I have an installed P4-server for Windows 10 for personally usage.
Now I want to include my friend to my project and want to let my p4 server be visible to the public internet.
Now everyone is allowed to create new users, they just need the ip and port to access to create new users and get access to all files..
Is it possible to disable the "New..." in the p4 "Open Connection" dialog?
There are two methods, both of which can only be done by an admin (super user).
Set up your protection table to ensure that only explicitly named users have permission to run any command that would entail user creation. This is easily done by replacing any user * lines in p4 protect with group * and making sure that all existing users are in a group.
Set dm.user.noautocreate to 2 so that users can only be created by a superuser.
I prefer (1) because it potentially allows you to delegate user creation to (non-admin) group owners, but (2) is sometimes preferred by admins who have a wide-open protection table and don't want to have to think about managing it at all.
Related
I've a requirement, where I need to add a few users from the UI. I'm working with "developer" access to the project in GitLab. Even if already a few users are added with different access while the project is created and only users added from the UI to perform developer role without making any changes in the project.
Is it possible and how to implement it?
"Overwriting" permissions is not possible and if you want to simulate this behavior you could create a new group and share this project with another group. Then you would need to deny access to individual group members. See this permission matrix.
Is it be possible to have a common ACL rule to the list of users? basically this rule will be for the mail access (read and write documents with no access)).We would able to achieve it my managing the ACL at a point of time. But later if any new user is onboarded, is it possible to force to be with the same ACL. Suggestions please..
If you want to create a set of standard ACL entries you can do so by creating ACL entries in the design template with names in square brackets.
For example an entry named [StandardUsers] in the ACL of the template will result in an entry named StandardUsers (presumably a group) with the same roles and access level in any new database based on that template.
Such an addition to the ACL of the template will not affect existing databases.
Here is the solution in detail.
First of all create the user who acts as a service account.
In domino administrator configuration--> files --> select the users apart from the service account. Right click --> manage --> manage ACL.
Add the service account user there. select person (right side combo box 1) No access (combo box 2). Select the 2 check boxes below(read and write options).
We want a policy whereby permissions must be managed through sharepoint groups. We want to allow site owners to add and remove users from groups in order to manage their permissions to resources, but we don't want them to be able to create the groups or to add user's explicitely to the resource. Is this possible? I don't see any permissions that relate to restricting explicit access to a resource as opposed to access via a group, but I could be overlooking something.
No, this is not possible out of the box. Either a user is able to manage permissions or not, there is no more granular settings to only allow managing in groups.
Unfortunately there also isn't an event receiver you could use e.g. PermissionAdded or PermissionModified, so the only way for you to check these things would be to write a timer job which checks every X minutes whether anything has changed you didn't want to change. Or another possibility is to not allow users to manage permissions, but write your own permission manager which only allows working with groups. Then you could use RunWithElevatedPriviliges to perform your actions.
I'm trying to secure an MS Access 2003 mdb using the workgroup security. I've got most of it set up (using a new MDW etc), but I can't stop people creating new tables in the database, if they've got access to open it. Am I missing something?
None of the accounts have any permissions allowed, I'm doing it all through groups.
Users only have Open\Run access to the database, no access to <New Tables/Queries> and only "Read Data" access on all the other tables, including the MSys* tables.
Any thoughts or am I trying to do the impossible?
--Update--
I've tried using the wizard as suggested, but that still leaves me with the same problem. I created a blank database & ran the wizard on it. Assigned 2 users, Me & User, and removed all access to the standard groups. I added Me into the Admin group & User to the Read Only group.
Not using the MDW denies access, as expected. Logging in as Me allows full access (Design things, add data, delete data, etc), logging in as User will allow read data inexisting tables, but not add data or design them (as expected), but it will still allow creation of a new table, which User will then have full access to add, delete etc.
So, over a year after posting this question, I have another go at solving it, but his time with success!
I came across the Microsoft Accesss Permissions Explorer and this showed that the standard ways of securing the database, both manually and using the wizard still give the Users group explicit Create permsissions on the Tabes Container. This same software also allows the revoking of said permissions, so now I can have a fully secured database, where any user can access the mdb without using a special MDB, but they are only able to access and edit the data I want them to.
Can your users use the runtime version of msAccess? They will not have the ability to create any new Access object, such as table, query, form, etc.
And runtime version is free, so you'll also spare on licences!
I would like to create a folder that users who do not have privileges to view the rest of the site can see. This user group would be granted access to the site, but I only want them to be able to view one particular page.
Is this possible to do without going to every single page and removing the new user group's access?
yeah, you should be able to create a new group and add the users to that list/subweb/whatever and just that. This is assuming that you didn't grant access to all users somewhere. If you did, then hopefully the default access is granted to a default user group (like sharepoint visitors) and you can alter that group to exclude the users you only want to access the limited part of the site.
If created correctly the new group shouldn't have access to the rest of the site.
If you are getting thrown off by the fact that the user/group is listed as having "Limited Access" on the ACLs on, say, the parent site/web. That's just a placeholder SharePoint uses to make sure people have access to at least the bare minimum set of objects (e.g. theme and other UI files and the parent web itself) to get to the list or item you actually want them to have access to.
As long as the group only has access on a single list, you should have to worry about them having access to anything else.