I'm very new to LINUX working with node.js. Its just my 2nd day. I use node-curl for curl request. In the link below I have found example with Get request. Can anybody provide me a Post request example using node-curl.
https://github.com/jiangmiao/node-curl/blob/master/examples/low-level.js
You need to use setopt in order to specify POST options for a cURL request. The options you should start looking at first are CURLOPT_POST and CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS. From the libcurl documentation linked from node-curl:
CURLOPT_POST
A parameter set to 1 tells the library to do a regular HTTP post. This will also make the library use a "Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded" header. (This is by far the most commonly used POST method).
Use one of CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS or CURLOPT_COPYPOSTFIELDS options to specify what data to post and CURLOPT_POSTFIELDSIZE or CURLOPT_POSTFIELDSIZE_LARGE to set the data size.
Optionally, you can provide data to POST using the CURLOPT_READFUNCTION and CURLOPT_READDATA options but then you must make sure to not set CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS to anything but NULL. When providing data with a callback, you must transmit it using chunked transfer-encoding or you must set the size of the data with the CURLOPT_POSTFIELDSIZE or CURLOPT_POSTFIELDSIZE_LARGE option. To enable chunked encoding, you simply pass in the appropriate Transfer-Encoding header, see the post-callback.c example.
CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS
... [this] should be the full data to post in a HTTP POST operation. You must make sure that the data is formatted the way you want the server to receive it. libcurl will not convert or encode it for you. Most web servers will assume this data to be url-encoded.
This POST is a normal application/x-www-form-urlencoded kind (and libcurl will set that Content-Type by default when this option is used), which is the most commonly used one by HTML forms. See also the CURLOPT_POST. Using CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS implies CURLOPT_POST.
If you want to do a zero-byte POST, you need to set CURLOPT_POSTFIELDSIZE explicitly to zero, as simply setting CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS to NULL or "" just effectively disables the sending of the specified string. libcurl will instead assume that you'll send the POST data using the read callback!
With that information, you should be able add the following options to the low-level example to have it make a POST request:
var fieldsStr = '{}';
curl.setopt('CURLOPT_POST', 1); // true?
curl.setopt('CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS', fieldsStr);
You will need to tweak the contents of fieldsStr to match the format the server is expecting. Per the documentation you may also need to url-encode the data - which should be as simple as using encodeURIComponent according to this post.
Related
I am trying to implement an authentication system and I've run into some problems and after a lot of troubleshooting I've come to realise that I don't fully understand the difference between theese three:
res.cookie(name, value, [options])
and
res.setHeader('Set-Cookie')
and
Cookies.set(name, value, [options]) //js-cookie npm package
I'm assuming that res.cookie (and res.setHeader) are coming from express.
Documentation for res.cookie states (just underneath the property table) that
All res.cookie() does is set the HTTP Set-Cookie header with the options provided. Any option not specified defaults to the value stated in RFC 6265.
So, res.cookie is just a wrapper around res.setHeader to make the code clearer: you can pass options as an object, instead of manually constructing a header value.
Both of those are called on a res (a.k.a response) object, so it's a serverside tool to tell the client "please put that into cookies".
As for the last one, Cookies.set, that is intended to be run on the client instead. Internally, it just sets the document.cookie propery.
So, if we build a tl;dr table of all mentioned cookie setting options, here they are:
function
side
needs manual formatting
res.cookie
server
no
res.setHeader
server
yes
Cookies.set
client
no
document.cookie =
client
yes
I am new to the whole backend stuff I understood that both bodyparser and express.json() will parse the incoming request(body from the client) into the request object.
But what happens if I do not parse the incoming request from the client ?
without middleware parsing your requests, your req.body will not be populated. You will then need to manually go research on the req variable and find out how to get the values you want.
Your bodyParser acts as an interpreter, transforming http request, in to an easily accessible format base on your needs.
You may read more on HTTP request here ( You can even write your own http server )
https://nodejs.org/api/http.html#http_class_http_incomingmessage
You will just lose the data, and request.body field will be empty.
Though the data is still sent to you, so it is transferred to the server, but you have not processed it so you won't have access to the data.
You can parse it yourself, by the way. The request is a Readable stream, so you can listen data and end events to collect and then parse the data.
You shall receive what you asked for in scenarios where you do not convert the data you get the raw data that looks somewhat like this username=scott&password=secret&website=stackabuse.com, Now this ain't that bad but you will manually have to filter out which is params, what is a query and inside of those 2 where is the data..
unless it is a project requirement all that heavy lifting is taken care of by express and you get a nicely formatted object looking like this
{
username: 'scott',
password: 'secret',
website: 'stackabuse.com'
}
For Situation where you DO need to use the raw data express gives you a convenient way of accessing that as well all you need to do is use this line of code
express.raw( [options] ) along with express.json( [options] )
I'm trying to make a request with Content-Type x-www-form-urlencoded that works perfectly in postman but does not work in Azure Logic App I receive a Bad Request response for missing parameters, like I'd not send enything.
I'm using the Http action.
The body value is param1=value1¶m2=value2, but I tried other formats.
HTTP Method: POST
URI : https://xxx/oauth2/token
In Headers section, add the below content-type:
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
And in the Body, add:
grant_type=xxx&client_id=xxx&resource=xxx&client_secret=xxx
Try out the below solution . Its working for me .
concat(
'grant_type=',encodeUriComponent('authorization_code'),
'&client_id=',encodeUriComponent('xxx'),
'&client_secret=',encodeUriComponent('xxx'),
'&redirect_uri=',encodeUriComponent('xxx'),
'&scope=',encodeUriComponent('xxx'),
'&code=',encodeUriComponent(triggerOutputs()['relativePathParameters']['code'])).
Here code is dynamic parameter coming from the previous flow's query parameter.
NOTE : **Do not forget to specify in header as Content-Type ->>>> application/x-www-form-urlencoded**
Answering this one, as I needed to make a call like this myself, today.
As Assaf mentions above, the request indeed has to be urlEncoded and a lot of times you want to compose the actual message payload.
Also, make sure to add the Content-Type header in the HTTP action with value application/x-www-form-urlencoded
therefore, you can use the following code to combine variables that get urlEncoded:
concat('token=', **encodeUriComponent**(body('ApplicationToken')?['value']),'&user=', **encodeUriComponent**(body('UserToken')?['value']),'&title=Stock+Order+Status+Changed&message=to+do')
When using the concat function (in composing), the curly braces are not needed.
First of all the body needs to be:
{ param1=value1¶m2=value2 }
(i.e. surround with {})
That said, value1 and value2 should be url encoded. If they are a simple string (e..g a_b) then this would be find as is but if it is for exmaple https://a.b it should be converted to https%3A%2F%2Fa.b
The easiest way I found to do this is to use https://www.urlencoder.org/ to convert it. convert each param separately and put the converted value instead of the original one.
Here is the screenshot from the solution that works for me, I hope it will be helpful. This is example with Microsoft Graph API but will work with any other scenario:
I'm accessing GMail via IMAP using OAuth2 authentication and Zend_Mail_Protocol_Imap.
It all works great.
What I need to do is present emails in thread form just like the GMail interface. Google make this really easy because they have an X-GM-THRID header that links a conversation with a 64-bit unsigned integer.
My problem is: when presented with a single email, how do I find out what X-GM-THRID it belongs to?
First off Google says that there is a server extension X-GM-EXT-1 which is active. You can check it is there using the CAPABILITY command (and I have).
All the information suggests that if this is active then the X-GM-THRID will simply be returned as a header, but it isn't.
Perhaps I need to ask Google to return it via the fetch command. Google does describe a simple fetch process here:
https://developers.google.com/google-apps/gmail/imap_extensions
My code is sending TAG5 FETCH 3673 (FLAGS RFC822.HEADER X-GM-THRID) but the headers do not include an entry for X-GM-THRID.
I've even simplified it to TAG6 FETCH 3673 (X-GM-THRID) to be exactly as described in the google example. In this case no headers are returned.
I'm not massively familiar with IMAP commands and I'm not sure if Zend_Mail_Protocol_Imap is abstracting some handling which means this header is being removed.
But I do know that this is driving me mad.
Am I missing something? Is it not a header?
Okay, so it looks like it is not a header. It is an attribute in the IMAP command and response.
The standard fetch command sent by Zend_Mail_Protocol_Imap is "TAG5 FETCH 3673 (FLAGS RFC822.HEADER)"
The code that handles the response only expects to be dealing with 'FLAGS' and 'RFC822.HEADER'. It passes this information to a Zend_Mail_Message object which extends Zend_Mail_Part.
Zend_Mail_Part parses information about flag. It also parses the header.
The additional 'X-GM-THRID' attribute that I added does actually get a response. but since it is not passed back to Zend_Mail_Message there is no way for me to use it. It gets lost in the ether (at around line 171 of Zend_Mail_Storage_Imap in my Zend Library to be exact).
So I've hacked the core... Zend_Mail_Storage_Imap::getMessage now expects $data['X-GM-THRID'] and passes it to the constructor Zend_Mail_Part. And I now have a method Zend_Mail_Part::getXGmThrid which solves all my problems. I'll obviously refactor them into my own classes extending Zend_Mail_Storage_Imap and Zend_Mail_Part in the not too distant... but for now I know this works.
I am currently working on a project based on varnish..
we write vcl and vmod. But the project needs to check the request body.
How can I get the post request body in VCL or vmod with a C function?
You can do almost everything you want with VCL/VMOD.
You should try to call a VMOD subroutine in vcl_recv, and then in C code, write something like below :
Use VRT_GetHdr(rec->s, HDR_REQ, "\017Content-Length:"); to read the body length
Use HTC_Read(rec->s->htc, body, bodylen);
And enjoy !
You should take a look at existing vmods https://www.varnish-cache.org/vmods, and be free to look into the varnish API sources.
I'm not sure you can.
Varnish generally only deals with Req/Resp headers.
The bodies are passed along without (much) modification.
I you do find a solution please let me know as I'm interested in this as well.