I'm new to thread, so i've been trying with this for hours (i'm using XE4),
i have a simple thread
type
TSendThread = class(TThread)
private
public
procedure proc(const s : string);
protected
procedure Execute; override;
end;
procedure TSendThread.proc(const S: String);
begin
showmessage(s);
end;
Now, in my main form, i want to call that "proc" with :
procedure TForm1.Button1Click(Sender: TObject);
var
t : TSendThread;
begin
t := TSendThread.create(true);
t.Synchronize(nil, t.proc('foo'));
end;
But whenever i try t compile that i get :
There is no overloaded version of 'Synchronize' that can be called
with these arguments
that does not make sense (to me) because when i remove the "S" parameter from "proc" it works fine.
Look at the various declarations of TThread.Synchronize(). You are trying to call the version that takes a TThreadMethod as input. TThreadMethod is parameter-less:
TThreadMethod = procedure of object;
That is why passing just t.Proc works but passing t.Proc('foo') does not.
With that said, you are completely misusing TThread.Synchronize(). You don't need to create a TThread object in order to use the static version of Synchronize(). And if you do create a TThread object, make it actually do something, like this:
type
TSendThread = class(TThread)
public
fStr: String;
procedure DoProc;
procedure Proc(const S: string);
protected
procedure Execute; override;
end;
procedure TSendThread.Execute;
begin
Proc('foo');
end;
procedure TSendThread.Proc(const S: string);
begin
fStr := S;
Synchronize(DoProc);
end;
procedure TSendThread.DoProc;
begin
ShowMessage(fStr);
end;
procedure TForm1.Button1Click(Sender: TObject);
var
t : TSendThread;
begin
t := TSendThread.Create(False);
t.WaitFor;
t.Free;
end;
However, because you are using XE4, Synchronize() also supports anonymous procedures as well, which would eliminate your TSendThread class completely in this example, eg:
procedure TForm1.Button1Click(Sender: TObject);
begin
TThread.Synchronize(nil,
procedure
begin
ShowMessage('foo');
end
);
end;
Update: given new info about what you REALLY want to do with your thread, you need to go about it like this instead:
type
TSendThread = class(TThread)
private
fURL, fMethod, fParam: string;
protected
procedure Execute; override;
public
constructor Create(aURL, aMethod, aParam: string);
end;
constructor TSendThread.Create(aURL, aMethod, aParam: string);
begin
inherited Create(False);
fURL := aUrl;
fMethod := aMethod;
fParam := aParam;
end;
procedure TSendThread.Execute;
begin
// use fURL, fMethod, and fParam as needed...
end;
procedure TForm1.Button1Click(Sender: TObject);
var
t : TSendThread;
begin
t := TSendThread.Create('url', 'method', 'param');
...
end;
Or like this:
type
TSendThread = class(TThread)
private
fURL, fMethod, fParam: string;
procedure GetValues;
protected
procedure Execute; override;
end;
procedure TSendThread.GetValues;
begin
fURL := ...;
fMethod := ...;
fParam := ...;
end;
procedure TSendThread.Execute;
begin
Synchronize(GetValues);
// use fURL, fMethod, and fParam as needed...
end;
procedure TForm1.Button1Click(Sender: TObject);
var
t : TSendThread;
begin
t := TSendThread.Create(False);
...
end;
Synchronize only takes a parameterless procedure, as I'm sure you've figured out. That means you have to use properties you get from the main thread in order to do certain things with it. For instance, my thread object is named monitor:
Synchronize(UpdateCaption); // as called in the thread code.
procedure monitor.UpdateCaption;
// synchronize procedure for monitor thread - updates memo on form.
begin
With Form1.CommandText.Lines do
Add(TextString);
end;
Alternatively, you pass messages to the main thread, but this is a quick in a pinch way to do it.
Another approach could be to write a wrapper function which takes no arguments, and call this parameterless method in Synchronize().
Related
I'm using Delphi XE6.
I have a thread where I pass a ID and would like to get back a string created by the thread. I looked at all examples, but they all getting values back when thread is running I just need it OnTerminate.
Calling the thread from a form:
StringReturnedFromThread := PrintThread.Create(MacId);
PrintThread = class(TThread)
private
MyReturnStr, PrinterMacId : String;
public
constructor Create(MacId: String); reintroduce;
procedure OnThreadTerminate(Sender: TObject);
protected
procedure Execute; override;
end;
constructor PrintThread.Create(MacId: String);
begin
inherited Create(False);
OnTerminate := OnThreadTerminate;
FreeOnTerminate := True;
PrinterMacId := MacId;
end;
procedure PrintThread.Execute;
begin
PrepareConnection;
MyReturnStr:= RequestPrintJobs(PrinterMacId);
end;
procedure PrintThread.OnThreadTerminate(Sender: TObject);
begin
end;
Thanks for any help.
You need to intercept thread termination. One way is to use TThread.OnTerminate event/callback.
Below a sample code.
Thread unit:
unit Processes;
interface
uses
System.Classes;
type
TProcess = class(TThread)
private
FReturnStr: string;
FMacId: string;
protected
procedure Execute; override;
public
property MacId: string read FMacId write FMacId;
property ReturnStr: string read FReturnStr write FReturnStr;
constructor Create;
end;
implementation
constructor TProcess.Create;
begin
inherited Create(True);
FreeOnTerminate := True;
end;
procedure TProcess.Execute;
begin
// Some hard calculation here
FReturnStr := FMacId + 'BLA';
end;
end.
Thread usage:
uses Processes;
procedure TForm1.Button1Click(Sender: TObject);
var P: TProcess;
begin
// Create the thread
P := TProcess.Create;
// Initialize it
P.MacId := 'MID123';
// Callback handler
P.OnTerminate := OnProcessTerminate;
// Let's go
P.Start;
end;
procedure TForm1.OnProcessTerminate(Sender: TObject);
var P: TProcess;
begin
// The thread has been terminated
P := TProcess(Sender);
ShowMessage(P.ReturnStr);
end;
The thread will return MID123BLA on it's termination.
Hi I'm doing a code MessageDlgPos running five threads at the same time, the code is this:
type
TMyThread = class(TThread)
protected
procedure Execute; override;
public
text: string;
property ReturnValue;
end;
procedure TMyThread.Execute;
begin
if Terminated then
Exit;
MessageDlgPos(text, mtInformation, [mbOk], 0, 100, 200);
end;
procedure TForm1.btnTestClick(Sender: TObject);
var
LThread: TMyThread;
i: Integer;
begin
For i := 1 to 5 do
begin
LThread := TMyThread(Sender);
try
LThread.text := 'hi';
LThread.FreeOnTerminate := True;
except
LThread.Free;
raise;
end;
LThread.Resume;
end;
end;
The problem is that Delphi XE always returns the following error and does not execute anything:
First chance exception at $ 7524B727. Exception class EAccessViolation with message 'Access violation at address 00D0B9AB. Write of address 8CC38309 '. Process tester.exe (6300)
How do I fix this problem?
As David Heffernan pointed out, MessageDlgPos() cannot safely be called outside of the main UI thread, and you are not managing the thread correctly. Your code needs to look more like this instead:
type
TMyThread = class(TThread)
protected
procedure Execute; override;
public
text: string;
property ReturnValue;
end;
procedure TMyThread.Execute;
begin
// no need to check Terminated here, TThread already
// does that before calling Execute()...
TThread.Synchronize(nil,
procedure
begin
MessageDlgPos(text, mtInformation, [mbOk], 0, 100, 200);
end
);
end;
procedure TForm1.btnTestClick(Sender: TObject);
var
LThread: TMyThread;
i: Integer;
begin
For i := 1 to 5 do
begin
LThread := TMyThread.Create(True);
LThread.text := 'hi';
LThread.FreeOnTerminate := True;
LThread.Start;
end;
end;
I would suggest a slightly different variation:
type
TMyThread = class(TThread)
private
fText: string;
protected
procedure Execute; override;
public
constructor Create(const aText: string); reintroduce;
property ReturnValue;
end;
constructor TMyThread.Create(const aText: string);
begin
inherited Create(False);
FreeOnTerminate := True;
fText := aText;
end;
procedure TMyThread.Execute;
begin
// no need to check Terminated here, TThread already
// does that before calling Execute()...
TThread.Synchronize(nil,
procedure
begin
MessageDlgPos(fText, mtInformation, [mbOk], 0, 100, 200);
end
);
end;
procedure TForm1.btnTestClick(Sender: TObject);
var
i: Integer;
begin
For i := 1 to 5 do
begin
TMyThread.Create('hi');
end;
end;
But either way, if you don't like using TThread.Synchronize() to delegate to the main thread (thus only displaying 1 dialog at a time) then you cannot use MessageDlgPos() at all, since it is only safe to call in the main UI thread. You can use Windows.MessageBox() instead, which can be safely called in a worker thread without delegation (but then you lose the ability to specify its screen position, unless you access its HWND directly by using a thread-local hook via SetWindowsHookEx() to intercept the dialog's creation and discover its HWND):
procedure TMyThread.Execute;
begin
Windows.MessageBox(0, PChar(fText), PChar(Application.Title), MB_OK or MB_ICONINFORMATION);
);
end;
There are many problems. The biggest one is here:
LThread := TMyThread(Sender);
Sender is a button. Casting to a thread is simply wrong and the cause of your exception. Casting a button to a thread doesn't make it so. It's still a button.
You likely mean to create a thread instead.
LThread := TMyThread.Create(True);
You cannot show VCL UI outside the main thread. The call to MessageDlgPos breaks that rule. If you do need to show UI at that point, you'll need to use TThread.Synchronize to have the code execute in the main thread.
Your exception handler makes no sense to me. I think you should remove it.
Resume is deprecated. Use Start instead.
I am designing a thread pool with following features.
New thread should be spawned only when all other threads are running.
Maximum number of thread should be configurable.
When a thread is waiting, it should be able to handle new requests.
Each IO operation should call a callback on completion
Thread should have a way to manage request its serving and IO callbacks
Here is the code:
unit ThreadUtilities;
interface
uses
Windows, SysUtils, Classes;
type
EThreadStackFinalized = class(Exception);
TSimpleThread = class;
// Thread Safe Pointer Queue
TThreadQueue = class
private
FFinalized: Boolean;
FIOQueue: THandle;
public
constructor Create;
destructor Destroy; override;
procedure Finalize;
procedure Push(Data: Pointer);
function Pop(var Data: Pointer): Boolean;
property Finalized: Boolean read FFinalized;
end;
TThreadExecuteEvent = procedure (Thread: TThread) of object;
TSimpleThread = class(TThread)
private
FExecuteEvent: TThreadExecuteEvent;
protected
procedure Execute(); override;
public
constructor Create(CreateSuspended: Boolean; ExecuteEvent: TThreadExecuteEvent; AFreeOnTerminate: Boolean);
end;
TThreadPoolEvent = procedure (Data: Pointer; AThread: TThread) of Object;
TThreadPool = class(TObject)
private
FThreads: TList;
fis32MaxThreadCount : Integer;
FThreadQueue: TThreadQueue;
FHandlePoolEvent: TThreadPoolEvent;
procedure DoHandleThreadExecute(Thread: TThread);
procedure SetMaxThreadCount(const pis32MaxThreadCount : Integer);
function GetMaxThreadCount : Integer;
public
constructor Create( HandlePoolEvent: TThreadPoolEvent; MaxThreads: Integer = 1); virtual;
destructor Destroy; override;
procedure Add(const Data: Pointer);
property MaxThreadCount : Integer read GetMaxThreadCount write SetMaxThreadCount;
end;
implementation
constructor TThreadQueue.Create;
begin
//-- Create IO Completion Queue
FIOQueue := CreateIOCompletionPort(INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, 0, 0, 0);
FFinalized := False;
end;
destructor TThreadQueue.Destroy;
begin
//-- Destroy Completion Queue
if (FIOQueue = 0) then
CloseHandle(FIOQueue);
inherited;
end;
procedure TThreadQueue.Finalize;
begin
//-- Post a finialize pointer on to the queue
PostQueuedCompletionStatus(FIOQueue, 0, 0, Pointer($FFFFFFFF));
FFinalized := True;
end;
function TThreadQueue.Pop(var Data: Pointer): Boolean;
var
A: Cardinal;
OL: POverLapped;
begin
Result := True;
if (not FFinalized) then
//-- Remove/Pop the first pointer from the queue or wait
GetQueuedCompletionStatus(FIOQueue, A, Cardinal(Data), OL, INFINITE);
//-- Check if we have finalized the queue for completion
if FFinalized or (OL = Pointer($FFFFFFFF)) then begin
Data := nil;
Result := False;
Finalize;
end;
end;
procedure TThreadQueue.Push(Data: Pointer);
begin
if FFinalized then
Raise EThreadStackFinalized.Create('Stack is finalized');
//-- Add/Push a pointer on to the end of the queue
PostQueuedCompletionStatus(FIOQueue, 0, Cardinal(Data), nil);
end;
{ TSimpleThread }
constructor TSimpleThread.Create(CreateSuspended: Boolean;
ExecuteEvent: TThreadExecuteEvent; AFreeOnTerminate: Boolean);
begin
FreeOnTerminate := AFreeOnTerminate;
FExecuteEvent := ExecuteEvent;
inherited Create(CreateSuspended);
end;
Changed the code as suggested by J... also added critical sections but the problem i am facing now is that when i am trying call multiple task only one thread is being used, Lets say if i added 5 threads in the pool then only one thread is being used which is thread 1. Please check my client code as well in the below section.
procedure TSimpleThread.Execute;
begin
// if Assigned(FExecuteEvent) then
// FExecuteEvent(Self);
while not self.Terminated do begin
try
// FGoEvent.WaitFor(INFINITE);
// FGoEvent.ResetEvent;
EnterCriticalSection(csCriticalSection);
if self.Terminated then break;
if Assigned(FExecuteEvent) then
FExecuteEvent(Self);
finally
LeaveCriticalSection(csCriticalSection);
// HandleException;
end;
end;
end;
In the Add method, how can I check if there is any thread which is not busy, if it is not busy then reuse it else create a new thread and add it in ThreadPool list?
{ TThreadPool }
procedure TThreadPool.Add(const Data: Pointer);
begin
FThreadQueue.Push(Data);
// if FThreads.Count < MaxThreadCount then
// begin
// FThreads.Add(TSimpleThread.Create(False, DoHandleThreadExecute, False));
// end;
end;
constructor TThreadPool.Create(HandlePoolEvent: TThreadPoolEvent;
MaxThreads: Integer);
begin
FHandlePoolEvent := HandlePoolEvent;
FThreadQueue := TThreadQueue.Create;
FThreads := TList.Create;
FThreads.Add(TSimpleThread.Create(False, DoHandleThreadExecute, False));
end;
destructor TThreadPool.Destroy;
var
t: Integer;
begin
FThreadQueue.Finalize;
for t := 0 to FThreads.Count-1 do
TThread(FThreads[t]).Terminate;
while (FThreads.Count = 0) do begin
TThread(FThreads[0]).WaitFor;
TThread(FThreads[0]).Free;
FThreads.Delete(0);
end;
FThreadQueue.Free;
FThreads.Free;
inherited;
end;
procedure TThreadPool.DoHandleThreadExecute(Thread: TThread);
var
Data: Pointer;
begin
while FThreadQueue.Pop(Data) and (not TSimpleThread(Thread).Terminated) do begin
try
FHandlePoolEvent(Data, Thread);
except
end;
end;
end;
function TThreadPool.GetMaxThreadCount: Integer;
begin
Result := fis32MaxThreadCount;
end;
procedure TThreadPool.SetMaxThreadCount(const pis32MaxThreadCount: Integer);
begin
fis32MaxThreadCount := pis32MaxThreadCount;
end;
end.
Client Code :
This the client i created to log the data in text file :
unit ThreadClient;
interface
uses Windows, SysUtils, Classes, ThreadUtilities;
type
PLogRequest = ^TLogRequest;
TLogRequest = record
LogText: String;
end;
TThreadFileLog = class(TObject)
private
FFileName: String;
FThreadPool: TThreadPool;
procedure HandleLogRequest(Data: Pointer; AThread: TThread);
public
constructor Create(const FileName: string);
destructor Destroy; override;
procedure Log(const LogText: string);
procedure SetMaxThreadCount(const pis32MaxThreadCnt : Integer);
end;
implementation
(* Simple reuse of a logtofile function for example *)
procedure LogToFile(const FileName, LogString: String);
var
F: TextFile;
begin
AssignFile(F, FileName);
if not FileExists(FileName) then
Rewrite(F)
else
Append(F);
try
Writeln(F, DateTimeToStr(Now) + ': ' + LogString);
finally
CloseFile(F);
end;
end;
constructor TThreadFileLog.Create(const FileName: string);
begin
FFileName := FileName;
//-- Pool of one thread to handle queue of logs
FThreadPool := TThreadPool.Create(HandleLogRequest, 5);
end;
destructor TThreadFileLog.Destroy;
begin
FThreadPool.Free;
inherited;
end;
procedure TThreadFileLog.HandleLogRequest(Data: Pointer; AThread: TThread);
var
Request: PLogRequest;
los32Idx : Integer;
begin
Request := Data;
try
for los32Idx := 0 to 100 do
begin
LogToFile(FFileName, IntToStr( AThread.ThreadID) + Request^.LogText);
end;
finally
Dispose(Request);
end;
end;
procedure TThreadFileLog.Log(const LogText: string);
var
Request: PLogRequest;
begin
New(Request);
Request^.LogText := LogText;
FThreadPool.Add(Request);
end;
procedure TThreadFileLog.SetMaxThreadCount(const pis32MaxThreadCnt: Integer);
begin
FThreadPool.MaxThreadCount := pis32MaxThreadCnt;
end;
end.
This is the form application where i added three buttons, each button click will write some value to the file with thread id and text msg. But the problem is thread id is always same
unit ThreadPool;
interface
uses
Windows, Messages, SysUtils, Variants, Classes, Graphics, Controls, Forms,
Dialogs, StdCtrls, ThreadClient;
type
TForm5 = class(TForm)
Button1: TButton;
Button2: TButton;
Button3: TButton;
Edit1: TEdit;
procedure Button1Click(Sender: TObject);
procedure FormCreate(Sender: TObject);
procedure Button2Click(Sender: TObject);
procedure Button3Click(Sender: TObject);
procedure Edit1Change(Sender: TObject);
private
{ Private declarations }
fiFileLog : TThreadFileLog;
public
{ Public declarations }
end;
var
Form5: TForm5;
implementation
{$R *.dfm}
procedure TForm5.Button1Click(Sender: TObject);
begin
fiFileLog.Log('Button one click');
end;
procedure TForm5.Button2Click(Sender: TObject);
begin
fiFileLog.Log('Button two click');
end;
procedure TForm5.Button3Click(Sender: TObject);
begin
fiFileLog.Log('Button three click');
end;
procedure TForm5.Edit1Change(Sender: TObject);
begin
fiFileLog.SetMaxThreadCount(StrToInt(Edit1.Text));
end;
procedure TForm5.FormCreate(Sender: TObject);
begin
fiFileLog := TThreadFileLog.Create('C:/test123.txt');
end;
end.
First, and probably most strongly advisable, you might consider using a library like OmniThread to implement a threadpool. The hard work is done for you and you will likely end up making a substandard and buggy product with a roll-your-own solution. Unless you have special requirements this is probably the fastest and easiest solution.
That said, if you want to try to do this...
What you might consider is to just make all of the threads in your pool at startup rather than on-demand. If the server is going to busy at any point then it will eventually end up with a pool of MaxThreadCount soon enough anyway.
In any case, if you want to keep a pool of threads alive and available for work then they would need to follow a slightly different model than what you have written.
Consider:
procedure TSimpleThread.Execute;
begin
if Assigned(FExecuteEvent) then
FExecuteEvent(Self);
end;
Here when you run your thread it will execute this callback and then terminate. This doesn't seem to be what you want. What you seem to want is to keep the thread alive but waiting for its next work package. I use a base thread class (for pools) with an execute method that looks something like this (this is somewhat simplified):
procedure TMyCustomThread.Execute;
begin
while not self.Terminated do begin
try
FGoEvent.WaitFor(INFINITE);
FGoEvent.ResetEvent;
if self.Terminated then break;
MainExecute;
except
HandleException;
end;
end;
end;
Here FGoEvent is a TEvent. The implementing class defines what the work package looks like in the abstract MainExecute method, but whatever it is the thread will perform its work and then return to waiting for the FGoEvent to signal that it has new work to do.
In your case, you need to keep track of which threads are waiting and which are working. You will probably want a manager class of some sort to keep track of these thread objects. Assigning something simple like a threadID to each one seems sensible. For each thread, just before launching it, make a record that it is currently busy. At the very end of your work package you can then post a message back to the manager class telling it that the work is done (and that it can flag the thread as available for work).
When you add work to the queue you can first check for available threads to run the work (or create a new one if you wish to follow the model you outlined). If there are threads then launch the task, if there are not then push the work onto the work queue. When worker threads report complete the manager can check the queue for outstanding work. If there is work it can immediately re-deploy the thread. If there isn't work it can flag the thread as available for work (here you might use a second queue for available workers).
A full implementation is too complex to document in a single answer here - this aims just to rough out some general ideas.
I have created this "threadsafe" generic property, that i can use between the main thread and a background Thread. I made it because i was tired of creating Lock-Objects for all my properties and variables.
TLockedProp<MyType> = class
private
FMyProp:MyType;
PropLock:TObject;
procedure SetMyProp(const Value: MyType);
function GetMyProp: MyType;
published
property Value:MyType read GetMyProp write SetMyProp;
public
Constructor Create;
Destructor Destroy;override;
end;
{ TLockedProp<MyType> }
constructor TLockedProp<MyType>.Create;
begin
inherited;
PropLock:=TObject.create
end;
destructor TLockedProp<MyType>.Destroy;
begin
PropLock.Free;
inherited;
end;
function TLockedProp<MyType>.GetMyProp: MyType;
begin
TMonitor.Enter(PropLock);
result := FMyProp;
TMonitor.Exit(PropLock);
end;
procedure TLockedProp<MyType>.SetMyProp(const Value: MyType);
begin
TMonitor.Enter(PropLock);
FMyProp := Value;
TMonitor.Exit(PropLock);
end;
Are there any problems i am overlooking?
This is some code using this property class. Tell me what you think.
TBgThread=class(TThread)
private
FPaused: TLockedProp<boolean>;
FCount:TLockedProp<integer>;
procedure ChangeCount(pPlusMin:integer);
function GetPaused:boolean;
function GetCount:integer;
public
constructor Create;
destructor Destroy;override;
{Toggle Pause}
procedure PausePlay;
protected
procedure Execute;override;
published
Property Paused:boolean read GetPaused;
Property Count:integer read GetCount;
end;
constructor TBgThread.Create();
begin
inherited Create(true);;
FPaused:=TLockedProp<boolean>.create;
FPaused.Value:=false;
FCount:=TLockedProp<integer>.create;
FCount.Value:=0;
end;
destructor TBgThread.Destroy;
begin
FPaused.Free;
FCount.free;
inherited;
end;
procedure TBgThread.Execute;
begin
inherited;
Repeat
if not Paused then begin
Try
//do something
finally
ChangeCount(+1);
end;
end else
Sleep(90);
Until Terminated;
end;
function TBgThread.GetCount: integer;
begin
Result:=FCount.Value;
end;
procedure TBgThread.ChangeCount(pPlusMin: integer);
begin
FCount.Value:=FCount.Value+pPlusMin;
end;
function TBgThread.GetPaused: boolean;
begin
result := FPaused.Value;
end;
procedure TBgThread.PausePlay;
begin
FPaused.Value:=not FPaused.Value;
end;
Your code is fine and will serialize read/write access to the property. The only comment that I would make is that you do not need to create a separate lock object. You can remove PropLock and lock on Self instead.
I have an almost identical class in my code base. The only differences are:
I use a critical section rather than TMonitor because I still don't trust TMonitor. The early versions had a number of bugs and that dented my confidence. However, I suspect that the TMonitor code is most likely correct by now. So I see no reason for you to change.
I use try/finally with the code that locks and unlocks. This is perhaps a little pessimistic on my part, because it's hard to see how you could usefully recover from exceptions in the getter and setter methods. Force of habit I suppose.
FWIW, my version of your class looks like this:
type
TThreadsafe<T> = class
private
FLock: TCriticalSection;
FValue: T;
function GetValue: T;
procedure SetValue(const NewValue: T);
public
constructor Create;
destructor Destroy; override;
property Value: T read GetValue write SetValue;
end;
{ TThreadsafe<T> }
constructor TThreadsafe<T>.Create;
begin
inherited;
FLock := TCriticalSection.Create;
end;
destructor TThreadsafe<T>.Destroy;
begin
FLock.Free;
inherited;
end;
function TThreadsafe<T>.GetValue: T;
begin
FLock.Acquire;
Try
Result := FValue;
Finally
FLock.Release;
End;
end;
procedure TThreadsafe<T>.SetValue(const NewValue: T);
begin
FLock.Acquire;
Try
FValue := NewValue;
Finally
FLock.Release;
End;
end;
I guess there's really just one way to write this class!
i use this component for processing drag and drop files
http://melander.dk/delphi/dragdrop
unit DragThread;
interface
uses
Classes,DragDrop, DropTarget,DragDropFile,Dialogs,SysUtils;
type
TDragThread = class(TThread)
private
{ Private declarations }
ArraysLength : Integer;
DragComponent : TDropFileTarget;
DragArray,HashsArray : Array of string;
Procedure FDArray;
//Procedure FDHArray;
protected
procedure Execute; override;
Public
Constructor Create(Com: TDropFileTarget);
Destructor Destroy; Override;
end;
implementation
{ TDragThread }
Constructor TDragThread.Create(Com: TDropFileTarget);
begin
inherited Create(True);
DragComponent := Com;
end;
Destructor TDragThread.Destroy;
begin
//DragComponent.Free;
end;
Procedure TDragThread.FDArray;
var
A : Integer;
begin
SetLength(DragArray,DragComponent.Files.Count);
SetLength(HashsArray,DragComponent.Files.Count);
ShowMessage(IntToStr(DragComponent.Files.Count)); // just working in the first time !!
for A := 0 to DragComponent.Files.Count -1 do begin
DragArray[A] := DragComponent.Files[A];
//ShowMessage(DragComponent.Files[A]);
end;
ArraysLength := DragComponent.Files.Count-1;
//ShowMessage(DragComponent.Files[0]);
end;
procedure TDragThread.Execute;
begin
{ Place thread code here }
FDArray;
end;
end.
the strange thing that the Drop process working just one time then the DragComponent.Files.Count gives 0 for ever .!!
that's how i call it
procedure TForm1.DropFileDrop(Sender: TObject; ShiftState: TShiftState;
APoint: TPoint; var Effect: Integer);
var
DropThread : TDragThread;
begin
DropThread := TDragThread.Create(DropFile);
DropThread.Resume;
end;
i want to know why this happened and thanks in advance :) .
Don't operate VCL components from other threads.
There's no guarantee that the component's drop-event information will continue to be valid once the drop event has completed.
Copy all the information you need out of the component when you construct the thread (i.e., fully populate DragArray) and then use that cached data when executing the thread. Don't store a reference in DragComponent or you might be tempted to use it from the thread's Execute method, which you really shouldn't do.