I have a query where I need to do a "Where" clause for two different columns in two different tables but subsonic creates the same parametrized parameter name for both which is causing an issue. How can I fix this?
string _RawSql = new Select()
.From(Tables.Table1)
.InnerJoin(Tables.Table2)
.InnerJoin(Table3.SidColumn, Table2.Table3SidColumn)
.Where(Table1.SidColumn).IsEqualTo(2)
.And(Table3.SidColumn).IsEqualTo(1)
.BuildSqlStatement();
The query this is creating is
SELECT ....
FROM [dbo].[Table1]
INNER JOIN [dbo].[Table2] ON [dbo].[Table1].[Table2Sid] = [dbo].[Table2].[Sid]
INNER JOIN [dbo].[Table3] ON [dbo].[Table2].[Table3Sid] = [dbo].[Table3].[Sid]
WHERE [dbo].[Table1].[Sid] = #Sid
AND [dbo].[Table3].[Sid] = #Sid
Note that in the last two lines its using #Sid for both Table1 and Table3. How go I do it so it uses #Sid0 and #Sid1?
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks
Thanks for the response, I really appreciate it. I am using 2.1
I am already using TableColumn. Below is the c# subsonic code...
.Where(Table1.SidColumn).IsEqualTo(2)
.And(Table3.SidColumn).IsEqualTo(1)
which creates the following sql when viewed in sql profiler
WHERE [dbo].[Table1].[Sid] = #Sid
AND [dbo].[Table3].[Sid] = #Sid
Could you please show me how can I replace these lines with the way you are suggesting? I would really rather not use literal "Table2.Sid = 2"
ranmore, the issue is same with variables or with constants.
I have even tried
.Where("Table1.Sid").IsEqualTo(2)
.And("Table3.Sid").IsEqualTo(1)
This creates the query as
WHERE Table1.Sid = #Table1.Sid0
AND Table3.Sid = #Table3.Sid1
I finally get different parametrized vars in this case but now SQL Server complains because it does not like . in the parametrized var names.
I have no clue how to perform a join with 2 where clauses for 2 different tables!
What version are you using? In 2.2 You can use the TableColumn object to get around this (it may be the same for 2.1 as well. So instead of using the struct, as you're doing, you can use the object (Table2.SidColumn).
If push comes to shove - you can override everything with a string - so in your case you could use "Table1.Sid" and "Table2.Sid" right in the Where() method.
I haven't been able to confirm this, but perhaps the problem only happens with literals? (not sure if your sample code is like that for brevity's sake)
int table1SidColumnValue = 2;
int table3SidColumnValue = 1;
.Where(Table1.SidColumn).IsEqualTo(table1SidColumnValue)
.And(Table3.SidColumn).IsEqualTo(table2SidColumnValue)
I remember seeing a problem with this when using multiple .In() clauses with literal values, not sure if that applies to your problem though.
I'm not sure what version of the code I have but your query produces numbered parameters for me.
If you look at Line 255 of ANSISqlGenerator.cs
https://github.com/subsonic/SubSonic-2.0/blob/master/SubSonic/SqlQuery/SqlGenerators/ANSISqlGenerator.cs
c.ParameterName = String.Concat(col.ParameterName, query.Constraints.IndexOf(c));
The where parameters really should have numbers appended to them... maybe pull the latest version?
Related
I need to create a query where the params are like:
queryParams.put("path", "/content/myFolder");
queryParams.put("1_property", "myProperty");
queryParams.put("1_property.operation", "exists");
queryParams.put("p.limit", "-1");
But, I need to exclude a certain path inside this blanket folder , say: "/content/myFolder/wrongFolder" and search in all other folders (whose number keeps on varying)
Is there a way to do so ? I didn't find it exactly online.
I also tried the unequals operation as the parent path is being saved in a JCR property, but still no luck. I actually need unlike to avoid all occurrences of the path. But there is no such thing:
path=/main/path/to/search/in
group.1_property=cq:parentPath
group.1_property.operation=unequals
group.1_property.value=/path/to/be/avoided
group.2_property=myProperty
group.2_property.operation=exists
group.p.or=true
p.limit=-1
This is an old question but the reason you got more results later lies in the way in which you have constructed your query. The correct way to write a query like this would be something like:
path=/main/path/where
property=myProperty
property.operation=exists
property.value=true
group.p.or=true
group.p.not=true
group.1_path=/main/path/where/first/you/donot/want/to/search
group.2_path=/main/path/where/second/you/donot/want/to/search
p.limit=-1
A couple of notes: your group.p.or in your last comment would have applied to all of your groups because they weren't delineated by a group number. If you want an OR to be applied to a specific group (but not all groups), you would use:
path=/main/path/where
group.1_property=myProperty
group.1_property.operation=exists
group.1_property.value=true
2_group.p.or=true
2_group.p.not=true
2_group.3_path=/main/path/where/first/you/donot/want/to/search
2_group.4_path=/main/path/where/second/you/donot/want/to/search
Also, the numbers themselves don't matter - they don't have to be sequential, as long as property predicate numbers aren't reused, which will cause an exception to be thrown when the QB tries to parse it. But for readability and general convention, they're usually presented that way.
I presume that your example was just thrown together for this question, but obviously your "do not search" paths would have to be children of the main path you want to search or including them in the query would be superfluous, the query would not be searching them anyway otherwise.
AEM Query Builder Documentation for 6.3
Hope this helps someone in the future.
Using QueryBuilder you can execute:
map.put("group.p.not",true)
map.put("group.1_path","/first/path/where/you/donot/want/to/search")
map.put("group.2_path","/second/path/where/you/donot/want/to/search")
Also I've checked PredicateGroup's class API and they provide a setNegated method. I've never used it myself, but I think you can negate a group and combine it into a common predicate with the path you are searching on like:
final PredicateGroup doNotSearchGroup = new PredicateGroup();
doNotSearchGroup.setNegated(true);
doNotSearchGroup.add(new Predicate("path").set("path", "/path/where/you/donot/want/to/search"));
final PredicateGroup combinedPredicate = new PredicateGroup();
combinedPredicate.add(new Predicate("path").set("path", "/path/where/you/want/to/search"));
combinedPredicate.add(doNotSearchGroup);
final Query query = queryBuilder.createQuery(combinedPredicate);
Here is the query to specify operator on given specific group id.
path=/content/course/
type=cq:Page
p.limit=-1
1_property=jcr:content/event
group.1_group.1_group.daterange.lowerBound=2019-12-26T13:39:19.358Z
group.1_group.1_group.daterange.property=jcr:content/xyz
group.1_group.2_group.daterange.upperBound=2019-12-26T13:39:19.358Z
group.1_group.2_group.daterange.property=jcr:content/abc
group.1_group.3_group.relativedaterange.property=jcr:content/courseStartDate
group.1_group.3_group.relativedaterange.lowerBound=0
group.1_group.2_group.p.not=true
group.1_group.1_group.p.not=true
I have a cql query I want to preform. The cql string looks like this:
SELECT * FROM :columnFamilyName WHERE <some_column_name> = :name AND <some_id> = :id;
My application has two layers of abstraction above the datastax driver. In one layer I want to bind the first two parameters and in another layer I'd like to bind the last parameter.
The problem is, if I bind the first two parameters, I get a BoundStatement to which I cannot bind another parameter. Am I missing something? Can it be done?
We're using datastax driver version 2.0.3.
Thanks,
Anatoly.
You should be able to bind any number of parameters to your BoundStatement using boundStatement.setXXXX(index,value) as follows :
BoundStatement statement = new BoundStatement(query);
statement.setString(0, "value");
statement.setInt(1, 1);
statement.setDate(2, new Date());
ResultSet results = session.execute(statement);
The problem though is that you're trying to use a dynamic column family whose value changes with the value you want to bind.
As far as I know, this is not allowed so you should instead prepare one statement per table and then use the right bound statement.
I've have 2 tables CampaignCoverage and Coverage
CampaignCoverage has a CoverageID column. Coverage has a column DateX.
Basically I've not specified in the code that CampaignCoverage.CoverageID = Coverage.ID like you would to in SQL. How does this work at all????!!!!
CampaignCoverageCollection campaignCoverages =
new Select()
.From(Tables.CampaignCoverage)
.InnerJoin(Tables.Coverage)
.Where(Coverage.DateXColumn).IsGreaterThan(ucDateStart.DateTime)
.And(Coverage.DateXColumn).IsLessThan(ucDateEnd.DateTime)
.And(CampaignCoverage.CampaignIDColumn).IsEqualTo(campaign.Id)
.ExecuteAsCollection<CampaignCoverageCollection>();
If you have not specified that CampaignCoverage.CoverageID is a foreign key to Coverage.ID (I think that is what you are trying to say), then getting rid of the join should do the trick. i.e. Remove
.InnerJoin(Tables.Coverage)
That said, you probably do want to make a CampaignCoverage.CoverageID a foreign key to Coverage.ID. After you do that, you can get rid of the IsEqualTo clause. i.e. Remove
.And(CampaignCoverage.CampaignIDColumn).IsEqualTo(campaign.Id)
I'm using subsonic 2.2 in an app. I'm running a little complicated query in I have used both "And" and "Or" for a field, I'm little confused about how it is going to be translated into sql statement
MytableCollection col = DB.Select().From("mytable").Where("prop1").IsEqualTo(obj.prop1)
.And("prop2").IsEqualTo(obj.prop2)
.And("prop3").IsEqualTo(obj.prop3)
.Or("prop1").IsEqualTo(1)
.ExecuteAsCollection<MytableCollection>();
I want to perform query like this.
select * from mytable where (prop1=obj.prop1 or prop1=1) and prop2=obj.prop2 and prop23=obj.prop3
As Andra says you can use AndExpression. This should do what you want:
MytableCollection col = DB.Select().From(Mytable.Schema)
.Where(Mytable.Columns.Prop2).IsEqualTo(obj.prop2)
.And(Mytable.Columns.Prop3).IsEqualTo(obj.prop3)
.AndExpression(Mytable.Columns.Prop1).IsEqualTo(obj.prop1)
.Or(Mytable.Columns.Prop1).IsEqualTo(1)
.ExecuteAsCollection<MytableCollection>();
N.B. using MyTable.Schema and MyTable.Columns will catch a lot of issues at compile time if you rename tablees and will save errors caused by mistyping
Something that is REALLY useful to know about is also the following two methods to call in your query building:
.OpenExpression()
and
.CloseExpression()
Mix those bad buoys and you have a lot better control over knowing where things start and finish
you can use expression in subsonic 2.2.
MytableCollection col = new Select(Mytable.Schema)
.WhereExpression("prop1").IsEqualTo(obj.prop1).Or("prop1").IsEqualTo(1)
.AndExpression("prop2").IsEqualTo(obj.prop2)
.AndExpression("prop3").IsEqualTo(obj.prop3)
.ExecuteAsCollection<MytableCollection>();
I'm trying to make something like this:
int count = new Select().From(tblSchema).Where("Type & 1").IsEqualTo("1").GetRecordCount();
And the error message is:
Incorrect syntax near '&'.
Must declare the scalar variable "#Deleted".
Is it possible to do that with SubSonic?
Must declare the scalar variable
"#Deleted"
The second error would be caused by using logical deletes on the table you are querying (the table has an isDeleted or Deleted column).
But I'm looking through the code, I'm not sure how that parameter is getting in there. The SqlQuery.GetRecordCount method doesn't call CheckLogicalDelete(), from what I can tell. Is that error message unrelated?
This seems to be a bug in the way SubSonic is naming it's parameters when it generates the SQL to be executed.
What's happening is that SubSonic is looking at "Type & 1" and then creating a parameter to compare against called #Type&10 which is not a valid SQL parameter name. So you'll end up with the following SQL from your original query. You should submit a bug to http://code.google.com/p/subsonicproject/
Meanwhile you can workaround the bug for now by using an inline query:
http://subsonicproject.com/docs/Inline_Query_Tool
It is a little fuzzy as to what you are trying to accomplish but here is a best guess.
int count = new Select().From(tbl.Schema).Where(tbl.TypeColumn).IsEqualTo(true).GetRecordCount();