I'm rather new to perforce, but have quite a bit of other VCS experience...
Imagine this:
You submit changes (changelist 1)
A colleague submits changes on the same branch, accidentally overwriting your changes. (changelist 2)
I tried integrating (which P4V refuses to do since it's already integrated) and looked around for a way to just generate a patch that I could apply, but couldn't find anything.
For now, I will check out the versions in question and use an external merge tool, but it would be great to know if perforce supports this somehow.
Is there a way using the perforce tools (preferably in P4V) to reapply changelist 1?
You can't reapply changelist 1, but you can reapply changelist 2.
Sync to changelist 1.
Check out the file(s). P4V will warn you that, "You do not have the latest revision of the file.", and ask you if you want to get the latest. Ignore the warning by clicking the "Don't Get Latest" button.
Now sync to the head revision (I'm assuming changelist 2 corresponds to the head revision). The file(s) will now need to be resolved, which you (or your colleague) can do, properly this time, without clobbering the changes you made in changelist 1.
Probably the easiest way is to retrieve the changes from changelist 1 (//depot/...#1,#1) and then going through the normal resolve/merge+submit song and dance.
Related
I have a file on another branch which contain a change I would like to integrate. But it contains other changes too which I don't want to integrate yet.
How can I integrate the file only partially?
I first integrated and resolved the file as usual, then I did a "p4 edit" on the file after that to remove the changes I don't want to go in yet. "p4 opened" said that the file is opened for edit, so I thought the commit will submitted as an edit not an integration. I was wrong! It still updated the integration history! So if I attempt to integrate the rest of the changes later the perforce will say "all revisions integrated", and the only way to resolve the problem is integrating by disregarding the integration history, which is painful to resolve.
How can I avoid this next time?
EDIT:
To clarify I mean there are multiple changes in a single revision of file and I want to integrate only a part of it.
(edited to reflect that the question is about partially integrating a revision, not integrating a single revision of a file)
Since a revision is the smallest atom of change in Perforce's metadata, you won't be able to record that a subset of a revision was integrated -- and since you don't want to record that the entire revision was integrated (thereby "ignoring" the rest of the revision for future integrations), rather than doing this as an integrate, I'd do it as an edit:
p4 edit target
p4 print -o theirs source#n
p4 print -o base source#n-1
p4 merge3 base theirs target > target
rm base theirs
(edit target)
p4 submit
Another option would be to initially open the file for integrate and then clear the resolve record by reverting (use the -k flag to keep local changes) and reopening for edit:
p4 integrate source#n,n target
p4 resolve
p4 revert -k target
p4 edit target
In general if there are multiple independent changes you're making to a file such that you might want to be able to cherry-pick and/or track them independently at a later date, submitting them as independent changelists will make that much much much easier. Shelving can help with this if you realize only after making a big change that it'd make more sense as a series of smaller changes -- shelve your big change, revert some parts, submit the smaller change, then unshelve the big change and continue.
Let's say I have a project under //depot/MyProject. At changelist 1001, this project took a major change in direction, changing everything about it. At changelist 2001, it got p4 deleted. The depot is now at change 3000.
I'd like to restore //depot/MyProject back to its state at changelist 1000. Specifically, I'd like the revision history to record the fact that change 3001 is an integration of change 1000 - i.e. the last version of this project before the major change.
Can Perforce do this at all? Or do I have to rename it into something like //depot/MyProjectOriginal, because //depot/MyProject is now tainted with all those deleted revisions?
(the naive attempt to p4 integrate //depot/MyProject/...#1000 //depot/MyProject/... fails with an "all revision(s) already integrated" message)
You cannot force the integration.
You have two options: you can create a branch using changelist 1000 as the base; or sync to changelist 1000, check out all files, and then submit (a.k.a rolling back).
Option 1
If you do want the history of your changes between 1001-3000 (i.e. a fresh start from changelist 1000) then this is the better option. Using P4V, create a new branchspec and then perform an integrate from your current project to the new branch at changelist 1000. This will be submitted as changelist 3001, when you compare differences between revisions, you will not see of the changes between 1001-3000.
In the P4 visualizer this will appear as a new branch creation at 1000.
Option 2
Sync to changelist 1000, check out all files, and then submit. There should not be any conflicts to resolve. This will be submitted as changelist 3001, however when you review history you will see the everything.
I hope this makes sense, any questions, please ask.
I don't believe that you can integrate files on top of one another like that. I think that you have two options.
If you are willing to move the files, you can do a
p4 integ //depot/MyProject/...#1000 //depot/MyOriginal/Project/...
and that will integrate MyProject at changelist 1000 to the new location.
If you'd like to keep the project at the same place, you can do that as well. It's really easiest in p4v - you can right click on the folder in workspace or depot view and choose "rollback...". In the subsequent dialog, you can then pick a changelist (or date, revision, etc) to roll the folder back to. In your case, I think that you would choose changelist 1000. Stick the files into a new pending changelist (I think that this is always good practice). You can then run a preveiw (to see what would happen), save the contents to a new changelist (so that you can inspect file contents before submitting), or just go for broke and pull the trigger and submit (I generally wouldn't recommend this).
HTH
Just do:
p4 copy //depot/MyProject/...#1000 //depot/MyProject/...
This also make a nice revision graph.
Though there is an accepted answer and plenty of other solutions, none of them works for me coz I need to rollback a large directory (with GBs of data)
Here is the way I used, which works fine for huge directory:
(Suggested to do in a new and clean workspace, though not strictly required)
Assuming the directory to rollback is //depot/foo/bar and you want to rollback to changelist 1234
Make sure no one is locking any files, and make sure the directory you are trying to rollback exists in your client spec
p4 copy -v //depot/foo/bar/...#1234 //depot/foo/bar/...
p4 submit
p4 copy -v is the meat of the solution. It tells Perforce server to perform virtual copy, which means Perforce copies the files but not actually in your workspace. This avoid huge data transfer for file content (when copying and when submitting). In my case, by using "rollback" in P4V (which is doing non-virtual copy), it took over an hour just for copy, and over an hour for submit for my folder. With virtual copy, whole process took me around 1 minute.
The most important thing is, it keep a sensible history. You can see your files being updated and rolled back, and all previous history exists.
use
p4 integrate -f //depot/MyProject/...#1000 //depot/MyProject/...
The -f flag means force an integration even if they have already been integrated.
From http://www.perforce.com/perforce/doc.current/manuals/cmdref/integrate.html
(I am a new perforce user, but have used lots of other source code control systems in the past.)
We use a change list to check-in each bug fix; the change list comment includes the bug ID therefore it is easy to track when a bug fix has been checked into a branch.
However I can’t see an easy way to find all branches a given bug fix has been merged into, or to find all bug fixes that have been merged into a given branch.
As far as I can tell perforce does not track all the branches a change list have been merged into. As I understand it, when a merge is done in perforce the history is not copied into the target branch so the only history in the target in the comment on the change list the merge was done into.
What am I missing?
Perforce tracks where revisions of a file have been integrated, but it doesn't automatically propagate check-in comments with your bug-tracking metadata.
Given a changelist on a particular branch, you can tell whether Perforce thinks the changelist has been integrated by asking Perforce to integrate the changelist. (I'm using "branch" in the more traditional source-control sense, to mean a particular branch of the source code tree, rather than in the specific Perforce sense to mean the path of integration between these two source code trees.) Let's say you've been working in //source/project/trunk/... and you have a changelist #1234 that you'd like to check whether it's been integrated into your release branch //source/project/rel/.... Create a client that maps //source/project/rel/... and execute:
$ p4 integrate -n //source/project/trunk/...#1234,1234 //source/project/rel/...
If Perforce tells you "All revision(s) already integrated.", changelist #1234 has been integrated, and that bugfix ought to be available on the release branch. If Perforce lists files that have changed, those files have not been integrated. (It's also possible for some files in a changelist to be integrated and not others, which may make for some interesting problems.)
This doesn't scale especially well -- you need to check each bugfix on each branch you care about, though it does lend itself to automation.
You can use the "unsupported" Perforce command interchanges to get a quick idea of what changelists have not been integrated from one branch into another. (In Perforce parlance, "unsupported" means something like "might not work the same in the next revision, but we think it could be useful so we'll release it anyway".) To see what changelists haven't been integrated from our example trunk to release branches, execute:
$ p4 interchanges //source/project/trunk/... //source/project/rel/...
Change 1236 on 2010/10/10 by user#client 'Fixed some bug you don't care about'
Change 1235 on 2010/10/09 by user#other_client 'Fixed some other random bug'
In this example, I haven't listed changelist #1234 because it's already been integrated into the release branch. One problem I've experienced using interchanges is it'll list every newer revision after an unintegrated change, even if the newer revisions themselves have been integrated, so if you're cherry-picking revisions for a release branch you may see changelists listed again. I use interchanges as a first pass to get a rough idea of what I need to integrate, then look at integrate to get a better idea of what's really missing.
(Perforce also supports a similar concept of "jobs", that let one attach particular fixes to particular changelists, but my organization doesn't use them so I don't know how well they work or whether they are propagated automatically on integration.)
Is there any easy way to exclude a specific changelist from p4 sync?
I want to sync up my code, but I don't want to fetch the changes from changelist #1337
Like: p4 sync //depot/source/... - //depot/source/...#1337?
The best way to accomplish this is just sync to head, and then use the 'Back out submitted changelist' function in P4V ('Submitted' pane, right-click the undesired changelist, select 'Back out submitted changelist').
This will create a new pending changelist in your workspace with the undesired changes removed.
It is possible by syncing to a range and using two commands to "skip" the changelist.
p4 sync //depot/source/... - //depot/source/...#0,#1337
p4 sync //depot/source/... - //depot/source/...#1337,#head
Note: you may have to specify the changelist on either side of the one you want to skip - not sure if the range is inclusive.
HTH,
Dennis
Ok this should work depending on what you want to do. Man I really miss git :(
If you simply want to sync and temporarily ignore a changelist you can do what the first reply said and back out the change list. Just remember to not check that change list in unless you want to wipe out the ignored changelist for the branch. However this approach will not work if you need to make changes to files that exist in the ignored changelist.
If you need to work with the same files from the ignored changelist you can do the following. One thing to note however, is that the ignored changelist will be pulled out of the remote branch until you are ok with them being in your code. (there is one other option but requires someone else to do something)
If you want to ignore a change list, and not get rid of it completely but simply be able to work on your code with it off to the side, the following will work.
Back out the changelist as previously stated.
Submit the backed out changelist to wipe out the changes in the remote branch. (don't worry)
Now do another back out but this time back out the chagelist created by the previous back out and shelve it. This back out of the back out will be a pending change list that is basically a copy of the one you wanted to ignore. Once its shelved you can go about your work, even in the same files. The down side is that now the ignored changelist only exist on your work space and its up to you to submit it or decide what to do with it at some point.
You can keep the ignored change list shelved until you know what you want to do with it. If, after you work on your code, you want to re integrate that chagelist and merge it with yours you can simply unshelf it and resolve conflicts.
So the (other option)
You could do the above with help from another dev with a perforce account (perhaps the one who's changelist you want to ignore) in this case you could have them back out the changelist and submit, then you could sync, then they could back out their back out. In this case the remote branch would not need to stay in weird state while you worked on your code. The big downside is, that you would have to do this every time you wanted to sync.
A better option would be branching before an issue like this arrises but that is not as easy or light weight in perforce as it is in git.
Hope one of these options help or spark a finale and perfect solution from some one else.
Using P4V 2009.2.
I have used P4Win in the past, but this is a new setup for me.
The problem is that the files I have checked out disappear from the changelists, so I cannot check them in.
To reproduce:
Check out a file, make a change to it.
Go to the 'pending changelist' tab.
There will be a + sign on the default changelist.
Click on the plus, or on the changelist line, the plus will disappear, there will be nothing in the changelist.
Try to check the file in by right-click on the file itself, the changelist dialog will show up but NO files are listed.
You can transfer the file to a new changelist, the same thing happens.
Looking at the file in the 'checked out by' window does correctly show the changelist number & description.
It sometimes happens to me, and what I normally do is change workspace and then change back again. Not sure if there is an easier way to get it to realise the files are checked out.
the only thing I can imagine is that you are looking at a different client workspace. Notice that the "Pending Changes" tab has a filter on the top, where you can separately filter for folder/files, user and workspace. Maybe the filter is set to something so that it doesn't match the client workspace where you have actually checked out the file.
Good luck,
Henrik
You may get this if the perforce server has not been upgraded. Old versions of P4D have this error: http://kb.perforce.com/article/1167/opened-files-missing-in-default-changelist
If that is not an option, use p4Win.
I agree with jhwist,sounds like your looking at a different client spec.
P4V is a bit confusing on this front, IMO and I personally prefer P4 Win but to check, open up a command prompt and type p4 changes -s pending -c YOURCLIENTSPEC - chances are that the changes you think you have aren't in your current clientspec
This can happen sometimes and in my experience it is a refresh issue with p4v. Often simply closing the pending tab or reopening p4v solves the problem.
In my case, the pending List has over 4000 files, (due to eclipse created so many files after mvn tasks) so none of them are shown. I created a different pending list, then cleared all contents, then moved the files to the new change list. Then it is appearing in the new change list.
Modify the file directly in the correctly mapped client folder (i.e. your current workspace). You will see the changelist for sure. As jhwist mentioned clear filters if any and choose your current workspace (since you may have many)