How to select only one field from table inside a model.
For example: table1(field1, field2 , ..) and the select only field 1
You want only one value or a rowset with one column?
In first case, you can use fetchOne():
$result = $db->fetchOne('SELECT bug_status FROM bugs WHERE bug_id = 2');
Or you can make a select only with the fields you want to retreive:
$select = $db->select()
->from(array('t' => 'table1'),
array('field1'));
Related
Working on Azure Cognitive Search with backend as MS SQL table, have some scenarios where need help to define a query.
Sample table structure and data :
Scenarios 1 : Need to define a query which will return data based on category.
I have tied query using search.ismatch but its uses prefix search and matches other categories as well with similar kind of values i.e. "Embedded" and "Embedded Vision"
$filter=Region eq 'AA' and search.ismatch('Embedded*','Category')
https://{AZ_RESOURCE_NAME}.search.windows.net/indexes/{INDEX_NAME}/docs?api-version=2020-06-30-Preview&$count=true&$filter=Region eq 'AA' and search.ismatch('Embedded*','Category')
And it will response with below result, where it include "Embedded" and "Embedded Vision" both categories.
But my expectation is to fetch data only if it match "Embedded" category, as highlighted below
Scenario 2: For the above Scenario 1, Need little enhancement to find records with multiple category
For example if I pass multiple categories (i.e. "Embedded" , "Automation") need below highlighted output
you'll need to use a different analyzer which will break the tokens on every ';' just for the category field rather than 'whitespaces'.
You should first ensure your Category data is populated as a Collection(Edm.String) in the index. See Supported Data Types in the official documentation. Each of your semicolon-separated values should be separate values in the collection, in a property called Category (or similar).
You can then filter by string values in the collection. See rules for filtering string collections. Assuming that your index contains a string collection field called Category, you can filter by categories containing Embedded like this:
Category/any(c: c eq 'Embedded')
You can filter by multiple values like this:
Category/any(c: search.in(c, 'Embedded, Automation'))
Start with clean data in your index using proper types for the data you have. This allows you to implement proper facets and you can utilize the syntax made specifically for this. Trying to work around this with wildcards is a hack that should be avoided.
To solve above mention problem used a below SQL function which will convert category to a json string array supported by Collection(Edm.String) data type in Azure Search.
Sql Function
CREATE FUNCTION dbo.GetCategoryAsArray
(
#ID VARCHAR(20)
)
RETURNS NVARCHAR(MAX)
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE #result NVARCHAR(MAX) = ''
SET #result = REPLACE(
STUFF(
(SELECT
','''+ TRIM(Value) + ''''
FROM dbo.TABLEA p
CROSS APPLY STRING_SPLIT (Category, ';')
WHERE p.ID = #ID
FOR XML PATH('')
),1,1,''),'&','&')
RETURN '[' + #result + ']'
END
GO
View to use function and return desired data
CREATE View dbo.TABLEA_VIEW AS
select
id
,dbo. GetCategoryAsArray(id) as CategoryArr
,type
,region
,Category
from dbo.TABLEA
Defined a new Azure Search Index using above SQL View as data source and during Index column mapping defined CategoryArr column as Collection(Edm.String) data type
Query to use to achieve expected output from Azure Search
$filter=Region eq 'AA' and CategoryArr/any(c: search.in(c, 'Embedded, Automation'))
I have two DAC's POReceipt, and and POReceiptLine. POReceiptLine containts a field called MfrPartNbr.
I want the user to be able to lookup all the POReceipts where the POReceiptLine.MfrPartNbr is equal to an entered value.
The SQL would be
SELECT *
FROM dbo.POReceipt
WHERE POReceipt.ReceiptNbr IN
(
SELECT ReceiptNbr
FROM dbo.POReceiptLine
WHERE MfrPartNbr = 'MY_ENTERED_PART_NBR'
)
Any idea how to write the BQL Statement for this?
As stated, an inner join won't work in this case because you will receive the same POReceipt multiple times (once for each POReceiptLine). The following BQL query shows how you can get the desired results using a sub query. If mfrPartNbr is an extension field, then replace POReceiptLine.mfrPartNbr with the correct extension name (e.g. POReceiptLineExtension.mfrPartNbr).
PXSelect<POReceipt, Where<Exists<
Select<POReceiptLine,
Where<POReceiptLine.receiptNbr, Equal<POReceipt.receiptNbr>,
And<POReceiptLine.mfrPartNbr, Equal<Required<POReceiptLine.mfrPartNbr>>>>>>>>.Select(this, "MY_ENTERED_PART_NBR");
I am dynamically generating a selectlist in Drupal and I want to create an associative array to populate the node ID as the value, and the title of the node as the option.
By default, it makes the value for each option the index of the select list. This is no good because the select list is dynamic, meaning the values won't be in the same order.
I used drupal_map_assoc to make the value the same as the option, but I have queries based on the value stored in this field, so if someone updates the value stored, the queries won't match.
<option value="Addison Reserve Country Club Inc.">Addison Reserve Country Club Inc.</option>
I want to replace the value with the Node ID also pulled with the query.
$sql = 'SELECT DISTINCT title, nid FROM {node} WHERE type = \'accounts\' ';
$result = db_query($sql);
while ($row = db_fetch_array($result)) {
$return[] = $row['title'];
//Trying to do something like 'Addison Reserve Country Club' => '2033' - where 2033 is the nid
}
$return = drupal_map_assoc($return);
I think you just want to do this inside the loop:
$return[$row['nid']] = $row['title'];
Based on your comment, you would also want to do an array_flip() right after the loop, but I think your comment may just have it backwards.
I am creating BOOK_Issue table which will contain id of person to whom the book is issued.
i have a column name user_id witch will contain ids from tbl_student as well as tbl_faculty. so how to set user_id field of book_issue table with reference to two primary key columns.
Your database schema is not correct.
If you expect unique IDs then they should be in one table.
You can create a table with all the users, and have a column to set their type (student, faculty). Then create 2 different tables for each type that has the proper information for each user based on their type.
Create a "person" superclass that can be either of type "student" or type "faculty". Reference this from the BOOK_Issue table instead.
Basically to create this relationship, you'll need one unique ID that spans both "student" and "faculty". Put this in a table (tbl_person?) and have each row in tbl_student and tbl_faculty reference this new table. It's probably also best to then pull out the fields present in both tbl_student and tbl_faculty and put them in this new supertable instead.
You can solve the problem by either having an extra column in BOOK_Issue table, next to user_id, which indicates if this is a Student ID or a Faculty ID.
Alternatively, the IDs themselves may readily include some pattern which indicate their nature (for example no all faculty Ids may start with say "UC", and none of the student Id are so).
The two solutions above then allow using queries similar to the following
SELECT B.*,
CASE B.BorrowerType -- could be LEFT(user_id, 2) etc...
WHEN 'S' THEN S.Name
WHEN 'F' Then F.Name
END As Name,
CASE B.BorrowerType
WHEN 'S' THEN S.PhoneNumber
WHEN 'F' Then F.Phone -- Note that these constructs allow
-- mapping distinct columns names etc.
END As PhoneNr
FROM BOOK_Issue B
LEFT JOIN tbl_student S ON B.BorrowerType = 'S' AND B.user_id = S.id
LEFT JOIN tbl_faculty F ON B.BorrowerType = 'F' AND B.user_id = F.id
WHERE B.DueDate < '11/23/2009' -- or some other condition
This can get a bit heavy when we need to get multiple columns from the student/faculty tables. A possible alternative is a UNION, but this would then cause the repeating of the search clause.
Finally, the best solution but not avaible on all DBMS is a sub-query driven by an "IF B.BorrowerType = 'S' " condition.
This should be your table design:
FacultyTable (FacultyID, FacultyName)
StudentsTable (StudentID, StudentName, FacultlyID, ...)
BookTable (BookID, BookName, ...)
UsersTable(UserID, UserName, UserPassword, StudentID, LastLogin, ...)
Now this is the main thing:
BookIssedTable(BookIssedID, BookID, UserID)
//This table tells me that a book of "BookID was issued to a user of "UserID"
//this can be better for this is certainly a great improvement from the initial design.
I have two tables. Both of them have a column named 'title'. When I use the following code snippet to join two tables, I can't access one of the title column.
$select = $this->select(Zend_Db_Table::SELECT_WITH_FROM_PART);
$select->setIntegrityCheck(false);
$select->join("service","service.id = lecture.service_id");
return $select;
is there a way to access both columns?
You need to rename one of the columns so it doesn't conflict with the other. If you pass an array as the optional 3rd argument to join(), you can specify which columns to retrieve from the joined table. If one or more of the entries in the array is hashed, then the hash key will be used as the property name. With the code below, you can refer to the title column of the service table as "service_title" in your query results. If you want other columns from the service table, add them to the array, with or without hashes as desired.
$select = $this->select(Zend_Db_Table::SELECT_WITH_FROM_PART);
$select->setIntegrityCheck(false);
$select->join("service", "service.id = lecture.service_id",
array("service_title" => "service.title");
return $select;
$select = $this->select();
$select->from(array('t'=>'table1'), array('table_title AS title_first','table_sendo_colun','table_third_colun'));
$select->setIntegrityCheck(false);
$select->join("service","service.id = t.service_id");
return $select;
Maybe It can do the job.
Regard´s.