Here is my problem. I want to use =SLOPE formula with a cell range that refers to another sheet with criteria: Date period between Oct-21 until Apr-22, the known_ys = Emiten Name and known_xs = IHSG.
I use this formula:
=SLOPE(IF(AND(Emiten!B:B>=Risk!$A$2;Emiten!B:B<=Risk!$B$2;Emiten!A:A=Risk!D17);Emiten!D:D);IF(AND(Indeks!B:B>=Risk!$A$2;Indeks!B:B<=Risk!$B$2;Indeks!A:A=Risk!$D$2);Indeks!D:D))
But it shows the result #VALUE!, can anyone please tell me where's the problem?
Thanks
AND only ever returns a single value. To simulate 'and' conditions within array constructions, use nested IF statements.
Also, you should not be using entire column references for such a construction, since it will be forced to process several million rows unnecessarily.
Try:
=SLOPE(IF(Emiten!B1:B10>=Risk!A2,IF(Emiten!B1:B10<=Risk!B2,IF(Emiten!A1:A10=Risk!D17,Emiten!D1:D10))),IF(Indeks!B1:B10>=Risk!A2,IF(Indeks!B1:B10<=Risk!B2,IF(Indeks!A1:A10=Risk!D2,Indeks!D1:D10))))
adjusting the last row referenced (10 here) to a suitably low, though sufficient, upper bound.
Also, I take it you are aware that the SLOPE function will only consider rows for which both the known_ys and the known_xs are numeric? For example, assuming that the above resolved to:
known_ys
known_xs
14
FALSE
53
FALSE
FALSE
27
FALSE
FALSE
16
63
58
90
FALSE
FALSE
3
FALSE
80
85
25
40
then SLOPE would ignore everything apart from the the 5th, 6th, 9th and 10th pairs, effectively calculating over the following reduced array:
known_ys
known_xs
16
63
58
90
80
85
25
40
Related
I have a few hundred rows of data, and each has a number between 1 and 200, and I'd like to put them in categories of 1-5 depending on where that number is.
The categories look like this:
Zones Min Max
1 0 35
2 35 60
3 60 85
4 85 110
5 110 200
I want to assign it a Zone if it is greater than the Min, but less than the Max.
I have 2 formulas I've been working with to solve it. One is a nested IF AND statement:
=IF(A1<=35,1,IF(AND(A1<=60,A1>35),2,IF(AND(A1<=85,A1>60),3,IF(AND(A1<=110,A1>85),4,IF(AND(A1<=200,A1>110),2,"TOO BIG")))))
The 2nd formula attempts to use a SUMPRODUCT function:
=INDEX($C$2:$C$6,SUMPRODUCT(--(A1<=$E$2:$E$6),-- (A1>$D2:$D$6),ROW($2:$6)))
Rather than have to continue to adjust the numeric values manually, I set them as absolutes, which is why this formula is slightly different. The E column is the Max value set, and the D is the Min value set.
Any help would be appreciated!
Use this:
=MATCH(A1,{0,35,60,85,110})
Another way is to use VLOOKUP and you just need to set the min number:
=VLOOKUP(D2,$A$2:$B$6,2,1)
The key is the 4th parameter needs to set to 1 which means TRUE. It will find the closest value and return the zone for you.
But noticed that you have overlaps like 35 or 60 etc. that you will need to adjust your value column.
I am using excel and I have a table of numbers with 6 columns from A to F and more than 1000 rows. For example, from my table,
4 17 37 38 47 53
8 43 54 55 56 60
4 18 21 25 38 57
15 25 37 38 58 59
4 16 19 20 27 43
18 32 47 50 54 56
i want to find if there is at least a row (it must be a row!) that contains the numbers 16 19 20 27. From this example, there is a match, but i don't know how to make a search or formula using four diferent numbers.
I feel like I need to use the match function but can't quite figure it out and I'm not sure about it. Does anyone know how to do this?
Thanks!
This should work:
=IF(AND(OR(A1=16,B1=16,C1=16,D1=16,E1=16,F1=16),OR(A1=19,B1=19,C1=19,D1=19,E1=19,F1=19),OR(A1=20,B1=20,C1=20,D1=20,E1=20,F1=20),OR(A1=27,B1=27,C1=27,D1=27,E1=27,F1=27)),"Yes","No")
Put it in a new column in the table. It will return a Yes if the row contains all 4 values, and a No otherwise. You can then filter the new column of Yes/No to search for a row with Yes
I put the four values you are seeking in I1:L1 and the array of data to be searched in A1:F#. Then in column G create a helper column that concatenates A:F into a delimited string. The formula in G1 is:
=":"&A1&":"&B1&":"&C1&":"&D1&":"&E1&":"&F1&":"
where I've used ":" for the delimiter (you can use any char that's not in your data).
The result in G1 is:
:4:17:37:38:47:53:
Now in H1 use this formula to search:
=NOT(ISERR(FIND(":"&$I$1&":",G1)*FIND(":"&$J$1&":",G1)*FIND(":"&$K$1&":",G1)*FIND(":"&$L$1&":",G1)))
Each FIND will return an INT if the value (with leading and trailing delimiters) is found and #VALUE! otherwise. So the product will be an INT if all values are found and #VALUE! otherwise. Wrapping the FINDs inside an ISERR makes the result prettier (TRUE/FALSE instead of #VALUE!), and inverting with NOT returns TRUE when all 4 values are found and FALSE otherwise.
Hope that helps.
Here's another way --- more elegant (no helper column). As before, I put the four values you are seeking in I1:L1 and the array of data to be searched in A1:F#. Then in column G use this ARRAY formula (CTRL-SHIFT-ENTER):
=NOT(OR(PRODUCT(A1:F1-$I$1)<>0,PRODUCT(A1:F1-$J$1)<>0,PRODUCT(A1:F1-$K$1)<>0,PRODUCT(A1:F1-$L$1)<>0))
Each PRODUCT term checks for the existence of one value and returns 0 when the value is found and a non-zero value otherwise. The results of each of the four PRODUCT terms is tested with <>0 which will return TRUE if a value is not found. Then OR with return TRUE if one or more values are not found and FALSE if all are found. That result is wrapped in a NOT so that the function result is TRUE when all four values are found.
I am looking for a formula that will return the earliest date from a column, based on the contents of values in other cells. (Actually I want a Min and Max date, but am assuming the Max will be identical to any Min solution )I know I can return the date I want just by using MIN and specifying the range of cells I want, but I ideally want the formula to be dynamic. I have looked around and believe I possibly need to use a combination of index and match, but cant find any examples that use Min and Max. I have considered using dynamic named ranges to define my task groups, but that would mean having to define a static number of task groups, and there could be many task groups.
The sheet below shos some sample date on the left of the workbook, with the summary data on the right. The "hidden worker column" was an idea I had that I though might make the solution easier. So I want the summary data on the right to use either column A, or column B if its easier, to display the min and max dates based on the section number in column F - Is this possible without VBA?
#mthierer's link is good. If you wanted to remove the need to add a "helper column", you could try (data in A1:C10; summary table in E1:G2):
{=MIN(IF(ROUNDDOWN($A$1:$A$10, 0)=$E1, $B$1:$B$10))} (or {=MAX(...)} with $C$1:$C$10)
Note that you have to enter the formula as an array formula with CtrlShiftEnter.
Data (A1:C10):
1 23 57
1.1 42 91
1.2 35 100
1.3 39 80
1.4 28 51
1.5 30 96
2 33 52
2.1 11 73
2.2 48 80
2.3 16 59
Summary Results (E1:G2):
1 23 100
2 11 80
I have an Excel (2007) spreadsheet which consists of several rows with the first few something like this:
CL DH HL SP FR CB TQ TT
37 33 27 27 26 25 31 26
25 26 33 32 28 25 26 25
21 28 26 31 26 28 26 28
They need to appear in this order since the first row also functions as headings for the columns.
What I need is to find the maximum number in each row, and to then return the column heading, i.e. for the data here the max in the first row is 37 so it returns CL, then HL and SP and so on.
Using the LOOKUP function in vector form requires the lookup row to be sorted (which isn't possible here since the order of each row is different and they all use the same headings), so I can't use that. Using HLOOKUP does not need data to be sorted but requires that the lookup row is the first row of an array, which again isn't practical here since I need the headings at the top.
Basically, what I think I need is a lookup-type function which uses vectors rather than a single array but does not require sorted data. Is this possible?
You can try index/match and large:
=INDEX($A$1:$H$1, 1, MATCH(LARGE(A2:H2,1), A2:H2, 0))
LARGE picks the greatest number, which is used by the exact match, and returned to INDEX to get the header.
EDIT: As tigeravatar rightfully pointed out, you can use MAX instead of LARGE:
=INDEX($A$1:$H$1, 1, MATCH(MAX(A2:H2), A2:H2, 0))
I'm using Excel 2013 and I have had to create a If statement which basically chooses a student's grade depending on a certain mark number (obviously, nesting is needed) Here is the If statement I created:
=IF(E2<=20,"N",
IF(OR(E2>=21,E2<=25),4,
IF(OR(E2>=26,E2<=32),"5C",
IF(OR(E2>=33,E2<=38),"5B",
IF(OR(E2>=39, E2<=44), "5A",
IF(OR(E2>=45, E2<=53), "6C",
IF(OR(E2>=54, E2<=61), "6B",
IF(OR(E2>=62, E2<=71), "6A",
IF(OR(E2>=72, E2<=87), "7C",
IF(OR(E2>=88, E2<=103), "7B",
IF(OR(E2>=104, E2<=120), "7A")))))))))))
The error I receive is:
the specified formula cannot be entered because it uses more levels of nesting than allowed in the current file format
My question is, how do I shorten this statement to allow Excel to use it?
Place the logic in the spreadsheet cells. One column for the minimum score, and one column for the grade-:
A B
1 0 N
2 21 4
3 26 5C
4 33 5B
5 39 5A
6 45 6C
7 54 6B
8 72 7C
9 88 7B
10 104 7A
Then do a vlookup to get the grade from the actual score. vlookup will find the highest value in the A column that is less that the lookup value of 38.
In the example vlookup below 38 is the score, A1:B10 is the lookup table 2 is the 2nd column (in this case the B column) that contains the result (the grade).
=VLOOKUP(38, A1:B3, 2, TRUE)
You can also use the following formula.
=LOOKUP(E2;{0;21;26;33;39;45;54;62;72;88;104;121};{"N";4;"5C";"5B";"5A";"6C";"6B";"6A";"7C";"7B";"7C";"No match"})
There are a few different solutions. AND agreements using OR instead of the first that comes to mind.
=IF(E2<=20,"N",
IF(AND(E2>=21,E2<=25),4,
IF(AND(E2>=26,E2<=32),"5C", ...
The best way, in my opinion, is to write a UDF. Then you can use VBA and a CASE statement.
Experiment with this code in VBA to create a UDF named GRADE() - just type it into a MODULE in the VBE:
Function Grade(Marks)
Dim Score As Integer
Score = Marks * 1
Select Case Score
Case 1 To 20
Grade = "N"
Case 21 To 50
Grade = "C"
Case 51 To 90
Grade = "B"
Case 91 To 120
Grade = "A"
End Select
End Function
Then use the Function GRADE() as you would any other function but type the address of the argument - like this GRADE(B7) to use it
=+IF(O3="Negative","Negative",IF(P3="Negative","Negative",IF(Q3="Negative","Negative",IF(R3="Negative","Negative",IF(O3="Refer","Refer",IF(P3="Refer","Refer",IF(Q3="Refer","Refer",IF(R3="Refer","Refer","Positive"))))))))
I find the final status in 4 cells have positive,negative,refer,pending or blank