The problem I faced has been solved here:
Loading shared library in open-mpi/ mpi-run
I know not how, setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH or specifying -x LD_LIBRARY_PATH fixes the problem, when my installation itself specifies the necessary -L arguments. My installation is in ~/mpi/
I have also included my compile-link configs.
$ mpic++ -showme:version
mpic++: Open MPI 1.6.3 (Language: C++)
$ mpic++ -showme
g++ -I/home/vigneshwaren/mpi/include -pthread -L/home/vigneshwaren/mpi/lib
-lmpi_cxx -lmpi -ldl -lm -Wl,--export-dynamic -lrt -lnsl -lutil -lm -ldl
$ mpic++ -showme:libdirs
/home/vigneshwaren/mpi/lib
$ mpic++ -showme:libs
mpi_cxx mpi dl m rt nsl util m dl % Notice mpi_cxx here %
When I compiled with mpic++ <file> and ran with mpirun a.out I got a (shared library) linker error
error while loading shared libraries: libmpi_cxx.so.1:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
The error has been fixed by setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH. The question is how and why? What am i missing? Why is LD_LIBRARY_PATH required when my installation looks just fine.
libdl, libm, librt, libnsl and libutil are all essential system-wide libraries and they come as part of the very basic OS installation. libmpi and libmpi_cxx are part of the Open MPI installation and in your case are located in a non-standard location that must be explicitly included in the linker search path LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
It is possible to modify the configuration of the Open MPI compiler wrappers and make them pass the -rpath option to the linker. -rpath takes a library path and appends its to a list, stored inside the executable file, which tells the runtime link editor (a.k.a. the dynamic linker) where to search for libraries before it consults the LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable. For example, in your case the following option would suffice:
-Wl,-rpath,/home/vigneshwaren/mpi/lib
This would embed the path to the Open MPI libraries inside the executable and it would not matter if that path is part of LD_LIBRARY_PATH at run time or not.
To make the corresponding wrapper add that option to the list of compiler flags, you would have to modify the mpiXX-wrapper-data.txt file (where XX is cc, c++, CC, f90, etc.), located in mpi/share/openmpi/. For example, to make mpicc pass the option, you would have to modify /home/vigneshwaren/mpi/share/openmpi/mpicc-wrapper-data.txt and add the following to the line that starts with linker_flags=:
linker_flags= ... -Wl,-rpath,${prefix}/lib
${prefix} is automatically expanded by the wrapper to the current Open MPI installation path.
In my case, I just simply appends
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/PATH_TO_openmpi-version/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
For example
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/openmpi-1.8.1/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
into $HOME/.bashrc file and then source it to active again source $HOME/.bashrc.
I installed mpich 3.2 using the following command on Ubuntu.
sudo apt-get install mpich
When I tried to run the mpi process using mpiexec, I got the same error.
/home/node1/examples/.libs/lt-cpi: error while loading shared libraries: libmpi.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Configuring LD_LIBRARY_PATH didn't fix my problem.
I did a search for the file 'libmpi.so.0' on my machine but couldn't find it. Took me some time to figure out that 'libmpi.so.0' file is named as 'libmpi.so' on my machine. So I renamed it to 'libmpi.so.0'.
It solved my problem!
If you are having the same problem and you installed the library through apt-get, then do the following.
The file 'libmpi.so' should be in the location '/usr/lib/'. Rename the file to 'libmpi.so.0'
mv /usr/lib/libmpi.so /usr/lib/libmpi.so.0
After that MPI jobs should run without any problem.
If 'libmpi.so' is not found in '/usr/lib', you can get its location using the following command.
whereis libmpi.so
first, run this command
$ sudo apt-get install libcr-dev
if still have this problem then configure LD_LIBRARY_PATH like this:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/mpich-3.2.1/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
then add it to ~/.bashrc before this line:
[ -z "$PS1" ] && return
Simply running
$ ldconfig
appears to me as a better way to solve the problem (taken from a comment on this question). In particular, since it avoids misuse of the LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable. See here and here, for why I believe it's misused to solve the problem at hand.
Related
So I got several shared libraries that I am trying to permanently install on my Ubuntu system but I am having some difficulty with it.
I want to install the libraries and the headers in a separate folder under /usr/local/lib and /usr/local/include (for example a folder named agony) so it would be clean and removing them would just require that I delete those folders. so it looks something like this:
/usr/local/lib/agony/libbtiGPIO.so
/usr/local/lib/agony/libbtiDSP.so
...
/usr/local/include/agony/GPIO.h
/usr/local/include/agony/DSP.h
...
And I added a file here /etc/ld.so.conf.d/agony.conf which include a line describing the path to the library folder:
$ cat /etc/ld.so.conf.d/agony.conf
/usr/local/lib/agony
and I perform sudo ldconfig to update the library database.
So to double check if the library is found I do ldconfig -p | grep bti* and
I see the following result:
$ ldconfig -p | grep bti
...
libbtiGPIO.so (libc6,x86-64) => /usr/local/lib/agony/libbtiGPIO.so
libbtiDSP.so (libc6,x86-64) => /usr/local/lib/agony/libbtiDSP.so
...
At this point I should be able to use the libraries without specifying the library path. But When I attempt to compile an application without providing the library path (-L) it fails. However, when I supply gcc with the library path ex:
gcc source.c -L /usr/local/lib/agony output -lbtiGPIO -lbtiDSP
it works!!
I don't want to use LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable because this library is going to be used everywhere on the system and I don't want other compilers to worry about providing LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
What am I doing wrong here?
At this point I should be able to use the libraries without specifying the library path
Here lies the confusion.
You have built your shared library libbtiGPIO.so (just sticking with that one),
placed it in /usr/local/lib/agony, and updated the ldconfig database accordingly.
The effect of that is when you run a program that has been linked with libbtiGPIO
then the dynamic linker (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.21.so, or similar) will know where to look
to load that library into the process and you will not need to tell it by setting an LD_LIBRARY_PATH in the environment.
However, you haven't done anything that affects the list of default library
search directories that are hardwired into your build of gcc, that it passes to
the linker (/usr/bin/ld) when you link a program with libbtiGPIO in the first place.
That list of default search directories is what you will find if your do a verbose
build of your program - gcc -v ... - and then pick out the value of LIBRARY_PATH
from the output, e.g.
LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/:\
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/:\
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/../../../../lib/:\
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/:\
/lib/../lib/:\
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/:\
/usr/lib/../lib/:\
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/../../../:\
/lib/:\
/usr/lib
/usr/local/lib/agony is not one of those and to make it one of those you
would have to build gcc from source yourself. Hence, in order to link your
program with libbtiGPIO you still need to tell ld where to find it with
-L/usr/local/lib/agony -lbtiGPIO.
man, you misunderstand the procedure of complier and link.
First, libbtiGPIO.so is a shared link library not a static link library. it is important to know those difference .
Then you need to know something else. changing ld.so.conf.d/*.conf and run sudo ldconfig, it affects the procedure of link. in other words, if you don't add agony.conf and sudo ldconfig, you will receive a error when you run ./a.out rather than gcc source.c -L ...., the gcc command can run successfully even thougth you don't ldconfig.
Finally,if you don't pollute the LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable, you have to add -L ... options in your gcc command. What'more, if you don't want to input too many words in your shell frequently, you can learn to use Makefile.
I'm trying to compile a program and during the configure checks one library cannot be found. Linking in my .bashrc file to this library with:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/:/users/much/needed/library/:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/path/to/other/libs/
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH
after that I source the .bashrc file with
source ~/.bashrc
and check with echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH to see if the LD_LIBRARY_PATH contains the path to the library I need (and it's there).
However, when I run ./configure again - the same error appears. Do you have any hints as to what might be wrong here? I can't find any problem...
Could you try exporting LDFLAGS="-L/usr/lib/:/users/much/needed/library/" in addition to the LD_LIBRARY_PATH you mentioned?
LD_LIBRARY_PATH tells the loader where to find libraries when executing a binary at runtime, but the linker needs to find the required library at link time too.
Sounds like you need to run ldconfig to create the linker bindings. Add the directory to /etc/ld.so.conf and then run ldconfig (as root).
I'm new in Linux. I have a library in a folder next to my C program source but I don't know how to compile it. I've compiled everything when my library was in the same folder as program code file. However, I do not understand how to use the library from another location?
Use gcc's -L option to specify where your library located, and -l option to specify what your library is.
If you're using 'make' to build your program, just open the Makefile and find out where -L option has used.
For example,
gcc -L ./my_program/my_library -lmylib -o my_executable ./my_program/src/my_program.c
Also, you can use LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable to specify your library path to your program.
Say that you have ready to run your excutable, but the library is not in any standard library path (such as /usr/lib),
then you can run your program by following command.
$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/my_name/my_program/my_library my_executable
I am following the explanation in this page and this page trying to build and use shared libraries on Ubuntu Linux.
I am building the libraries and application using a cross-compiler on my PC, than copying the files to the target system and running there.
Finally, I am at the stage where all symlinks are defined correctly and the I am able to run the application - but not in the required form.
Let's say that I have a shared library libtest.so.1.0 in a directory /home/ysap/libs. I then created the symlinks libtest.so.1 and libtest.so in the same directory, both pointing to the library file.
In the directory /home/ysap/apps I have an application program app.e that uses the test library.
Now, to run the application, I can type:
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/ysap/libs ./app.e
and the application runs nicely. However, I'd like to eliminate the assignment, so I tried typing:
> export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/ysap/libs
> ./app.e
but unfortunately I get an error message, saying:
./app.e: error while loading shared libraries: libtest.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
I also tried typing:
> ldconfig -n /home/ysap/libs
and
> sudo ldconfig -n /home/ysap/libs
but it does not help.
What am I doing wrong? How can I make app.e run w/o the variable assignment?
Update 1:
The application uses the mmap() call, so it has to be run with sudo priviledge. The actual invocation line is:
> sudo LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/ysap/libs ./app.e
Is it possible that the export-ed variable is not updated in the sudo environment?
Update 2:
Output of ldd ./app.e:
libtest.so.1 => /home/ysap/libs/libtest.so.1 (0xb6faa000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xb6f85000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/libc.so.6 (0xb6ea4000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.3 (0xb6fb7000)
The sudo problem is as #duskwuff states, but if you want to compile an application, and not need to modify the LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable, when linking the application you can use the $ORIGIN variable, which is recognized by most recent versions of linux.
If all the libraries are in the current directory, then when you link the application, you use the extra option:
-Wl,-R'$ORIGIN'
You need to quote the option to prevent it being expanded by the shell when compiling.
If you're putting it into a Makefile then you use:
-Wl,-R\$$ORIGIN
the $$ is for make to use a $, the \ is to prevent the shell that is invoked from the command line expanding the variable before passing it into the command.
You can use any symbolic path reference, so if you had a structure where binaries were in bin/ and libraries were in lib/, you can use $ORIGIN/../lib.
This works for dlopen as well, so it will find libraries when they are being dynamically loaded at run-time
Loading libraries from a user-specified path is a security risk, so sudo always strips out all LD_ environment variables, including LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
My gcc compiler is at a custom location /my/path/hpgcc
I've downloaded the boost sources. Executed bootstrap.sh, but it fails because it runs with the default gcc.
Looking into it, I see that it fails at the first thing it does: building the Boost.Build engine:
gcc -o bootstrap/jam0 command.c compile.c debug.c expand.c glob.c hash.c hdrmacro.c headers.c jam.c jambase.c jamgram.c lists.c make.c make1.c newstr.c option.c output.c parse.c pathunix.c pathvms.c regexp.c rules.c scan.c search.c subst.c timestamp.c variable.c modules.c strings.c filesys.c builtins.c pwd.c class.c native.c md5.c w32_getreg.c modules/set.c modules/path.c modules/regex.c modules/property-set.c modules/sequence.c modules/order.c execunix.c fileunix.c
(fails because executed with the default gcc, and not my gcc version).
I've tried to change the gcc path in the user-config.jam file, but it doesn't help. Probably because the Boost.Build's build script boost_1_47_0/tools/build/v2/engine/build.sh doesn't use user-config.jam, and just uses the default locations.
Any solution?
Add the line:
using gcc : : /my/path/hpgcc ;
to user-config.jam. user-config.jam will usually be in /path/to/boost/tools/build/v2/, but you can put a custom user-config.jam or site-config.jam in any of the places listed here.
/my/path/hpgcc should be the full path to the g++ executable.
EDIT (Igor Oks) : What eventually solved the problem is that I edited boost_1_47_0/tools/build/v2/engine/build.sh to make it use my custom gcc.
We do this in our build environment by simply defining the PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variables to pickup our desired GCC first.