Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Most of the packages I have seen on Hackage are libaries released with open-source licenses and I think I have faint memory of a hackage upload with a missing license field triggering a bashing from hackage.haskell.org about not using an open-source license.
Is there a rule that says every package hosted on Hackage is required to be made available under an open-source license?
If you claim that there is such a rule, how does http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/Cabal/1.14.0/doc/html/Distribution-License.html relate?
You may use any license you like. That's what the OtherLicense constructor of License is for. That said, Hackage is a source distribution hub, so keep that in mind if you don't want people looking at your source.
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I've read ServiceStack license and some questions have arisen. The license declares that ServiceStack v4 goes commercial. Will next versions (v4 and higher) be available under FOSS license exceptions?
Roadmap states that "We're also planning to introduce our commercial offerings and commercially supported versions of ServiceStack". Does this mean that free ServiceStack version will not get much developer's attention since v4 Release (as MySQL) or become a developer's playground (as Red Hat's Fedora)?
It would be great if the project founders shed some light on the future of ServiceStack.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
Can anyone tell me when the cassandra20 or dsc20 RPM packages will be available on the Datastax yum repository located at http://rpm.datastax.com/community/noarch/ ?
I tried googling for third-party repos but nobody seems to have C* 2.0.0 yet.
Thanks in advance!
It's now available here http://planetcassandra.org/Download/StartDownload (and the usual repository). Please use the new dsc20 package name for apt and yum.
We are working on it. Hopefully tomorrow, kinda depends on how qa goes.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm developing an application on a device that has Windows CE 5.0.
I need to change the OS, e.g. language installation & ... , and it seems that i need an IDE named Microsoft Platform Builder.
But how can i get it? is there any free release for download?
i googled the web, but got nothing!
There is an evaluation version of Platform Builder that is downloadable. I think it's a 30-day, though it may be more. If you have MSDN, the full version is also part of that. Otherwise you have to buy it from one of the distributors that sell it.
You'll also need a BSP (board support package) for your specific device. That comes from the device OEM, and without it you can't really do anything at all, so make sure you have access to that. If you don't have a BSP, installing Platform Builder is purely a waste of time (well unless you're after the shared source, which I recommend for any app dev).
Note: Microsoft moves things around a lot, plus Windows CE is effectively dead, so the links above may well go stale or just be completely lost to the ether. It's also getting harder to find a distributor for licenses.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
I know this question has been asked before but I am looking for bugtracking system that is free and is just online.
We are not looking for anything fancy, just want the test team to be able to log something so that testers can go back and go through the bugs.
I've looked at bugzilla but it has to be installed and the installation seems very long. Basically looking for something quick and dirty...
If this is a class project (e.g., a university course project), you can get a free FogBugz account for the duration of the project. Joel has mentioned it several times on the Stack Overflow Podcast. I only suggested this because you didn't give any details about what type of project you are working on. This may not apply to your situation.
You can use Google Code. It's for open source projects, so your bugs will be visible, but it is free to use.
Also this.
you could always create your own using google docs.
We use veoproject.com to track our bugs. It's a fully-featured project management system, but works great for our needs. They have a basic free account that works really well.
I like BugHost.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm looking for a tool that's able to create "setup" packages for Linux, just like the Windows install creators do (NSIS, InstallShield, etc.). I want it to be able to present a graphical interface to the user (or ncurses based), where he can select some options and install the package.
Any ideas of such a tool? I'm aware of autopackage, but it's not exactly what I want. It focuses mostly on correctly installing the software, I want something that focuses on creating an installer that's able to copy files, edit, run scripts, etc.
One option could be loki setup. It supports curses and gtk based setup programs. A few installer generators are cross-platform, relying on the presence of a JVM, like VAInstall. Commercial offerings include InstallAnywhere.
There isn't one.
Installing software on linux/bsd is, usually, done by the package management system. What this package management system is depends on the linux distribution or bsd variant.
Making a package for a distribution is usually done by the distribution themselves. Mostly because they are teo many to for developers to support.
So you don't package it, let them do it.
Unless the source isn't freely distributed, then pick the distribution(s) your (potential) users are using.
Use InstallBuilder 9. It seems awesome.