I have an application which use to write contacts using ContactList.commit(). I am using this app on 2 different mobiles, one is Nokia X2-02 and other Samsung DUOS E2252.
When I use this code in Samsung DUOS, it goes inside if statement that means it supports these fields of Contact.TEL and Contact.ATTR_MOBILE, and probably also executes c.addString(...) statement. But when committing using c.commit() it throws PIMException and simply ignores the whole contact, while using the same application in Nokia phone it works fine. I wonder if Samsung doesn't supports ATTR_MOBILE field, it should simply ignore that filed but instead of that it throws exception and ignores the whole contact. What I want to do is simply ignore that particular field if it doesn't add that or whatever rather than ignoring the contact. My code for this portion is below
if (clist.isSupportedField(Contact.TEL)) {
if ((clist.isSupportedAttribute(Contact.TEL, Contact.ATTR_HOME)) && (contact.getPhoneHome() != null)) {
c.addString(Contact.TEL, Contact.ATTR_HOME, contact.getPhoneHome());
}
if ((clist.isSupportedAttribute(Contact.TEL, Contact.ATTR_PAGER)) && (contact.getPager() != null)) {
c.addString(Contact.TEL, Contact.ATTR_PAGER, contact.getPager());
}
if ((clist.isSupportedAttribute(Contact.TEL, Contact.ATTR_MOBILE)) && (contact.getPhoneMobile() != null)) {
c.addString(Contact.TEL, Contact.ATTR_MOBILE, contact.getPhoneMobile());
}
} c.commit();
Related
I need to attach custom data into new fields added to INTranCost when the PO Receipt occurs.
Following the breadcrumbs, it seems that POReceiptEntry -> Release Action eventually calls INDocumentRelease.ReleaseDoc that eventually creates INTranCost. I tried extending both POReceiptEntry and INDocumentRelease to add an event for INTranCost_RowInserted to publish a PXTrace message, but the trace doesn't appear, telling me that I'm not hitting the event that I expected. (Which explains why the real business logic I need included didn't fire.)
protected virtual void _(Events.RowInserted<INTranCost> e)
{
PXTrace.WriteInformation("This is it!");
}
Of course, I want to put real code in this spot, but I am just trying to make sure I'm hitting the event properly. This works on pretty much everything else I've done, including attaching similar data to INTranExt fields. I cannot get it to work for INTranCost so that I can add to INTranCostExt. At this point, I can't determine if it is location (which graph extension) or a special methodology required for this special case.
I also tried overriding events and putting a breakpoint on the code, but it's like I'm not even on the same process. (Yes, I checked that I am connected to the right Acumatica instance and that I have no errors.)
What event in which graph is required to capture the creation in INTranCost for a PO Receipt to update custom fields in INTranCostExt?
Using Request Profiler, I was able to determine that I was close but not deep enough. While the INTranCost object to insert was built in INDocumentRelease FILE, the actual insert was processed in INReleaseProcess graph in that same file.
I only need to execute this "push" from the data captured on the POLine when the INTranCost record is created, and LineNbr is a key field and therefore never updated after it is set. I need to be sure that I have enough data to make the connection back, and the primary key links me back to the INTran easily. That subsequently gets back to the POReceiptLine to the POLine where the data is maintained that needs the "current value" to be captured when the transaction is posted. Since I need to update the DAC Extension, I need to use an event that will allow an existing DAC.Update to apply my values. Therefore, I added an event handler on INTranCost_LineNbr_FieldUpdated since that value should not be "updated" after it is set initially.
Code that accomplished the task:
public class INReleaseProcess_Extension : PXGraphExtension<INReleaseProcess>
{
public override void Initialize()
{
base.Initialize();
}
protected virtual void _(Events.FieldUpdated<INTranCost.lineNbr> e)
{
INTranCost row = (INTranCost) e.Row;
INTran tran = PXSelect<INTran,
Where<INTran.docType, Equal<Required<INTran.docType>>,
And<INTran.refNbr, Equal<Required<INTran.refNbr>>,
And<INTran.lineNbr, Equal<Required<INTran.lineNbr>>
>>>>
.SelectSingleBound(Base, null, row.DocType, row.RefNbr, (int?) e.NewValue);
if (tran?.POReceiptType != null && tran?.POReceiptNbr != null)
{
PXResultset<POReceiptLine> Results = PXSelectJoin<POReceiptLine,
InnerJoin<POLine, On<POLine.orderType, Equal<POReceiptLine.pOType>,
And<POLine.orderNbr, Equal<POReceiptLine.pONbr>,
And<POLine.lineNbr, Equal<POReceiptLine.pOLineNbr>>>>,
InnerJoin<POOrder, On<POOrder.orderType, Equal<POLine.orderType>,
And<POOrder.orderNbr, Equal<POLine.orderNbr>>>>>,
Where<POReceiptLine.receiptType, Equal<Required<POReceiptLine.receiptType>>,
And<POReceiptLine.receiptNbr, Equal<Required<POReceiptLine.receiptNbr>>,
And<POReceiptLine.lineNbr, Equal<Required<POReceiptLine.lineNbr>>>>>>.
SelectSingleBound(Base, null, tran.POReceiptType, tran.POReceiptNbr, tran.POReceiptLineNbr);
if (Results != null)
{
foreach (PXResult<POReceiptLine, POLine, POOrder> result in Results)
{
POReceiptLine receipt = result;
POLine line = result;
POOrder order = result;
POLineExt pOLineExt = PXCache<POLine>.GetExtension<POLineExt>(line);
INTranCostExt iNTranCostExt = PXCache<INTranCost>.GetExtension<INTranCostExt>(row);
if (pOLineExt != null && iNTranCostExt != null)
{
Base.Caches[typeof(INTranCost)].SetValueExt<INTranCostExt.usrField>(row, pOLineExt.UsrField);
}
}
}
}
}
}
I am working on microservices in .Net Core with the domain driven design. The infrastructure layer has EF Core DbContext to access the database and in my repositories, I have async methods to retrieve data.
Because Include/ThenInclude does not support filtering (at least not up to Ef Core 2.1), I have tried all the possible approaches I found when googling on how to replace Include. I watched the Pluralsight videos about Ef Core too and when I saw the Explicit Loading option I was really happy due to its ability to filter related objects, but when I rewrote one of the methods into Explicit version, the query that ran for a couple of milliseconds went up to a couple of minutes!
In my entity configurations I set up all the navigations and foreign keys, but I am not sure whether explicit loading requires any additional setup or not? Before recommending to use global filters, please note that the Where clause is usually longer, so the below example is just a shortened version of the actual filtering!
This is how my methods look like (TransferService serves as the aggregate, TransferServiceDetail and any other classes are just entities within the TransferService domain):
public async Task<IEnumerable<TransferService>> GetAllAsync(
TransferServiceFilter transferServiceFilter)
{
int? pageIndex = null;
int? itemsPerPage = null;
IEnumerable<TransferService> filteredList = DBContext.TransferServices.Where(
ts => !ts.IsDeleted); //This one itself is quick.
//This is just our filtering, it does not affect performance.
if (transferServiceFilter != null)
{
pageIndex = transferServiceFilter.PageIndex;
itemsPerPage = transferServiceFilter.ItemsPerPage;
filteredList = filteredList.Where(f =>
(transferServiceFilter.TransferSupplierId == null ||
f.TransferSupplierId == transferServiceFilter.TransferSupplierId) &&
(transferServiceFilter.TransferDestinationId == null ||
f.TransferDestinationId == transferServiceFilter.TransferDestinationId) &&
(transferServiceFilter.TransferSupplierId == null ||
f.TransferSupplierId == transferServiceFilter.TransferSupplierId) &&
(string.IsNullOrEmpty(transferServiceFilter.TransportHubRef) ||
f.NormalizeReference(f.TransportHubRef) ==
f.NormalizeReference(transferServiceFilter.TransportHubRef)));
}
//This is just for paging and again, this is quick.
return await FilterList(filteredList.AsQueryable(), pageIndex, itemsPerPage);
}
public async Task<IEnumerable<TransferService>> GetAllWithServiceDetailsAsync(
TransferServiceFilter transferServiceFilter)
{
IEnumerable<TransferService> returnList = await GetAllAsync(
transferServiceFilter);
//This might be the problem as I need to iterate through my TransferServices
//to be able to load all TransferServiceDetails that belong to each individual
//Service.
foreach (TransferService service in returnList)
{
await DBContext.Entry<TransferService>(service)
.Collection(ts => ts.TransferServiceDetails.Where(
tsd => !tsd.IsDeleted)).LoadAsync();
}
return returnList;
}
In my repository I have other methods as well, similarly referring to a previous GetAllXY... method (TransferServiceDetails have Rates, Rates have Periods, etc...).
My idea was to simply call GetAllAsync when I only need TransferService data (and alone this method is lightning quick), or call GetAllWithServiceDetailsAsync when I also need the Details of the selected Services, etc, but the lower I go in this parent-child hierarchy, the slower the execution becomes and I am talking about minutes, not just a couple of extra milliseconds, or in worst case seconds.
So my question again: is there any additional setting that I might have missed from the entity configurations that explicit loading requires, or simply my queries are incorrect? Or maybe explicit loading is only good when there is only one TransferService as a parent instead of a list of TransferServices (50-100 in my case) and also there are only just a few children related entities (in my case I usually have 5-10 Details, each Detail has 2-3 Rates, each Rate has exactly 1 Period, etc...)?
I guess your filtering can't be converted to SQL Where and all filtering happens client-side (EF loads ALL TransferServices entities into memory, filters in-memory and drops mismatched).
I may check this by enabling detailed (debug) logging - EF will dump SQLs into log.
After you confirm, your should make improvements:
First, put ifs out of Where. Instead of:
filteredList = filteredList.Where(f => transferServiceFilter.TransferSupplierId == null ||
f.TransferSupplierId == transferServiceFilter.TransferSupplierId)
use
if (transferServiceFilter.TransferSupplierId != null)
{
filteredList = filteredList.Where(f => f.TransferSupplierId == transferServiceFilter.TransferSupplierId)
}
Second, you should re-think NormalizeReference. This can't be executed server-side, because SQL server doesn't know about this implementation. You should pre-normalize TransportHubRef, save it in DB (say, NormalizedTransportHubRef) and use Where with simple equality.
(Also, don't forget about indexes).
I have an MVC 5.2 application that takes advantage of ASP.Identity and the enhanced role services. All users are assigned a role that is prefixed as such: Corporate for internal users (e.g. "CorporateAdmin") and Client for external users (e.g. "ClientAdmin").
I have content that I want only to display in the view to external clients only that are authenticated. I have tried a variety of formats of the following:
#if (Request.IsAuthenticated && !Roles.GetRolesForUser().Contains("Corporate"))
{
*Content to be displayed*
}
The error message returned is "CS0201: Only assignment, call, increment, decrement, await, and new object expressions can be used as a statement.
I have also tried:
#if (Request.IsAuthenticated && Roles.GetRolesForUser().Contains("Corporate") == false)
{
*Content to be displayed*
}
and
#if (Request.IsAuthenticated && User.IsInRole("CorporateAdmin") == false)
{
*Content to be displayed*
}
all receiving the same error.
Any direction would be greatly appreciated.
I think, this errors means that GetRolesForUser returns an array of strings, not a list of strings. An array has not Contains method.
Try:
#if (Context.User.IsInRole("Corporate"))
{
"Content to be displayed"
}
I have implemented List.cshtml to provide a custom display for an image gallery. This is the first time I have tried to override a Projection with a Template and at first it seemed to work fine. Then I noticed that when I try to access the Projection on the backend Orchard 1.7 falls over with:
RuntimeBinderException 'Orchard.ContentManagement.ContentItem' does
not contain a definition for 'TagsPart'
Here is some code from the template List.cshtml:
List<TagRecord> uniqueTags = new List<TagRecord>();
List<dynamic> items = Model.Items;
if (items != null && items.Any())
{
foreach (var item in items)
{
if (item != null && item.ContentItem != null)
{
TagsPart part = item.ContentItem.TagsPart;
if (part != null && part.CurrentTags != null)
{
foreach (var t in part.CurrentTags)
{
if (!uniqueTags.Contains(t))
{
uniqueTags.Add(t);
}
}
}
}
}
I am ignorant on a couple of points, which I suspect may be causing the error:
How to specify a template for a Projection (more specific than 'List.cshtml'). Can I use Placement.info? How?
How should I test for the presence of a specific part in the ContentItem? Just assigning TagsPart part = item.ContentItem.TagsPart; throws the exception above.
UPDATE: I had implemented this as a Module; that is, the List.cshtml was in the Views folder of a simple Module. If I move List.cshtml to the Theme then the problem goes away. However, I would still prefer to use a module so that the layout is independent of the theme.
Orchard 1.7 includes a new query layout provider called 'Shape'. I simply used this provider, gave it a Shape Type of 'LightboxIsotope', and created a view called 'LightboxIsotope.cshtml'.
In a projection you can customize the html rendered for each property on the List. In order to acomplish this you need to go to your query, and add a new Layout, choose the properties you need, and set everything you want.
If the layouts provided in the Queries Module don´t fullfill your requirements, you can allways create your own layout provider, this blog post shows an example:
http://www.stevetaylor.me.uk/image-carousel-using-twitter-bootstrap-and-orchard-cms-projections
I have already added 5 cammands in a form and I want to add a sixth but It does not display the sixth?
I am posting my codes below.
public Command getOk_Lastjourney() {
if (Ok_Lastjourney == null) {
// write pre-init user code here
Ok_Lastjourney = new Command("Last Journey", Command.OK, 0);
// write post-init user code here
}
return Ok_Lastjourney;
}
public Form getFrm_planjourney() {
if (frm_planjourney == null) {
// write pre-init user code here
frm_planjourney = new Form("Plan journey", new Item[] { getTxt_From(), getTxt_To(), getCg_usertype(), getCg_userpref(), getCg_searchalgo() });
frm_planjourney.addCommand(getExt_planjourney());
frm_planjourney.addCommand(getOk_planjourney());
frm_planjourney.addCommand(getOk_planFare());
frm_planjourney.addCommand(getOk_planDistance());
frm_planjourney.addCommand(getOk_planTime());
frm_planjourney.addCommand(getOk_planRoute());
frm_planjourney.setCommandListener(this);
// write post-init user code here
System.out.println("Appending.....");
System.out.println("Append completed...");
System.out.println(frm_planjourney.size());
frm_planjourney.setItemStateListener(this);
}
return frm_planjourney;
}
Given System.out.println I assume you were debugging with emulator, right? in that case it would be really helpful to provide a screen shot showing how exactly does not display the sixth looks like.
Most likely you just got too many commands to fit to area allocated so that some of them are not shown until scrolled. There is also a chance that sixth command was reassigned to some other soft-button and you didn't notice that. Or there's something else - hard to tell with details you provided.
A general note - handling six actions with commands might be not the best choice in MIDP UI. For stuff like that, consider using lcdui List API instead. IMPLICIT kind of lists allow for more reliable and user friendly design than commands.