What is the script to update deployment ( from GUI, we can do this update by unlock & save changes ) in linux. Is it possible to do this ? If not what is script to redeploy ?
As Kevin pointed out, WLST is the way to go. You should probably craft a script (named wlDeploy.py, for instance), with content like follows (import clauses were omitted for the sake of simplicity):
current_app_name = '[your current deployed app name]'
new_app_name = '[your new app name]'
target_name = '[WL managed server name (or AdminServer)]'
connect([username],[pwd],'t3://[admin server hostname/IP address]:[PORT]')
stopApplication(current_app_name)
undeploy(current_app_name, timeout=60000);
war_path = '[path to war file]'
deploy(appName=new_app_name, path=war_path, targets=target_name);
And call it via something like:
./wlst.sh wlDeploy.py
Of course you can add parameters to your script, and a lot of logic which is relevant to your deployment. This is entirely up to you. The example above, though, should help you getting started.
In WebLogic you can use wlst to perform administrative tasks like managing deployments. If you google weblogic wlst, you will receive tons of information. wlst runs on the python language.
Assuming you are using weblogic 10 you can also "Record" your actions. This will save the actions into a python script which you can "replay" (execute) later.
Related
I'm revisiting a project which hasn't been updated for a while.
In production/online environment, it uses environment variables defined at:
openshift online console > applications > deployments > my node app > environment
In development/offline environment, it uses environment variables defined at:
./src/js/my_modules/local_settings (this file is ignored by .gitignore)
The code looks something like:
// check which environment we are in
if (process.env.MONGODB_USER) {
var online_status = "online";
}
else {
var online_status = "offline";
}
// if online, use environment variables defined in red hat openshift
if (online_status === 'online') {
var site_title = process.env.SITE_TITLE;
var site_description = process.env.SITE_DESCRIPTION;
//etc
}
// if offline, get settings from a local file
else if (online_status === 'offline') {
var local_settings = require('./src/js/my_modules/local_settings');
var site_title = local_settings.SITE_TITLE;
var site_description = local_settings.SITE_DESCRIPTION;
// etc
}
I would like to install the dotenv package in my local project repo via:
npm install dotenv
So that I can:
Have my local settings in a .env file in the root of my project (ignored in .gitignore)
Be able to use process.env.SOME_VARIABLE rather than local_settings.SOME_VARIABLE
Get rid of some if/else blocks as both scenarios would point to process.env.SOME_VARIABLE
I'm a bit confused as to how this would effect the online environment.
Seeing as both production/online and development/offline environments would use:
var some_variable = process.env.SOME_VARIABLE_HERE
would the application automatically know to:
Look at the local .env file when in development?
Look at the Red Hat environment variables when in production?
And would adding the required instantiation at the beginning of the server-side file:
require('dotenv').config()
somehow make Red Hat OpenShift freak out (as it seems to already have its own 'things' in place to resolve references to process.env.SOME_VARIABLE_HERE to the relevant values defined in the OpenShift console)?
To have a file by any environment (.dev .staging .prod) into the source code repository or manually in the server (it those are in .gitignore) worked for long time, but now it goes against to the devops.
The clean way is to use environment variables but managed remotely and obtained at the start of your application.
How it works?
Basically your apps don't read or need a file (.env .properties, etc) with variables anymore. It loads them from a remote http service.
Not intrusive
In this approach, you don't need specific languages variables (nodejs in your case). You just need to prepare your app to use environment variables. Your application don't care where the variables come from, just needs to be available at operative system level.
To achieve that, you just need to download the variables using a simple shell code or a very basic algorithm (http invocation) in your favorite language.
After that, after the start of your app, variables are ready to use at the most basic level.
var site_title = process.env.SITE_TITLE;
This approach is not intrusive because your app don't need something complex like library or algorithm in some programing language. Just needs the environment variables.
Intrusive
Same as previous alternative but instead to read the variables direct from environment system, you should use or create a class/module in your language. This offer your the variables you need:
var site_title = VariablesManager.getProperty("SITE_TITLE");
VariablesManager at the startup must have consumed the variables from a remote service (http) and the store them to offer them to whoever needs it through getProperty method.
Also this VariablesManager usually has a feature called hot-reload which at intervals, update the variables consuming the remote variables manager. With this, if your application is running in production with real users and some variable needs to be updated, you just need to change it in the variables manager. Automatically your app will load the new values, without restart or touching your app
This approach is intrusive because you need to load advanced libraries in some programing language or create it.
Devops
Your application just needs a few properties or settings related to the consume of remote variables. For example: variables of acme-web-staging:
remote_variables_manager = https://variables.com/api
application_id = acme-web-staging
secure_key = *****
You could hide the secure key and parametrize the application_id using environment variables (created in the platform console)
remote_variables_manager = https://variables.com/api
application_id = ${application_id}
secure_key = ${remote_variables_manager_key}
Or if you want one variable manager by each environment
staging
remote_variables_manager = https://variables-staging.com/api
application_id = acme-web
secure_key = *****
production
remote_variables_manager = https://variables-staging.com/api
application_id = acme-web
secure_key = *****
Variables manager
This concept was introduced many years ago. I used with java. It consist in a web application with features like:
secure login
create applications
create variables of an application
crypt sensitive values
publish http endpoints to download or query the variables by application
Here a list of some ready to use alternatives:
Configurator
Nodejs & mysql solution. I developed this and I use it in various projects.
Doppler
zookeeper
http://www.therore.net/java/2015/05/03/distributed-configuration-with-zookeeper-curator-and-spring-cloud-config.html
Spring Cloud
https://www.baeldung.com/spring-cloud-configuration
This is a java spring framework functionality in which you can create properties file with configurations and configure your applications to read them.
Consul
Consul is a service mesh solution providing a full featured control plane with service discovery, configuration, and segmentation functionality.
doozerd, etcd
In your specific case
Don't use dot-env
Use pure process.env.foo
Deploy a remote variables manager in your openshift infraestructure
Create just one variable in your openshift web console: APP_ENVIRONMENT
In your code at the start, do something like this:
if (process.env.APP_ENVIRONMENT === "PROD")
//get variables from remote service using
//some http client like axios, request, etc
//then inject them to your process.env
process.env.site_url = remoteVariables.site_url
else
//we are in local developer workspace
//so, nothing complex is required
//developer should inject manually
//before the startup: npm run start or dev
//export site_url = "acme.com"
If you can configure an execution of a shell script before the start of your openshift app, you could load and expose the variables at that stage and the previous snippet would not be necessary because the variables will be ready to be retrieved using process.env directly in your app
I'm setting up my production environment and would like to secure my environment-related variables.
For the moment, every environment has its own application parameters file, which works well, but I don't want every dev in my team knowing the production connection strings and other sensitive stuffs that could appear in there.
So I'm looking for every possibility available.
I've seen that in Azure DevOps, which I'm using at the moment for my CI/CD, there is some possible variable substitution (xml transformation). Is it usable in a SF project?
I've seen in another project something similar through Octopus.
Are there any other tools that would help me manage my variables by environment safely (and easily)?
Can I do that with my KeyVault eventually?
Any recommendations?
Thanks
EDIT: an example of how I'd like to manage those values; this is a screenshot from octopus :
so something similar to this that separates and injects the values is what I'm looking for.
You can do XML transformation to the ApplicationParameter file to update the values in there before you deploy it.
The other option is use Powershell to update the application and pass the parameters as argument to the script.
The Start-ServiceFabricApplicationUpgrade command accept as parameter a hashtable with the parameters, technically, the builtin task in VSTS\DevOps transform the application parameters in a hashtable, the script would be something like this:
#Get the existing parameters
$app = Get-ServiceFabricApplication -ApplicationName "fabric:/AzureFilesVolumePlugin"
#Create a temp hashtable and populate with existing values
$parameters = #{ }
$app.ApplicationParameters | ForEach-Object { $parameters.Add($_.Name, $_.Value) }
#Replace the desired parameters
$parameters["test"] = "123test" #Here you would replace with your variable, like $env:username
#Upgrade the application
Start-ServiceFabricApplicationUpgrade -ApplicationName "fabric:/AzureFilesVolumePlugin" -ApplicationParameter $parameters -ApplicationTypeVersion "6.4.617.9590" -UnmonitoredAuto
Keep in mind that the existing VSTS Task also has other operations, like copy the package to SF and register the application version in the image store, you will need to replicate it. You can copy the full script from Deploy-FabricApplication.ps1 file in the service fabric project and replace it with your changes. The other approach is get the source for the VSTS Task here and add your changes.
If you are planning to use KeyVault, I would recommend the application access the values direct on KeyVault instead of passing it to SF, this way, you can change the values in KeyVault without redeploying the application. In the deployment, you would only pass the KeyVault credentials\configuration.
I'm trying to update Jenkins' root URL via the Groovy API, so I can script the deployment of a Jenkins master without manual input (aside: why is a tool as popular with the build/devops/automation community as Jenkins so resistant to automation?)
Based on this documentation, I believe I should be able to update the URL using the following script in the Script Console.
import jenkins.model.JenkinsLocationConfiguration
jlc = new jenkins.model.JenkinsLocationConfiguration()
jlc.setUrl("http://jenkins.my-org.com:8080/")
println(jlc.getUrl())
Briefly, this instantiates a JenkinsLocationConfiguration object; calls the setter setUrl with the desired value, http://jenkins.my-org.com:8080/; and prints out the new URL to confirm that it has changed.
The println statement prints what I expect it to, but following this, the value visible through the web interface at "Manage Jenkins" -> "Configure System" -> "Jenkins URL" has not updated as I expected.
I'm concerned that the value hasn't been update properly by Jenkins, which might lead to problems when communicating with external APIs.
Is this a valid way to fix the Jenkins root URL? If not, what is? Otherwise, why isn't the change being reflected in the config page?
You are creating a new JenkinsLocationConfiguration object, and updating the new one, not the existing one being used
use
jlc = JenkinsLocationConfiguration.get()
// ...
jlc.save()
to get the one from the global jenkins configuration, update it and save the config descriptor back.
see : https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/blob/master/core/src/main/java/jenkins/model/JenkinsLocationConfiguration.java
I am a newbie to Capybara.
Here is my configuration within file env.rb
Capybara.configure do |config|
config.run_server = false
#config.default_driver = :selenium
config.default_driver = :rack_test
config.app_host = 'point to my localhost port 3000'
end
Everything runs just fine if I set default_driver to :selenium. But I need to set the driver to :rack_test, so that when running cucumber command, it will not open the web browser.
Many thanks,
P/S If you are an expert, please show me the learning path, I'm not expecting someone showing them selves.
I presume you want to test against a test server controlled by capybara (which is the normal way to do it), rather than testing against your dev instance (the one at localhost:3000) or a staging server or something.
First, configure capybara to run your Rails app. The usual way to do this is to add the cucumber-rails gem to your Gemfile and require 'cucumber/rails' in your env.rb. You can also set up capybara to run Rails (or any Rack app) manually.
Having done that, capybara will do what you want (use the Rack::Test driver) by default. Remove the configuration that you showed from your env.rb and Cucumber/capybara will work the way you want.
If you also want some scenarios to use Javascript, tag those scenarios with #javascript and add
Capybara.javascript_driver = :selenium
to your env.rb. Capybara will continue to use its Rack::Test driver for scenarios without the tag, and will use its Selenium driver for scenarios with the tag.
Thank you Dave for helping me during the time. Briefly, in order for running "cucumber" without triggering to open a web-browser (which is rack-test), here is the configuration:
1> File env.rb.
require 'cucumber/rails'
Only 1 line above is enough.
2> File .feature
Feature: Post a new Product
Feature: Post a new Product
Scenario: Open new product page
Given I open new product site
When I input new product
Then I should see the product created confirmed
By the way, we don't need "Capybara.javascript_driver = :selenium" within file env.rb.
There's still so many tricky things I need to learn about capybara and cucumber
I'm trying to use the node-config module to change some parameters of my configuration (basically logging level) during runtime.
In the official documentation says:
Environment variables can be used to override file configurations. Any environment variable that starts with $CONFIG_ is set into the CONFIG object.
I've checked that this is true when the server starts but it does not seem to work once it's up. (The handler of the watch function is never called when an environment variable is changed unlike a change in the runtime.json file or directly changing a config variable).
I'm currently watching the whole CONFIG object like this:
var CONFIG = require('config');
CONFIG.watch( CONFIG , null , function(object, propertyName, priorValue, newValue){
console.log("Configuration change detected");
});
Does anyone know if this is possible?
The environment is available during startup of a process.
If the process is running, you won't be able to change the environment anymore, the process is in.
The only option is to restart the process or use other mechanisms to communicate with it.
Say for example having a rest or tcp listener inside, where you can transfer your variable inside.
Best regards
Robert
As you must knowing, React is a single page application which is eventually when it is complied is a static page app that means all the files of the react application is complied into vanilla JS and CSS file bundle in a Tarball. Now that Tarball is eventually deployed on a web server. It could be Apache web server, nginx web server or anything which you are using it but an important point is the static app is running in someone else browser and someone access to website CSS and JS are downloaded in a browser and it is running in the browser runtime environment so technically you cannot have a runtime environment variable for someone else browser but may be there would be a way to access them during runtime.
SOLUTION
I have achieved this goal with the package called runtime-cra.
follow the steps on this official documentation: https://blog.risingstack.com/create-react-app-runtime-env-cra/