I am trying to figure out svn:ignore. I am using:
svn propedit svn:ignore file://path/myrepository/project
Within there I am adding 'files' to that and then saving. It commits the revision fine. When I now go to a machine to SVN Update it, it downloads the files directory. How come that isn't applied? With SVN, do you need to apply things by doing some sort of restart? I am using a Red Hat Linux box.
Thanks.
EDIT:
Looks like I misunderstood ignore.
svn:ignore only works for untracked files. once you have added a file to your repository it cannot be ignored again (unless removed again). Why should you ignore a file that you initially wanted to track?
svn:ignore only saves you from accidentally adding garbage (build products, backup/swap-files, log files, etc.). It will not forbid downloading of files from the repository (if I understood your last sentence)
Related
At some point during my adventures with Linux, I decided that it would be a good idea to put everything in my home directory into source control. I'm not asking whether that was a good idea or not -- I'm asking how to undo it.
The reason for removing the repository is that I recently installed Oh My Zsh, and I really like it. The rub is that my home directory has a big git:(master) stuck behind it, and I'm just not a huge fan of that.
So what I would like to do is remove the git repository itself, so that the git:(master) is no longer displayed, without deleting all of my files.
Just remove (or rename) the .git subdirectory. That subdirectory is the whole of the repository. This will not delete your files, but it will delete their history.
Additionally, there might be files like .gitignore and .gitattributes that are not necessary anymore.
Make sure that all your files are present in the working tree before removing/renaming .git.
Your repository resides in the .git directory, you can delete it easily. But if only the prompt disturbs you, it is enough to search where PROMPT gets new value in your environment and modify it to something else.
Removing the directory .git in a repository removes the history, and keeps the files currently checked out - it does not keep all files.
Warning: this may not be what you need!
The history contains earlier states of files, files that were removed at some time, and other branches, containing similar, up to date files similar to the currently checked out, or completely different ones.
That means, in the general case, removing the .git affects files that where in the repository tree earlier, and files that currently - in the newest version - exist in other branches. All these would be deleted too!
The answers proposing to just delete .git apply only in the simplest case,
where you only added files to the master branch since creating the repository, and master is checked out.
I have a bunch of files that I've changed that I don't really want to commit, but I would like to back them up locally in case I would like to use them again. (Then I'll revert them.)
TortoiseSvn working status helps to view the modified files, but I want a way to save them all to a separate directory like Backups\, preferably with their folder heirararchy still in tact.
How can I do that?
UPDATE:
Apparently branching is the way to go.
But what I did was just copied the modified files paths to the clipboard (which is an option in tortoisesvn) then to a file, and created a program to copy them to a backup folder.
You can create a branch and commit those files only in that branch.
You can commit it inside a branch, so it doesn't affect your current 'trunk' or branch.
If you had a try with bazaar , that is compatible with SVN, there is a shelf command to temporarily store a set of modification and apply back them later.
I've been using Tortoise SVN + Visual SVN for about a year since left the corporate world to do my own startup. There's one feature in Tortoise SVN that I've never figured out:
How can I bundle up a bunch of changes into a PATCH or DIFF file and either: A) share them with my co-founder; or B) archive them into a standalone change that I can either "apply" or "revert" on my dev box?
At my previous employer, we used an internal tool that let us build so-called DPK files that contained a set of local changes. You could add changed files to the DPK and then share it with colleagues. They could either review the changes in a Diff tool or apply all the changes from the DPK to test your change on their box. After the review was complete, you could then check in these changes. You could also have multiple DPK's applied at the same time (provided you didn't have overlapping changes).
I want to achieve the same thing with Tortoise SVN + Visual SVN in the VS2010 IDE.
My real-world scenario is that I have some extensive change pending but uncompleted on my box. I want to ZIP up these changes and store them in a DIFF file, revert the changes, move on to something else, work on that, and in a few days reapply my changes from the archived DIFF file.
Reluctantly answering my own question. This feature is available with Tortoise SVN. Basically, you make a PATCH file, distribute it or archive it, and then you apply the PATCH. The only trick is to make sure you're in the right location in the WC (Working Copy) when you do the "apply". When you apply, you'll get a popup menu to the left with a list of all files in the changelist. You can apply the patches one by one or in bulk. Seems to work great. I should have drilled into the docs more before posting this question.
Here's the text for picking the location:
"Patch files are applied to your
working copy. This should be done from
the same folder level as was used to
create the patch. If you are not sure
what this is, just look at the first
line of the patch file. For example,
if the first file being worked on was
doc/source/english/chapter1.xml and
the first line in the patch file is
Index: english/chapter1.xml then you
need to apply the patch to the
doc/source/ folder. However, provided
you are in the correct working copy,
if you pick the wrong folder level,
TortoiseSVN will notice and suggest
the correct level."
Be sure to pick the location carefully. If Tortoise SVN can't find it because you selected the wrong node in the VS file explorer, it will try to find a matching location and that might be wrong. In my tests, the Patch feature actually tried to map to a branch (!!) when I specified the wrong location.
Here's the relevant link:
http://tortoisesvn.net/docs/release/TortoiseSVN_en/tsvn-dug-patch.html
I have a settings file that is under version control using subversion. Everybody has their own copy of this file, and I need this not to be ever committed. However, like I said, there is already a copy under version control. My question is: how do I remove this file from version control without deleting everyone's file, then add it to the ignore list so it won't be committed? I'm using linux command line svn.
Make a clean checkout, svn delete the file and add the ignore. Then commit this. Everyone else will have to take care (once) that their local copy isn't deleted on the next svn update, but after that, the local file would stay undisturbed and ignored by SVN.
If you remove the file from version control, how does a developer new to the project (or the one who accidentally deleted his local copy) get it after initial checkout? What if there are additions to the settings file?
I would suggest the following: Keep a default settings file (with no passwords, hostnames, connection strings, etc.) in SVN, name it something like settings.dist, and let the code work with a copy of this, named settings. Every developer has to make this copy once, and can then work with her personalized settings. If there are additions, add them to settings.dist – everyone else will get them with a update and can merge then into her personalized copy.
After you delete the file, your users will have to recover the file from the repository using svn export.
$ svn export -r x path ./
Where x is a revision where the file existed before it was deleted, path is the full path to the file, and ./ is where the file will be placed.
See svn help export for more information.
simply define a file containing settings that will override the default ones. This file is not checked into Subversion and each developer is responsible for maintaining this file according to their environments.
In an Ant-based world, you would have the files:
settings.properties
settings-local.properties (ignored for Subversion)
and in your build.xml file
<property file="settings-local.properties"/>
<property file="settings.properties"/>
For those who couldn't connect the dots:
modify the build.xml file like proposed
set the setting-local.properties as ignored
in an init target of your build, copy the settings.properties to settings-local.properties
wait a couple of days until everyone had the chance to run this target
delete the setting.properties from Subversion
Voila, every developer has its own setting-local.properties and everything was done automatically (and no developer lost his or her settings, which happens if you brutally delete the file from Suvbersion and there is no "Everyone else will have to take care...")
I have a similar issue. In my case it's an auto-generated user settings file (visual studio) that was accidentally checked in very early in the project. While just deleting it might work, it seems more correct to have it removed from the history, as it was never supposed to be in there in the first place.
I came across this, which might be a new feature since this question was originally posted 7.5 years ago:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/6025750/779130
Seems like an idea would be to:
1) create a dump of the project.
2) filter the dump using `svndumpfilter` to exclude the unwanted file(s).
3) load the dump as a new project.
This might be the only way to completely get rid of the file. In most cases the "delete and ignore" approach might be good enough.
[[ I'm new to subversion, so maybe this doesn't make sense. marking this as wiki -- if you know the right answer, please APPEND in the later section ]]
Couldn't you have a custom set of checkout steps so each user gets a different settings folder?
$ svn checkout http://example.com/project project
..
$ dir project
original_settings\ folder1\ folder2\
$ svn checkout http://example.com/project/aaron_settings project\settings
..
$ dir project
original_settings\ folder1\ folder2\ settings\
Or for new users
$ svn import project\settings http://example.com/project/aaron_settings
What I'm getting at is you want each user to have a custom view of the repository. In other version control systems, you could set up a custom listing of which projects you were using and which you weren't and which you put in odd places.
Does this work in subversion? The above code looks really risky, but maybe i'm doing it wrong.
WIKI:
(nothing yet)
Lets say, I know there is going to be a conflict with me committing but I don't want to deal with merging or anything.
I simply want to overwrite the repositories version with my own. What is the tortoisesvn command to do so?
First you have to make an update (SVN Update), so the conflict is actually happening.
Then you get three files in your directory: yourfilename.mine yourfilename.rX yourfilename.rY (X and Y are the original and the new revision numbers)
Rename the .mine file to the original file name.
Mark the conflicted file as resolved. (TortoiseSVN -> Resolved) (The .r? files will be deleted automatically)
After that you can commit the file as it were a normal change. (SVN Commit)
Look at the svn resolve command from the red book. With a command line client, you would be able to run
svn update
svn resolve -R --accept mine-full
It doesn't appear that TortoiseSVN makes this available, but if you have the command line client as backup, it may be handy. Otherwise, I'd go with a hack of the sort Neil describes (move working copy files, update, replace working copy files).
A big caution: Using the Resolved... command instead will accept the conflict-containing version after the update; you really want the file before the update.
Another (horrible) possibility:
Check out the version you know you are going to conflict with into a separate directory from your own stuff
Copy your working files over the ones in the separate directory - take care not to copy the .svn files
Commit from the separate directory