Hi I need to round up the numbers (last 2 digits, no decimal) based on following conditions:
If from 0 to 64 should be 49
If from 65 – 89 set at 79
If from 90 – 129 set at 99
If from 130 – 164 set at 149
If from 165 – 189 set at 179
If from 190 – 229 set at 199
and so on until 989
Then:
If value is from 989 – 1099 set at 999
If value is from from 1100 – 1249 set at 1199
If value is from from 1250 – 1349 set at 1299
If value is from from 1350 – 1449 set at 1399
and so on until 5000
I would appreciate some info and help how to get a formula to work for this.
Thanks
Harmz
This is not really a rounding problem but more a conversion problem. because there seems to be no pattern to your number groups I don't think it is therefore something you can calculate and therefore you will have to do a lookup.
If you want to do it all in one formula you could use and array inside of a vlookup like the partial example below:
=VLOOKUP(C1,{0,49;65,79;90,99;130,149;165,179},2,TRUE)
Otherwise do it as a normal vlookup. All you need is a two column table table, the first column contains the lower bound of you ranges and the second column contains the value that you want it to be. The important thing is that the vlookup has the final parameter of true, this makes the vlookup find the nearest match.
Related
I cannot find a way to do this, is it possible (with excel functions or VBS)?
For example, these would be the initial values:
Number
Value
101
234
102
324
103
345
104
325
105
437
106
443
107
806
108
476
109
538
110
546
And after taking the three highest numbers, this would be the output:
Number
Value
107
806
110
546
109
538
The data is constantly updating, so that might cause some issues.
You can use FILTER in combination with LARGE function to achieve this:
Columns A and B represent sample data. Cell D2 can contain this formula:
=FILTER($A$2:$B$9,$B$2:$B$9>=LARGE($B$2:$B$9,3))
If data is constantly updating, better to have an Excel Table (I named TB_NumVal), so the range index get automatically updated.
In cell: J2:
=SORT(FILTER(SORT(TB_NumVal,2), (ROW(TB_NumVal[Number])-1)
> ROWS(TB_NumVal[Number])-3),2,-1)
Here is the output:
Explanation
We sort the data, then since we start on row 2 (row 1 is the header) we substract 1. So
ROW(TB_NumVal[Number])-1
will provide the row number starting from one.
ROWS(TB_NumVal[Number])
is the total number of rows, in our case 10.
Using a filter condition like this:
(ROW(TB_NumVal[Number])-1) > ROWS(TB_NumVal[Number])-3)
ensures only the last three row will be selected, then finally sorted the filtered result by value in descending order to match the result of the screenshot of the question.
Here is my problem. I want to use =SLOPE formula with a cell range that refers to another sheet with criteria: Date period between Oct-21 until Apr-22, the known_ys = Emiten Name and known_xs = IHSG.
I use this formula:
=SLOPE(IF(AND(Emiten!B:B>=Risk!$A$2;Emiten!B:B<=Risk!$B$2;Emiten!A:A=Risk!D17);Emiten!D:D);IF(AND(Indeks!B:B>=Risk!$A$2;Indeks!B:B<=Risk!$B$2;Indeks!A:A=Risk!$D$2);Indeks!D:D))
But it shows the result #VALUE!, can anyone please tell me where's the problem?
Thanks
AND only ever returns a single value. To simulate 'and' conditions within array constructions, use nested IF statements.
Also, you should not be using entire column references for such a construction, since it will be forced to process several million rows unnecessarily.
Try:
=SLOPE(IF(Emiten!B1:B10>=Risk!A2,IF(Emiten!B1:B10<=Risk!B2,IF(Emiten!A1:A10=Risk!D17,Emiten!D1:D10))),IF(Indeks!B1:B10>=Risk!A2,IF(Indeks!B1:B10<=Risk!B2,IF(Indeks!A1:A10=Risk!D2,Indeks!D1:D10))))
adjusting the last row referenced (10 here) to a suitably low, though sufficient, upper bound.
Also, I take it you are aware that the SLOPE function will only consider rows for which both the known_ys and the known_xs are numeric? For example, assuming that the above resolved to:
known_ys
known_xs
14
FALSE
53
FALSE
FALSE
27
FALSE
FALSE
16
63
58
90
FALSE
FALSE
3
FALSE
80
85
25
40
then SLOPE would ignore everything apart from the the 5th, 6th, 9th and 10th pairs, effectively calculating over the following reduced array:
known_ys
known_xs
16
63
58
90
80
85
25
40
I have 2 massive columns filled with studentids
Column 1(SID) has 110,000 rows
Column 2(SID2) has 100,000 rows
How do I make a check of column 1 = column 2 or vice versa and then finally place it all in one field!
Current Results
SID SID2
45 45
142 142
237 218
238 441
410 410
440 442
452 237
452
Final Expected output
SID SID2 Check
45 45
142 142
237 218
238 441 238,441
410 410
440 442 440
452 237
452
238,441,440
As you can see, all the ids that dont match should be placed in one field so I can easily spot them rathen than looking though 100,000 rows
Looks like SolarMike answered assuming that the test is A2=B2, but I think you're asking if A2=[Anything in Column B] and if B2=[Anything in Column A]. Here's how I'd test that:
Column C:
=IFERROR(IF(MATCH(A2,B:B,0)>1,"",A2),A2)
Column D:
=IFERROR(IF(MATCH(B2,A:A,0)>1,"",B2),B2)
Column E (very crude, but effective):
=IF(AND(C2="",D2=""),"",CONCATENATE(C2,",",D2,","))
Now, your real problem is getting it all into one single cell. The only way I know how to do this is to use Concatenate, but it requires you to select EACH CELL individually.
=CONCATENATE(E2,E3,E4,E5,E6,E7,E8,E9,E10)
For 10000 rows, that doesn't seem feasible. Also, that output isn't very flexible, but I digress.
If you want to concatenate everything together in one cell, you have two options.
A) Use the VBA code here (it's pretty simple, this seems like a viable option): Concatenate Excel Ranges with VBA
B) Hope that you have Office 365 with TEXTJOIN() See Support article here.
You could use match() with iferror() and if():
=IF(IFERROR(MATCH(A1,B1,)>0,0),"ok",A1)
see:
To get both fields back use:
=IF(IFERROR(MATCH(A1,B1,)>0,0),"ok",A1)&" , "&IF(IFERROR(MATCH(A1,B1,)>0,0),"ok",B1)
I am trying to count the number of values within a cell, in Excel. So far I have found plenty of ways to count the number of characters, regardless of whether they're a space, number, or letter. However, I would like to count the number of values in a list or a cell, like so:
Let's say in cell A1 I have the following sequence of values:
38 39 101 102 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125
I would like for the cell to return 16, indicating that there are sixteen values in the cell.
Is there an easy way to do this with Excel?
If you have a known delimiter (what breaks up the values) and you don't have to test your data for whether it's a value or non-value then...
=LEN(A1)-LEN(SUBSTITUTE(A1,"[Your delimiter here]",""))+1
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/187667
I have a fair bit of data I am trying to make smaller. My data is arranged in minutes following an event with associated sugar readings (see below):
469 13.3
471
474 13.5
479 14.1
484 14.3
489 14.3
494 14
499 13.9
504 14.2
509 13.9
514 13.7
519 13.4
524 13.5
529 13.8
534 14.1
539 14.3
544 14.1
549 13.8
554 13.2
559 12.9
564 12.9
569 12.8
574 12.4
579 12.1
584 11.9
589 11.7
594 11.7
599 11.8
604 11.7
The minute readings go up to ~4500. I was wondering if there is a way to find the average of the sugar readings based on time criteria - e.g. find the sugar average for every 20 minute group. I also have time data as well if this helps (e.g. 10/12/2013 13:53)?
Thanks for your help!
Alternatively is there a way to add in numbers between the minute values with blank spaces between the sugar values - that is:
Instead of this:
469 13.3
471
474 13.5
479 14.1
484 14.3
It would be this:
469 13.3
470
471
472
473
474 13.5
475
476
477
478
479 14.1
480
481
482
483
484 14.3
Thanks again
I don't understand the first part exactly, but in general, you can use Excel's AVERAGE function:
=AVERAGE(A1:A10)
=AVERAGE(A:A)
The first one will output the average of the values between A1 and A10 (inclusive), the second one will output the average of all values in the A column.
In the second part of your question, you ask to "expand" the time values with the measurement values. This is best done in a second sheet. Let's name the sheet with the data you have Data.
In the second sheet, write 469 in A1, 470 in A2 and then you can drag it down to the final measurement time.
Then, in B1 (of the second sheet we just started working on), add the following:
=IF(ISNA(VLOOKUP(A1, Data!$A$1:$B$200, 2, FALSE)), "", VLOOKUP(A1, Data!$A$1:$B$200, 2, FALSE))
Drag it down all the way to the last measurement time. You might have to change the two references to $B$200 to something higher, like $B$500 or whatever the highest row number is in the original Data spreadsheet.
This will add the measurement value for the corresponding time from the Data sheet, or it will just be an empty cell if there is no such value (e.g. no value for time 472).
Some explanations to that formula (skip if not interested). The heart of the formula is the following:
VLOOKUP(A1, Data!$A$1:$B$200, 2, FALSE))
VLOOKUP searches for a value at another place and then returns that row. In this case, we want to find the value A1 in Data!$A$1:$B$200, which is Excel's way of writing "the table A1 to B200 in the sheet Data". The $ signs guarantee that the values will not be changed as we drag the formula down, since Excel will automatically update regular cell references such as A1 in the formula.
So this will search for A1 in that area of Data and it will return a row. 2 specifies what cell's value we want to use, which is the measurement time right next to the value we just searched for (e.g. we found 564 in Data but we want to get the corresponding value next to it, i.e. 12.9).
VLOOKUP is a little dangerous in that it uses approximate values by default, which the last FALSE parameter prevents. To quote from microsoft.com [Source]:
If an exact match is not found, the next largest value that is less than lookup_value is returned.
And we really don't want that in this case. (It beats me why this is the default behavior, to be honest.)
VLOOKUP with no approximate search returns #N/A for values it can't find, and we don't want that all over our spreadsheet. This is why we test the function first:
=IF(ISNA(VLOOKUP(...)), "", VLOOKUP(...))
In other words, if VLOOKUP returns #N/A, let's just write nothing (""); otherwise, let's write what VLOOKUP returns to us.