On a page converted to an image with wkhtmltoimage:
If images on the page contain colour profiles (sRGB, for example), will the profiles be taken into account in the rendered image?
If images on the page contain multiple embedded colour profiles (sRGB and Adobe RGB, e.g.) which one (if any) is used?
Related
.svg .xml Format Images not showing in ios devices
Added Images of different format in Resources/images (img1.svg, img2.xml)
Added image code in xaml : <Image Source="img1.svg" />
When you add an SVG image to MAUI it converts it to multiple PNG images at different resolutions. As per the (possibly new?) details on the Image page you have to use .png as the extension for the image if you are requesting it as a file, or you can use the filename without any extension in XAML as that is a key for images found in resources.
Image name should start and end with character
in lower case alpha numeric and under scroll allowed. in your case it is number
I want to render a large SVG image to a PDF document (PageSize = A4).I am using Itext Library and Java. Here is a post that describes how to render a image larger than page size to PDF () How to show an image with large dimensions across multiple pages in ITextPdf?. But when I use this way of rendering I have 2 problems.
1)The Image ignores the page boundaries.
2)Some time the SVG splits in a way which cuts the text written in the SVG.
Both the problems can be solved If I can control the height of SVG to be rendered on each page, but I cannot find any way to control both Height, and starting point of a Image while rendering it to PDF.
In the past I've used the Image Field Module to require a user to provide an image of specific dimensions and it's worked great. I like the new Media Library Picker Field and it's integration with the Image Editor module to allow for cropping and re-sizing.
What I'd like to do is use the Media Library Picker Field but require the user to crop and/or re-size the image to specific dimensions. Is there any way to configure it that way? So far, the best I've come up with is to provide some help text to the user suggesting that they re-size the image to desired dimensions.
Should I just stick with the Image Field if I must have the image meet specific dimensions or is there a better way with the Media Library Picker Field?
You can't enforce that the image is supplied with specific dimensions using the Orchard 1.7+ media processing features, however you can ensure that it is displayed with correct dimensions.
Orchard 1.7 introduces the concept of media profiles, which effectively allow you to create a bunch of image transformations, name them, and then use them arbitrarily throughout your site.
On a recent project I was given a load of customer profile pictures for a testimonial page on an Orchard site. They were supplied in a variety of different sizes, and I knew I needed at least 2 different sizes (one for the main testimonial page, and a smaller one for testimonial widgets shown on other pages).
In the Admin Dashboard, I went to Media -> Profiles and created a new Media Profile called Customer_Profile_Regular, then added a Resize filter to scale it down to 100x100px (the resize filter is quite flexible, and you can create your own filters easily by implementing the IImageFilterProvider interface).
I did the same for a second profile, Customer_Profile_Small, scaling down to 50x50.
Then, using Shape Tracing, I overrode the existing Media Library Picker field display shape, and replaced it with this:
#{
var imagesField = Model.ContentItem.Testimonial.CustomerProfile;
}
#if(imagesField.MediaParts.Any()) {
<div class="customer-profile-image">
#Display.MediaUrl(Profile: "Customer_Profile_Regular", Path: imagesField.MediaParts.First().MediaUrl)
</div>
}
For the testimonial widget, it was simply a case of creating a similar shape override, supplying the other profile name.
Now I can upload any image to my media library, and use it as a customer profile image on a testimonial. Orchard will automatically resize (or perform other operations on) the image based on the profile I tell it to use, the result of which is stored in the site's Media folder so that it is only regenerated when necessary.
I have a blog that uses Channel Images to upload and manage images. The content area is a WYGWAM field. I have a few sizes set up in Channel Images to allow the user to adjust the layout inside their content (landscape left, landscape right, portrait left, portrait right) when adding images to the WYGWAM content field. I then have two other sizes: thumb and gallery. These are for the image gallery that appears below the content. Thumb is set as the small preview in the field settings, and gallery is set as the big preview in the field settings. It all works great in the CP publish form.
However, when using the Safecracker form things don't work as well. I can select existing images, but when I add a photo to the content field (WYGWAM) it does not resize it properly. I do get the dialog box and options I want to choose from, but that choice is not being saved.
What happens is the image is added to the WYGWAM content using the size I have selected in the field settings as the big preview. I tested this by changing what size is selected for "big preview".
However, if I upload a new image and select a size it works fine. The issue is only with existing images (ie uploaded previously for other entries).
Is it possible to use sizes in Channel Images/safecracker/wygwam?
It was a bug in the most recent build. The developer has sent me a patched version that is working.
is there a way how to get images from flickr api with custom width/height? I found only standard function flickr.photos.getSizes, but this functions returns only predefined sizes. Thank's
As far as I know it's not possible to have flickr resize the photos for you (except for the default options) Depending on the system you are building there are a couple of options:
use one of the flickr provided sizes ... ;-)
If you are using HTML: resize the image in the browser by setting the width and the height of the image (make sure you enable the right settings in IE for maximum viewing pleasure: http://code.flickr.com/blog/2008/11/12/on-ui-quality-the-little-things-client-side-image-resizing/)
If you are using flash resizing the image should not be a big issue
If you have a php or java (or any other language really) backend you can use that to scale the image.
Also: check http://www.flickr.com/groups/api and http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/yws-flickr/