I have Windows CE 5.0 device and it doesn't support any hardware accelearation.
I am looking for some good 2d graphics library to do following things.
I prefer backend programming in Compact .Net Framework.
Drawing fonts with antialiasing.
drawing lines, and simple vector objects with antialiasing.
I am not doing animation, so i don't care about frames per seconds performance.
i have looked into following libraries, but nothing suits me.
opengl (vincent 3d software rendering) - works, but api is very low level and complex.
openvg - no software implementation for windows ce.
Cairo - api is very neat, but no wince build.
Adobe Flash - installs as browser plugin , no activex support in wince.
Anti-aliased fonts in .Net CF 2.0+ can be done with Microsoft.WindowsCE.Form.LogFont -- after creating your logfont, you can use it with any WinForms widget's .Font property by converting it using System.Drawing.Font.FromLogFont().
...you might need to enable anti-aliasing in the registry for these to render properly, see this MSDN article for the right keys: [http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms901096.aspx][1].
There was a decent implementation of GDI+ for .Net CF 1.0 called "XrossOne Mobile GDI+", it's not longer supported, but you can get the source code here: http://www.isquaredsoftware.com/XrossOneGDIPlus.php -- Run it through the import wizard on VS2008 to build it for later versions of CF. I liked this library for its alpha transparency support without hardware acceleration, rounded rectangles and gradient support.
Someone was advertising this library in some forum. It's for Windows Mobile, but you can check it out. I have no experience with it.
link
I have Google's skia library compiling under WindowsCE, although I haven't done much with it yet :) It wasn't too hard to get working. It does support a OpenGL/ES backend.
There is also AGG (Anti Grain Geometry) which is a heavy C++ library based on templates.
Related
I was wondering if it would be possible to get graphical hardware acceleration without Xorg and its DDX driver, only with kernel module and the rest of userspace driver. I'm asking this because I'm starting to develop on an embedded platform (something like beagleboard or more roughly a Texas instruments ARM chip with integrated GPU), and I would get hardware acceleration without the overhead of a graphical server (that is not needed).
If yes, how? I was thinking about OpenGL or OpengGLES implementations, or Qt embedded http://harmattan-dev.nokia.com/docs/library/html/qt4/qt-embeddedlinux-accel.html
And TI provides a large documentation, but still is not clear to me
http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Sitara_Linux_Software_Developer%E2%80%99s_Guide
Thank you.
The answer will depend on your user application. If everything is bare metal and your application team is writing everything, the DirectFB API can be used as Fredrik suggest. This might be especially interesting if you use the framebuffer version of GTK.
However, if you are using Qt, then this is not the best way forward. Qt5.0 does away with QWS (Qt embedded acceleration). Qt is migrating to LightHouse, now known as QPA. If you write a QPA plug-in that uses your graphics acceleration by whatever kernel mechanism you expose, then you have accelerated Qt graphics. Also of interest might be the Wayland architecture; there are QPA plug-ins for Wayland. Support exists for QPA in Qt4.8+ and Qt5.0+. Skia is also an interesting graphics API with support for an OpenGL backend; Skia is used by Android devices.
Getting graphics acceleration is easy. Do you want compositing? What is your memory foot print? Who is your developer audience that will program to the API? Do you need object functionality or just drawing primitives? There is a big difference between SKIA, PegUI, WindML and full blown graphics frameworks (Gtk, Qt) with all the widget and dynamics effects that people expect today. Programming to the OpenGL ES API might seem fine at first glance, but if your application has any complexity you will need a richer graphics framework; Mostly re-iterating Mats Petersson's comment.
Edit: From the Qt embedded acceleration link,
CPU blitter - slowest
Hardware blitter - Eg, directFB. Fast memory movement usually with bit ops as opposed to machine words, like DMA.
2D vector - OpenVG, Stick figure drawing, with bit manipulation.
3D drawing - OpenGL(ES) has polygon fills, etc.
This is the type of drawing you wish to perform. A framework like Qt and Gtk, give an API to put a radio button, checkbox, editbox, etc on the screen. It also has styling of the text and interaction with a keyboard, mouse and/or touch screen and other elements. A framework uses the drawing engine to put the objects on the screen.
Graphics acceleration is just putting algorithms like a Bresenham algorithm in a separate CPU or dedicated hardware. If the framework you chose doesn't support 3D objects, the frameworks is unlikely to need OpenGL support and may not perform any better.
The final piece of the puzzle is a window manager. Many embedded devices do not need this. However, many handset are using compositing and alpha values to create transparent windows and allow multiple apps to be seen at the same time. This may also influence your graphics API.
Additionally: DRI without X gives some compelling reasons why this might not be a good thing to do; for the case of a single user task, the DRI is not even needed.
The following is a diagram of a Wayland graphics stack a blog on Wayland.
This is depend on soc gpu driver implement ,
On iMX6 ,you can use wayland composite on framebuffer
I build a sample project as a reference
Qt with wayland on imx6D/Q
On omap3 there is a project
omap3 sgx wayland
How does one do image processing & manipulation in an iPhone application?
I would like to include below 3 important steps:
access raw RGB from image data
apply any image processing (edge detect, grey-scale, contrast & color).
create a new image from this modified data.
I got few links with color & contrast, but still looking for edge detection just from the corners of the image.
Here are the links:
https://launchpad.net/imagemagick/main/6.3.2-2
http://code.google.com/p/image-tools2009/source/checkout
http://www.google.com/codesearch#I0cABDTB4TA/pub/FreeBSD/
Is there any other open source code available for these functionalities?
Your question highlights open source frameworks - but I'm going to throw my answer behind Apple's CoreImage framework that is now available in iOS5. CI has been around as an OSX framework for a very long time and as of iOS 5+ you can use a subset of the filters in iOS.
Advantages include:
Very powerful
Highly Optimised
Been around for ages
Ray Wenderlich has great tutorials and he has one on "Beginning Core Image in OS5" which I think might be right up your alley. He talks of the fundamental parts like CIContext, CIImage, CIFilter.
The second place you should look is the Core Image Programming guide for iOS and then CoreImage Filter Reference from Apple. The filter reference mentions which filters are available in iOS.
If you're finding that all a bit difficult, I think you may need to step backwards into CoreGraphics to learn the underlying basics of graphics on iOS - but that's outside the scope of this question.
As you all know, Direct2D can be used for 2D animation in case of Windows7.
Since Direct2D is not supported in WindowsXP, can you specify some equivalent 2D graphics API that is supported both in Windows7 and WindowsXP
SDL.
check out http://www.libsdl.org/
It's what i've used for simple top down games and such, very very easy to learn!
You may check out agge - https://github.com/tyoma/agge.
It's a CPU-only rendering engine that beats Direct2D in the cases it supports.
The library is limited at the moment, it doesn't support textured/gradient filling, but otherwise is quite simple to use and has STL-lite spirit (in the sense it's more a set of algorithms than a fat interface like GDI's HDC or ID2D1RenderTarget).
Since it's CPU only, it's a cross-platform solution (samples can be compiled for Windows/Mac/Android/ Linux (there's no support for X11 XImage as underlying surface yet)).
I've developed a site that requires high quality resizing of uploaded photos. The site works perfectly under ASP.NET on Windows. This afternoon I tried running it under Mono/Apache/Ubuntu 10.10. To my surprise, it worked - except for the image resampling.
It seems the libraries underlying Mono's Graphics/GDI+ implementation don't implement the bi-cubic interpolation mode. (See Mono Ignores Graphics.InterpolationMode? ).
So I'm looking for a library that can do high quality image resizing. I'm willing to put in the effort to interop to it from C# since this is important functionality and I'd like to be able to run under mono if at all possible. I don't really need any other graphics processing capabilities - just resize.
Follow up: as suggested below ImageMagick works really well for this and was pretty easy to interop to. More details here: http://www.toptensoftware.com/blog/posts/17/high-quality-image-resampling-in-monolinux
ImageMagick is both a command line tool and a library with high quality interpolation and antialiasing algorithms.
I'd like to open an OpenGL context without X in Linux. Is there any way at all to do it?
I know it's possible for integrated Intel graphics card hardware, though most people have Nvidia cards in their system. I'd like to get a solution that works with Nvidia cards.
If there's no other way than through integrated Intel hardware, I guess it'd be okay to know how it's done with those.
X11 protocol itself is too large and complex. Mouse/Keyboard/Tablet input multiplexing it provides is too watered-down for modern programs. I think it's the worst roadblock that prevents Linux desktop from improving, which is why I look for alternatives.
Update (Sep. 17, 2017):
NVIDIA recently published an article detailing how to use OpenGL on headless systems, which is a very similar use case as the question describes.
In summary:
Link to libOpenGL.so and libEGL.so instead of libGL.so. (Your linker options should therefore be -lOpenGL -lEGL
Call eglGetDisplay, then eglInitialize to initialize EGL.
Call eglChooseConfig with the config attribute EGL_SURFACE_TYPE followed with EGL_PBUFFER_BIT.
Call eglCreatePbufferSurface, then eglBindApi(EGL_OPENGL_API);, then eglCreateContext and eglMakeCurrent.
From that point on, do your OpenGL rendering as usual, and you can blit your pixel buffer surface wherever you like. This supplementary article from NVIDIA includes a basic example and an example for multiple GPUs. The PBuffer surface can also be replaced with a window surface or pixmap surface, according to the application needs.
I regret not doing more research on this on my previous edit, but oh well. Better answers are better answers.
Since my answer in 2010, there have been a number of major shakeups in the Linux graphics space. So, an updated answer:
Today, nouveau and the other DRI drivers have matured to the point where OpenGL software is stable and performs reasonably well in general. With the introduction of the EGL API in Mesa, it's now possible to write OpenGL and OpenGL ES applications on even Linux desktops.
You can write your application to target EGL, and it can be run without the presence of a window manager or even a compositor. To do so, you would call eglGetDisplay, eglInitialize, and ultimately eglCreateContext and eglMakeCurrent, instead of the usual glx calls to do the same.
I do not know the specific code path for working without a display server, but EGL accepts both X11 displays and Wayland displays, and I do know it is possible for EGL to operate without one. You can create GL ES 1.1, ES 2.0, ES 3.0 (if you have Mesa 9.1 or later), and OpenGL 3.1 (Mesa 9.0 or later) contexts. Mesa has not (as of Sep. 2013) yet implemented OpenGL 3.2 Core.
Notably, on the Raspberry Pi and on Android, EGL and GL ES 2.0 (1.1 on Android < 3.0) are supported by default. On the Raspberry Pi, I don't think Wayland yet works (as of Sep. 2013), but you do get EGL without a display server using the included binary drivers. Your EGL code should also be portable (with minimal modification) to iOS, if that interests you.
Below is the outdated, previously accepted post:
I'd like to open an OpenGL context without X in linux. Is there any way at all to do it?
I believe Mesa provides a framebuffer target. If it provides any hardware acceleration at all, it will only be with hardware for which there are open source drivers that have been adapted to support such a use.
Gallium3D is also immature, and support for this isn't even on the roadmap, as far as I know.
I'd like to get a solution that works with nvidia cards.
There isn't one. Period.
NVIDIA only provides an X driver, and the Nouveau project is still immature, and doesn't support the kind of use that you're looking for, as they are currently focused only on the X11 driver.
You might be interested in a project called Wayland
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wayland_%28display_server%29
Have you looked at this page?
http://virtuousgeek.org/blog/index.php/jbarnes/2011/10/31/writing_stanalone_programs_with_egl_and_
It is likely a bit outdated. I haven't tried yet, but I would appreciate more documentation of this type.
Probably a good idea, as of today, is to follow Wayland compositor-drm.c implementation:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/weston/tree/src/compositor-drm.c
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/kmscube/ is a good a reference implementation of OGL (or OGLES) hardware-accelerated rendering without an X11 or wayland dependency.
You can look at how Android has solved this issues. See Android-x86 project.
Android uses mesa with egl and opengles. Android has its own simple Gralloc component for mode setting and graphic allocations. On top of that they have SurfaceFlinger component which is a composition engine, which uses OpenGLES for acceleration.
Cannot see why couldn't you use these components in similar way and even reuse the Android glue code.