Parse usable Street Address, City, State, Zip from a string [closed] - string

Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Problem: I have an address field from an Access database which has been converted to SQL Server 2005. This field has everything all in one field. I need to parse out the address's individual sections into their appropriate fields in a normalized table. I need to do this for approximately 4,000 records, and it needs to be repeatable.
Assumptions:
Assume an address in the US (for now)
assume that the input string will sometimes contain an addressee (the person being addressed) and/or a second street address (i.e. Suite B)
states may be abbreviated
zip code could be standard 5 digits or zip+4
there are typos in some instances
UPDATE: In response to the questions posed, standards were not universally followed; I need need to store the individual values, not just geocode and errors means typo (corrected above)
Sample Data:
A. P. Croll & Son 2299 Lewes-Georgetown Hwy, Georgetown, DE 19947
11522 Shawnee Road, Greenwood DE 19950
144 Kings Highway, S.W. Dover, DE 19901
Intergrated Const. Services 2 Penns Way Suite 405 New Castle, DE 19720
Humes Realty 33 Bridle Ridge Court, Lewes, DE 19958
Nichols Excavation 2742 Pulaski Hwy Newark, DE 19711
2284 Bryn Zion Road, Smyrna, DE 19904
VEI Dover Crossroads, LLC 1500 Serpentine Road, Suite 100 Baltimore MD 21
580 North Dupont Highway Dover, DE 19901
P.O. Box 778 Dover, DE 19903

I've done a lot of work on this kind of parsing. Because there are errors you won't get 100% accuracy, but there are a few things you can do to get most of the way there, and then do a visual BS test. Here's the general way to go about it. It's not code, because it's pretty academic to write it, there's no weirdness, just lots of string handling.
(Now that you've posted some sample data, I've made some minor changes)
Work backward. Start from the zip code, which will be near the end, and in one of two known formats: XXXXX or XXXXX-XXXX. If this doesn't appear, you can assume you're in the city, state portion, below.
The next thing, before the zip, is going to be the state, and it'll be either in a two-letter format, or as words. You know what these will be, too -- there's only 50 of them. Also, you could soundex the words to help compensate for spelling errors.
before that is the city, and it's probably on the same line as the state. You could use a zip-code database to check the city and state based on the zip, or at least use it as a BS detector.
The street address will generally be one or two lines. The second line will generally be the suite number if there is one, but it could also be a PO box.
It's going to be near-impossible to detect a name on the first or second line, though if it's not prefixed with a number (or if it's prefixed with an "attn:" or "attention to:" it could give you a hint as to whether it's a name or an address line.
I hope this helps somewhat.

I think outsourcing the problem is the best bet: send it to the Google (or Yahoo) geocoder. The geocoder returns not only the lat/long (which aren't of interest here), but also a rich parsing of the address, with fields filled in that you didn't send (including ZIP+4 and county).
For example, parsing "1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA" yields
{
"name": "1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA, USA",
"Status": {
"code": 200,
"request": "geocode"
},
"Placemark": [
{
"address": "1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA",
"AddressDetails": {
"Country": {
"CountryNameCode": "US",
"AdministrativeArea": {
"AdministrativeAreaName": "CA",
"SubAdministrativeArea": {
"SubAdministrativeAreaName": "Santa Clara",
"Locality": {
"LocalityName": "Mountain View",
"Thoroughfare": {
"ThoroughfareName": "1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy"
},
"PostalCode": {
"PostalCodeNumber": "94043"
}
}
}
}
},
"Accuracy": 8
},
"Point": {
"coordinates": [-122.083739, 37.423021, 0]
}
}
]
}
Now that's parseable!

The original poster has likely long moved on, but I took a stab at porting the Perl Geo::StreetAddress:US module used by geocoder.us to C#, dumped it on CodePlex, and think that people stumbling across this question in the future may find it useful:
US Address Parser
On the project's home page, I try to talk about its (very real) limitations. Since it is not backed by the USPS database of valid street addresses, parsing can be ambiguous and it can't confirm nor deny the validity of a given address. It can just try to pull data out from the string.
It's meant for the case when you need to get a set of data mostly in the right fields, or want to provide a shortcut to data entry (letting users paste an address into a textbox rather than tabbing among multiple fields). It is not meant for verifying the deliverability of an address.
It doesn't attempt to parse out anything above the street line, but one could probably diddle with the regex to get something reasonably close--I'd probably just break it off at the house number.

I've done this in the past.
Either do it manually, (build a nice gui that helps the user do it quickly) or have it automated and check against a recent address database (you have to buy that) and manually handle errors.
Manual handling will take about 10 seconds each, meaning you can do 3600/10 = 360 per hour, so 4000 should take you approximately 11-12 hours. This will give you a high rate of accuracy.
For automation, you need a recent US address database, and tweak your rules against that. I suggest not going fancy on the regex (hard to maintain long-term, so many exceptions). Go for 90% match against the database, do the rest manually.
Do get a copy of Postal Addressing Standards (USPS) at http://pe.usps.gov/cpim/ftp/pubs/Pub28/pub28.pdf and notice it is 130+ pages long. Regexes to implement that would be nuts.
For international addresses, all bets are off. US-based workers would not be able to validate.
Alternatively, use a data service. I have, however, no recommendations.
Furthermore: when you do send out the stuff in the mail (that's what it's for, right?) make sure you put "address correction requested" on the envelope (in the right place) and update the database. (We made a simple gui for the front desk person to do that; the person who actually sorts through the mail)
Finally, when you have scrubbed data, look for duplicates.

After the advice here, I have devised the following function in VB which creates passable, although not always perfect (if a company name and a suite line are given, it combines the suite and city) usable data. Please feel free to comment/refactor/yell at me for breaking one of my own rules, etc.:
Public Function parseAddress(ByVal input As String) As Collection
input = input.Replace(",", "")
input = input.Replace(" ", " ")
Dim splitString() As String = Split(input)
Dim streetMarker() As String = New String() {"street", "st", "st.", "avenue", "ave", "ave.", "blvd", "blvd.", "highway", "hwy", "hwy.", "box", "road", "rd", "rd.", "lane", "ln", "ln.", "circle", "circ", "circ.", "court", "ct", "ct."}
Dim address1 As String
Dim address2 As String = ""
Dim city As String
Dim state As String
Dim zip As String
Dim streetMarkerIndex As Integer
zip = splitString(splitString.Length - 1).ToString()
state = splitString(splitString.Length - 2).ToString()
streetMarkerIndex = getLastIndexOf(splitString, streetMarker) + 1
Dim sb As New StringBuilder
For counter As Integer = streetMarkerIndex To splitString.Length - 3
sb.Append(splitString(counter) + " ")
Next counter
city = RTrim(sb.ToString())
Dim addressIndex As Integer = 0
For counter As Integer = 0 To streetMarkerIndex
If IsNumeric(splitString(counter)) _
Or splitString(counter).ToString.ToLower = "po" _
Or splitString(counter).ToString().ToLower().Replace(".", "") = "po" Then
addressIndex = counter
Exit For
End If
Next counter
sb = New StringBuilder
For counter As Integer = addressIndex To streetMarkerIndex - 1
sb.Append(splitString(counter) + " ")
Next counter
address1 = RTrim(sb.ToString())
sb = New StringBuilder
If addressIndex = 0 Then
If splitString(splitString.Length - 2).ToString() <> splitString(streetMarkerIndex + 1) Then
For counter As Integer = streetMarkerIndex To splitString.Length - 2
sb.Append(splitString(counter) + " ")
Next counter
End If
Else
For counter As Integer = 0 To addressIndex - 1
sb.Append(splitString(counter) + " ")
Next counter
End If
address2 = RTrim(sb.ToString())
Dim output As New Collection
output.Add(address1, "Address1")
output.Add(address2, "Address2")
output.Add(city, "City")
output.Add(state, "State")
output.Add(zip, "Zip")
Return output
End Function
Private Function getLastIndexOf(ByVal sArray As String(), ByVal checkArray As String()) As Integer
Dim sourceIndex As Integer = 0
Dim outputIndex As Integer = 0
For Each item As String In checkArray
For Each source As String In sArray
If source.ToLower = item.ToLower Then
outputIndex = sourceIndex
If item.ToLower = "box" Then
outputIndex = outputIndex + 1
End If
End If
sourceIndex = sourceIndex + 1
Next
sourceIndex = 0
Next
Return outputIndex
End Function
Passing the parseAddress function "A. P. Croll & Son 2299 Lewes-Georgetown Hwy, Georgetown, DE 19947" returns:
2299 Lewes-Georgetown Hwy
A. P. Croll & Son
Georgetown
DE
19947

I've been working in the address processing domain for about 5 years now, and there really is no silver bullet. The correct solution is going to depend on the value of the data. If it's not very valuable, throw it through a parser as the other answers suggest. If it's even somewhat valuable you'll definitely need to have a human evaluate/correct all the results of the parser. If you're looking for a fully automated, repeatable solution, you probably want to talk to a address correction vendor like Group1 or Trillium.

SmartyStreets has a new feature that extracts addresses from arbitrary input strings. (Note: I don't work at SmartyStreets.)
It successfully extracted all addresses from the sample input given in the question above. (By the way, only 9 of those 10 addresses are valid.)
Here's some of the output:
And here's the CSV-formatted output of that same request:
ID,Start,End,Segment,Verified,Candidate,Firm,FirstLine,SecondLine,LastLine,City,State,ZIPCode,County,DpvFootnotes,DeliveryPointBarcode,Active,Vacant,CMRA,MatchCode,Latitude,Longitude,Precision,RDI,RecordType,BuildingDefaultIndicator,CongressionalDistrict,Footnotes
1,32,79,"2299 Lewes-Georgetown Hwy, Georgetown, DE 19947",N,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
2,81,119,"11522 Shawnee Road, Greenwood DE 19950",Y,0,,11522 Shawnee Rd,,Greenwood DE 19950-5209,Greenwood,DE,19950,Sussex,AABB,199505209226,Y,N,N,Y,38.82865,-75.54907,Zip9,Residential,S,,AL,N#
3,121,160,"144 Kings Highway, S.W. Dover, DE 19901",Y,0,,144 Kings Hwy,,Dover DE 19901-7308,Dover,DE,19901,Kent,AABB,199017308444,Y,N,N,Y,39.16081,-75.52377,Zip9,Commercial,S,,AL,L#
4,190,232,"2 Penns Way Suite 405 New Castle, DE 19720",Y,0,,2 Penns Way Ste 405,,New Castle DE 19720-2407,New Castle,DE,19720,New Castle,AABB,197202407053,Y,N,N,Y,39.68332,-75.61043,Zip9,Commercial,H,,AL,N#
5,247,285,"33 Bridle Ridge Court, Lewes, DE 19958",Y,0,,33 Bridle Ridge Cir,,Lewes DE 19958-8961,Lewes,DE,19958,Sussex,AABB,199588961338,Y,N,N,Y,38.72749,-75.17055,Zip7,Residential,S,,AL,L#
6,306,339,"2742 Pulaski Hwy Newark, DE 19711",Y,0,,2742 Pulaski Hwy,,Newark DE 19702-3911,Newark,DE,19702,New Castle,AABB,197023911421,Y,N,N,Y,39.60328,-75.75869,Zip9,Commercial,S,,AL,A#
7,341,378,"2284 Bryn Zion Road, Smyrna, DE 19904",Y,0,,2284 Bryn Zion Rd,,Smyrna DE 19977-3895,Smyrna,DE,19977,Kent,AABB,199773895840,Y,N,N,Y,39.23937,-75.64065,Zip7,Residential,S,,AL,A#N#
8,406,450,"1500 Serpentine Road, Suite 100 Baltimore MD",Y,0,,1500 Serpentine Rd Ste 100,,Baltimore MD 21209-2034,Baltimore,MD,21209,Baltimore,AABB,212092034250,Y,N,N,Y,39.38194,-76.65856,Zip9,Commercial,H,,03,N#
9,455,495,"580 North Dupont Highway Dover, DE 19901",Y,0,,580 N DuPont Hwy,,Dover DE 19901-3961,Dover,DE,19901,Kent,AABB,199013961803,Y,N,N,Y,39.17576,-75.5241,Zip9,Commercial,S,,AL,N#
10,497,525,"P.O. Box 778 Dover, DE 19903",Y,0,,PO Box 778,,Dover DE 19903-0778,Dover,DE,19903,Kent,AABB,199030778781,Y,N,N,Y,39.20946,-75.57012,Zip5,Residential,P,,AL,
I was the developer who originally wrote the service. The algorithm we implemented is a bit different from any specific answers here, but each extracted address is verified against the address lookup API, so you can be sure if it's valid or not. Each verified result is guaranteed, but we know the other results won't be perfect because, as has been made abundantly clear in this thread, addresses are unpredictable, even for humans sometimes.

This won't solve your problem, but if
you only needed lat/long data for
these addresses, the Google Maps API
will parse non-formatted addresses
pretty well.
Good suggestion, alternatively you can execute a CURL request for each address to Google Maps and it will return the properly formatted address. From that, you can regex to your heart's content.

+1 on James A. Rosen's suggested solution as it has worked well for me, however for completists this site is a fascinating read and the best attempt I've seen in documenting addresses worldwide: http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/postal.html

Are there any standards at all in the way that the addresses are recorded? For example:
Are there always commas or new-lines separating street1 from street2 from city from state from zip?
Are address types (road, street, boulevard, etc) always spelled out? always abbreviated? Some of each?
Define "error".
My general answer is a series of Regular Expressions, though the complexity of this depends on the answer. And if there is no consistency at all, then you may only be able to achieve partial success with a Regex (ie: filtering out zip code and state) and will have to do the rest by hand (or at least go through the rest very carefully to make sure you spot the errors).

Another request for sample data.
As has been mentioned I would work backwards from the zip.
Once you have a zip I would query a zip database, store the results, and remove them & the zip from the string.
That will leave you with the address mess. MOST (All?) addresses will start with a number so find the first occurrence of a number in the remaining string and grab everything from it to the (new) end of the string. That will be your address. Anything to the left of that number is likely an addressee.
You should now have the City, State, & Zip stored in a table and possibly two strings, addressee and address. For the address, check for the existence of "Suite" or "Apt." etc. and split that into two values (address lines 1 & 2).
For the addressee I would punt and grab the last word of that string as the last name and put the rest into the first name field. If you don't want to do that, you'll need to check for salutation (Mr., Ms., Dr., etc.) at the start and make some assumptions based on the number of spaces as to how the name is made up.
I don't think there's any way you can parse with 100% accuracy.

Try www.address-parser.com. We use their web service, which you can test online

Based on the sample data:
I would start at the end of the string. Parse a Zip-code (either format). Read end to first space. If no Zip Code was found Error.
Trim the end then for spaces and special chars (commas)
Then move on to State, again use the Space as the delimiter. Maybe use a lookup list to validate 2 letter state codes, and full state names. If no valid state found, error.
Trim spaces and commas from the end again.
City gets tricky, I would actually use a comma here, at the risk of getting too much data in the city. Look for the comma, or beginning of the line.
If you still have chars left in the string, shove all of that into an address field.
This isn't perfect, but it should be a pretty good starting point.

If it's human entered data, then you'll spend too much time trying to code around the exceptions.
Try:
Regular expression to extract the zip code
Zip code lookup (via appropriate government DB) to get the correct address
Get an intern to manually verify the new data matches the old

This won't solve your problem, but if you only needed lat/long data for these addresses, the Google Maps API will parse non-formatted addresses pretty well.

RecogniContact is a Windows COM object that parses US and European addresses. You can try it right on
http://www.loquisoft.com/index.php?page=8

You might want to check this out!! http://jgeocoder.sourceforge.net/parser.html
Worked like a charm for me.

This type of problem is hard to solve because of underlying ambiguities in the data.
Here is a Perl based solution that defines a recursive descent grammar tree based on regular expressions to parse many valid combination of street addresses: http://search.cpan.org/~kimryan/Lingua-EN-AddressParse-1.20/lib/Lingua/EN/AddressParse.pm . This includes sub properties within an address such as:
12 1st Avenue N Suite # 2 Somewhere CA 12345 USA
It is similar to http://search.cpan.org/~timb/Geo-StreetAddress-US-1.03/US.pm mentioned above, but also works for addresses that are not from the USA, such as the UK, Australia and Canada.
Here is the output for one of your sample addresses. Note that the name section would need to be removed first from "A. P. Croll & Son 2299 Lewes-Georgetown Hwy, Georgetown, DE 19947" to reduce it to "2299 Lewes-Georgetown Hwy, Georgetown, DE 19947". This is easily achieved by removing all data up to the first number found in the string.
Non matching part ''
Error '0'
Error descriptions ''
Case all '2299 Lewes-Georgetown Hwy Georgetown DE 19947'
COMPONENTS ''
country ''
po_box_type ''
post_box ''
post_code '19947'
pre_cursor ''
property_identifier '2299'
property_name ''
road_box ''
street 'Lewes-Georgetown'
street_direction ''
street_type 'Hwy'
sub_property_identifier ''
subcountry 'DE'
suburb 'Georgetown'

Since there is chance of error in word, think about using SOUNDEX combined with LCS algorithm to compare strings, this will help a lot !

using google API
$d=str_replace(" ", "+", $address_url);
$completeurl ="http://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/geocode/xml?address=".$d."&sensor=true";
$phpobject = simplexml_load_file($completeurl);
print_r($phpobject);

For ruby or rails developers there is a nice gem available called street_address.
I have been using this on one of my project and it does the work I need.
The only Issue I had was whenever an address is in this format P. O. Box 1410 Durham, NC 27702 it returned nil and therefore I had to replace "P. O. Box" with '' and after this it were able to parse it.

There are data services that given a zip code will give you list of street names in that zip code.
Use a regex to extract Zip or City State - find the correct one or if a error get both.
pull the list of streets from a data source Correct the city and state, and then street address. Once you get a valid Address line 1, city, state, and zip you can then make assumptions on address line 2..3

I don't know HOW FEASIBLE this would be, but I haven't seen this mentioned so I thought I would go ahead and suggest this:
If you are strictly in the US... get a huge database of all zip codes, states, cities and streets. Now look for these in your addresses. You can validate what you find by testing if, say, the city you found exists in the state you found, or by checking if the street you found exists in the city you found. If not, chances are John isn't for John's street, but is the name of the addressee... Basically, get the most information you can and check your addresses against it.
An extreme example would be to get A LIST OF ALL THE ADDRESSES IN THE US OF A and then find which one has the most relevant match to each of your addresses...

There is javascript port of perl Geo::StreetAddress::US package: https://github.com/hassansin/parse-address . It's regex-based and works fairly well.

Related

FuzzyWuzzy for very similar records in Python

I have a dataset with which I want to find the closest string match. For that purpose I'm using FuzzyWuzzy in this way
sol=process.extract(t,dev2,scorer=fuzz.token_sort_ratio)
Where t is the string and dev2 is the list to compare to. My problem is that sometimes it has very similar records and options provided by FuzzyWuzzy seems to be lacking. And I've tested with token_sort, token_set, partial_token sort and set, ratio, partial_ratio, and WRatio.
For example, the string Italy - Serie A gives me the following 2 closest matches.
Token_sort_ratio: (92, 'Italy - Serie D');(86, 'Italian - Serie A')
The one wanted is obviously the second one, but character by character is closer the first one, which is a different league.
This happens as well with teams. If, let's say I have a string Buchtholz I would obtains Buchtholz II before I get TSV Buchtholz.
My main guess now would be to try and weight the presence and absence of several characters more heavily, like single capital letters at the end of the string, so if there is a difference in the letter or an absence it is weighted as less close. Or for () and special characters.
I don't know if there is a way to take this into account or you guys have a better approach to get the string that really matches.
Similarity matches often require knowledge of the data being analysed. i.e. it is not just a blind single round of matching. I recommend that you pass your results through more steps of matching, starting with inclusive/optimistic approaches (like token_set_ratio) with low cut off scores and working toward more exclusive/pessimistic approaches with higher cut off scores until you have a clear winner. If you know more about the text you're analyzing, you can even modify the strings as you progress.
In a case I worked on, I did similarity matches of goods movement descriptions. In the descriptions the numbers sequences were more important than the text. e.g. when looking for a match for "SLURRY VALVE 250MM RAGMAX 2000" the 250 and 2000 part of the string are important, otherwise I get a "SLURRY VALVE 50MM RAGMAX 2000" as the best match instead of "VALVE B/F 250MM,RAGMAX 250RAG2000 RAGON" which is a better result.
I put the similarity match process through two steps: 1. Get a bunch of similar matches using an optimistic matching scorer (token_set_ratio) 2. get the number sequences of these results and pass them through another round of matching with a more strict scorer (token_sort_ratio). Doing this gave me the better result in the example I showed above.
Below is some blocks of code that could be of assistance:
here's a function to get numbers from the sequence. (In your case you might use this to exclude numbers from your string instead?)
def get_numbers_from_string(description):
numbers = ''.join((ch if ch in '0123456789.-' else ' ') for ch in description)
numbers = ' '.join([nr for nr in numbers.split()])
return numbers
and here is a portion of the code I used to put the description match through two rounds:
try:
# get close match from goods move that has material numbers
df_material = pd.DataFrame(process.extract(description,
corpus_material,
scorer=fuzz.token_set_ratio),
columns=['Similar Text','Score']
)
if df_material['Score'][df_material['Score']>=cut_off_accuracy_materials].count()>=1:
similar_text = df_material['Similar Text'].iloc[0]
score = df_material['Score'].iloc[0]
if nr_description_numbers>4:
# if there are multiple matches found, then get best number combination match
df_material = df_material[df_material['Score']>=cut_off_accuracy_materials]
new_corpus = list(df_material['Similar Text'])
new_corpus = np.vectorize(get_numbers_from_string)(new_corpus)
df_material['numbers'] = new_corpus
df_numbers = pd.DataFrame(process.extract(description_numbers,
new_corpus,
scorer=fuzz.token_sort_ratio),
columns=['numbers','Score']
)
similar_text = df_material['Similar Text'][df_material['numbers']==df_numbers['numbers'].iloc[0]].iloc[0]
nr_score = df_numbers['Score'].iloc[0]
hope it helps, and good luck

Lists in formula in Lotus Notes - trying to update each element

I have a multi-value field where users are able to enter multiple values. The field is a Name value field which holds the users email address. I am wanting to have the email address listed as the user's internet address and not as their organization unit/organization address.
Initially it appears as "Jane Doe/Sales/USA" and I want to have it listed as Jane.Doe#crown.com
This field will hold multivalues so it could be Jane Doe/Sales/USA; Fred Smith/Sales/KNC; Tom Jones/Accounting/ING
First off, is there a way of getting the internet address to be listed from the names field? I tried a couple of things that were supposedly going to display the internet address, but it didn't work.
I had a previous single value field and used the following formula to display it as an internet address:
Here is the formula I used. Hold Name listed the users name as their first name and last name.
HoldingLeft := #Left(HoldName; " ");
HoldingRight := #Right(HoldName; " ");
CompleteName := (HoldingLeft + "." + HoldingRight + "#newplace.com");
CompleteName
Since I am not familiar with lists in formula language, what is the best way to get the result I am wanting.
Your comments are appreciated.
Thank you,
Jean
This is a way to convert the fully qualified names into email addresses:
#If(FieldWithNames = "";
"";
#Replace(#Name([CN]; FieldWithNames); " "; ".") + "#newplace.com")
Assuming the names field is called FieldWithNames then we first test if it's empty. If yes we return an empty string. If no we convert the list of fully qualified names to a list of names only. Then we replace all spaces with "." and add the domain. We are lucky because #Name and #Replace can deal with lists.
This is a way to read the internet email addresses from directory for fully qualified names:
#If(FieldWithNames = "";
"";
#NameLookup([Exhaustive]; FieldWithNames; 'InternetAddress'))
We are lucky again as #NameLookup accepts as second parameter a list. It reads for every entry the internet email address from directory and returns the result as list.
In other cases, you might have to handle every entry of a list separately. Then you'd use #Transform(list; "variable"; [code doing stuff with variable])

Tell if specific char in string is a long char or a short char

Be prepared, this is one of those hard questions.
In Farsi or Persian language ی which sounds like y or i and is written in 4 different shapes according to it's place in word. I'll call ی as YA from now for simplification.
take a look at this image
All YA characters are painted in red, in the first word YA is attached to it's previous (right , in Farsi we right from RIGHT to LEFT) character and is free at the end whereas the last YA (3rd word, left-most red char) is free both from left or right.
Having said this long story, I want to find out if a part of a string ends with long YA (YA without points) or short YA (YA with two points beneath it).
i.e تحصیلداری (the 3rd word) ends with long YA but تحصیـ which is a part of 3rd word does not ends with short YA.
Question: How can I say تحصیلداری ends whit which unicode? I just have a simple string, "تحصیلداری", how can I convert its characters to unicode?
I tried the unicodes
string unicodes = "";
foreach (char c in "تحصیلداری")
{
unicodes += c+" "+((int)c).ToString() + Environment.NewLine;
}
MessageBox.Show(unicodes);
result :
but at the end of the day unfortunately all YAs have the same unicode.
Bad news : YA was an example, a real one though. There are also a dozen of other characters like YA with different appearances too.
Additional info :
using this useful link about unicodes I found unicode of different YAs
We solved similar problem the way bellow:
We had a core banking application, the customer sub-system needed a full text search on customers name, family, father name etc.
Different encoding, legacy migrated data, keyboard layouts and Farsi fonts ... made search process inaccurate.
We overcame the problem by replacing problematic characters with some standard one and saving the standard string for search purpose.
After several iterations, the replacement is as bellow that may come in handy:
Formula="UPPER(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE
(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE
(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE
(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE
(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE
(REPLACE(FirsName || LastName || FatherName,
chr(32),''),
chr(13),''),
chr(9),''),
chr(10),''),
'-',''),
'-',''),
'آ','ا'),
'أ', 'ا'),
'ئ', 'ي'),
'ي', 'ي'),
'ك', 'ک'),
'آإئؤةي','اايوهي'),
'ء',''),
'شأل','شاال'),
'ا.','اله'),
'.',''),
'الله','اله'),
'ؤ','و'),
'إ','ا'),
'ة','ه'),
' ا لله','اله'),
'ا لله','اله'),
' ا لله','اله'))"
Despite there are different YEHs in Unicode, it must noticed that all presentation forms of YEHs are same Unicode character with code 0x06cc. You can not determine presentation forms by their Unicode code.
But you can reach your goal be checking to see what characters is before or after YEH.
You can also use Fardis to see Unicode codes of strings.

Comparring a string with a manually added string

If have been cracking my head over this for a week now:
We have an assignment, where we have 2 options in our program, with option 1, the program asks for a name and a date, and then it generates an email addressed to the give name, with that date.
The second option, we have to paste text in to program, and it will tell us if the 'template' from option 1 is used or not, and it gives you the name, and date.
my question is now: how do I compare the given string, with the manual input string and make that name, and date (could be 2nd of oktober, could be 10/02, could be sunday the 2nd, basically anything that isn't the same as the template) and still make it say the template matches?
I thought: cutting the strings up, comparing them, word for word, but then what? and how?
Since I do not know what language you are programming in, I will give you some examples of what you ask in the languages I know.
Python(2.7):
x = raw_input('Manual String') // get user input, this can be replaced
y = 'this is a string: '+ str(x) // use Str incase of a number or other format of x.
if(y == 'this is a string: doubleo'):
print "The strings are equal!"
C:
use this page:
http://www.tutorialspoint.com/ansi_c/c_strcmp.htm

Is there any way when I choose an option not to clear previously typed data in the input

The problem is this:
In my programme at first the user gets options for a first name - so hopefully he likes something from the options and he chooses it -so far everything is OK!
But then when he types space he starts receiving options for second name and a if he likes something and chooses it - then the Autocomplete just erases the first name. Is there any way I can change that?
hello Rich thank you very much or your response - now i've decided to change my task and here is what I made when a user types for example I character i get all the first names that start with I- so far no problem! ANd when he types the white space and K for example I make request to my web service that gets the middle names that starts with K or the last names that start with K (one of them should start with K for Iwelina), so in this case for Iwelina Ive got RADULSKA KOSEWA and KOSEWA NEDEWA! For the source of autocomplete I concatenate iwelina with (radulska kosewa)and iwelina with (KOSEWA NEDEWA) so at the end I've got IWELINA IELINA RADULSKA KOSEWA and IWELINA KOSEWA NEDEWA!!! the only problem is that when i type Iwelina K i get only IWELINA KOSEWA NEDEWA!!!here is the code for autocomlete
$('#input').autocomplete({
source: function(request, response) {
var matcher = new RegExp( $.ui.autocomplete.escapeRegex(request.term, " "));
var data = $.grep( srcAutoComp, function(value) {
return matcher.test( value.label || value.value || value );
});
response(data);
}
});
if you know how i can change it I will be glad for the help
I don't understand how, when the user begines to type the second name, he's getting results that are only the last name. For example, if he types "Joh" and selects "John" from the options, and then continues to type "John Do", then how is it possible that your drop down gives him results for only the last name, like "Doe"?
At any rate, assuming this is truly happening, you could just combine all combinations of first and last names in your source data and that will show "John Doe" in the drop down when the user types "Joh" selects "John" and then continues to type "John Do".
Another way to do this is with a complicated change to the search and response events to search after a space if it is there, and recombine it with the first string after the search for the last name is complete. If you give me your source data, I could put something together for this.

Resources