I have the following problem: some processes, generated dynamically, have a tendency to eat 100% of CPU. I would like to limit all the process matching some criterion (e.g. process name) to a certain amount of CPU percentage.
The specific problem I'm trying to solve is harnessing folding#home worker processes. The best solution I could think of is a perl script that's executed periodically and uses the cpulimit utility to limit the processes (if you're interested in more details, check this blog post). It works, but it's a hack :/
Any ideas? I would like to leave the handling of processes to the OS :)
Thanks again for the suggestions, but we're still missing the point :)
The "slowDown" solution is essentially what the "cpulimit" utility does. I still have to take care about what processes to slow down, kill the "slowDown" process once the worker process is finished and start new ones for new worker processes. It's precisely what I did with the Perl script and a cron job.
The main problem is that I don't know beforehand what processes to limit. They are generated dynamically.
Maybe there's a way to limit all the processes of one user to a certain amount of CPU percentage? I already set up a user for executing the folding#home jobs, hoping that i could limit him with the /etc/security/limits.conf file. But the nearest I could get there is the total CPU time per user...
It would be cool if to have something that enables you to say:
"The sum of all CPU % usage of this user's processes cannot exceed 50%". And then let the processes fight for that 50% of CPU regarding to their priorities...
Guys, thanks for your suggestions, but it's not about priorities - I want to limit the CPU % even when there's plenty of CPU time available. The processes are already low priority, so they don't cause any performance issues.
I would just like to prevent the CPU from running on 100% for extended periods...
I had a slightly similar issue with gzip.
Assuming we want to decrease the CPU of a gzip process:
gzip backup.tar & sleep 2 & cpulimit --limit 10 -e gzip -z
Options:
I found sleep useful as the cpulimit sometimes didn't pick up the new gzip process immediately
--limit 10 limits gzip CPU usage to 10%
-z automatically closes cpulimit when gzip process finishes
Another option is to run the cpulimit daemon.
I don't remember and dont think there was something like this in the unix scheduler. You need a little program which controls the other process and does the following:
loop
wait for some time tR
send SIGSTOP to the process you want to be scheduled
wait for some time tP
send SIGCONT to the process.
loopEnd
the ratio tR/tP controls the cpu load.
Here is a little proof of concept. "busy" is the program which uses up your cpu time and which you want to be slowed-down by "slowDown":
> cat > busy.c:
main() { while (1) {}; }
> cc -o busy busy.c
> busy &
> top
Tasks: 192 total, 3 running, 189 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 76.9% us, 6.6% sy, 0.0% ni, 11.9% id, 4.5% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Mem: 6139696k total, 6114488k used, 25208k free, 115760k buffers
Swap: 9765368k total, 1606096k used, 8159272k free, 2620712k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
26539 cg 25 0 2416 292 220 R 90.0 0.0 3:25.79 busy
...
> cat > slowDown
while true; do
kill -s SIGSTOP $1
sleep 0.1
kill -s SIGCONT $1
sleep 0.1
done
> chmod +x slowDown
> slowDown 26539 &
> top
Tasks: 200 total, 4 running, 192 sleeping, 4 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 48.5% us, 19.4% sy, 0.0% ni, 20.2% id, 9.8% wa, 0.2% hi, 2.0% si
Mem: 6139696k total, 6115376k used, 24320k free, 96676k buffers
Swap: 9765368k total, 1606096k used, 8159272k free, 2639796k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
26539 cg 16 0 2416 292 220 T 49.7 0.0 6:00.98 busy
...
ok, that script needs some more work (for example, to care for being INTR-upted and let the controlled process continue in case it was stopped at that moment), but you get the point. I would also write that little script in C or similar and compute the cpu ratio from a comand line argument....
regards
I think in Linux there is no solution to cap the cpu usage, but there is an acceptable way to limit any process to a certain CPU usage: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=992706
In case they remove the info, here is again
INSTALL PACKAGES
Install cpulimit package.
Code:
sudo apt-get install cpulimit
Install gawk package.
Code:
sudo apt-get install gawk
CREATE CPULIMIT DAEMON FILE
Open text editor with root privileges and save bellow daemon script text to new file /usr/bin/cpulimit_daemon.sh
Code:
#!/bin/bash
# ==============================================================
# CPU limit daemon - set PID's max. percentage CPU consumptions
# ==============================================================
# Variables
CPU_LIMIT=20 # Maximum percentage CPU consumption by each PID
DAEMON_INTERVAL=3 # Daemon check interval in seconds
BLACK_PROCESSES_LIST= # Limit only processes defined in this variable. If variable is empty (default) all violating processes are limited.
WHITE_PROCESSES_LIST= # Limit all processes except processes defined in this variable. If variable is empty (default) all violating processes are limited.
# Check if one of the variables BLACK_PROCESSES_LIST or WHITE_PROCESSES_LIST is defined.
if [[ -n "$BLACK_PROCESSES_LIST" && -n "$WHITE_PROCESSES_LIST" ]] ; then # If both variables are defined then error is produced.
echo "At least one or both of the variables BLACK_PROCESSES_LIST or WHITE_PROCESSES_LIST must be empty."
exit 1
elif [[ -n "$BLACK_PROCESSES_LIST" ]] ; then # If this variable is non-empty then set NEW_PIDS_COMMAND variable to bellow command
NEW_PIDS_COMMAND="top -b -n1 -c | grep -E '$BLACK_PROCESSES_LIST' | gawk '\$9>CPU_LIMIT {print \$1}' CPU_LIMIT=$CPU_LIMIT"
elif [[ -n "$WHITE_PROCESSES_LIST" ]] ; then # If this variable is non-empty then set NEW_PIDS_COMMAND variable to bellow command
NEW_PIDS_COMMAND="top -b -n1 -c | gawk 'NR>6' | grep -E -v '$WHITE_PROCESSES_LIST' | gawk '\$9>CPU_LIMIT {print \$1}' CPU_LIMIT=$CPU_LIMIT"
else
NEW_PIDS_COMMAND="top -b -n1 -c | gawk 'NR>6 && \$9>CPU_LIMIT {print \$1}' CPU_LIMIT=$CPU_LIMIT"
fi
# Search and limit violating PIDs
while sleep $DAEMON_INTERVAL
do
NEW_PIDS=$(eval "$NEW_PIDS_COMMAND") # Violating PIDs
LIMITED_PIDS=$(ps -eo args | gawk '$1=="cpulimit" {print $3}') # Already limited PIDs
QUEUE_PIDS=$(comm -23 <(echo "$NEW_PIDS" | sort -u) <(echo "$LIMITED_PIDS" | sort -u) | grep -v '^$') # PIDs in queue
for i in $QUEUE_PIDS
do
cpulimit -p $i -l $CPU_LIMIT -z & # Limit new violating processes
done
done
CHANGE VARIABLES TO YOUR ENVIRONMENT NEEDS
CPU_LIMIT
Change this variable in above script if you would like to omit CPU consumption for every process to any other percentage then 20%. Please read "If using SMP computer" chapter bellow if you have SMP computer (more then 1 CPU or CPU with more then 1 core).
DAEMON_INTERVAL
Change this variable in above script if you would like to have more/less regular checking. Interval is in seconds and default is set to 3 seconds.
BLACK_PROCESS_LIST and WHITE_PROCESSES_LIST
Variable BLACK_PROCESSES_LIST limits only specified processes. If variable is empty (default) all violating processes are limited.
Variable WHITE_PROCESSES_LIST limits all processes except processes defined in this variable. If variable is empty (default) all violating processes are limited.
One or both of the variables BLACK_PROCESSES_LIST and WHITE_PROCESSES_LIST has to be empty - it is not logical that both variables are defined.
You can specify multiple processes in one of this two variables using delimiter characters "|" (without double quotes). Sample: if you would like to cpulimit all processes except mysql, firefox and gedit processes set variable: WHITE_PROCESSES_LIST="mysql|firefox|gedit"
PROCEDURE TO AUTOMATICALLY START DAEMON AT BOOT TIME
Set file permissions for root user:
Code:
sudo chmod 755 /usr/bin/cpulimit_daemon.sh
Open text editor with root privileges and save bellow script to new file /etc/init.d/cpulimit
Code:
#!/bin/sh
#
# Script to start CPU limit daemon
#
set -e
case "$1" in
start)
if [ $(ps -eo pid,args | gawk '$3=="/usr/bin/cpulimit_daemon.sh" {print $1}' | wc -l) -eq 0 ]; then
nohup /usr/bin/cpulimit_daemon.sh >/dev/null 2>&1 &
ps -eo pid,args | gawk '$3=="/usr/bin/cpulimit_daemon.sh" {print}' | wc -l | gawk '{ if ($1 == 1) print " * cpulimit daemon started successfully"; else print " * cpulimit daemon can not be started" }'
else
echo " * cpulimit daemon can't be started, because it is already running"
fi
;;
stop)
CPULIMIT_DAEMON=$(ps -eo pid,args | gawk '$3=="/usr/bin/cpulimit_daemon.sh" {print $1}' | wc -l)
CPULIMIT_INSTANCE=$(ps -eo pid,args | gawk '$2=="cpulimit" {print $1}' | wc -l)
CPULIMIT_ALL=$((CPULIMIT_DAEMON + CPULIMIT_INSTANCE))
if [ $CPULIMIT_ALL -gt 0 ]; then
if [ $CPULIMIT_DAEMON -gt 0 ]; then
ps -eo pid,args | gawk '$3=="/usr/bin/cpulimit_daemon.sh" {print $1}' | xargs kill -9 # kill cpulimit daemon
fi
if [ $CPULIMIT_INSTANCE -gt 0 ]; then
ps -eo pid,args | gawk '$2=="cpulimit" {print $1}' | xargs kill -9 # release cpulimited process to normal priority
fi
ps -eo pid,args | gawk '$3=="/usr/bin/cpulimit_daemon.sh" {print}' | wc -l | gawk '{ if ($1 == 1) print " * cpulimit daemon can not be stopped"; else print " * cpulimit daemon stopped successfully" }'
else
echo " * cpulimit daemon can't be stopped, because it is not running"
fi
;;
restart)
$0 stop
sleep 3
$0 start
;;
status)
ps -eo pid,args | gawk '$3=="/usr/bin/cpulimit_daemon.sh" {print}' | wc -l | gawk '{ if ($1 == 1) print " * cpulimit daemon is running"; else print " * cpulimit daemon is not running" }'
;;
esac
exit 0
Change file's owner to root:
Code:
sudo chown root:root /etc/init.d/cpulimit
Change permissions:
Code:
sudo chmod 755 /etc/init.d/cpulimit
Add script to boot-up procedure directories:
Code:
sudo update-rc.d cpulimit defaults
Reboot to check if script starts cpulimit daemon at boot time:
Code:
sudo reboot
MANUALLY CHECK, STOP, START AND RESTART DAEMON
Note: Daemon and service in this tutorial has equal meaning.
Note: For users using prior to Ubuntu 8.10 (like Ubuntu 8.04 LTS) instead of service command use "sudo /etc/init.d/cpulimit status/start/stop/restart" syntax or install sysvconfig package using command: sudo apt-get install sysvconfig
Check if cpulimit service is running
Check command returns: "cpulimit daemon is running" if service is running, or "cpulimit daemon is not running" if service is not running.
Code:
sudo service cpulimit status
Start cpulimit service
You can manually start cpulimit daemon which will start to omit CPU consumption.
Code:
sudo service cpulimit start
Stop cpulimit service
Stop command stops cpulimit daemon (so no new process will be limited) and also sets to all existing limited processes to have full access to CPU, just like it was before cpulimit was not running.
Code:
sudo service cpulimit stop
Restart cpulimit service
If you change some variables settings in /usr/bin/cpulimit_daemon.sh like CPU_LIMIT, DAEMON_INTERVAL, BLACK_PROCESSES_LIST or WHITE_PROCESSES_LIST, then after changing settings you must restart service.
Code:
sudo service cpulimit restart
CHECK CPU CONSUMPTION WITH OR WITHOUT CPULIMIT DAEMON
Without daemon
1. stop cpulimit daemon (sudo service cpulimit stop)
2. execute CPU intensive tasks in background
3. execute command: top and check for %CPU column
Result of %CPU is probably more then 20% for each process.
With daemon turned on
1. start cpulimit daemon (sudo service cpulimit start)
2. execute the same CPU intensive tasks in background
3. execute command: top and check for %CPU column
Result of %CPU should be maximum 20% for each process.
Note: Don't forget at beginning %CPU can be more then 20%, because daemon has to catch violating process in interval of 3 seconds (set in script by default)
IF USING SMP COMPUTER
I have tested this code on Intel dual-core CPU computer - that behaves like SMP computer. Don't forget that top command and also cpulimit by default behaves in Irix mode, where 20% means 20% of one CPU. If there are two CPUs (or dual-core) then total %CPU can be 200%. In top command Irix mode can be turned off with command I (pressing +i when top command is running) and Solaris mode is turned on, where total amount of CPU is divided by number of CPUs, so %CPU can be no more then 100% on any number of CPU computer. Please read more info about top command in top man page (search for I command). Please also read more about how cpulimit is operating on SMP computer in cpulimit official page.
But how does cpulimit daemon operates on SMP computer? Always in Irix mode. So if you would like to spend 20% of CPU power on 2-CPU computer then 40% should be used for CPU_LIMIT variable in cpulimit daemon script.
UNINSTALL CPULIMIT DAEMON AND CPULIMIT PROGRAM
If you would like to get rid of cpulimit daemon you can clean up your system by removing cpulimit daemon and uninstalling cpulimit program.
Stop cpulimit daemon
Code:
sudo service cpulimit stop # Stop cpulimit daemon and all cpulimited processes
Remove daemon from boot-up procedure
Code:
sudo update-rc.d -f cpulimit remove # Remove symbolic links
Delete boot-up procedure
Code:
sudo rm /etc/init.d/cpulimit # Delete cpulimit boot-up script
Delete cpulimit daemon
Code:
sudo rm /usr/bin/cpulimit_daemon.sh # Delete cpulimit daemon script
Uninstall cpulimit program
Code:
sudo apt-get remove cpulimit
Uninstall gawk program
If you don't need this program for any other script, you can remote it.
Code:
sudo apt-get remove gawk
NOTE ABOUT AUTHORS
I have just written daemon for cpulimit (bash scripts above). I am not the author of cpulimit project. If you need more info about cpulimit program, please read official cpulimit web page: http://cpulimit.sourceforge.net/.
Regards,
Abcuser
I had a similar problem, and the other solutions presented in the thread don't address it at all. My solution works for me right now, but it is suboptimal, particularly for the cases where the process is owned by root.
My workaround for now is to try very hard to make sure that I don't have any long-running processes owned by root (like have backup be done only as a user)
I just installed the hardware sensors applet for gnome, and set up alarms for high and low temperatures on the CPU, and then set up the following commands for each alarm:
low:
mv /tmp/hogs.txt /tmp/hogs.txt.$$ && cat /tmp/hogs.txt.$$ | xargs -n1 kill -CONT
high:
touch /tmp/hogs.txt && ps -eo pcpu,pid | sort -n -r | head -1 | gawk '{ print $2 }' >> /tmp/hogs.txt && xargs -n1 kill -STOP < /tmp/hogs.txt
The good news is that my computer no longer overheats and crashes. The downside is that terminal processes get disconnected from the terminal when they get stopped, and don't get reconnected when they get the CONT signal. The other thing is that if it was an interactive program that caused the overheating (like a certain web browser plugin!) then it will freeze in the middle of what I'm doing while it waits for the CPU to cool off. It would be nicer to have CPU scaling take care of this at a global level, but the problem is that I only have two selectable settings on my CPU and the slow setting isn't slow enough to prevent overheating.
Just to re-iterate here, this has nothing at all to do with process priority, re-nicing,and obviously nothing to do with stopping jobs that run for a long time. This has to do with preventing CPU utilization from staying at 100% for too long, because the hardware is unable to dissipate the heat quickly enough when running at full capacity (idle CPU generates less heat than a fully loaded CPU).
Some other obvious possibilities that might help are:
Lower the CPU speed overall in the BIOS
Replace the heatsink or re-apply the thermal gel to see if that helps
Clean the heatsink with some compressed air
Replace the CPU fan
[edit]
Note: no more overheating at 100% CPU when I disable variable fan speed in the bios (asus p5q pro turbo). With the CPU fully loaded, each core tops out at 49 celcius.
Using cgroups' cpu.shares does nothing that a nice value wouldn't do. It sounds like you want to actually throttle the processes, which can definitely be done.
You will need to use a script or two, and/or edit /etc/cgconfig.conf to define the parameters you want.
Specifically, you want to edit the values cpu.cfs_period_us and cpu.cfs_quota_us. The process will then be allowed to run for cpu.cfs_quota_us microseconds per cpu.cfs_period_us microseconds.
For example:
If cpu.cfs_period_us = 50000 and cpu.cfs_quota_us = 10000 then the process will receive 20% of the CPU time maximum, no matter what else is going on.
In this screenshot I have given the process 2% of CPU time:
As far as the process is concerned it is running at 100%.
Settings cpu.shares on the other hand can and will still use 100% of the idle CPU time.
In this similar example I have given the process cpu.shares = 100 (of 1024):
As you can see the process is still consuming all the idle CPU time.
References:
http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/precise/man5/cgconfig.conf.5.html
http://kennystechtalk.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/throttling-cpu-usage-with-linux-cgroups.html
In a system that uses systemd, you can run a single process with a maximum CPU usage using a command like the following:
sudo systemd-run --scope --uid=1000 -p CPUQuota=20% my_heavy_computation.sh
This will use up to 20% of a single CPU core (or CPU thread if using hyper-threading).
I also had the need to limit CPU time for certain processes. Cpulimit is a good tool, but I always had to manually find out the PID and manually start cpulimit, so I wanted something more convenient.
I came up with this bash script:
#!/bin/bash
function lp
{
ps aux | grep $1 | termsql "select COL1 from tbl" > /tmp/tmpfile
while read line
do
TEST=`ps aux | grep "cpulimit -p $line" | wc -l`
[[ $TEST -eq "2" ]] && continue #cpulimit is already running on this process
cpulimit -p $line -l $2
done < /tmp/tmpfile
}
while true
do
lp gnome-terminal 5
lp system-journal 5
sleep 10
done
This example limits the cpu time of each gnome-terminal instance to 5% and the cpu time of each system-journal instance to 5% as well.
I used another script I created named termsql in this example to extract the PID . You can get it here:
https://gitorious.org/termsql/termsql/source/master:
You can limit the amount of cpu time with cgroups. The OS will handle resource management just like you ask for in you question.
Here is a wiki with examples: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Cgroups
Since the processes already run as a separate user limiting all process from that user should be the easiest solution.
I see at least two options:
Use "ulimit -t" in the shell that creates your process
Use "nice" at process creation or "renice" during runtime
PS + GREP + NICE
The nice command will probably help.
This can be done using setrlimit(2) (specifically by setting RLIMIT_CPU parameter).
Throwing some sleep calls in there should force the process off the CPU for a certain time. If you sleep 30 seconds once a minute, your process shouldn't average more than 50% CPU usage during that minute.
I dont really see why you want to limit the CPU time... you should limit the total load on that machine, and the load is determined by IO operations mostly .
Ex: if i create a while(1){} loop, it will get the total load to 1.0, but if this loop does some disk writes the load jumps to 2.0... 4.0. And that's what killing your machine, not the CPU usage. The CPU usage can be easily handled by nice/renice.
Anyways, you could make a script that does a 'kill -SIGSTOP PID' for a specific PID, when the load gets too high, and kill -SIGCONT when everything gets back to normal... The PID's can be determined by using the 'px aux' command, because i see that it displays the CPU usage, and you should be able to sort the list using that column. I think this the whole thing could be done in bash...
You could scale down the CPU frequency. Then you don't have to worry about the individual processes. When you need more cpu's, scale the frequency back up.
Related
I have a bash script where I would like to get know how much percentage of CPU time a process uses until I kill it in the last line of the script.
I know that I could normally do this via the time -v command, however my process is Erlang/OTP based and by using the time command it only measures the startup process statistics.
Therefore I'd like to use the process PID I can get easily and use that one to get the CPU time percentage until the end of the script.
Currently I'm using pidstat but it is only giving me statistics for linear time intervals.
I want to measure the exact timeinterval from when the process started until it gets killed.
Peak RAM statistics woul also be nice.
Could you recommend me any command I could use in this case?
This is my bash script:
sudo emqx start
sleep 10
mypid=$(sudo emqx pid)
echo $mypid
sudo pidstat -h -r -u -v -p "$mypid" 5 > $local/server_results/test1/emqxstats_$b.txt &
# process for load testing
# jthreads = amount of publishing users
sleep 5
until sudo ~/Downloads/apache-jmeter-5.2.1/bin/jmeter -n -t $local/testplans/csv.jmx -Jport=$a | grep -m 1 "... end of run"; do : ; done
sudo emqx stop
kill %!
So I want to measure the CPU percentage from the interval between starting mosquitto and until the Apache Jmeter test finished when it reaches the last 2 lines.
Kind regards
I found the command I was looking after some more research.
ps -o pcpu -p $pid
this was exactly the command I needed, because it calculates the percentage over the lifetime of the process.
Is there a way to limit the absolute CPU time (in CPU seconds) spend in a process group?
ulimit -t 10; ./my-process looks like a good option but if my-process forks then each process in the process group gets its own limit. The whole process group can use an arbitrary amount of time by forking every 9 seconds.
The accepted answer on a similar question is to use cgroups but doesn't explain how. However, there are other answers (Limit total CPU usage with cgroups) saying that this is not possible in cgroups and only relative cpu usage can be limited (for example, 0.2 seconds out of every 1 second).
Liran Funaro suggested using a long period for cpu.cfs_period_us (https://stackoverflow.com/a/43660834/892961) but the parameter for the quota can be at most 1 second. So even with a long period I don't see how to set a CPU time limit of 10 seconds or an hour.
If ulimit and cgroups cannot do this, is there another way?
you can do it with cgroups. Do as root:
# Create cgroup
cgcreate -g cpu:/limited
# set shares (cpu limit)
cgset -r cpu.shares=256 limited
# run your program
cgexec -g cpu:limited /my/hungry/program
Alternatively you can use the cpulimit program which can freeze your code periodically. cgroups is the most advanced method though.
to set fixed cpu share :
cgcreate -g cpu:/fixedlimit
# allow fix 25% cpu usage (1 cpu)
cgset -r cpu.cfs_quota_us=25000,cpu.cfs_period_us=100000 fixedlimit
cgexec -g cpu:fixedlimit /my/hungry/program
It turned out, the goal is to limit runtime to certain seconds while measuring it. After setting the desired cgroup limits (in order to get a fair sandbox) you can achieve this goal by running:
((time -p timeout 20 cgexec -g cpu:fixedlimit /program/to/test ) 2>&1) | grep user
After 20 seconds the program will be stopped no matter what, and we can parse for user time (or system or real time) to evaluate it's performance.
This not directly answer the question but refers to the discussion on the actual need of the OP.
If your competition ignores everything except CPU time, it may be fundamentally flawed. One can simply, for example, cache results in the primary storage device. Since you do not count storage access time, it may have the least CPU cycles, but the worse actual performance.
A perfect crime would be to simply send the data via the Internet to another computer, which calculate the task then return the answer. This would finish the task with what appear to be zero cycles.
You actually want to measure "real" time and give this process the highest priority in your system (or actually running it secludedly).
When checking students' homework, we simply used an unrealistic time limit (e.g., 5 minutes for what should be a 10 seconds program), then killing the process if it has not finished in time and failing this submission.
If you want to pick a winner, then simply re-run the best competitors multiple times to ensure the validity of their results.
I found a solution that works for me. It is still far from perfect (read the caveats before using it). I'm somewhat new to bash scripting so any comments about this are welcome.
#!/bin/bash
#
# This script tries to limit the CPU time of a process group similar to
# ulimit but counting the time spent in spawned processes against the
# limit. It works by creating a temporary cgroup to run the process in
# and checking on the used CPU time of that process group. Instead of
# polling in regular intervals, the monitoring process assumes that no
# time is lost to I/O (i.e., wall clock time = CPU time) and checks in
# after the time limit. It then updates its assumption by comparing the
# actual CPU usage to the time limit and waiting again. This is repeated
# until the CPU usage exceeds its limit or the monitored process
# terminates. Once the main process terminates, all remaining processes
# in the temporary cgroup are killed.
#
# NOTE: this script still has some major limitations.
# 1) The monitored process can exceed the limit by up to one second
# since every iteration of the monitoring process takes at least that
# long. It can exceed the limit by an additional second by ignoring
# the SIGXCPU signal sent when hitting the (soft) limit but this is
# configurable below.
# 2) It assumes there is only one CPU core. On a system with n cores
# waiting for t seconds gives the process n*t seconds on the CPU.
# This could be fixed by figuring out how many CPUs the process is
# allowed to use (using the cpuset cgroup) and dividing the remaining
# time by that. Since sleep has a resolution of 1 second, this would
# still introduce an error of up to n seconds.
set -e
if [ "$#" -lt 2 ]; then
echo "Usage: $(basename "$0") TIME_LIMIT_IN_S COMMAND [ ARG ... ]"
exit 1
fi
TIME_LIMIT=$1
shift
# To simulate a hard time limit, set KILL_WAIT to 0. If KILL_WAIT is
# non-zero, TIME_LIMIT is the soft limit and TIME_LIMIT + KILL_WAIT is
# the hard limit.
KILL_WAIT=1
# Update as necessary. The script needs permissions to create cgroups
# in the cpuacct hierarchy in a subgroup "timelimit". To create it use:
# sudo cgcreate -a $USER -t $USER -g cpuacct:timelimit
CGROUPS_ROOT=/sys/fs/cgroup
LOCAL_CPUACCT_GROUP=timelimit/timelimited_$$
LOCAL_CGROUP_TASKS=$CGROUPS_ROOT/cpuacct/$LOCAL_CPUACCT_GROUP/tasks
kill_monitored_cgroup() {
SIGNAL=$1
kill -$SIGNAL $(cat $LOCAL_CGROUP_TASKS) 2> /dev/null
}
get_cpu_usage() {
cgget -nv -r cpuacct.usage $LOCAL_CPUACCT_GROUP
}
# Create a cgroup to measure the CPU time of the monitored process.
cgcreate -a $USER -t $USER -g cpuacct:$LOCAL_CPUACCT_GROUP
# Start the monitored process. In case it fails, we still have to clean
# up, so we disable exiting on errors.
set +e
(
set -e
# In case the process doesn't fork a ulimit is more exact. If the
# process forks, the ulimit still applies to each child process.
ulimit -t $(($TIME_LIMIT + $KILL_WAIT))
ulimit -S -t $TIME_LIMIT
cgexec -g cpuacct:$LOCAL_CPUACCT_GROUP --sticky $#
)&
MONITORED_PID=$!
# Start the monitoring process
(
REMAINING_TIME=$TIME_LIMIT
while [ "$REMAINING_TIME" -gt "0" ]; do
# Wait $REMAINING_TIME seconds for the monitored process to
# terminate. On a single CPU the CPU time cannot exceed the
# wall clock time. It might be less, though. In that case, we
# will go through the loop again.
sleep $REMAINING_TIME
CPU_USAGE=$(get_cpu_usage)
REMAINING_TIME=$(($TIME_LIMIT - $CPU_USAGE / 1000000000))
done
# Time limit exceeded. Kill the monitored cgroup.
if [ "$KILL_WAIT" -gt "0" ]; then
kill_monitored_cgroup XCPU
sleep $KILL_WAIT
fi
kill_monitored_cgroup KILL
)&
MONITOR_PID=$!
# Wait for the monitored job to exit (either on its own or because it
# was killed by the monitor).
wait $MONITORED_PID
EXIT_CODE=$?
# Kill all remaining tasks in the monitored cgroup and the monitor.
kill_monitored_cgroup KILL
kill -KILL $MONITOR_PID 2> /dev/null
wait $MONITOR_PID 2>/dev/null
# Report actual CPU usage.
set -e
CPU_USAGE=$(get_cpu_usage)
echo "Total CPU usage: $(($CPU_USAGE / 1000000))ms"
# Clean up and exit with the return code of the monitored process.
cgdelete cpuacct:$LOCAL_CPUACCT_GROUP
exit $EXIT_CODE
I want to create a near 100% load on a Linux machine. It's quad core system and I want all cores going full speed. Ideally, the CPU load would last a designated amount of time and then stop. I'm hoping there's some trick in bash. I'm thinking some sort of infinite loop.
I use stress for this kind of thing, you can tell it how many cores to max out.. it allows for stressing memory and disk as well.
Example to stress 2 cores for 60 seconds
stress --cpu 2 --timeout 60
You can also do
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null
To run more of those to put load on more cores, try to fork it:
fulload() { dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null | dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null | dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null | dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null & }; fulload; read; killall dd
Repeat the command in the curly brackets as many times as the number of threads you want to produce (here 4 threads).
Simple enter hit will stop it (just make sure no other dd is running on this user or you kill it too).
I think this one is simpler. Open Terminal and type the following and press Enter.
yes > /dev/null &
To fully utilize modern CPUs, one line is not enough, you may need to repeat the command to exhaust all the CPU power.
To end all of this, simply put
killall yes
The idea was originally found here, although it was intended for Mac users, but this should work for *nix as well.
Although I'm late to the party, this post is among the top results in the google search "generate load in linux".
The result marked as solution could be used to generate a system load, i'm preferring to use sha1sum /dev/zero to impose a load on a cpu-core.
The idea is to calculate a hash sum from an infinite datastream (eg. /dev/zero, /dev/urandom, ...) this process will try to max out a cpu-core until the process is aborted.
To generate a load for more cores, multiple commands can be piped together.
eg. generate a 2 core load:
sha1sum /dev/zero | sha1sum /dev/zero
To load 3 cores for 5 seconds:
seq 3 | xargs -P0 -n1 timeout 5 yes > /dev/null
This results in high kernel (sys) load from the many write() system calls.
If you prefer mostly userland cpu load:
seq 3 | xargs -P0 -n1 timeout 5 md5sum /dev/zero
If you just want the load to continue until you press Ctrl-C:
seq 3 | xargs -P0 -n1 md5sum /dev/zero
One core (doesn't invoke external process):
while true; do true; done
Two cores:
while true; do /bin/true; done
The latter only makes both of mine go to ~50% though...
This one will make both go to 100%:
while true; do echo; done
Here is a program that you can download Here
Install easily on your Linux system
./configure
make
make install
and launch it in a simple command line
stress -c 40
to stress all your CPUs (however you have) with 40 threads each running a complex sqrt computation on a ramdomly generated numbers.
You can even define the timeout of the program
stress -c 40 -timeout 10s
unlike the proposed solution with the dd command, which deals essentially with IO and therefore doesn't really overload your system because working with data.
The stress program really overloads the system because dealing with computation.
An infinite loop is the idea I also had. A freaky-looking one is:
while :; do :; done
(: is the same as true, does nothing and exits with zero)
You can call that in a subshell and run in the background. Doing that $num_cores times should be enough. After sleeping the desired time you can kill them all, you get the PIDs with jobs -p (hint: xargs)
:(){ :|:& };:
This fork bomb will cause havoc to the CPU and will likely crash your computer.
I would split the thing in 2 scripts :
infinite_loop.bash :
#!/bin/bash
while [ 1 ] ; do
# Force some computation even if it is useless to actually work the CPU
echo $((13**99)) 1>/dev/null 2>&1
done
cpu_spike.bash :
#!/bin/bash
# Either use environment variables for NUM_CPU and DURATION, or define them here
for i in `seq ${NUM_CPU}` : do
# Put an infinite loop on each CPU
infinite_loop.bash &
done
# Wait DURATION seconds then stop the loops and quit
sleep ${DURATION}
killall infinite_loop.bash
to increase load or consume CPU 100% or X%
sha1sum /dev/zero &
on some system this will increase the load in slots of X%, in that case you have to run the same command multiple time.
then you can see CPU uses by typing command
top
to release the load
killall sha1sum
cat /dev/urandom > /dev/null
#!/bin/bash
duration=120 # seconds
instances=4 # cpus
endtime=$(($(date +%s) + $duration))
for ((i=0; i<instances; i++))
do
while (($(date +%s) < $endtime)); do :; done &
done
I've used bc (binary calculator), asking them for PI with a big lot of decimals.
$ for ((i=0;i<$NUMCPU;i++));do
echo 'scale=100000;pi=4*a(1);0' | bc -l &
done ;\
sleep 4; \
killall bc
with NUMCPU (under Linux):
$ NUMCPU=$(grep $'^processor\t*:' /proc/cpuinfo |wc -l)
This method is strong but seem system friendly, as I've never crashed a system using this.
#!/bin/bash
while [ 1 ]
do
#Your code goes here
done
I went through the Internet to find something like it and found this very handy cpu hammer script.
#!/bin/sh
# unixfoo.blogspot.com
if [ $1 ]; then
NUM_PROC=$1
else
NUM_PROC=10
fi
for i in `seq 0 $((NUM_PROC-1))`; do
awk 'BEGIN {for(i=0;i<10000;i++)for(j=0;j<10000;j++);}' &
done
Using examples mentioned here, but also help from IRC, I developed my own CPU stress testing script. It uses a subshell per thread and the endless loop technique. You can also specify the number of threads and the amount of time interactively.
#!/bin/bash
# Simple CPU stress test script
# Read the user's input
echo -n "Number of CPU threads to test: "
read cpu_threads
echo -n "Duration of the test (in seconds): "
read cpu_time
# Run an endless loop on each thread to generate 100% CPU
echo -e "\E[32mStressing ${cpu_threads} threads for ${cpu_time} seconds...\E[37m"
for i in $(seq ${cpu_threads}); do
let thread=${i}-1
(taskset -cp ${thread} $BASHPID; while true; do true; done) &
done
# Once the time runs out, kill all of the loops
sleep ${cpu_time}
echo -e "\E[32mStressing complete.\E[37m"
kill 0
Utilizing ideas here, created code which exits automatically after a set duration, don't have to kill processes --
#!/bin/bash
echo "Usage : ./killproc_ds.sh 6 60 (6 threads for 60 secs)"
# Define variables
NUM_PROCS=${1:-6} #How much scaling you want to do
duration=${2:-20} # seconds
function infinite_loop {
endtime=$(($(date +%s) + $duration))
while (($(date +%s) < $endtime)); do
#echo $(date +%s)
echo $((13**99)) 1>/dev/null 2>&1
$(dd if=/dev/urandom count=10000 status=none| bzip2 -9 >> /dev/null) 2>&1 >&/dev/null
done
echo "Done Stressing the system - for thread $1"
}
echo Running for duration $duration secs, spawning $NUM_PROCS threads in background
for i in `seq ${NUM_PROCS}` ;
do
# Put an infinite loop
infinite_loop $i &
done
You can try to test the performance of cryptographic algorithms.
openssl speed -multi 4
If you do not want to install additional software, you may use a compression utility which utilizes all CPU cores automatically. For example, xz:
cat /dev/zero | xz -T0 > /dev/null
This takes infinite stream of dummy data from /dev/zero and compresses it using all cores available in the system.
This does a trick for me:
bash -c 'for (( I=100000000000000000000 ; I>=0 ; I++ )) ; do echo $(( I+I*I )) & echo $(( I*I-I )) & echo $(( I-I*I*I )) & echo $(( I+I*I*I )) ; done' &>/dev/null
and it uses nothing except bash.
To enhance dimba's answer and provide something more pluggable (because i needed something similar). I have written the following using the dd load-up concept :D
It will check current cores, and create that many dd threads.
Start and End core load with Enter
#!/bin/bash
load_dd() {
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null
}
fulload() {
unset LOAD_ME_UP_SCOTTY
export cores="$(grep proc /proc/cpuinfo -c)"
for i in $( seq 1 $( expr $cores - 1 ) )
do
export LOAD_ME_UP_SCOTTY="${LOAD_ME_UP_SCOTTY}$(echo 'load_dd | ')"
done
export LOAD_ME_UP_SCOTTY="${LOAD_ME_UP_SCOTTY}$(echo 'load_dd &')"
eval ${LOAD_ME_UP_SCOTTY}
}
echo press return to begin and stop fullload of cores
read
fulload
read
killall -9 dd
Dimba's dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null is definitely correct, but also worth mentioning is verifying maxing the cpu to 100% usage. You can do this with
ps -axro pcpu | awk '{sum+=$1} END {print sum}'
This asks for ps output of a 1-minute average of the cpu usage by each process, then sums them with awk. While it's a 1 minute average, ps is smart enough to know if a process has only been around a few seconds and adjusts the time-window accordingly. Thus you can use this command to immediately see the result.
awk is a good way to write a long-running loop that's CPU bound without generating a lot of memory traffic or system calls, or using any significant amount of memory or polluting caches so it slows down other cores a minimal amount. (stress or stress-ng can also do that if you either installed, if you use a simple CPU-stress method.)
awk 'BEGIN{for(i=0;i<100000000;i++){}}' # about 3 seconds on 4GHz Skylake
It's a counted loop so you can make it exit on its own after a finite amount of time. (Awk uses FP numbers, so a limit like 2^54 might not be reachable with i++ due to rounding, but that's way larger than needed for a few seconds to minutes.)
To run it in parallel, use a shell loop to start it in the background n times
for i in {1..6};do awk 'BEGIN{for(i=0;i<100000000;i++){}}' & done
###### 6 threads each running about 3 seconds
$ for i in {1..6};do awk 'BEGIN{for(i=0;i<100000000;i++){}}' & done
[1] 3047561
[2] 3047562
[3] 3047563
[4] 3047564
[5] 3047565
[6] 3047566
$ # this shell is usable.
(wait a while before pressing return)
[1] Done awk 'BEGIN{for(i=0;i<100000000;i++){}}'
[2] Done awk 'BEGIN{for(i=0;i<100000000;i++){}}'
[3] Done awk 'BEGIN{for(i=0;i<100000000;i++){}}'
[4] Done awk 'BEGIN{for(i=0;i<100000000;i++){}}'
[5]- Done awk 'BEGIN{for(i=0;i<100000000;i++){}}'
[6]+ Done awk 'BEGIN{for(i=0;i<100000000;i++){}}'
$
I used perf to see what kind of load it put on the CPU: it runs 2.6 instructions per clock cycle, so it's not the most friendly to a hyperthread sharing the same physical core. But it has a very small cache footprint, getting negligible cache misses even in L1d cache. And strace will show it makes no system calls until exit.
$ perf stat -r5 -d awk 'BEGIN{for(i=0;i<100000000;i++){}}'
Performance counter stats for 'awk BEGIN{for(i=0;i<100000000;i++){}}' (5 runs):
3,277.56 msec task-clock # 0.997 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.24% )
7 context-switches # 2.130 /sec ( +- 12.29% )
1 cpu-migrations # 0.304 /sec ( +- 40.00% )
180 page-faults # 54.765 /sec ( +- 0.18% )
13,708,412,234 cycles # 4.171 GHz ( +- 0.18% ) (62.29%)
35,786,486,833 instructions # 2.61 insn per cycle ( +- 0.03% ) (74.92%)
9,696,339,695 branches # 2.950 G/sec ( +- 0.02% ) (74.99%)
340,155 branch-misses # 0.00% of all branches ( +-122.42% ) (75.08%)
12,108,293,527 L1-dcache-loads # 3.684 G/sec ( +- 0.04% ) (75.10%)
217,064 L1-dcache-load-misses # 0.00% of all L1-dcache accesses ( +- 17.23% ) (75.10%)
48,695 LLC-loads # 14.816 K/sec ( +- 31.69% ) (49.90%)
5,966 LLC-load-misses # 13.45% of all LL-cache accesses ( +- 31.45% ) (49.81%)
3.28711 +- 0.00772 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.23% )
The most "friendly" to the other hyperthread on an x86 CPU would be a C program like this, which just runs a pause instruction in a loop. (Or portably, a Rust program that runs std::hint::spin_loop.) As far as the OS's process scheduler, it stays in user-space (nothing like a yield() system call), but in hardware it doesn't take up many resources, letting the other logical core have the front-end for multiple cycles.
#include <immintrin.h>
int main(){ // use atoi(argv[1])*10000ULL as a loop count if you want.
while(1) _mm_pause();
}
I combined some of the answers and added a way to scale the stress to all available cpus:
#!/bin/bash
function infinite_loop {
while [ 1 ] ; do
# Force some computation even if it is useless to actually work the CPU
echo $((13**99)) 1>/dev/null 2>&1
done
}
# Either use environment variables for DURATION, or define them here
NUM_CPU=$(grep -c ^processor /proc/cpuinfo 2>/dev/null || sysctl -n hw.ncpu)
PIDS=()
for i in `seq ${NUM_CPU}` ;
do
# Put an infinite loop on each CPU
infinite_loop &
PIDS+=("$!")
done
# Wait DURATION seconds then stop the loops and quit
sleep ${DURATION}
# Parent kills its children
for pid in "${PIDS[#]}"
do
kill $pid
done
Just paste this bad boy into the SSH or console of any server running linux. You can kill the processes manually, but I just shutdown the server when I'm done, quicker.
Edit: I have updated this script to now have a timer feature so that there is no need to kill the processes.
read -p "Please enter the number of minutes for test >" MINTEST && [[ $MINTEST == ?(-)+([0-9]) ]]; NCPU="$(grep -c ^processor /proc/cpuinfo)"; ((endtime=$(date +%s) + ($MINTEST*60))); NCPU=$((NCPU-1)); for ((i=1; i<=$NCPU; i++)); do while (($(date +%s) < $endtime)); do : ; done & done
I would like to monitor the number of threads used by a specific process on Linux.
Is there an easy way to get this information without impacting the performance of the process?
try
ps huH p <PID_OF_U_PROCESS> | wc -l
or htop
To get the number of threads for a given pid:
$ ps -o nlwp <pid>
Where nlwp stands for Number of Light Weight Processes (threads). Thus ps aliases nlwp to thcount, which means that
$ ps -o thcount <pid>
does also work.
If you want to monitor the thread count, simply use watch:
$ watch ps -o thcount <pid>
To get the sum of all threads running in the system:
$ ps -eo nlwp | tail -n +2 | awk '{ num_threads += $1 } END { print num_threads }'
Each thread in a process creates a directory under /proc/<pid>/task. Count the number of directories, and you have the number of threads.
cat /proc/<PROCESS_PID>/status | grep Threads
ps -eLf on the shell shall give you a list of all the threads and processes currently running on the system.
Or, you can run top command then hit 'H' to toggle thread listings.
$ ps H p pid-id
H - Lists all the individual threads in a process
or
$cat /proc/pid-id/status
pid-id is the Process ID
eg.. (Truncated the below output)
root#abc:~# cat /proc/8443/status
Name: abcdd
State: S (sleeping)
Tgid: 8443
VmSwap: 0 kB
Threads: 4
SigQ: 0/256556
SigPnd: 0000000000000000
If you use:
ps uH p <PID_OF_U_PROCESS> | wc -l
You have to subtract 1 to the result, as one of the lines "wc" is counting is the headers of the "ps" command.
My answer is more gui, but still within terminal. Htop may be used with a bit of setup.
Start htop.
Enter setup menu by pressing F2.
From leftmost column choose "Columns"
From rightmost column choose the column to be added to main monitoring output, "NLWP" is what you are looking for.
Press F10.
JStack is quite inexpensive - one option would be to pipe the output through grep to find active threads and then pipe through wc -l.
More graphically is JConsole, which displays the thread count for a given process.
Here is one command that displays the number of threads of a given process :
ps -L -o pid= -p <pid> | wc -l
Unlike the other ps based answers, there is here no need to substract 1 from its output as there is no ps header line thanks to the -o pid=option.
Newer JDK distributions ship with JConsole and VisualVM. Both are fantastic tools for getting the dirty details from a running Java process. If you have to do this programmatically, investigate JMX.
If you're looking for thread count for multiple processes, the other answers won't work well for you, since you won't see the process names or PIDs, which makes them rather useless. Use this instead:
ps -o pid,nlwp,args -p <pid_1> <pid_2> ... <pid_N>
In order to watch the changes live, just add watch:
watch ps -o pid,nlwp,args -p <pid_1> <pid_2> ... <pid_N>
jvmtop can show the current jvm thread count beside other metrics.
The easiest way is using "htop". You can install "htop" (a fancier version of top) which will show you all your cores, process and memory usage.
Press "Shift+H" to show all process or press again to hide it.
Press "F4" key to search your process name.
Installing on Ubuntu or Debian:
sudo apt-get install htop
Installing on Redhat or CentOS:
yum install htop
dnf install htop [On Fedora 22+ releases]
If you want to compile "htop" from source code, you will find it here.
If you are trying to find out the number of threads using cpu for a given pid I would use:
top -bc -H -n2 -p <pid> | awk '{if ($9 != "0.0" && $1 ~ /^[0-9]+$/) print $1 }' | sort -u | wc -l
If you want the number of threads per user in a linux system then you should use:
ps -eLf | grep <USER> | awk '{ num += $6 } END { print num }'
where as <USER> use the desired user name.
If you're interested in those threads which are really active -- as in doing something (not blocked, not timed_waiting, not reporting "thread running" but really waiting for a stream to give data) as opposed to sitting around idle but live -- then you might be interested in jstack-active.
This simple bash script runs jstack then filters out all the threads which by heuristics seem to be idling, showing you stack traces for those threads which are actually consuming CPU cycles.
First get the process ID (pid) by executing below command:
ps -ef | grep (for e.g ps -ef | grep java)
Now replace the pid in below command and execute to get the total thread count of a process.
ps huH p | wc -l
VisualVM can show clear states of threads of a given JVM process
I would like a "system" that monitors a process and would kill said process if:
the process exceeds some memory requirements
the process does not respond to a message from the "system" in some period of time
I assume this "system" could be something as simple as a monitoring process? A code example of how this could be done would be useful. I am of course not averse to a completely different solution to this problem.
For the first requirement, you might want to look into either using ulimit, or tweaking the kernel OOM-killer settings on your system.
Monitoring daemons exist for this sort of thing as well. God is a recent example.
I wrote a script that runs as a cron job and can be customized to kill problem processes:
#!/usr/local/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use Proc::ProcessTable;
my $table = Proc::ProcessTable->new;
for my $process (#{$table->table}) {
# skip root processes
next if $process->uid == 0 or $process->gid == 0;
# skip anything other than Passenger application processes
#next unless $process->fname eq 'ruby' and $process->cmndline =~ /\bRails\b/;
# skip any using less than 1 GiB
next if $process->rss < 1_073_741_824;
# document the slaughter
(my $cmd = $process->cmndline) =~ s/\s+\z//;
print "Killing process: pid=", $process->pid, " uid=", $process->uid, " rss=", $process->rss, " fname=", $process->fname, " cmndline=", $cmd, "\n";
# try first to terminate process politely
kill 15, $process->pid;
# wait a little, then kill ruthlessly if it's still around
sleep 5;
kill 9, $process->pid;
}
https://www.endpointdev.com/blog/2012/08/automatically-kill-process-using-too/
To limit memory usage of processes, check /etc/security/limits.conf
Try Process Resource Monitor for a classic, easy-to-use process monitor. Code available under the GPL.
There's a few other monitoring scripts there you might find interesting too.
If you want to set up a fairly comprehensive monitoring system, check out monit. It can be very chatty at times, but it will do a lot of monitoring, restart services, alert you, etc.
That said, don't be surprised if you're getting dozens of e-mails a day until you get used to configuring it and telling it what not to bug you about.
I have a shell script here that could be your start point. I did it because I also had some issues with processes exceeding memory limit. Actually it just checks a given limit of CPU usage, but you can easily change to watch memory, or the jobs list for an idle process.
file: pkill.sh
#!/bin/bash
if [ -z "$1" ]
then
maxlimit=99
else
maxlimit=$1
fi
ps axo user,%cpu,pid,vsz,rss,uid,gid --sort %cpu,rss\
| awk -v max=$maxlimit '$6 != 0 && $7 != 0 && $2 > max'\
| awk '{print $3}'\
| while read line;\
do\
ps u --no-headers -p $line;\
echo "$(date) - $(ps u --no-headers -p $line)" >> pkill.log;\
notify-send 'Killing proccess!' $(ps -p $line -o command --no-headers | awk '{print $1}') -u normal -i dialog-warning -t 3000;\
kill $line;\
done;
Simple run it once like: sh ./pkill.sh <limit-cpu>
Or, to keep it running: watch -n 10 sh ./pkill.sh 90
In the case above it will keep running each 10 seconds, killing processes that exceeds 90% of CPU
Are the monitored processes ones you're writing, or just any process?
If they're arbitrary processes then it might be hard to monitor for responsiveness. Unless the process is already set up to handle and respond to events that you can send it, then I doubt you'll be able to monitor them. If they're processes that you're writing, you'd need to add some kind of message handling that you can use the check against.