, rather than an update of an existing record. The same issue occurs in the parallel async methods too.
Is there any other way to get around this issue, other than by saving each record individually (inside a transaction). It would be preferable to save all updated records for a table in one command.
Save is a high-level API that will INSERT or UPDATE based on whether or not the Primary Key has a value. If you want to insert a default Primary Key value you can use Insert instead as seen in this Live Example on Gistlyn:
public class Model
{
[PrimaryKey]
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
}
db.DropAndCreateTable<Model>();
var model0 = new Model { ID = 0, Description = "Item Zero" };
var model1 = new Model { ID = 1, Description = "Item One" };
db.Insert(model0, model1);
var rows = db.Select<Model>();
"Inserted Rows: {0}".Print(rows.Dump());
Which outputs:
Inserted Rows: [
{
ID: 0,
Description: Item Zero
},
{
ID: 1,
Description: Item One
}
]
With Amazon native .net lib, batchget is like this
var batch = context.CreateBatch<MyClass>();
batch.AddKey("hashkey1");
batch.AddKey("hashkey2");
batch.AddKey("hashkey3");
batch.Execute();
var result = batch.results;
Now I'm testing to use servicestack.aws, however I couldn't find how to do it. I've tried the following, both failed.
//1st try
var q1 = db.FromQueryIndex<MyClass>(x => x.room_id == "hashkey1" || x.room_id == "hashkey2"||x.room_id == "hashkey3");
var result = db.Query(q1);
//2nd try
var result = db.GetItems<MyClass>(new string[]{"hashkey1","hashkey2","hashkey3"});
In both cases, it threw an exception that says
Additional information: Invalid operator used in KeyConditionExpression: OR
Please help me. Thanks!
Using GetItems should work as seen with this Live Example on Gistlyn:
public class MyClass
{
public string Id { get; set; }
public string Content { get; set; }
}
db.RegisterTable<MyClass>();
db.DeleteTable<MyClass>(); // Delete existing MyClass Table (if any)
db.InitSchema(); // Creates MyClass DynamoDB Table
var items = 5.Times(i => new MyClass { Id = $"hashkey{i}", Content = $"Content {i}" });
db.PutItems(items);
var dbItems = db.GetItems<MyClass>(new[]{ "hashkey1","hashkey2","hashkey3" });
"Saved Items: {0}".Print(dbItems.Dump());
If your Item has both a Hash and a Range Key you'll need to use the GetItems<T>(IEnumerable<DynamoId> ids) API, e.g:
var dbItems = db.GetItems<MyClass>(new[]{
new DynamoId("hashkey1","rangekey1"),
new DynamoId("hashkey2","rangekey3"),
new DynamoId("hashkey3","rangekey4"),
});
Query all Items with same HashKey
If you want to fetch all items with the same HashKey you need to create a DynamoDB Query as seen with this Live Gistlyn Example:
var items = 5.Times(i => new MyClass {
Id = $"hashkey{i%2}", RangeKey = $"rangekey{i}", Content = $"Content {i}" });
db.PutItems(items);
var rows = db.FromQuery<MyClass>(x => x.Id == "hashkey1").Exec().ToArray();
rows.PrintDump();
I am using the Google Data API for .net (https://code.google.com/p/google-gdata/) to read data from some Google Docs spreadsheets.
I have found that reading from a large spreadsheet ( > 14000 records) takes a very long time, several hours, before returning the data.
The code I'm using is below, is there another method to use to read the data, or am I missing something else to speed up this process?
public void ReadSpreadsheet(string applicationName, string title, string sheetName, string cellRange, string userName, string password)
{
var service = new SpreadsheetsService(applicationName);
service.setUserCredentials(userName, password);
SpreadsheetEntry spreadSheetEntry = GetSpreadsheetByTitle(service, title);
WorksheetEntry workSheetEntry = GetWorkSheetByTitle(spreadSheetEntry.Worksheets, sheetName);
AtomEntryCollection list = GetCells(service, workSheetEntry, cellRange);
}
public static SpreadsheetEntry GetSpreadsheetByTitle(SpreadsheetsService service, string title)
{
var query = new SpreadsheetQuery();
query.Title = title;
SpreadsheetFeed feed = service.Query(query);
return (from SpreadsheetEntry entry in feed.Entries
where title.Equals(entry.Title.Text, StringComparison.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase)
select (entry)).FirstOrDefault();
}
public static WorksheetEntry GetWorkSheetByTitle(WorksheetFeed feed, string title = null)
{
return (from WorksheetEntry entry in feed.Entries
where title != null && title.Equals(entry.Title.Text, StringComparison.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase)
select (entry)).FirstOrDefault();
}
public static AtomEntryCollection GetCells(SpreadsheetsService service, WorksheetEntry entry, string range)
{
AtomLink cellFeedLink = entry.Links.FindService(GDataSpreadsheetsNameTable.CellRel, null);
var query = new CellQuery(cellFeedLink.HRef.ToString());
query.Range = range;
query.ReturnEmpty = ReturnEmptyCells.yes;
// this line is what takes the most time
CellFeed feed = service.Query(query);
return (feed.Entries);
}
I want to configure my Mongo DB to create sequence number for an Id column. Ex. It has to start from 1001 and increase by 1 automatically when I insert next row. I have my schema definitions as part of Node.JS how to add this configuration in Node schema?
MongoDB doesn't support this out of the box. The way I've implemented this (albeit in C#) is to create a "Sequence" collection with a key and a next number. You can atomically increment and return the next number then use this as the id in your collection.
This is a C# function, using the findandmodify mongodb command to fetch and update a sequence number for a given "key".
public long GetNextSequenceNumber(string name, string key)
{
var update = new BsonDocument(new BsonElement("$inc", new BsonDocument(new BsonElement("SequenceNumber", 1))));
var query = new BsonDocument("_id", key);
var command = new CommandDocument {
{ "findandmodify" , name },
{ "query", query},
{ "update" , update},
{ "new" , true},
};
var res = Db.RunCommand(command);
if (res.Response["value"] != BsonNull.Value)
{
var o = BsonSerializer.Deserialize<Sequence>(res.Response["value"].ToBsonDocument());
return o.SequenceNumber;
}
else
{
var o = new Sequence() { Id = key, SequenceNumber = 0 };
Db.GetCollection(name).Insert<Sequence>(o);
return o.SequenceNumber;
}
}
and the Sequence model:
public class Sequence
{
public string Id { get; set; }
public long SequenceNumber { get; set; }
}
The sequence documents look like:
{
_id : 'mykey',
SequenceNumber : NumberLong(1234)
}
If you need converting it to javascript please ask.
Hope that helps.
I would like to create a method that orders an IEnumerable List by a given property where the property is passed into the method by a string i.e. (Mind you the first code example does not work, but the second does and is what I am trying to emulate dynamically).
string sortName = "SerialNumber";
IEnumerable<PartSummary> partList = FunctionToCreateList();
partOrderedList = partList.OrderBy(what do I stick in here);
that would be equivalent to
IEnumerable<PartSummary> partList = FunctionToCreateList();
partOrderedList = partList.OrderBy(p => p.SerialNumber);
How can I accomplish this?
Are you saying you want to pass the order by in to your method? If so, you can use this:
Expression<Func<PartSummary, bool>> orderByClause
Then you can do this:
partOrderedList = partList.OrderBy(orderByClause);
Then you can handle your order by in your business layer or wherever you wish.
Okay, update: If you want to pass in the column name as a string you can do something like as follows:
Create a static class for an extension method (reference: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/linqprojectgeneral/thread/39028ad2-452e-409f-bc9e-d1b263e921f6/):
static class LinqExtensions
{
public static IQueryable<T> OrderBy<T>(this IQueryable<T> source, string sortingColumn, bool isAscending)
{
if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(sortingColumn))
{
return source;
}
ParameterExpression parameter = Expression.Parameter(source.ElementType, String.Empty);
MemberExpression property = Expression.Property(parameter, sortingColumn);
LambdaExpression lambda = Expression.Lambda(property, parameter);
string methodName = isAscending ? "OrderBy" : "OrderByDescending";
Expression methodCallExpression = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), methodName,
new Type[] { source.ElementType, property.Type },
source.Expression, Expression.Quote(lambda));
return source.Provider.CreateQuery<T>(methodCallExpression);
}
}
Then you can create your method:
static IQueryable<PartSummary> FunctionToCreateList()
{
IList<PartSummary> list = new List<PartSummary>();
list.Add(new PartSummary
{
Id = 1,
SerialNumber = "A",
});
list.Add(new PartSummary
{
Id = 2,
SerialNumber = "B",
});
return list.AsQueryable();
}
And then call your method:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
IQueryable<PartSummary> partOrderedList = FunctionToCreateList();
PartSummary partSummary = new PartSummary();
string sortBy = "Id";
partOrderedList = partOrderedList.OrderBy(sortBy, false);
foreach (PartSummary summary in partOrderedList)
{
Console.WriteLine(summary.Id + ", " + summary.SerialNumber);
}
Console.ReadLine();
}
Now you can pass in the column name as a string and sort.
Hope this helps!
You can also avoid extending and just use a compiled expression tree to accomplish this:
public Func<T, object> ResolveToProperty<T>(String propertyName)
{
Type t = typeof(T);
var paramExpression = Expression.Parameter(t, "element");
var propertyExpression = Expression.Property(paramExpression, propertyName);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, object>>(propertyExpression, paramExpression).Compile();
}
string sortName = "SerialNumber";
IEnumerable<PartSummary> partList = FunctionToCreateList();
var partOrderedList = partList.OrderBy(ResolveToProperty<PartSummary>(sortName));