For example, I want to modify the content of this DBpedia page: http://dbpedia.org/page/A_Game_of_Thrones. In particular, the field
dbpedia-owl:thumbnail
which incorrectly points to
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/93/AGameOfThrones.jpg/200px-AGameOfThrones.jpg
I want to correct this field by pointing it to http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/93/AGameOfThrones.jpg
Related
I have a content type post where the entries have a categories attribute, which is an Array of Links (to a category content type).
I want to fetch all posts that have been tagged with a certain category. That is, Post entries where fields.categories[any link sys.id] = MyCategoryId.
I can only find an example only where the reference field is a singleton, not an array.
Would love any help, thanks!
You could specify your query like this:
/spaces/YOURSPACEID/entries?content_type=CONTENTTYPEID&fields.categories.sys.id=SOMEID
Notice that a content type restriction is necessary as we are filtering on a field property.
Also note that this only works because we're filtering on a system property directly accessible from the actual entry returned. If you wanted to filter on another property of the Category content type, for example title or description that is not currently supported.
Here's also a link to the official documentation including examples and explanations for the search api: https://www.contentful.com/developers/docs/references/content-delivery-api/#/reference/search-parameters/query-entries
I am writing a webscript, wherein I have a custom content model.
I want to list all the documents, that have a particular property as one of it's attributes.
Firstly I did
search.luceneSearch("PATH:\"/app:company_home//*\" AND #cm:name:myDocument")
This returned me value 1. But this query actually returns me the documents, whose cm:name property is myDocument.
what if I want to search for documents, who has cm:name property as an attribute.
So that later, I can change cm:name with mycontentmodel:myproperty, and find the elements that belong to my content type.
If I understand correctly, you'd like to find all the documents that have property mycontentmodel:myproperty, but you're not interested in the actual value of the property.
If so, find out what type or aspect mycontentmodel:myproperty belongs to.
If it belongs to type mycontentmodel:mytype the query can be:
PATH:"/app:company_home//*" AND TYPE:"mycontentmodel:mytype"
and if it belongs to aspect mycontentmodel:myaspect
PATH:"/app:company_home//*" AND ASPECT:"mycontentmodel:myaspect"
I have created a custom content type (via the admin UI) that consists mostly of text fields. I know how to position the fields using zones and Placement.info but for simplicity I would like to use a single view template and to just arrange the fields by name instead of having to use Placement.info. Is there a good way to reference the fields by name from the content item in my MVC view?
So for example, I have a template named Content-MyContentType-Detail.cshtml. Instead of the generic
#Display(Model.Content)
I would like to be able to do something like
#Display(...MyField...)
#Display(...MyOtherField...)
Is there a way to explicitly render a field by name that is associated with my content item?
You can use Shape Tracing module to view model properties and how to get access to content parts.
Then in your template you can use something like this:
<h3>#Model.ContentItem.TitlePart.Title - £#Model.ContentItem.Product.Fields[1].Value</h3>
<p>#Model.ContentItem.BodyPart.Text</p>
If you don't just want to access the field's properties, but rather would like its shape rendered in-place, but like it would be when using placement (i.e. using the existing template), then read this article, which describes how to do direct rendering without placement: http://weblogs.asp.net/bleroy/archive/2013/02/13/easy-content-templates-for-orchard-take-2.aspx
I have defined my own projection by a query which returns a set of content items of known content type. I would like to take pick up certain content parts of these content items and display them in the list. Using shape tracing tool I have found the view template where to write my custom layout:
/Views/Parts.ProjectionPart.cshtml
but from the Model variable in the template I can not get the data I want because it is way too high above from the content parts data.
a good example of what I want: let's say I want to render product catalog as defined in this tutorial:
http://skywalkersoftwaredevelopment.net/blog/writing-an-orchard-webshop-module-from-scratch-part-5
but I want only to render a list which consists from items:
name of the owner who created the product
name of the product.
publish date of the product
and I need to render it at one place, i.e., not separately in their own part views.
Have you tried adding a layout in the projector module? There is a properties mode option that lets you select which fields/data to show. If the data you want is not there, you should be able to implement an IPropertyProvider. There are examples of this in the Projections module code.
I'm in the middle of trying to copy a custom content type from one web to another. I've googled around and found some examples that use FieldLinks and Fields. I'm kind of lost as to which one to use, since when I get the FieldLinks from my source web, I get 3 fields; while retrieving from Fields only returned me 2 fields... the custom field is missing. I'm pretty darn sure that I've added the fields at the proper level since I did it via the interface. But when retrieving it using code... the numbers just don't add up.
So besides from that strange problem, I want to know what is the difference between FieldLinks and Fields, and when dealing with them in Content Types (programmatically) which one should I use?
Thanks.
SPFields are fields themselves, while SPFieldLinks are references to the fields. This is a good read that will explain things in detail. In general practice, it is safer to use SPFieldLinks when you are working on the actual content type definition. However, I'll give a quick summary here.
Lists and Webs contain the actual fields with field data. A content type, on the other hand, only holds Field Reference, which simply points at the corresponding field in the list or web. This gets a bit confusing, because content types have both an SPFieldLinkCollection and an SPFieldCollection.
The SPFieldLinkCollection is used in the actual definition of the content type, and is what you would want to use in your situation of copying a content type from one web to another. SPFieldLinks correspond to the actual elements in the XML Schema for a content type.
Comparatively, when you call on a content type's SPFieldCollection and retrieve a Field from it, what is actually happening is that the content type is checking the corresponding field reference, and then looking up in the list/web to get the actual field. Basically, think of the SPFieldCollection in the same way a lookup works: it is worthless without both the lookup value and the lookup source.