I used the steps explained in this page: http://nodejs.org/api/addons.html and successfully created a addon.node file using the node-gyp tool. it works fine and it's a wrapper of a c++ static library.
Now I want to distribute this, I created the package.json file using:
npm init
and test it using "npm install . -g" but it tries to recompile the module which will be difficult to achieve because it will require the libraries that I'm embedding into the .node file, is it possible to distribute the .node file that I already compiled in my system?
How can I include the compiled .node file into the npm package and upload it to the npm registry. I'm sure I'm just one step to made it, but I dont know where to start.
I read about the dependencies, but seems that it's suited when your module depends on other modules, and not with your own .node file.
Thanks for your help.
ok, I finally did what I wanted to achieve, here're the options in case someone else needs this:
To avoid the compilation you could create a new folder and copy the package.json in there, along with the .node file, I didn't find this, just tried and it worked.
Provide the required libraries to allow the user his own compilation.
Although the first one worked well, I will need to create a package for windows, linux, mac, etc. Which looks very odd to say: "if you are in linux use: npm install xxx-linux", so I decided to adjust my library to allow the user the module compilation.
To do this I created a "client-dev" installer that has the required libraries precompiled, as long as the include headers required, then created the node module to be compiled using the preinstalled libraries and headers. I will need to add a help in my website to explain that, in order to install the module, the user will need to install the dependencies first using apt-get, windows installer, or mac pkg.
Although this works for me, I don't know if that will be maintainable in the long run, but I didn't find a better way to do this. (the only link that finally enlightened my goal was one saying: "if you're going to use node modules with precompiled libraries you will have nightmares", anyway... I prefer that instead of doing a full implementation in node js from scratch and maintain version for java, c#, nodejs, php, etc.
Related
I tried so but I have a 'require is not defined' error. I can't find information about that, can someone enlighten the noob in me please?
It's possible, but you have to be careful. Trying to require() a package means that node will try to locate its files in your file system. A chrome extension only has access to the files you declare in the manifest, not your filesystem.
To get around this, use a module bundler like Webpack, which will generate a single javascript file containing all code for all packages included through require(). You will have to generate a separate module for each component of your chrome extension (e.g. one for the background page, one for content scripts, one for the popup) and declare each generated module in your manifest.
To avoid trying to setup your build system to make using require() possible, I suggest starting with a boilerplate project. You can check out my extension to see how I do it.
An updated answer for 2022
Short answer: yes, you can require/import packages. Rather than going through the tedious work of setting up & configuring a bundler like Webpack on your own (especially if you have no experience with them), there are now build tools you can use to create the boilerplate "scaffolding" for a Chrome extension:
Extension CLI -- this one is well-documented and you can also reference the source code of some Chrome extensions that have used this tool (READ: learn how others have set up their code).
Chrome Extension CLI
Benefits of using them:
New projects are initiated with a default project file structure. Super helpful.
They support modern Javascript (ES6, ES2021), so modules work fine.
They already have bundlers integrated and pre-configured (Webpack in both above cases I think). You therefore don't need to install and configure any on your own.
You can use npm as normal to install any packages/dependencies you need.
Then of course, let the official documentation for Chrome Extensions guide you through the rest.
It's not possible to require node modules directly within a chrome extension. However, it is possible to bundle node applications and packages into the browser for use with your extensions. See here for more: Is it possible to develop Google Chrome extensions using node.js?
Yes, It is possible with esm npm packages.
require is commonjs module loader.
Browser doesn't support commonjs modules system
so that this error showed.
Method 1:
Run npm init -y and add "type" :"module" in your package.json.
create path.js file
add this line in path.js
const fullPath = await import.meta.resolve("npm-pkg-name");
const path = fullPath?.match(/(/node_modules.*)/)[0];
console.log(path);
add this line inside package.json
"path": "node --experimental-import-meta-resolve path.js",
Copy console output text. Replace package name with this copied path.
Method 2:
Install other npm package to find and replace
npm packages' virtual path to real path so that chrome browser will find it.
Install Path-fixxer
Add this line in path.js
import setAllPkgPath from "path-fixxer";
setAllPkgPath();
then run command : npm run path.
Now open browser to test it.
Is it possible to install a package via npm and exclude its tests and other files not necessary for using it?
Many packages include a lot of unnecessary files, I've seen some of them even include JPEG images for some testing - I don't want to download that, I just want to use their APIs.
You can't, because npm downloads all the files whether it's required or not. However it is possible to import part of the npm library in your app.
If you want you can delete unused part manually from node_modules folder. But I'll not recommend it.
I tried so but I have a 'require is not defined' error. I can't find information about that, can someone enlighten the noob in me please?
It's possible, but you have to be careful. Trying to require() a package means that node will try to locate its files in your file system. A chrome extension only has access to the files you declare in the manifest, not your filesystem.
To get around this, use a module bundler like Webpack, which will generate a single javascript file containing all code for all packages included through require(). You will have to generate a separate module for each component of your chrome extension (e.g. one for the background page, one for content scripts, one for the popup) and declare each generated module in your manifest.
To avoid trying to setup your build system to make using require() possible, I suggest starting with a boilerplate project. You can check out my extension to see how I do it.
An updated answer for 2022
Short answer: yes, you can require/import packages. Rather than going through the tedious work of setting up & configuring a bundler like Webpack on your own (especially if you have no experience with them), there are now build tools you can use to create the boilerplate "scaffolding" for a Chrome extension:
Extension CLI -- this one is well-documented and you can also reference the source code of some Chrome extensions that have used this tool (READ: learn how others have set up their code).
Chrome Extension CLI
Benefits of using them:
New projects are initiated with a default project file structure. Super helpful.
They support modern Javascript (ES6, ES2021), so modules work fine.
They already have bundlers integrated and pre-configured (Webpack in both above cases I think). You therefore don't need to install and configure any on your own.
You can use npm as normal to install any packages/dependencies you need.
Then of course, let the official documentation for Chrome Extensions guide you through the rest.
It's not possible to require node modules directly within a chrome extension. However, it is possible to bundle node applications and packages into the browser for use with your extensions. See here for more: Is it possible to develop Google Chrome extensions using node.js?
Yes, It is possible with esm npm packages.
require is commonjs module loader.
Browser doesn't support commonjs modules system
so that this error showed.
Method 1:
Run npm init -y and add "type" :"module" in your package.json.
create path.js file
add this line in path.js
const fullPath = await import.meta.resolve("npm-pkg-name");
const path = fullPath?.match(/(/node_modules.*)/)[0];
console.log(path);
add this line inside package.json
"path": "node --experimental-import-meta-resolve path.js",
Copy console output text. Replace package name with this copied path.
Method 2:
Install other npm package to find and replace
npm packages' virtual path to real path so that chrome browser will find it.
Install Path-fixxer
Add this line in path.js
import setAllPkgPath from "path-fixxer";
setAllPkgPath();
then run command : npm run path.
Now open browser to test it.
Always feel stupid asking here because people are always confused with my questions, or I have a dumb problem, but, I'm working on a program in node.js and the text editor I'm using (NP++) doesn't seem to like to save files in the system32 directoy, (The directory where my modules are), and that is where my script is as well. (So I have .../.../node_modules/(modules) and .../.../node_modules/script.js) this becomes a pain when I want to edit the script, I have to clone the script to my desktop, then edit it, then overwrite the one in the node_modules directory. I tried saving the script to my desktop and running it, but it just gives me an error of module not found. (In my script I have the modules as var example = require('example.js')) Is there any way I can get it to get the modules from the node_modules directory, while keeping the script file somewhere easily accessible and editable? (i.e desktop?) (Sorry if this is confusing, not the best at these kind of things)
I'm not 100% sure that this is what's happening because I haven't used npm on Windows, but it sounds to me like you're installing your dependencies globally using npm -g. The more proper way to use Node is to install your dependencies locally, using npm without the -g flag. That way your dependencies get installed in your current working directory.
For example, let's say you've saved your project in a directory on your Desktop, and your script uses require("lodash"). If you cd to your directory and run npm install lodash, then the lodash module will be available to your script.
I would like to download node module packages (listed in a package.json file, in the present working directory) source code to a node_modules subdirectory of the present working directory, without compiling, or installing those modules. Now I have seen the related question download source from npm without npm install xxx but that question dealt with downloading the source code of individual modules specified to NPM directly (i.e., without using a package.json file). The reason why I want to do this is because I am working on developing an Atom package for the Open Build Service (OBS) of openSUSE and this seems like one of the necessary steps I need to go through in order to achieve this.
The source code is not shipped with the npm distributed code. The best you could do is read the package.json and look for the { repository: url { } } key if it exists and if it's a git repo (which most of them will be) clone it.
However be aware that the source code often requires a build step before it can be used, as in an npm prepublish step defined in the source code. In modern Javascript projects a common example of this is transpiling ES6 code to ES5 code for use in NodeJS and the browser.
I have not made an Atom package but I'm fairly certain you don't need to do any of this.