I have added a file (say SomeFile.cs) to a specific folder. I did not commit as I wanted to do commit at once after achieving the functionality. An svn update worked just fine on this until someone changed the folder name and changed the names of files under it.
Now the next day when I did svn checkout, resulted in tree level conflicts, so I copied my newly added files to this "new" location and did as "Resolve using theirs".
The resolve deleted all my local files and replaced with new folder and files. I could not find my local files (which were in my working copy) in my entire computer (includint recycle bin).
Now is there at least an option to retrieve the files which were added ("Add" option) to svn and NOT committed to svn using "Commit"?
Regards
AFAIK, only files committed to svn will be recoverable. But if you merge the conflict with theirs, then it would have overriden the changes locally.
Try to "Update to revision", but as your files were NOT committed it will most likely restore your directory structure in best case scenario.
Generally "Resolve using theirs" option is an equivalent of saying "I screwed up, they are right" -> whatever I have is wrong, and what they have is right -> overwrite my copy.
What you are asking for is pretty much against the workflow of SVN. Things don't get stored in the repository until they are committed, and are thus not "safe". You are supposed to commit often.
If you are trying to work but worried about other people's tree changes getting in your way, consider making a branch.
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.branchmerge.html
However, SVN should never overwrite files in your local working copy that have modifications. If you do an svn update, and someone has added/changed something, you will get a "conflict", which you will have to resolve manually. You resolved these conflicts manually, and accidentally overwrote you work. This is why you should commit often. Anything you commit can be recovered.
Related
I've checked out a copy of the SVN branch (my branch) locally to which I've merged from a different branch (which has a completely different folder structure). So basically there are a lot of deletions (of old files) and additions (of new files).
When I try to commit the merge to the repository (to my branch), Tortoise says
This commit is not recursive, and there are moved/renamed folders selected for commit. Such moves/renames are always performed recursively in the repository. Do you want to commit anyway?
Is it fine to proceed with this commit? If not, what should I do so that there's no problem?
Also, for some files that I've added, I've made changes after adding (if this affects the nature).
Found by Google how to fix it: press F5 in the commit window (not in the "warning popup")
See http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=757&dsMessageId=2831045 for details.
On 26.08.2011 22:39, Ryan J Ollos wrote:
For several months now I've been seeing the following dialog box appear when
initiating Commit. It frequently happens when attempting to commit following
a merge.
The thing I have noticed lately however is that if I Cancel and then
manually refresh the file list (F5), I don't see the message again when
initiating the commit a second time. The commit seems to succeed fine and
with no further problems.
The commit dialog monitors the working copy in a background thread for
change notifications. Such notifications are sent by the OS in case
files are modified/moved/renamed/...
If such a notification is received, the commit dialog first does a few
checks so it can drop most of them. If the notification indicates that a
file that is not checked and not visible in the commit dialog has
somehow changed, it switches back to non-recursive committing.
That's because if you have e.g. a file open in another editor and save
your changes while the commit dialog is open, then that file would get
committed as well even though you haven't checked it in the commit
dialog (it doesn't show up until you refresh the dialog with F5).
So if you see that warning dialog often, please check if there's another
tool/app running which modifies files in your working copy.
And as you noticed: if you hit F5, that 'non-recursive flag' is reset
because after a refresh, you see all the files again - even the ones you
modified after you started the dialog.
Stefan
I had the same issue but resolved it by reverting changes to files that I had marked to 'ignore-on-commit'
Once I reverted these files, then tortoisesvn was able to commit all the other files from the merge
Is it fine if i proceed with this commit?
No, your commit will ignore all changes in WC-tree and reflect only root-level changes (broken merge).
You made an error when checking out non-recursive initially. You can try to perform good, full commit using --depth infinity parameter in the CLI or find this switch in TortoiseSVN GUI.
svn commit --depth infinity . -m "Merge"
Also for some files that I've SVN-added , I've made changes after adding (If this affects the nature).
In my case that was exactly what caused the message to appear, even I unselected those files for the commit.
Ugly solution which only works safely if just a few files are affected:
Create a copy of the changed files
Revert the changed files
Commit the merge/reintegration
Copy the changed files back to the original place
Reminder to self: only reintegrate a branch if the target (trunk) is clean.
I just had the same issue. Instead of selecting all the files, I clicked on versioned and everything worked well. In my case, the option versioned selected all the files, so everything is ok now.
It looks like TortoiseSVN performs some kind of validity checking before calling commit. Good but the error message is very unclear.
When I faced this issue, I went back to using the svn command line to commit. Commit failed due to the reason that one of the folders was not up to date. After updating just that folder, I ran "svn commit" once again and it went through.
Edit: PS: Before you use try this out, make sure you do not have any files marked as "ignore on commit". "Ignore on commit" is tortoise specific and SVN commit picks these changes as well.
Just thought I'd post this because it worked for me...
The reason this happened is because I'd partially renamed one of the new projects I'd created and for some reason they all showed up as "Missing" on the commit screen.
After I removed the project and folder (which SVN had put a tick on) and put it back in as a new project again, suddenly all of the "Missing" had turned into "Added" and the commit ran fine without warning me of anything.
Hope this helps!
I saw this issue and the cause was a few added files not having the added status for no apparent reason. They were 'normal' even though the parent folder correctly showed as 'added'. I reverted those 'normal' changes and then manually re-did them. This made each added item show up twice in the commit list but it resolved the error and everything appears to be in working order now.
It didn't have anything to do with ignore-on-commit as in another answer, it just seemed like a bug in TortoiseSVN.
The problem could be, that your mergeinfo is deleted by someone or automatically, because the infos moved up in the tree. If you are gonna merge them in again, it will work for the moment. But all others will get problems with their not merged branches. SVN will loose some code and merge already submitted code again.
So reverting those files and changing them again could work, but you should not just commit the changes.
i don't know a option for tortoisesvn but u could use the command line
svn commit --non-recursive [folder]
thats sould work just as u like it to work
greeings
My project directory inside trunk has been accidentally deleted by another user.
I can see my project when browsing it through the web at one revision (364), but the top of the tree it is missing (370)
How do I undo those commits and get my source tree back using the command line subversion client?
EDIT:
Thanks for all the hints. It was a combination of answers that helped me solve it. Although Avi's answer is the closest to the one that allowed me to restore the source tree. So I'll accept that. Although to be totally correct, below is what worked for me since even the trunk directory was eventually removed!
Final solution was:
svn cp https://xxx.xxx.xxx/url/trunk#364 https://xxx.xxx.xxx/url
I then checked this out locally:
svn co https://xxx.xxx.xxx/url/trunk
Copied my changes into this. Double check it builds without issues.
Followed by:
svn up
svn commit
You can copy it back to the current revision:
svn cp -r<revision where it existed> <project-url> <project-url>
EDIT:
Note that if you have changes to your working copy, you need to take care that they don't get overwritten when updating the working copy.
In this case, I suggest you copy them somewhere safe, then doing the svn cp I suggested above, and doing svn up to update your copy, before copying your local changes back in and committing.
svn up -r[revision]
Find the revision number first by doing svn log
I have a bunch of files that I've changed that I don't really want to commit, but I would like to back them up locally in case I would like to use them again. (Then I'll revert them.)
TortoiseSvn working status helps to view the modified files, but I want a way to save them all to a separate directory like Backups\, preferably with their folder heirararchy still in tact.
How can I do that?
UPDATE:
Apparently branching is the way to go.
But what I did was just copied the modified files paths to the clipboard (which is an option in tortoisesvn) then to a file, and created a program to copy them to a backup folder.
You can create a branch and commit those files only in that branch.
You can commit it inside a branch, so it doesn't affect your current 'trunk' or branch.
If you had a try with bazaar , that is compatible with SVN, there is a shelf command to temporarily store a set of modification and apply back them later.
I'm using TortoiseSVN without an external Subversion server to manage LabView source (i.e. a large collection of ever-changing binary files).
I'd like to have a "beta" branch of the repository that anyone can subscribe to and get daily updates. I guess this is different from a usual beta release series with separate branches, but it's right for this project.
What is the best/easiest way to copy the contents of a particular revision of the trunk branch over to the beta branch? Essentially what I want to do is delete the old contents of beta and insert new contents. Delete+add would work, I suppose, but it's clearly suboptimal. Merge is not an option unless I can get Tortoise to automatically resolve all conflicts in the trunk's favor, including deleting files.
Update: a couple people have asked why I don't want delete+add. I'd like a cleaner alternative.
This method leads to half the updates to the beta tree being "wipe out last rev."
The updates are not atomic so someone could pick up an empty release.
I haven't tried and seen, but beta wouldn't be a proper branch. Would the revision log even track multiple revisions at all, since it's a "new" file each time?
Update 2: svn allows any arbitrary commands before a commit, but I couldn't get Tortoise to work this way. After selecting "Delete," stub directories were still left over until I committed, at which point I could repopulate the branch. There needs to be a way to unmark a directory for deletion when it exists in both the old and new tag revisions.
Merge is not an option unless I can
get Tortoise to automatically resolve
all conflicts in the trunk's favor,
including deleting files.
I don't know about TortoiseSVN, but if you install the command line client you could do the following to merge the latest trunk changes to a beta branch:
cd c:/path/to/my/working/copy/of/beta/branch
svn merge file:///c:/path/to/my/repository/trunk --accept theirs-full
svn commit -m "merged latest trunk changes to beta branch"
The --accept theirs-full option resolves all conflicts by using the trunk's version like you want.
This has some advantages: subversion will do representation sharing, so files stored on both branches will not take extra space in the repository. Also, when users update their beta working copy, only the files that were changed need to be pulled over the wire.
SVN is transactional - a delete and copy (not add!) would not be problematic. And beta would be a proper branch (or better a tag)
Why not delete beta/* and then copy trunk/* to beta/ ?
I use tortise svn in VS2010. When I go to commit my changes at the end of the day, I get the following error.
Commit item 'folder / filename' has copy flag but an invalid revision.
What does that mean and how do I resolve it? I Googled for it but really only saw a transcript of a rather esoteric discussion for a Java-related issue.
EDIT - 10/25/2010
Nothing? Really?
I agree with Pekka's comment. Right click on the project folder -> TortoiseSVN -> Check for modifications. Take note of the files you changed.
Create a new folder - and checkout the repository to the new folder. Move the files that changed back into the new folder, replacing any existing ones. Try your commit again.
You may try doing this with Windows Explorer instead of Visual Studio.
have you renamed that folder[say, folder1]?
If not then, "export" the content of that folder to somewhere else[say, folder2].
go back to parent of folder1 and delete then update folder1.
replace all the files[*not folder*s] in folder1 with the equivalent files from folder1
now commit folder1 independently after stealing any lock if exists.
What happens if you try to get the latest revision (update before committing, but after you back up your code ;)?
It sounds like there is potentially something that is in conflict in a bad way - you may need to back up your files, update or check out a new working copy, and then replace checked out files with your old ones.
check out a clean copy. put in the changes you previously made. commit.
do that, and try to forget your problems. it should work.