I've successfully used the AccountManagement code to retrieve basic AD information but it's only returning a very limited set of information about the returned object. How can I get extended information from AD using the AccountManagement functionality. Specifically the Job Title or title as it seems to be called in my instance of AD.
I know how to do it using the older DirectoryServices but I'd like to know how to do it using the new namespace.
Yes, the default set of properties on UserPrincipal is quite limited - but the great part is: there's a neat extensibility story in place!
You need to define a class descending from UserPrincipal and then you can very easily get access to a lot more properties, if needed.
The skeleton would look something like this:
namespace ADExtended
{
[DirectoryRdnPrefix("CN")]
[DirectoryObjectClass("User")]
public class UserPrincipalEx : UserPrincipal
{
// Inplement the constructor using the base class constructor.
public UserPrincipalEx(PrincipalContext context) : base(context)
{ }
// Implement the constructor with initialization parameters.
public UserPrincipalEx(PrincipalContext context,
string samAccountName,
string password,
bool enabled) : base(context, samAccountName, password, enabled)
{}
UserPrincipalExSearchFilter searchFilter;
new public UserPrincipalExSearchFilter AdvancedSearchFilter
{
get
{
if (null == searchFilter)
searchFilter = new UserPrincipalExSearchFilter(this);
return searchFilter;
}
}
// Create the "Title" property.
[DirectoryProperty("title")]
public string Title
{
get
{
if (ExtensionGet("title").Length != 1)
return string.Empty;
return (string)ExtensionGet("title")[0];
}
set { ExtensionSet("title", value); }
}
// Implement the overloaded search method FindByIdentity.
public static new UserPrincipalEx FindByIdentity(PrincipalContext context, string identityValue)
{
return (UserPrincipalEx)FindByIdentityWithType(context, typeof(UserPrincipalEx), identityValue);
}
// Implement the overloaded search method FindByIdentity.
public static new UserPrincipalEx FindByIdentity(PrincipalContext context, IdentityType identityType, string identityValue)
{
return (UserPrincipalEx)FindByIdentityWithType(context, typeof(UserPrincipalEx), identityType, identityValue);
}
}
}
And that's really almost all there is! The ExtensionGet and ExtensionSet methods allow you to "reach down" into the underlying directory entry and grab out all the attributes you might be interested in....
Now, in your code, use your new UserPrincipalEx class instead of UserPrincipal:
using (PrincipalContext ctx = new PrincipalContext(ContextType.Domain))
{
// Search the directory for the new object.
UserPrincipalEx myUser = UserPrincipalEx.FindByIdentity(ctx, "someUserName");
if(myUser != null)
{
// get the title which is now available on your "myUser" object!
string title = myUser.Title;
}
}
Read all about the System.DirectoryServices.AccountManagement namespace and its extensibility story here:
Managing Directory Security Principals in the .NET Framework 3.5
Update: sorry - here's the UserPrincipalExSearchFilter class - missed that one in the original post. It just shows the ability to also extend the search filters, if need be:
public class UserPrincipalExSearchFilter : AdvancedFilters
{
public UserPrincipalExSearchFilter(Principal p) : base(p) { }
public void LogonCount(int value, MatchType mt)
{
this.AdvancedFilterSet("LogonCount", value, typeof(int), mt);
}
}
To Augment the above I have knocked up an extension method to call ExtensionGet. It uses reflection to get hold of the protected method you would otherwise have to inherit. You might need to use this if you are returning UserPrincipalObjects from Groups.Members, for example
public static class AccountManagmentExtensions
{
public static string ExtensionGet(this UserPrincipal up, string key)
{
string value = null;
MethodInfo mi = up.GetType()
.GetMethod("ExtensionGet", BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance);
Func<UserPrincipal, string, object[]> extensionGet = (k,v) =>
((object[])mi.Invoke(k, new object[] { v }));
if (extensionGet(up,key).Length > 0)
{
value = (string)extensionGet(up, key)[0];
}
return value;
}
}
There are simpler ways of getting to that info. Here is the way I got to Job Title in VB.NET:
Dim yourDomain As New PrincipalContext(ContextType.Domain, "yourcompany.local")
Dim user1 As UserPrincipal = UserPrincipal.FindByIdentity(yourDomain, principal.Identity.Name)
Dim Entry As DirectoryServices.DirectoryEntry = user1.GetUnderlyingObject()
Dim JobTitle As String = Entry.Properties.Item("Title").Value.ToString
To expand on Programmierus' comment, here is a simple way to do this on the fly in C#.
public static string GetProperty(UserPrincipal userPrincipal, string property)
{
DirectoryEntry d = (DirectoryEntry)userPrincipal.GetUnderlyingObject();
return d.Properties[property]?.Value?.ToString();
}
Related
Given the following code:
public enum Roles {
ADMIN("admin"),
OPERATOR("operator"),
SYSTEM_ADMIN("system-admin"),
SYSTEM_VIEWER("system-viewer"),
TENANT_ADMIN("admin"),
TENANT_OPERATOR("operator"),
TENANT_VIEWER("viewer");
private String role;
private Roles(String role) { this.role = role; }
public String getRole() {
return role;
}
}
public class TenantMapping {
private String tenant;
private Roles role;
public TenantMapping(String tenant, Roles role) {
super();
this.tenant = tenant;
this.role = role;
}
//accessors
}
Scenario: Create new users
When REST Create new user "system_systemuser" with tenants list
| system | SYSTEM_ADMIN |
#When("^REST Create new user \"(.*)\" with tenants list$")
public void createNewUser(String newUsername, Map<String, Roles> tenantsMap) {
try {
List<TenantMapping> tenantMappingsList = new ArrayList<>();
tenantsMap.forEach((key, value) -> tenantMappingsList.add(new TenantMapping(key, value)));
....
}
usersRest.json maybe relevant fragment:
"tenant_mappings": [
{
"tenant": "system",
"role": "system-admin"
}
...
]
When I run the scenario I get:
java.lang.AssertionError: 13:09:43: Failed to get the Object from
usersRest.json file
com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.exc.InvalidFormatException: Can not
construct instance of
com.rest.testhandlers.restassured.system.users.enums.Roles from String
value 'system-admin': value not one of declared Enum instance names:
[ADMIN, OPERATOR, SYSTEM_ADMIN, SYSTEM_VIEWER, TENANT_ADMIN,
TENANT_OPERATOR, TENANT_VIEWER]
and when I try:
Scenario: Create new users
When REST Create new user "system_systemuser" with tenants list
| system | system-admin |
I get:
cucumber.deps.com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.ConversionException:
Couldn't convert system-admin to
com.rest.testhandlers.restassured.system.users.enums.Roles. Legal
values are [ADMIN, OPERATOR, SYSTEM_ADMIN, SYSTEM_VIEWER,
TENANT_ADMIN, TENANT_OPERATOR, TENANT_VIEWER]
Why?
My guess is that there is some attempt at casting from string to emum here which is causing the first issue?
In the first attempt you are passing the correct capitalised ENUM value in your Gherkin datatable, but in the tenantMapping constructor you decLare you are passing a Roles ENUM object (containing all values etc.) and but actually pass a String from the dataTable with value 'SYSTEM_ADMIN ':
public TenantMapping(String tenant, **Roles role**) {
super();
this.tenant = tenant;
this.role = role;
}
Perhaps you should instead call the ENUM constructor in this function using the (uppercase) role value and then ask the enum for its current role (lowercase) and save that in your mapping:
public TenantMapping(String tenant, **String role**) {
super();
this.tenant = tenant;
// better to use some case switch to cover all options in your solution
if (role.equals("SYSTEM_ADMIN"){Roles.SYSTEM_ADMIN;}
// the Roles Enum calls its private constructor and sets current 'role' value
this.role = Roles.getRole();
}
I get:
cucumber.deps.com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.ConversionException: Couldn't convert system-admin to com.rest.testhandlers.restassured.system.users.enums.Roles. Legal values are [ADMIN, OPERATOR, SYSTEM_ADMIN, SYSTEM_VIEWER, TENANT_ADMIN, TENANT_OPERATOR, TENANT_VIEWER]
Why?
While you do create your enum using the lower case name ADMIN("admin"), neither Jackson nor XStream knows that you want to use this value. So they both only look at the name of the enum which is uppercased.
You can work around this by going through the documentations for XStream and/or Jackson and adding the right annotations.
Btw, you version of Cucumber is old. You may want to upgrade.
I'm using Dapper Extensions and have defined my own custom mapper to deal with entities with composite keys.
public class MyClassMapper<T> : ClassMapper<T> where T : class
{
public MyClassMapper()
{
// Manage unmappable attributes
IList<PropertyInfo> toIgnore = typeof(T).GetProperties().Where(x => !x.CanWrite).ToList();
foreach (PropertyInfo propertyInfo in toIgnore.ToList())
{
Map(propertyInfo).Ignore();
}
// Manage keys
IList<PropertyInfo> propsWithId = typeof(T).GetProperties().Where(x => x.Name.EndsWith("Id") || x.Name.EndsWith("ID")).ToList();
PropertyInfo primaryKey = propsWithId.FirstOrDefault(x => string.Equals(x.Name, $"{nameof(T)}Id", StringComparison.CurrentCultureIgnoreCase));
if (primaryKey != null && primaryKey.PropertyType == typeof(int))
{
Map(primaryKey).Key(KeyType.Identity);
}
else if (propsWithId.Any())
{
foreach (PropertyInfo prop in propsWithId)
{
Map(prop).Key(KeyType.Assigned);
}
}
AutoMap();
}
}
I also have this test case to test my mapper:
[Test]
public void TestMyAutoMapper()
{
DapperExtensions.DapperExtensions.DefaultMapper = typeof(MyClassMapper<>);
MySubscribtionEntityWithCompositeKey entity = new MySubscribtionEntityWithCompositeKey
{
SubscriptionID = 145,
CustomerPackageID = 32
};
using (var connection = new SqlConnection(CONNECTION_STRING))
{
connection.Open();
var result = connection.Insert(entity);
var key1 = result.SubscriptionID;
var key2 = result.CustomerPackageID;
}
}
Note that I set the default mapper in the test case.
The insert fails and I notive that my customer mapper is never called. I have no documentation on the github page on the topic, so I'm not sure if there's anything else I need to do to make dapper extensions use my mapper.
Thanks in advance!
Looking at your question, you are attempting to write your own defalut class mapper derived from the existing one. I never used this approach; so I do not know why it is not working or whether it should work.
I explicitly map the classes as below:
public class Customer
{
public int CustomerID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
public sealed class CustomerMapper : ClassMapper<Customer>
{
public CustomerMapper()
{
Schema("dbo");
Table("Customer");
Map(x => x.CustomerID).Key(KeyType.Identity);
AutoMap();
}
}
The AutoMap() will map rest of the properties based on conventions. Please refer to these two resources for more information about mapping.
Then I call SetMappingAssemblies at the startup of the project as below:
DapperExtensions.DapperExtensions.SetMappingAssemblies(new[] { Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly() });
The GetExecutingAssembly() is used in above code because mapping classes (CustomerMapper and other) are in same assembly which is executing. If those classes are placed in other assembly, provide that assembly instead.
And that's it, it works.
To set the dialect, I call following line just below the SetMappingAssemblies:
DapperExtensions.DapperExtensions.SqlDialect = new DapperExtensions.Sql.SqlServerDialect();
Use your preferred dialect instead of SqlServerDialect.
Apparently, the solution mentioned here may help you achieve what you are actually trying to. But, I cannot be sure, as I said above, I never used it.
I'm trying to create a simple schema using ReflectiveSchema and then trying to project an Employee "table" using Groovy as my programming language. Code below.
class CalciteDemo {
String doDemo() {
RelNode node = new CalciteAlgebraBuilder().build()
return RelOptUtil.toString(node)
}
class DummySchema {
public final Employee[] emp = [new Employee(1, "Ting"), new Employee(2, "Tong")]
#Override
String toString() {
return "DummySchema"
}
class Employee {
Employee(int id, String name) {
this.id = id
this.name = name
}
public final int id
public final String name
}
}
class CalciteAlgebraBuilder {
FrameworkConfig config
CalciteAlgebraBuilder() {
SchemaPlus rootSchema = Frameworks.createRootSchema(true)
Schema schema = new ReflectiveSchema(new DummySchema())
SchemaPlus rootPlusDummy = rootSchema.add("dummySchema", schema)
this.config = Frameworks.newConfigBuilder().parserConfig(SqlParser.Config.DEFAULT).defaultSchema(rootPlusDummy).traitDefs((List<RelTraitDef>)null).build()
}
RelNode build() {
RelBuilder.create(config).scan("emp").build()
}
}
}
I seem to be correctly passing in the "schema" object to the constructor of the ReflectiveSchema class, but I think its failing while trying to get the fields of the Employee class.
Here's the error
java.lang.StackOverflowError
at java.lang.Class.copyFields(Class.java:3115)
at java.lang.Class.getFields(Class.java:1557)
at org.apache.calcite.jdbc.JavaTypeFactoryImpl.createStructType(JavaTypeFactoryImpl.java:76)
at org.apache.calcite.jdbc.JavaTypeFactoryImpl.createType(JavaTypeFactoryImpl.java:160)
at org.apache.calcite.jdbc.JavaTypeFactoryImpl.createType(JavaTypeFactoryImpl.java:151)
at org.apache.calcite.jdbc.JavaTypeFactoryImpl.createStructType(JavaTypeFactoryImpl.java:84)
at org.apache.calcite.jdbc.JavaTypeFactoryImpl.createType(JavaTypeFactoryImpl.java:160)
at org.apache.calcite.jdbc.JavaTypeFactoryImpl.createStructType(JavaTypeFactoryImpl.java:84)
What is wrong with this example?
Seems that by just moving the Employee class a level above, ie. making it a sibling of the DummySchema class, makes the problem go away.
I think the way the org.apache.calcite.jdbc.JavaTypeFactoryImpl of Calcite is written doesn't handle Groovy's internal fields well.
I have a Spring3 controller in which I'm using the #RequestMapping annotation. I know I can use the params value to route based on the the presence or lack of a url parameter, but is there a way to route based on the presence of one of two parameters?
Ideally I'd have something like the following:
#RequestMapping(value="/auth", params="error OR problem")
public ModelAndView errorInAuthenticate()
Where I route to errorInAuthenticate if the parameters error OR problem exist.
Unfortunately #RequestMapping params are combined using AND, not OR. (Source)
simply map both params as not required and test them:
#RequestMapping(value="/auth")
public ModelAndView errorInAuthenticate(#RequestParam(value="error", required=false) String errorParam,
#RequestParam(value="problem", required=false) String problemParam) {
if(errorParam != null || problemParam != null) {
//redirect
}
}
You can do it using Spring AOP and create a surrounding aspect for that request mapping.
Create an annotation like the following:
public #interface RequestParameterOrValidation{
String[] value() default {};
}
Then you can annotate your request mapping method with it:
#GetMapping("/test")
#RequestParameterOrValidation(value={"a", "b"})
public void test(
#RequestParam(value = "a", required = false) String a,
#RequestParam(value = "b", required = false) String b) {
// API code goes here...
}
Create an aspect around the annotation. Something like:
#Aspect
#Component
public class RequestParameterOrValidationAspect {
#Around("#annotation(x.y.z.RequestParameterOrValidation) && execution(public * *(..))")
public Object time(final ProceedingJoinPoint joinPoint) throws Throwable {
Object[] args= joinPoint.getArgs();
MethodSignature methodSignature = (MethodSignature) thisJoinPoint.getStaticPart().getSignature();
Method method = methodSignature.getMethod();
Annotation[][] parameterAnnotations = method.getParameterAnnotations();
RequestParameterOrValidation requestParamsOrValidation= method.getAnnotation(RequestParameterOrValidation.class);
String[] params=requestParamsOrValidation.value();
boolean isValid=false;
for (int argIndex = 0; argIndex < args.length; argIndex++) {
for (Annotation annotation : parameterAnnotations[argIndex]) {
if (!(annotation instanceof RequestParam))
continue;
RequestParam requestParam = (RequestParam) annotation;
if (Arrays.stream(params).anyMatch(requestParam.value()::equals) && args[argIndex]!=null) {
// Atleast one request param exist so its a valid value
return joinPoint.proceed();
}
}
}
throw new IllegalArgumentException("illegal request");
}
}
Note:- that it would be a good option to return 400 BAD REQUEST here since the request was not valid. Depends on the context, of course, but this is a general rule of thumb to start with.
I have been playing with this for a few hours and I'm stuck. I'm trying to save a list of Favorite objects in the NSUserDefaults using Monotouch. I believe that I am on the right track but I just can't quite get it... here are my model objects:
public class Favorite {
public Favorite (){}
public string Description {get;set;}
public Song Song {get;set;}
}
public class Song {
public Song (){}
public string Name {get;set;}
public string Artist {get;set;}
}
Next, I want to save a list of Favorites that the user has selected. From what I have read, I can use an NSArray to save a list of items in the NSUserDefaults. So how do I go from a List of Favorites to an NSArray of Favorites... I haven't been able to find any documentation on this. Here is my Settings wrapper:
public class Settings {
private static string _favoritesKey = "favorites";
public static IList<Favorite> Favorites {get;set;}
public static void Add(Favorite favorite){
Favorites.Add(favorite);
}
public static void Remove(Favorite favorite){
Favorites.Remove(favorite);
}
public static void Read()
{
var tempFavorites = (NSArray)NSUserDefaults.StandardUserDefaults[_favoritesKey];
if(tempFavorites == null){
Favorites = new List<Favorite>();
}
else {
for(uint i=0;i<tempFavorites.Count;i++){
var fav = tempFavorites.ValueAt(i); //returns IntPtr
// do something to convert to Favorite
// Favorites.Add(converted_favorite);
}
}
}
public static void Write()
{
var tempArray = Favorites.ToArray();
// convert to NSObject[]
NSUserDefaults.StandardUserDefaults[_favoritesKey] = NSArray.FromNSObjects(converted_array);
NSUserDefaults.StandardUserDefaults.Synchronize();
}
}
Am I on the right track? It looks like all I need to do is figure out how to convert to and from NSObjects. Also, if I am saving these custom objects in NSUserDefaults, do they need to be serializable? Much thanks!
If you want to do this, you would need your Favorite class to be a NSObject with native storage that you synchronize with the [Connect] attribute, something like this:
[Register]
public class Favorite : NSObject {
[Connect]
public string Description {
get {
return (string) this.GetNativeField ("Description");
}
set {
this.SetNativeField ("Description", new NSString (value));
}
}
}
You would do the same for your Song class. You can only store native classes in the NSStandardUserDefaults object store.
An alternative would be what Jason suggested and just serialize to a string and then store that as a NSString.
I would try serializing them and then convert to NSString.
Editing, found the way around it:
var Chosenkey = new object[] { NSUserDefaults.StandardUserDefaults.StringForKey("FooIdentifier").ToString() };
var DefValueToSet = new object[] { "Foo" };
var newInfo = NSDictionary.FromObjectsAndKeys(Chosenkey,DefValueToSet);
And then we register this NSDictionary to user defaults and we're done.
I am trying to serialize and then convert the result to a NSstring, but I am still getting the nullexception when trying to create the dictionary:
This is my declaration:
string llalalala = "Thisisatest";
NSString test = SerializeToString(llalalala);
NSDictionary dictionary = new NSDictionary(test, test,null);
This is my method to serialise:
//Method to serialize objects
public NSString SerializeToString(object obj)
{
XmlSerializer serializer = new XmlSerializer(obj.GetType());
using (StringWriter writer = new StringWriter())
{
serializer.Serialize(writer, obj);
try
{
return (NSString)writer.ToString();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
return new NSString("");
}
}
}
am I doing anything wrong? the NSstrings are not empty so I have no clue what´s going on here..