Ok right I have a voice recorder which records whatever the user plays, says etc
Is there anyway where i can have effects such as 'slow motion voice' or just like changing the sound effects. Or the 'bass' drops or something
So like a Mixer.
Consider looking into BASS for your audio library. You can use it with many languages. It has sample code for some of the functionality you are looking for, and is a good way to get started.
Related
I want to make an application that counts the speaking time of each speaker in an audio recording. I don't care about doing full voice recognition and transcribing every word in the recording, I just want the speaking time of each voice.
Is there a piece of software that provides such feature?
If possible, I would like to avoid using a third-party service (such as Google Cloud) to achieve this, and I would like the solution to be light enough to run on a modern smartphone.
Thank you for your help.
I had the same idea. Check this out https://github.com/pyannote/pyannote-audio
Haven't tried it myself yet. Will add an edit after.
I have recorded an audio.
I dont know how it happened that only one sided speech is recorded and the other speech is recorded with a very low sound.
Is there any solution to amplify the other side signal.
any help would be much appreciated.
This question is probably more appropriately asked at a forum where recording and mixing is discussed. For example: https://sound.stackexchange.com/
The ideal would be to improve your recording situation, to control factors so the sound are more closely matched. (Match microphones, isolate the speakers from environmental sounds, optimize input levels, etc.)
After that, the next option or step is to pre-process your audio files with a tool like Audacity. Use this or another DAW (Digital Audio Workstation) tool to match amplitudes or employ noise filtering or a range of other tools.
Audio processing is both tricky (an "art") and cpu intensive, so it's good to get as much of this handled as possible before the sounds are imported into a program.
Recently, I discover that my tutorial videos could be seen at 1.5x playback speed without losses in quality (they are actually better to see, as I normally speak slowly). My problem is that if I change the speed of the video when using a video editor, like Kdenlive, the audio becomes distorted and turns into a mess (higher pitch, I believe).
How could I obtain the same quality as VLC "playback fast" and Youtube "playback speed 1.5" for the audio track? I'm a layman in audio/video editing, so I'm also satisfied with partial answers, like the identification of which terms I should search for in this case.
It might be better to take your audio track and use something like Sound Forge to automatically remove silence. Just be sure to add a pad to that (built into sound forge) otherwise the speech will sound way to chopped and fast.
Aside from that, you could also use Vegas to (then) chop the video to keep pace with your new speech rate. Vegas is a video editing program that is best for this kind of down and dirty editing.
Here is what i like to achieve:
I like to play around in creating "new" software / hardware instruments.
Sound processing and creation is always managed by software. But one could play the instrument via ultrasonic distance sensor for example. Another idea is to start playback when someone interrupts the light of a photoelectric barrier and so on....
So the instrument would play common sounds, but has to be used in an unusal way. For example, the ultrasonic instrument would play a sound if it detects something in a certain distance. The sound could be manipiulated in pitch for example if the distance gets smaller.
Basically i like to playback a sound sample and manipualte this in realtime.
I guess i have to use WAV samples for this, right? And which programming language do you think fits best for this task?
Edited after kevins hint: please kick me into the right direction - give me a hint where to start.
Thanks in advance
Since you're using the the Processing tag, you can try Processing.
It comes with a sound library like Minim or you can install beads which is great. There's actually a nice book on it: Sonifying Processing
You might find SuperColider fun as well.
The main thing is what are you comfortable with at the moment ?
If Processing syntax looks intimidating, you can actually try a different programming paradigm like data flow. In which case you can use PureData(free, opensource) or MaxMSP(very similar, but commercial). The idea is rather than typing instructions, you connect boxes with wires which is fun and the examples are great too.
If you're into c++ there are plenty of libraries. On the creative side, there's a nice set of libraries called OpenFrameworks that's easy and fun to use. If this is your cup of tea, have a peek at Maximilian.
Bottomline is: there are multiple options to achieve the same task. Choose the best tool for your (based on your background) or try each and see what you like best.
You asked "And which programming language do you think fits best for this task?" - I would also suggest using Processing. I have been used Processing to work with sounds previously. And in all cases I used Minim. It has many UgenS to generate sounds programmatically.
Also, you wants to integrate with some sensors. I'm not sure what types of sensors you will use, but Processing goes pretty well with different Arduino modules and sensors. Check this link for more direction.
Furthermore, you can export your project as .exe or executable .jar files. And their JS version (P5.js) works almost the same as the Java version.
I'm working on a simple music visualization. Probably not relevant, but I am doing the sound processing using the new WebKit Audio Data API and the dsp.js library.
I want to make a text vibrate (grow/shrink) to the rhythm of the music. What is the best way to do this?
What I've done so far is ran the signals through a FFT. I look at the bottom 10% of frequencies (bass notes?) and when the amplitude surpasses a certain threshold, I animate the text.
Does this sound right? Or am I completely off?
You say you've done it, and then you ask if you are way off? Well, you tell us: does it work for your application?
One potential problem is that the FFT is slow, both in that there may be a lag between your input and output and there will be a lot of CPU used. I don't expect this will matter for your application, but, in general, you are better off using a low-pass filter. When the output of the low-pass goes above some level, you can use that to trigger something for some short amount of time.
Another issue is simply that this is only a very basic beat detection algorithm. It might work for bass-heavy "four on the floor" music, but you'll need to figure out where the threshold goes and how to keep it moving when the bass stops or something. You may want to research beat detection algorithms. The open source aubio has some.
http://aubio.org/