This question already has answers here:
Why width 960px?
(7 answers)
Closed 8 years ago.
Back in the day we use to design website with resolution:
1024px(width) by 768px(height)
but to avoid getting scrollbar from appearing from both sides we use a slightly smaller resolution, may be:
1000px(width) by 620px(height)---rectify me if I'm wrong on this one
but my main concern is how did 960 grid system comes to place? I know it is good for laying out contents accordingly within the 960px grid, but if so why not just use 1000px instead? Since it is mostly use size during that time?
The reasoning is like this:
1024 x 768 was a common resolution at which designs were aimed.
Subtract 24px for the scroll bar - 1000px;
960px leaves additional breathing room and importantly - has many more factors (division) than 1000px. 960 is therefore the ideal choice for a grid system.
Here are the factors:
960
1 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 12 15 16 20 24 30 32 40 48 60 64
80 96 120 160 192 240 320 480 960
1000
1 2 4 5 8 10 20 25 40 50 100 125 200 250 500 1000
Credit to the answers on this post: Why width 960px?
Related
This might sound bonkers, but looking to see if there are any ideas on how to do this.
I have N categories (say 7) where a set number of people (say 1000) have to be allocated. I know from historical data the minimum and maximum for each category (there is limited historical data, say 15 samples, so I have data that looks like this - if I had a larger sample, I would try to generate a distribution for each category from all the samples, but there isn't.
-Year 1: [78 97 300 358 132 35 0]
-Year 2: [24 74 346 300 148 84 22]
-.
-.
-Year 15:[25 85 382 302 146 52 8]
The min and max for each category over these 15 years of data is:
Min: [25 74 252 278 112 27 0 ]
Max: [132 141 382 360 177 84 22]
I am trying to scale this using simulation - by allocating 1000 to each category within the min and max limits, and repeating it. The only condition is that the sum of the allocation across the seven categories in each simulation has to sum to 1000.
Any ideas would be greatly appreciated!
The distribution you want is called the multinomial distribution. You can use the RandMultinomial function in SAS/IML to produce random samples from the multinomial distribution. To use the multinomial distribution, you need to know the probability of an individual in each category. If this probability has not changed over time, the best estimate of this probability is to take the average proportion in each category.
Thus, I would recommend using ALL the data to estimate the probability, not just max and min:
proc iml;
X = {...}; /* X is a 15 x 7 matrix of counts, each row is a year */
mean = mean(X);
p = mean / sum(mean);
/* simulate new counts by using the multinomial distribution */
numSamples = 10;
SampleSize = 1000;
Y = randmultinomial(numSamples, SampleSize, p);
print Y;
Now, if you insist on using the max/min, you could use the midrange to estimate the most likely value and use that to estimate the probabilty, as follows:
Min = {25 74 252 278 112 27 0};
Max = {132 141 382 360 177 84 22};
/* use midrange to estimate probabilities */
midrange = (Min + Max)/2;
p = midrange / sum(midrange);
/* now use RandMultinomial, as before */
If you use the second method, there is no guarantee that the simulated values will not exceed the Min/Max values, although in practice many of the samples will obey that criterion.
Personally, I advocate the first method, which uses the average count. Or you can use a time-weighted count, if you think recent observations are more relevant than observations from 15 years ago.
I need to make a diagram which shows the lines of different ceramic firing schedules. I want them to be plotted in one diagram and they need to be plotted in time-relative ax. It needs to show the different durations in a right way. I don't seem to be able to achieve this.
What I have is the following:
First table:
Pendelen
Temp. per uur
Stooktemp.
Stooktijd 4
Stooktijd Cum.4
95
120
1:15:47
1,26
205
537
2:02:03
3,30
80
620
1:02:15
4,33
150
1075
3:02:00
7,37
50
1196
2:25:12
9,79
10
1196
0:10:00
9,95
Total
9:57:17
Second table:
Pendelen
Temp. per uur
Stooktemp.
Stooktijd 5
Stooktijd Cum.5
140
540
3:51:26
3,86
65
650
1:41:32
5,55
140
1095
3:10:43
8,73
50
1222
2:32:24
11,27
Total
11:16:05
The lines to be shown in a diagram should represent the 'stooktijd cum.' for both programs 4 and 5 (which is a cumulation of the time needed to fire up the kiln from it's previous temp. in the schedule). One should be able to see in the diagram that program 5 takes more time to reach it's endtemp.
What I achieved is nothing more than a diagram with two lines, but only plotted in the 'stooktijd cum.4' points from program 4. The image shows a screenshot of this diagram.
But as you can see, this doesn't look like program 5 takes more time to reach it's end. I would like it to show something like this:
Create this table :
p4
p5
0
10
3.86
540
5.55
650
8.73
1095
11.27
1222
0
0
1.26
120
3.3
537
4.33
620
7.37
1075
9.79
1196
9.95
1196
Select all > F11 > Design > Chg Chart type > scatter with straight line and marker
Here's my tryout :
Please share if it works/not. ( :
this is my data and im trying to get the formula of it, how can i do it ( it dosent have to be using excell only but i dont know how to do it )
0 2 4 6 8
0 100 90 80 70 60
2 85 64.49 53.5 48.15 50
4 70 48.9 38.43 35.03 40
6 55 38.78 30.39 27.07 30
8 40 35 30 25 20
and this is the graphic that i obtain
but when i try to do an adjustment of the data i cant find the option as in a 2d graph
ok i didnt find how to get the equation for those values but this problem its solved by the bilinear interpolation
i used this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=va8vFViss90
and this calculator to make sure that i didnt messed it up https://www.ajdesigner.com/phpinterpolation/bilinear_interpolation_equation.php#ajscroll
Data Encryption Standard (DES) algorithm : (Using sbox 2) to show that Two output bits from each S-box affect middle bits of the next round and the other two affect the end bits.
The permutation table P is defined in the following table.
16 7 20 21 29 12 28 17 [END BITS]
1 15 23 26 5 18 31 10 [MIDDLE BITS]
2 8 24 14 32 27 3 9 [MIDDLE BITS]
19 13 30 6 22 11 4 25 [END BITS]
From the table above you can see that bits 7 and 6 refer to the end bits and 5 and 8 refer to the middle bits.
However am not sure if this is correct because if we consider E table the 5,6 are end bits and 7,8 affecting middle bit. What is correct ?
Don't fully understand the question but your first statement about bits 7,6,5 and 8 is true, but remember that the "cascade effect" will make all the changes made by the P-table will go to the "right side" of the equation; but at the same time these will interact in the next round in the left side!
To fully understand the process check out this link: http://www.cronos.est.pr/DES.php
How can I right align (and left align?) a block of numbers or text in vim like this:
from:
45 209 25 1
2 4 2 3
34 5 300 5
34 120 34 12
to this:
45 209 25 1
2 4 2 3
34 5 300 5
34 120 34 12
That means the biggest number or greatest string in every column doesn't move.
In the first column it is 45+34, in the second column 209+120, in the third column 300 and in the last column 12.
Have a look at the align plugin, it can do this and much more. Great tool in your utility belt!
Found here
After some serious vimhelp/reading I found the correct AlignCtrl mapping...
Visually select the table, e.g. by using ggVG, then do a \Tsp i.e. <leader>Tsp
Then I get this:
45 209 25 1
2 4 2 3
34 5 300 5
34 120 34 12
From vimhelp:
\Tsp : use Align to make a table separated by blanks |alignmap-Tsp|
(right justified)
You can look into the Tabularize plugin. So if you have something like
45 209 25 1
2 4 2 3
34 5 300 5
34 120 34 12
just select those lines in the visual mode and type :Tab/ and it will format it as
45 209 25 1
2 4 2 3
34 5 300 5
34 120 34 12
Also, it looks like you don't have an equal number of spaces separating the numbers at the moment. So before you use the plugin, replace all the multiple spaces with a single space with the following regex:
%s![^ ]\zs \+! !g
With the Align plugin you can select the rows you want to align and hit :
<Leader>Tsp
From Align.txt
\Tsp : use Align to make a table separated by blanks |alignmap-Tsp|
(right justified)
(The help mention \ because it is the default leader but in case you have changed it to something else you must adapt accordingly)
Just trying on my install, I got the following result :
45 209 25 1
2 4 2 3
34 5 300 5
34 120 34 12
In my opinion Align plugin is great but the "align maps" and various commands are not really easy to remember.
With the Align and AlignMaps plugins: select using V, then \anum (AlignMaps comes with Align). One advantage of \anum is that it also handles decimal points (commas) and scientific notation.
I think the best thing to do is to first eat all multiple spaces with
:{range}s/ \+/ /g
And then call Tabularize
:Tab / /r1
Or change that r to l.