I'm looking for a development board for WinCE, preferably with the following connectors:
VGA/DVI for screen
USB for kb/mouse
Ethernet (10Mbit is OK, 100 would be even better ;-) )
Storage (eg: SD/MMC/CF cards)
I'm looking for this, because I want to attend the Imagine Cup , Embedded Systems design. And I'm looking for a challenge, ofcourse ;-).
I found a board called HawkBoard (http://www.hawkboard.org), but I want to know if there are alternatives for about the same price (max $200 incl. shipping/customs/taxes). I need the BSP, ofcourse ;-).
Thanks!
Yvan
The eBox 2300/3300 is a low cost device that has been used for past Imagine Cup challenges. It's x86, comes with a BSP, is in an enclosure, is low cost ($195 or $255) and meets most of your needs.
Of course CE has forever shipped with a reference BSP for x86, so you can usually get just about any x86 device working, though most other devices tend to be pretty big physically.
There are also open source CE BSPs available for the BeagleBoard and GumStix.
The BeagleBoard is a good ARM system that costs $150. It has all the features you want, from the product page:
DVI-D for connecting digital computer monitors
Compatibility with a huge collection of USB peripherals including hubs, keyboards, mice, WiFi, Bluetooth, web cameras, and much more
MMC+/SD/SDIO interface for memory or wireless connectivity
S-Video out for connecting your NTSC or PAL television or wearable visor
Stereo audio in and out for a microphone and headphones or speakers
Power via typical USB chargers for cell phones from your laptop, from an automobile adapter, from batteries, or even from a solar backpack
I never tried Windows CE myself, but a google search suggests it's possible, and there's even a video on YouTube.
Another option is Gumstix, and there's a project on codeplex to help you get Windows CE on it.
I guess it also depends if you want to start something for fun or rather serious.
Check some of the big manufacturers homepages too, so you can see what specifications could
help the realisation of your ideas or set limits to them.
What helps for shure is if you choose a platform, that can be configured easily and its much more fun if you start with something that can work out of the box too.
Here an example, like you can find it on a lot of manufactureres homepages on the web.
http://www.toradex.com/En/Products/Colibri
Colibri modules feature state of the art technology, and aimed at low power systems that require high CPU performance. They are equipped withall the interfaces needed in a modern embedded device.
Colibri T20 features include:
· Dual Core ARM Cortex A9 Processor
· 2 x 1.0GHz Processor Speed
· Full HD 1080p Video (Encode / Decode)
· Powerful 3D Rendering Performance
· True Dual Display
· Up to 12 Megapixel Camera Sensor Support
And if this is to much there are Colibri modules in the family which are in a lower price range with adapted specifications that might fit you needs better.
What I personally think is important, that you know that you can get good support and talk to the right people in person as well.
Give it a shot and good luck.
Regards
Any old PC that has a video adapter that is VESA compliant and a network adapter based on NE2000, realtek RTL8139 or 3COm 3Cx5 can be used as Windows CE target device using the CEPC BSP.
If you have an old 486 or more powerful PC lying unused somewhere in your garage, it's time to resurrect it! :)
Related
I am involved working on new hardware LED products where we are selecting a Bluetooth chipset to use in multiple products controlled by iOS and Android apps, for at minimum the next 3-4 years. Also I am not the developer, a third party will be contracted for this project.
As part of background research, I wanted to ask for feedback from Stack Overflow communities' experience with programming for Bluetooth, more specifically with custom firmware and GPIO PWM for LED?
What kind of challenges did you come across?
Are there any granular details or features to look out for with the hardware?
**Edit: based on first answer-
Requirements:
BLE 5
I do need OTA update capability
Chip size not big constraint, plastic enclosure can accommodate up to 1 inch/25mm or bit more easily.
Not high temp application
Single-chip solution, that will be programmed with our firmware, controlling 4x PWM Channels is ideal for our LED strips, avoiding separate MCU
Cost per unit (lowest average cost/unit)- important factor at volume, TBD
**Qualities I can not gauge well myself, being a designer and not an experienced programmer:
Ease of integration/support (lowest cost of development)
Quality of the chip manufacturer's software tools
Quality of the chips documentation
I have found some questions related with Raspberry Pi that seem generally helpful, but those questions don't help me with features or the support and documentation as related to BT SOCs.
**Edit: Yes I we are only considering BLE, and the NORDIC Semiconductor link I have included below are BLE and BT 5.
NORDIC chips are on my short list, they seem well supported and capable of 3x or 4x PWM channels for example nRF52832 Nordic nRF52832 Spec info. or the newer model RF5340. Does anyone have experience with them?
I really appreciate any answers regarding development considerations with Bluetooth.
I will edit & clarify if needed.
If you wish to support iOS Apps, a BLE device is necessary, BT classic requires a special apple license (for your product) to be able to connect with iOS Apps.
But other than that, your specifications dont really help to rule out ANY chip.
The first question that comes to mind is what other features do you
have already on your specification list that could be satisfied with
a common solution. I.e. if you also need WiFi, don't choose two
separate BLE/WiFi Chips, buy a chip that can do both (it's both
2.4GHz RF). If you need OTA updates for your firmware, choose a chip manufacturer with extensive and well documented tooling.
Consider special requirements:
Do you need a very small chip?
Does it need to be run at high temperatures (i.e. inside a light bulb)?
Do you need to run at ultra-low-power?
Does it need a high performance RF transceiver?
Decide whether you need a single-chip solution, that will be programmed with your firmware, or if your firmware will run on a dedicated microcontroller which is connected to the BLE chip.
Unless you have absolutely no special requirements to narrow down the selection, I'd base my decision along these criteria (not ordered):
Ease of integration (lowest cost of development)
Cost per unit (lowest average cost/unit)
Quality of the chip manufacturer's software tools
Quality of the chips documentation
GPIO-PWM Output should be possible with almost any programmable BLE chip.
I've never worked with the Yocto Project, and barely knows what it is. But I'm investigating the possibility to use a Simatic 2040 as a gateway between an USB hall sensor and industrial PLC network.
The sensor that we want to use is this one. It's designed to use with an Windows desktop PC, connected via USB.
Now my main question is, would it be possible to write software in the Yocto device to capture the sensors data, and share this information with an industrial PLC network.
The industrial PLC network is also Siemens based, so I don't see much problems around that because we can make use of the Node-Red Profinet or Modbus library's.
The question is stated in very general terms, so I will have to answer in very general terms.
Overall the answer to your question is yes, but there are a number of details to sort out (some of them might be show stoppers).
Yocto is a system to generate embedded Linux images and also SDKs (cross compiler toolchain + sysroot).
You might be fine to take an existing Yocto Image for the SIMATIC 2040 and just add your own application to it. For this a matching SDK has to exist. This approach works fine as long as your application has not too many dependencies and you don't need to many modifications off the existing image.
If this is not the case you might be better off generating a custom image as well as an SDK (based on the existing SIMATIC 2040 configuration).
Considering your USB device. The linked data sheet states windows support. Your options?
Talk to the vendor? Does he provide a driver, but doesn't advertise it? Is he willing to hand out a detailed datasheet?
Check if there is a community driver in the mainline kernel?
Reverse engineering the existing Windows driver?
Pick an alternative device with an existing Linux driver (preferably in the mainline kernel).
The right solution depends on the time and effort you are willing and able to put into this.
I am trying to get my hands dirty on understanding Bluetooth (BT) for building a BT based speaker. When i read through Google on selecting the device, i came across CSR, TI and few more of them. After some research and talking to ppl, they suggested to go with TI (CC256x series). Few questions i have here are:
Can the same TI chip be used as Speaker, BT headset?
Can both SPP profiles and audio profiles co-exist together?
I am not sure as a application developer, i should know about BT firmware but wanted to get some insight on how BT works. Any good books?
Sorry for asking basic question here
-Prashanth
Yes! Audio transfer requires a high data rate which means you have to use a chip that supports bluetooth classic and not low energy (ble). The CC256x offers both a bluetooth classic and a dual bluetooth (classic + low energy) version, both will work.
Yes! SPP and audio profiles are implemented on different streams and it is normal for them to co-exist.
Good books on bluetooth classic are hard to come by, one of the best places to start is the Apple developer documentation (linked down below). The developer area of bluetooth.org is also a good place to start.
https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/DeviceDrivers/Conceptual/Bluetooth/BT_Intro/BT_Intro.html
https://developer.bluetooth.org/
I trying to learn DMA for device drivers with PCI/PCIe devices, and my platform is linux/bsd. I have found quite a few simple PCI boards for training (such as simple digital I/O boards), but none have hardware complex enough to handle DMA. Is anyone on Stackoverflow aware of a PCI/PCIe card with some sort of microprocessor or mcirocontroller that I could program with open-source tools like gcc (e.g. PowerPC, 68HC11, Atmel, 8051, etc.)??
Of course the kicker is low cost...sub USD 300.00 if possible.
I DO NOT WANT an FPGA-based board, because that requires a Windows workstation (usually) for programming the FPGA, as well as all of the time required for creating and working with a PCI/PCIe IP core in the FPGA. Basically, I don't want to spend my time working on the FPGA; I want to work on the device driver! This may be my only option though...
If you don't want to use FPGA, then you have to find a board that has enough info for you to be able to communicate with the PCIe interface of it. Not that many boards come with HW interface document, but if you want or can do this without documentation, you can use one of these boards:
Alibaba 4 Channel MIDI GAME port 3D
Same board on E-bay Alternative 2 on e-bay
You can also get a bit more advanced board like this one, but then you need to know how to communicate with their chipset.
Alibaba 4CH PCIe HDMI Video Capture Card here
If you change your mind for the FPGA, I would really recommend the Altera PCIe board that comes with a reference design and the bit file already per-programmed on the board. It is much more expensive than those, but the biggest benefit is that you have full documentation of the PCIe interface:
Altera Cyclone IV GX Transceiver Starter Kit
Here is the info about their reference design:
Altera PCIe reference design
Hope you find what you are looking for here.
I am looking at integrating a C# application with a barcode scanner.
The last time I did this was with Delphi 1 (win 3.11) using a scanner that plugged in-line into the keyboard cable.
Looking around it appears most scanners are USB based these days and assume they emulate keyboard entry.
Anybody know of more sophisticated/programmable scanner that can call a webservice or even just do a basic POST/GET this would eliminate the C# application and the computer to support it?
There are a number of Ethernet and Wifi code readers on the market, though they tend to be targeted at industrial applications and usually cost more than the USB models. The company I work for makes such readers, and our fixed-mount DM200 reader is just such a device.
You could use a small computer (or even a microcontroller) with RO media, USB, and networking capabilities plus a psu to turn any suitable scanner to a network one. Raspberry Pi, for example, could do it and seems to be hip these days.
Alternatively some portable devices (like Android tablets) could probably use a camera or even a USB scanner for scanning codes and come with capable networking features.